Re: Future of Chaos Calmer

On Fri, 6 May 2016, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote: On 05/05/2016 21:30:56 CEST, David Lang wrote: On Thu, 5 May 2016, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote: Hello, I'd like to know if there are any plans for Chaos Calmer? Will it become mantained by LEDE? almost certinly not. But LEDE will create

Re: Future of Chaos Calmer

On 05/05/2016 21:30:56 CEST, David Lang wrote: On Thu, 5 May 2016, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote: Hello, I'd like to know if there are any plans for Chaos Calmer? Will it become mantained by LEDE? almost certinly not. But LEDE will create their own release to replace it. Okay, it would be

Re: project goals

On 05/05/2016 10:03 PM, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > On 05/05/2016 04:09 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> I think we should encourage everyone to upstream the patches, I think in >> one of the statics I saw that OpenWrt ranked 3. or 4. in contribution to >> the kernel among the Linux distributions before

How can I help?

I have been following the OpenWrt list for a while now and have been active with OpenWrt for my own internal use since 2013. I have wanted to become publicly active with open source embedded Linux for a while but have not been able to figure out how to do so. I initially thought this OpenWrt

Re: Introducing the LEDE project

On 2016-05-05 20:22, mbm wrote: > On 5/5/2016 7:40 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> Many of the changes that we previously tried to introduce were often >> squashed by internal disagreements. Resulting discussions often turned >> toxic quickly and led to nothing being done to address the issues. >>

Re: [RFC] A change to the way packages are built

David Lang - 10:41 5.05.16 wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2016, Michal Hrusecky wrote: > > > David Lang - 18:20 4.05.16 wrote: > > > Debian has ... > > > > Just for the sake of discussion and inspiration, how openSUSE does it's > > rolling > > release. We have OBS, which is server software, connected

Re: [RFC] A change to the way packages are built

On 16-05-05 01:57 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> Basically one builds a minimal SDK and does kind of like Debian where a >> git commit to a package kicks of a build of pristine environment which >> builds only the package and it's dependencies. > > I've set up a two-phase buildbot

Web forums for LEDE

Given that many people strongly prefer web forums, I assume that LEDE is going to set them up at some point. I would like to get a request in early that the web forms that get setup be cross-connected with mailing lists. Not just for 'something new has happened' the way the OpenWRT forms are,

[PATCH 3/3] toolchain: rename OpenWrt into Lede

Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens --- target/toolchain/Config.in | 6 +++--- target/toolchain/files/README.TOOLCHAIN | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/toolchain/Config.in b/target/toolchain/Config.in index 5a6ecef..e377c20

Re: [LEDE-DEV] List Prefix

On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 14:12 -0300, Fernando Frediani wrote: > Come on. It´s not a big thing and it helps some people to organize > their mailboxes in the way they prefer. > We are talking about just 10 extra characters ! You are right. It isn't a big thing. It's just 10 extra characters. But

Re: Introducing the LEDE project

Hi Mike, thank you for reaching out to us and for your interest in addressing these issues. On 2016-05-04 21:01, mbm wrote: > Dear OpenWrt community, > > It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we read > about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was no

Suggestion: apply for the Linux Foundation CII program

Hello: It sounds like this project would be a good candidate for CII support (see https://www.coreinfrastructure.org/grants). The state of security on consumer-grade wireless routers is overall very poor, and I believe you will have no trouble getting CII to offer support in getting some

Re: project goals

On 05/04/2016 11:49 PM, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/05/2016 22:30:40 CEST, Bert Vermeulen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Very happy to see this project reboot happening. An acknowledgement of >> the issues facing OpenWRT was long overdue. I'd like some clarity on >> some things that

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

> It kinda makes sense, although it would be even nicer if the tests > were automated as well. That is something that Purple is working on. > There is a BoardFarm[1] test framework that is designed to test > routers and there could be created test suites that reflects some of > the criteria you

[PATCH] ramips: introduce serial0 aliases for active console in dts

This patch introduces serial0 aliases in the ramips DTS files, which can then be used to denote the active console instead of relying on bootargs. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Galabov --- target/linux/ramips/dts/LINKIT7688.dts | 4 target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620a.dtsi | 3

Re: Contacting Felix

On 2016-05-05 04:54, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > Hey, > > Could you let Felix know I wanted to apologize to him for getting upset > previously on the openwrt list, because of situations he is obviously > also frustrated with? > > I can't reach him because n...@openwrt.org bounces and I don't have

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

On 05/05/2016 08:56 AM, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow > community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report > the results some place. after some time thinking of different ways to do > this I came up with one

Re: [LEDE-DEV] List Prefix

On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 01:37 -0700, David Lang wrote: > > > can this be turned on by subscribers manually for their subscription or > > is there only one global option ? for the list ? > > I'm pretty sure it's a list-wide option. Indeed. There are plenty of things that individual subscribers can

Re: List subject prefix?

On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 10:23 +0300, Hannu Nyman wrote: > On 5.5.2016 9:59, David Woodhouse wrote: > > It's the Mailman default, but it is deliberately disabled on this list > > (as on many other technical lists where the members are expected to be > > able to drive their email client properly). >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] List Prefix

On Thu, 5 May 2016, John Crispin wrote: On 05/05/2016 10:14, David Woodhouse wrote: On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 08:13 +0200, John Crispin wrote: Hi David, some folks would prefer to have the prefix on the 2 lists. I just had a look in the mailman settings and failed to quickly spot the location

Re: [RFC] A change to the way packages are built

David Lang - 18:20 4.05.16 wrote: > Debian has ... Just for the sake of discussion and inspiration, how openSUSE does it's rolling release. We have OBS, which is server software, connected to multiple builders. It has projects and in those projects packages. Packages can have sources somewhere

Re: [LEDE-DEV] List Prefix

On 05/05/2016 10:14, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 08:13 +0200, John Crispin wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> some folks would prefer to have the prefix on the 2 lists. I just had a >> look in the mailman settings and failed to quickly spot the location >> where this can be

Re: [LEDE-DEV] List Prefix

On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 08:13 +0200, John Crispin wrote: > > Hi David, > > some folks would prefer to have the prefix on the 2 lists. I just had a > look in the mailman settings and failed to quickly spot the location > where this can be achieved. Ick, they really ought to be able to handle that

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

John Crispin - 9:39 5.05.16 wrote: > > > On 05/05/2016 09:10, Michal Hrusecky wrote: > > John Crispin - 8:56 5.05.16 wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow > >> community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report > >>

Re: Proposal to sign all commits

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05.05.16 10:08, David Lang wrote: > In an environment where the vast majority of people are unknown, > and any signing they are doing involves no liability, and no > assurance that the person is who they claim to be (other than > claiming to

Re: List subject prefix?

On 5.5.2016 9:59, David Woodhouse wrote: It's the Mailman default, but it is deliberately disabled on this list (as on many other technical lists where the members are expected to be able to drive their email client properly). That sounds pretty funny on 2010s when most of us use multiple

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

John Crispin - 8:56 5.05.16 wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow > community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report > the results some place. after some time thinking of different ways to do > this I came up with one possible

Re: List subject prefix?

On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 17:31 -0400, Aaron Z wrote: > On many (most?) mailing lists, there is a prefix on all subjects > which has the list name (such as [OpenWRT-Devel]) > Can this prefix be added for this list (or is that an option that I > missed when I signed up)? It's the Mailman default, but

Re: [LEDE-DEV] List Prefix

On 27/04/2016 10:47, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 26/04/2016 18:51, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 17:16 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >>> This is just a test, please ignore. >> >> Hm, I thought I fixed the stupid mailman default when I set up the >> list, to remove the