Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On 13/06/17 21:58, Florian Fainelli wrote: On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote: Hi, here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal > with many details will

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On 29.05.2017 09:03, John Crispin wrote: (resend, this time as plain text) Hi, here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: >> (resend, this time as plain text) >> >> Hi, >> >> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments >> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that > post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal with many >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that > post remerge anything

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 09:03:57AM +0200, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that > post remerge anything can be voted

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On 29-05-17 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please > remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 24/05/17 10:13, Paul Oranje wrote: Who are/will be entitled to an [IRC] project cloak ? Paul people with voting rights and probably also regular contributors ... that is however unrelated to the remerge discussion and would fall under the normal voting system Op 22 mei 2017, om 19:11

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Who are/will be entitled to an [IRC] project cloak ? Paul > Op 22 mei 2017, om 19:11 heeft Imre Kaloz het volgende > geschreven: > > Hi, > > On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 23/05/17 17:29, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Hi John, John Crispin wrote: here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. [snip] Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or if you want to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Hi John, John Crispin wrote: here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. [snip] Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or if you want to wait a few days if anything bumps in for a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Hi, On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote: On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 05/22/2017 02:02 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> *) branding >> - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand >> - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most >> people said they did not care >> - as the last vote had a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 22/05/17 11:39, Vincenzo Romano wrote: I also agree to everything. With am extra point. 2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper : *) SPI - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone else is interested let us know) - inform SPI of the new

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

I also agree to everything. With am extra point. 2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper : >> *) SPI >> - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone >> else is interested let us know) >> - inform SPI of the new liaisons, voters and project rules >> -

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Sounds good to me! On 22/05/2017 08:40, John Crispin wrote: Hi, here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. John *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor)

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is the only

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> On May 11, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Philip Prindeville > wrote: > > Yeah, I have to agree with this. You don’t get married, then define your > vows afterwards… Actually, sticking with the “marriage” paradigm a bit longer, what are the assets that the OpenWRT

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Thanks for the reply Imre. Imre Kaloz schreef op 2017-05-11 15:13: Well hello there, On 2017-05-11 12:53, Stijn Segers wrote: While, like most people, I'm happy progress has been made towards a re-merge, there still seems quite some passive-agressive behaviour present coming from certain

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 05/09/2017 10:12 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> >>> On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote: *) domain - transfer owner ship to SPI for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] Im > Auftrag von Imre Kaloz > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2017 11:36 > > On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > > > > I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

So many items to vote and work on. I would suggest we sort out those formal things first, e.g. project rules, umbrella project etc. I do not know much about the past history apart from those posts in the public mailing list. But if these formal things were the major cause of the split in the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 05/08/2017 06:19 AM, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and > discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we > would like to propose and have people vote on. > > *) branding > - the owrt side sees no option of

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> >> On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote: >>> >>> *) domain >>> - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org >>> (...) >>> >>> *) SPI

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote: *) domain - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org (...) *) SPI - TBD post remerge This is unclear to me. Are we postponing setting rules with SPI on how they

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote: > *) domain > - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org > (...) > > *) SPI > - TBD post remerge This is unclear to me. Are we postponing setting rules with SPI on how they should manage domains? I guess it

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > > Trac: > > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just > > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? > > There is a lot of