s out when it hits a limit?
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
given that 4.4.114 added meltdown/spectrefixes, shouldn't we move to it?
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
that's mostly a question to direct at the upstream software sources. only a
small portion of things are written by the LEDE team
SPDX is mostly useful for people wanting to fork or extract code from opensource
projects, not for the project writing the code
David Lang
On Thu, 9 Nov
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, John Crispin wrote:
you can probably drop the validation. if the users passes 9 as a
priority everything will be logged. passing -1 will cause silent logging.
you should do limit checks and cap the internal value to the limit, otherwise
you have to do more work for each lo
17.01 is pointer to a particular commit on the master branch
I haven't looked at the specific method used for the r# generation, but I think
it's incremented daily
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mail
t hash.
LEDE makes fewer official release candidates and the nightly snapshots are just
that.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, Hans Dedecker wrote:
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Hans Dedecker [2017-11-03 13:46:14]:
Hi,
By default dropbear logs to syslog which discloses info about account names
when doing connection attempts (e.g. "Bad password attempt for 'engineer'
from
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
* Port the generic patches
what are the 'generic patches' and is there an effort to get them upstream so
that they don't need to be ported in each release?
* Make all the out of tree modules work with it
is there any work being done to make these
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
It's tempting to set it to 1 (like I have for the past year+) and be damned
:-)
So what is the failure mode and how will people who experience failures know
what they need to change?
David
note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to be a LTS
kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on that if possible.
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listin
the vote on the name was held several months ago, please stop trying to re-do
the vote just because it didn't come out the way you wanted it to.
k
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-d
ually passionate in the other direction, while still others are
less passionate.
But the vote is the vote, and stating how passionate you are on one side or
another doesn't alter the vote.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradea
unity'? how do you determin who would be
allowed to vote? how would you prevent voter fraud from people who have very
strong opinions?
David Lang
P.S. the people who voted, including those who have strong opinions against the
name OpenWRT are not disputing the vote, w
The original post in this thread listed the remaining items to be
done/decided for a remerge.
David Lang
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Fernando Frediani wrote:
If the majority voted for the name OpenWRT what's the remaining issue then ?
Fernando
On 12 May 2017 23:40, "David Lang"
east consider voting on "should the merged project
be called OpenWrt" before the final decision on the name of the merged
project is made.
they already voted on exactly that question.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
ge OpenWRT/LEDE user base' was not part of the vote, both LEDE and
OpenWRT limit the vote to a fairly small set of people who contribute to the
code (very common in opensource projects. I don't know of any who allow the user
base to vote on project infrastructure)
David Lang
I also
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Edwin,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:02:36AM +0200, Edwin van Drunen wrote:
As a long time user of OpenWRT and recent “LEDE convert” I would also like to
chime in on the naming and branding of the post-merge project.
My employer and several of my indu
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Stijn Segers wrote:
David Lang wrote:
The (soon to be former) LEDE developers don't want @openwrt.org addresses,
so
providing a way to not break the existing addresses and not giving out new
ones
doesn't seem like it is upsetting to any of the developers.
m as source addresses for
performing acts on behalf of openwrt.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
would have to comply with these rules?
or are they outsiders (I am an outsider)
David Lang
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 04:09:31 +
From: Eric Luehrsen
Cc: LEDE Development List
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal
I read this on
een taking place have included discussions on
the rules. If there are OpenWRT devs that are unhappy with the LEDE rules, I
would be expecting them to be speaking up in these discussions, and not in
general terms, but with what they specifically are unhappy with.
It almost sounds like you are tr
s, then you really aren't part of the
project any longer.
All it takes is changing the word "Committers" to "Contributers".
The existing method of giving programmers commit/voting privileges will work
just as well for non-programmers (i.
ogress and look forward to the remerge happening.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
May I suggest that you talk directly rather than through the mailing list?
David Lang
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, lede-proj...@bepo.de wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:51:21 +0200
From: "lede-proj...@bepo.de"
To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] [AD] support me hacking
Just a note in case you were not aware, json-c is not thread-safe (the rsyslog
project forked it to libfastjson to fix the thread safety and drastically
improve speed)
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:10:57 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli
To: lede-dev@lists
and/or
stderr capturing either per-script and/or globally
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
result
would greatly multiply the size of the downloaded page, not nice to users.
This change seems reasonable to me.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
The kernel already includes facilities for signing modules, if you are looking
for a way to sign and verify things, it seems like it would make sense to adapt
that to sign the entire image.
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http:/
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 02/17/2017 12:52 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Alberto Bursi wrote:
And having no password is a much bigger change than having a short
password when you are testing things. It makes a lot of sense to be
excercising the password routine
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 02/17/2017 12:26 PM, John Crispin wrote:
On 17/02/2017 12:16, Dan Lüdtke wrote:
Hi David,
thanks for the fast response!
On 17 Feb 2017, at 11:54, David Lang wrote:
But deciding that you know better than the admin of the system is not.
Not
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Dan Lüdtke wrote:
Hi David,
thanks for the fast response!
On 17 Feb 2017, at 11:54, David Lang wrote:
But deciding that you know better than the admin of the system is not.
Not that I am a fan of telling admins what to do, but do you see any chance
that we can get an
he root user to select a password that
is shorter than 'recommended', that's normal behavior on *nix systems and has
been for decades, even as the 'recommendations' have changed.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote:
If you look for where the /files/* are copied into the filesystem, that is
probably the place you would want to add your scripting hooks.
Good idea. I’ll look there.
Once you find this, may I suggest that you create /scripts/* and contribute t
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote:
This can't eliminate the /etc/rc.d/S* files as it only adds files, and it's not
as flexibile as adding a user or changing a password (as it would just let you
replace the /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow files, not modify them).
If you look for where the
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi.
I was wondering if there’s an obvious place to install a hook that’s:
(a) after all the packages have been installed;
(b) before the root filesystem image gets finalized;
I’d like to be able to run some simple sed scripts inside the root-to-b
violation of the GPL and while none have gone to court
in the US, that's because the violators have always settled before getting into
court (with vmware being the only exception, and I haven't heard that that case
has gone to trial yet)
David Lang
ers are free to pass the
source along, as it is GPL.
But if it's a separate download, it does have to be made available to anyone.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
k.
Reason:
We're sorry, but new users are temporarily limited to 3 replies in the same
topic.
If you can correct the problem, please try again.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
ready accepting pull requests via github
But I think everyone is saying there won't be a 'commercial' vs 'community'
split. There will be 'stable' vs tip-of-development, but that's it.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev
ease. If you are able to sustain the results for a few versions,
people may start to trust and use it (or they may just use the more up-to-date
tree)
David Lang (who has no authority within LEDE or OpenWRT)
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
doesn't happen for a
while, the list will still be useful as it reduces how far back people would
have to go at the point of release.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer,
but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some
point the fact that
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, James Feeney wrote:
On 12/22/2016 01:33 AM, David Lang wrote:
the reason for this is sort order, if something is sorting versions with an
alpha sort, you want the ~rc to show up as older than the YY.MM release, and you
want that to show up as older than the YY.MM.N
oblem that can be solved by a http redirect ...
Is that going to break all links in discussions that point at OpenWRT docs
and/or forum threads?
That's a high cost.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://list
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote:
- While brands have value, you can change a name without losing all the
brand recognition. I'm thinking here of cases like XBMC->Kodi or
OpenOffice->LibreOffice.
I would point at OpenOffice -> LibreOffice as a failure of name change
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote:
From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as
part of the branding of the project moving forward. It can just be
cosmetic (web site, etc
or a period, you want to use a tilde
'~'
the reason for this is sort order, if something is sorting versions with an
alpha sort, you want the ~rc to show up as older than the YY.MM release, and you
want that to show up as older than the YY.MM.N releases.
David Lang
that brand attached
to the development moving forward.
I agree, I think this is an obvious choice to make. OpenWRT has a lot of name
recognition, it would be foolish to throw that away.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradea
farm? how much hardware would people need to donate to
reduce this significantly (1-2 days for example)?
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-11-22 17:48, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-11-22 17:43, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On a 16M filesystem, we probably want to use a 1K block size and have an inode
for
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-11-22 17:43, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On a 16M filesystem, we probably want to use a 1K block size and have an inode
for every couple of blocks.
I'd say on a 16M filesystem we probably want to use squ
not sure I understand how this would work?
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
every couple of blocks.
On a 10TB filesystem, we probably want 4K block size and an inode for every few
K blocks
A menu to customize these rather than calculating them will allow people to
tweak them to fit the uncommon cases that LEDE is likely to be used for.
David Lang
_
r to
just the git repository "https://git.lede-project.org/";, and the git directory
"source.git" would instead be named "build.git". The file "feeds.conf.default"
could be called "manifest.default", which would be a concept shared
kernel.org and see what
the folks there have to say.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
the 'feeds'.
LEDE maintains this structure and uses the same feeds as OpenWRT
David Lang
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016, James Feeney wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:11:16 -0700
From: James Feeney
To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release Preparation Questions
Ok - thanks fo
argument for the
lede source in that you may backport some fixes into a release branch)
Other than this, it looks reasonable.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
Hi David,
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:49:40 PM CET David Lang wrote:
Well, we are. We can't change the fact that the devices need to be locked
to be sold in the US. But if you google a little, you will find a lot of
patches for various
erent
firmware from being loaded on the devices and the proposed rule that would have
required lockdowns have basically been stopped.
However, multiple vendors are imposing restriction and claiming that the FCC is
requiring them, even after the FCC says that it'
could be setup by someone outside of the core group
(working with their own fork of the project until they get things functioning)
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 3 October 2016 at 15:26, Karl Palsson wrote:
What's the "new" way of doing this? In the past, in OpenWrt CC
and before, a package could install files like /etc/banner and
/etc/inittab that were provided by the base-files package. It was
always liste
a no-brainer to use the same software for the LEDE wiki.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
the merger discussions and the openwrt development.
I've said before that if lede starts it's own forums, I'd like it to be
something that can integrate mailing lists with web interaction (and mentioned
how Baen books uses FUDForum and mailman to offer e-mail, web, and nn
A bit more setup, but fudforum (Fast Uncompromising Discussion Forum,
fudforum.org) can integrate with nttp, which mailman can then integrate with
mailing lists, allowing for full interaction between people accessing the forum
through all three methods.
David Lang
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, A
If the network interface goes through the switch in the AP, then you will not
see the interface on the CPU go up/down. At best you could poll the switch info
(if it gives you link state)
David Lang
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
Ok thanks Tobias.
How can I detect that ethernet
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016, Dennis Schneck wrote:
Hello,
i use a TP Link Archer C7 v2 with LEDE r811.
But the Wireless performace (2,4GHz) is not optimal.
Are the parameter or something else to tune the performace ?
If use other Firmware in the same Environment get better transfer rates.
CPU use is ne
have luci
David Lang
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Adrian Panella
wrote:
Totally agree with the observation.
+1 for including LuCI as default.
-Original Message-
From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
Jo-Philipp Wich
Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:
ller group can contribute entire systems.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
f the distance, so things a few
feet apart have a tremendous advantage to the same things within a
couple inches of each other (completely ignoring signals propagating
over power/ground busses and things like that)
David Lang
___
Lede-de
have a 3D
version of the problem, not just the 'simple' 2D version.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Ben Greear wrote:
On 06/21/2016 03:04 PM, David Lang wrote:
I'll point out that there is a lot of work being done on these drivers
right now in terms of making significant changes to how they do buffering
that in
increasing network speed as well as reducing la
make-wifi-f...@lists.bufferbloat.net,
ath9k-de...@venema.h4ckr.net,linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org
David Lang
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016,
gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:00:17 -0700
From: gree...@candelatech.com
To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Ben Greear
Subject: [LED
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 19:52 -0700, David Lang wrote:
Is there a list of hardware that is needed? (or do you want donations of money
for the project to buy hardware)?
TBH I'm not sure how useful random hardware donations are. For ex
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 12:35 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Z wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
With Imagebuilder and things
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Z wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
With Imagebuilder and things pre-compiled, what does it take to create an
image? I'm wondering if this is something that can be conv
ls?id=org.pocketworkstation.pckeyboard
it gives you a traditional keyboard (including escape)
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 11:05 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 11:17 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
Again I think you read too much into what I said (admittedly I do the
it,
but I don't know enough to know what qualifies.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Ok, so it sounds like this particular hardware is not wanted and support may be
dropped.
But for the general case, my question still stands. What hardware (including
brand-new devices, wishlists for future devices, etc) is wanted, how can it be
donated?
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016
Is there a list of hardware that is needed? (or do you want donations of money
for the project to buy hardware)?
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, John Crispin wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:29:31 +0200
From: John Crispin
To: LEDE Development List
Subject: [LEDE-DEV] looking for ar7
ay because they aren't helping in exactly the way that you
consider ideal is a good way to kill a project.
David Lang
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:14 PM, David Lang wrote:
Like individuals, companies do things that benefit them. Almost all Open
Source software development is done by peop
your hostile attitude doesn't spread.
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:10:36 -0500
From: L. D. Pinney
To: David Lang
Cc: LEDE Development List
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
Just because a company works on
Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make
LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols?
Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500
From:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Etienne Champetier wrote:
Hi David,
2016-06-14 20:21 GMT+03:00 David Lang :
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Etienne Champetier wrote:
2016-06-14 9:08 GMT+02:00 Felix Fietkau :
On 2016-06-13 22:10, Etienne Champetier wrote:
Hi John, Felix,
2016-06-13 13:55 GMT+02:00 John
s individually.
But when you have a limited amount of boot/OS storage that does not have wear
leveling in place, then the OpenWRT/LEDE approach of a complete filesystem image
that gets updated as a whole still makes sense.
Even when we have a few Gb of flash storage av
ites before there is a problem?
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
The worst thing that you can do is to use the same seed on multiple boots.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Just a FYI in case you didn't see it, Ted Ts'o posted a 7-patch cluster for
changing urandom that he plans to get into the next kernel
Subject: PATCH-v4 0/7] random: replace urandom pool with a CRNG
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1166186.html
ve that's >2TB. 3TB drives are now <$100
Now, if support for larger drives really does add a lot to the system footprint,
it should be optional. But how much space are we talking about here? It should
at least be an easy-to-select option.
David Lang
_
On Sat, 28 May 2016, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
* David Lang [28.05.2016 13:48]:
rather than making a bunch of scripts for specific models, how about
some scripts that will let you build from a downloaded .config (yes,
you can do this manually, but it could be greatly simplified)
but for this
On Sat, 28 May 2016, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 05/27/2016 12:43 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote:
We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by
Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing"
proposals. As a nex
atest code from a much larger set of configs, and
tweak a config and then use it over time to build newer versions.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
calls, etc for different distros is much
easier (just write your daemon with the expectation that the input and output
details are going to change, so don't get fancy with them).
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
htt
ed to know what the codes are)
be sure to have the appropriate dire warnings about deliberatly setting it
incorrectly and the trouble you could get into :-)
David Lang
AG6AH
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
bottom.
Just because information is old doesn't mean it's incorrect. Especially when
looking at hardware info. Once a device is supported well, there are seldom
updates needed.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradea
images
are too big (and which ones)
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
There was a new wifi firmware release today (not yet in LEDE or OpenWRT trunk)
announced around post 11400 on this forum
https://forum.openwrt.org/post.php?tid=50173&qid=325044
David Lang
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 14:16:13 -0700
From: Dave Taht
by giving you the
wrong IP for the NTP server
If I can control your gateway, I can redirect all your NTP queries to someone
else (NAT, redirects, etc)
so why not trust the NTP server being provided?
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing lis
they aren't willing to change. So far
they've seemed very willing to tweak things in response to suggestions.
David Lang
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Gabriel F.C. Mazzocato wrote:
2016-05-19 17:51 GMT-03:00 David Lang :
Is this something that's not already packaged for LEDE/OpenWRT?
It's far more complex to add something new than to just select different
options that are already configured.
Yeah. Currentl
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
