Constitutions protect lawyers and politicians.
Common sense protects us all.
Sent from my iPad
Dr. Michael Benjamin
Community Psychiatrist
On May 4, 2011, at 12:47 AM, Simon Austin simon...@auzsoft.net wrote:
On 03/05/2011 23:05, Ian Murray wrote:
We need a constitution that protects
Perhaps he spoke to Patrick Murrin or Peter Boatman?
Or perhaps he's senile as suspected and talked to himself.
On 3 May 2011, at 19:12, Rick Duniec ri...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I think that Ken deserves the Sherlock Holmes award for managing to track
down the owners (he didn't know who they
And Luton were docked 10 points for paying money to an unlicensed agent...
There's a lot of precedent and reports are that the FA have already
contacted clubs in and around the playoffs should a points deduction
mean the playof dates change (no idea why they would change though?)
On 04/05/2011,
Cool, so you are all for the coalition in their attempts to reduce the
structural deficit asap I take it?
Just curious like
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Murray
Sent: 03 May 2011 22:52
To: Joe Skinner
Cc:
But who else will polish the silver in this republican utopia.. duh!
:-)
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Austin
Sent: 04 May 2011 00:48
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [NON-LU] Boring Legal guff was
Playoff dates will change as there will be a legal challenge from QPR if
they are docked enough points to put them in the playoffs (or worse) rather
than automatic promotion.
On 4 May 2011 07:40, Lee Jones em...@leedjones.co.uk wrote:
And Luton were docked 10 points for paying money to an
And is it only Scum sponsors that cause us to think that way? What about
companies who sponsor Spurs, Liverpool, Sheffield United etc.
Since Northern Rock is owned by the government and they sponsor Newcastle, I
have stopped paying any British income tax. (I am not sure the campaign has
It is well known hereabouts of my one man campaign to stop the life of the
mirror. Like the US searching for Osama, I will persevere and get there in
the end. Good on yer Steve.
I love one-man boycott campaigns. A long time ago, my wife went into the bakery
in our village (Robin Hood's
Do we really think that the league will do anything other than fudge it?
Can anyone realistically conceive of a situation whereby Leeds United will
benefit from anything? They'll probably find some way of docking us 5 points!
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 May 2011, at 08:20, Jim Moran
No because I don't think that the coalitions's plans are economically sound,
like. They are ideologically driven, like, and have stifled the recovery to the
extent that net growth in our economy over the last 6 months has been 0.0%.
Deficit reduction is one thing, slash and burn quite another.
And Labour's plan to reduce the deficit wouldn't be called slash and burn?
How different was their plan?
But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very well with the
structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years. One could argue that Labours
idea to delay the slash and burn by 1 year
Hi,
any of the diaspora managed to get iplayer and bbc services abroad - if so
any simple instructions appreciated - my bro has finally been connected to
t'internet (merci mr sarkozy) and has 6 years of TV to catch up on.
ttfn
Richard
___
Leedslist
But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very
well with the structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years.
SNIP
only difference was the timing of and depth of the initial cuts.
trouble is the major cuts aren't really major - despite the real pain that
will be caused to many
Since this long political thread has come round to the subject of The Cuts,
perhaps I could link it back to the original issue.
I understood that the good old generous Royals footed the bill for the
so-called wedding, and all the rest of us had to do was stump up the paltry 20
million quid for
- Original Message - This begs the question as to why Ken has chosen
right now, this week, to make clear the ownership of LUFC.
Why else would Ken rock a boat that did not need to be rocked?
http://lufctrust.squarespace.com/
This explains the various aspects of the situation and
Well the 'prancing around on horses' bit is pretty self explanatory as
they are called the Household Cavalry.
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we are
still being defended by Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Typhoons then we
are in the sh*t if someone attacks us
Does the question Why now? really matter?
The answer is the info you/we/they wanted to know. We now know the answer (I
think)
Like the South Park policeman Move along now, nothing to see
PC2
- Original Message -
From: Rick Duniec ri...@ntlworld.com
To: Leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent:
Because we're British
Because we've been doing it for the last 4 or 500 years (RAF flyovers
notwithstanding)
Because we can
Because nobody does it better
I enjoyed it
- Original Message -
From: Robert Heath rhe...@mis-munich.de
To: Richard Naef rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk;
My father-in-law or this geezer I once overheard in a pub (dependant upon
whether Ed has pressed the delete button) lives in the charente maritime and
has tried numerous proxies and either hasn't got them to work or they have been
shut down sharpish.
The are some vpn services that give you a
Do we really think that the league will do anything other than fudge it?
Can anyone realistically conceive of a situation whereby Leeds United will
benefit from anything? They'll probably find some way of docking us 5
points!
True, but remember that the only person who gets shat on
Personally, I think he has done it because of the QPR situation. Bates
ownership suddenly gives the club some moral high ground
He might see that there is a chance, albeit slim, that we could overtake
Forrest on goal difference and get into the play-offs.
Couple this with the likely points
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we
are
still being defended by Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Typhoons then we
are in the sh*t if someone attacks us ala 1941
We are still very much being defended by Typhoons!
It's what the RAF calls a
Just a reminder you have the opportunity to vote for or against the present
general election voting system.(and for your local council ward members ) No
point moaning on result if you don't actually vote.
Also QPR -, whats the voting odds on on number of points deducted? . or could
just be
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store and clearing out loads of rubbish.
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we
are
still being defended by Spitfires,
On 04/05/2011 11:50, Tim Leslie wrote:
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store
Didn't work though did it? They still found him.
___
Leedslist
Afaik there was a bit if a row in the 1860s about slavery. Dunno, mebbes google
will help?
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 May 2011, at 07:51, Mark Humphries mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
wrote:
But who else will polish the silver in this republican utopia.. duh!
:-)
-Original
If it's true that this guy has played over 80 times whilst QPR knew he
was ineligible then nothing short of relegation will be enough.
All the reports say QPR are bang to rights, so any punishment that
leaves them with a chance of going up will be a cop out. All IMHO of course.
Si.
DAVID
Reduce the deficit, not fill it.
And as I'm sure you know, the structural deficit is not the same thing as
the national debt, which is fast approaching a TRILLION pounds.
In that context 1 extra bank holiday every 30 years is pissing in the wind.
If only Labour had read all of John Keynes
me too works well
From: Nigel Sykes ni...@sykesonline.com
To: 'Richard Naef' rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2011 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] NONLU - Ed Morrish DO NOT READ THIS
I have used ExpatShield and it seems to
Would have been an interesting dogfight to watch from the fens though, a
typhoon vs a bf109
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of markbu...@aol.com
Sent: 04 May 2011 13:55
To: t...@3leafieldvillas.co.uk;
Hmm what evidence have you got that they spent any money ever or came for the
wedding. Don't all tourists go to france instead because paris is warmer?
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Mark Humphries mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
Sender:
If you want to watch the UK channels live I have found this site works well
(have watched a couple of Leeds games on it). Is not for BBC iPlayer though.
http://fbhost-tv.fr/
From: Chris Briggs c_bri...@hotmail.co.uk
To: Richard Naef
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store
Didn't work though did it? They still found him.
Or did they? :-) Conspiracy theories rool!
Quick thread; most plausable conspiracy theory ever?
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 May 2011, at 14:23, Mark Humphries mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
wrote:
Reduce the deficit, not fill it.
Semantics, pedantics.
And as I'm sure you know, the structural deficit is not the same thing as
the national debt, which is fast approaching a TRILLION
Christ
Having just run the most dull thread known to mankind I have a good mind to
answer about OBL.
But not wanting to set the list on fire ( anyone wants a rant then off line), I
won't .
Suffice to say that my opinion of spin meisters and politicians has sunk even
lower.
More off line.
Did you make those acronyms up?
Sent from my iPad
Dr. Michael Benjamin
Community Psychiatrist
On May 4, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Chris Briggs c_bri...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
My father-in-law or this geezer I once overheard in a pub (dependant upon
whether Ed has pressed the delete button) lives in
Bates has just bought LUFC off himself! He also owns Elland Road and
Thorpe Arch! :-O
Another conspiracy theory, or is it? Stranger things have happened.
Quick thread; most plausable conspiracy theory ever?
I'll start with us avoliding promotion against Watford because it would
have
I can see this is all upsetting you, so I will just say it
doesn't matter what the tories (or libdems) thought about the
deregulation of the financial services sector, Labour did the
deed, no one else. I also don't remember reading any other
chancellor in the developed world claiming
or Bin Laden was the custodian of Leeds and agreed to pass it on to Bates in
the event of his death.
It would explain why Bates did not know where the owners of Leeds were all this
time.
On 2011-05-04 16:12:05 + Simon Hart simon.h...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Bates has
Wasnt Bin Laden a Gooner? Seem to remember them banning him from Highbury
after September 11.
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:24:38 +0100
From: c_bri...@hotmail.co.uk
To: simon.h...@york.ac.uk
CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good conspiracy theories
or Bin Laden was the
Nah, he was Leeds through and through, just check out the colour of his
outfits, based on Leeds home strip circa 1972.
You are confusing him with Robert Mugabe, he was a gooner and got banned due to
baring his arse from the directors box window.
On 2011-05-04 16:26:55
Of course we would. Pity you couldn’t lend Tony and Gordon your crystal ball
though, would have prevented the tories getting in again wouldn’t it.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 04 May 2011 15:55
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Robert Heath;
Whereas obviously you're seeing all this through the retrospectoscope.
Hindsight makes prophets of us all.
The investment in all public services was needed after 18 years of Tory rule.
Many mistakes were made but a vast improvement was seen, most obviously in the
NHS.
And, forgive me for
I just don't understand how we are taking it up the arse by having a
monarchy?
Well, having read a defence of the monarchy on the grounds that it's claimed
to make us money, I was merely intrigued to know what else the citizens of
Britain should be willing to accept *just so long as it brings
I just don't understand how we are taking it up the arse by having a
monarchy?
Well, having read a defence of the monarchy on the grounds that it's claimed
to make us money, I was merely intrigued to know what else the citizens of
Britain should be willing to accept *just so long as it brings
They may do, but has one ever blown up in someones face so dramatically? I
mean, Gordy was the self styled economic genius of his generation, so he
told us. But the thing that I really don't get is how so soon after this
happened, Milliband is trying to now pretend we don't need slash and burn
On 04/05/2011 14:23, Mark Humphries wrote:
Either way you look at it, it is
Blair/Brown/Darling to blame, not Cameron, not Clegg, not FPTP, not the
Queen and not Ken Bates.
And just how do you know it's not Ken Bates, Mark? Whio knows what shit
the old beardy bastard is dreaming up with his
Well said that man.
From: b1...@yorkietalkie.plus.com
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:06:58 +0100
Subject: [LU] Non-LU: More farce than arse, really
I just don't understand how we are taking it up the arse by having a
monarchy?
Well, having read a defence of the
On 04/05/2011 17:24, Chris Briggs wrote:
or Bin Laden was the custodian of Leeds and agreed to pass it on to Bates in
the event of his death.
It would explain why Bates did not know where the owners of Leeds were all this
time.
Posting iof the day: accurate believable and 100% more fun than
The benefit of the retrospectoscope is that it's based on cold hard facts,
not mystical powers. Like the assumption Major wouldn't have invested in
public services with the economic boom just round the corner, no, he would
have abolished the top rate tax band, or set up nurse/teacher/policeman
My view is that we'd have the same disparity in a republic. How do US
earnings compare? Or French? Or Cuban (government official vs prole)?
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Brian
Sent: 04 May 2011 16:07
To:
And for heaven's sake, PLEASE don't come out with the line
that this is about envy. It's about wanting a little more
*fairness*. Take a look at the diagram at the end of this article:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11942117
Ignore Frank Lampard and Tiger Woods, just gawp in awe at the
www.filmon.com with free BBC1 , ITV1 and Channel 4.
all other channels are about £15 a month.
Best option though is to get hold of a Dreambox and sat dish.
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Armit arm...@yahoo.com
To: Chris Briggs c_bri...@hotmail.co.uk; Richard Naef
I'm starting to lose the will to live here. The Tory 1997 manifesto talks
largely about tax cuts and, euphemistically, benefit reform.
It does not mention failing public services and a plan to increase investment
therein. I suppose the manifesto is the best we have to go on as far as 'cold
Don't worry about anti-lawyer abuse on this list. I think you'll find that
we're all very pro lawyer-abuse here!
Damian ;)
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.comwrote:
*braces self for anti-lawyer abuse*
___
Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are properly funded,
and if the funding is invested into productive enterprise (for want of a
better word).
Today's problem with Final Salary Pensions is the funding. Public Service
pensions are unfunded with the govt making guarantees out
56 matches
Mail list logo
