--- On Sat, 4/12/10, Mark Humphries mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
The bloke should be sacked. We pay his wages, we have no choice, he is not
directly accountable for his actions, so the BBC should be forced to sack
him.
Mark - you're a sensible bloke, so can I ask what the f*** you're
I think they were correct to air it too, it's about time all the corruption in
that organisation was investigated.
On 6 Dec 2010, at 13:38, John Lee wrote:
--- On Sat, 4/12/10, Mark Humphries mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
The bloke should be sacked. We pay his wages, we have no
in exposing the sham for what
it is.
From: sinister dexter sinisterpictu...@dogz-bollox.co.uk
To: John Lee bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Mon, December 6, 2010 8:59:33 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - More on World Cup
I think they were correct
2010 22:25
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - More on World Cup
On 03/12/2010 21:23, John Sykes wrote:
If no one else, ITV, SKY or whatever was going to air with the story
of corruption, then why did BBC have to do it when they did.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2010/11
I hope I don't sound as though I am bragging about my careerI simply
mention this for one good reason - I know how media works, be it here in
Canada on elsewhere. I was in radio news as a writer/broadcaster before I
thankfully, moved into the sports side.
I had the displeasure of breaking the
Left leaning? don't make me laugh. Are you suggesting that England not
getting the WC was some sort of socialist plot hatched in a Trotskyist
underground cell and gleefully executed by the BBC fellow travellers(*)?
They may be publicly funded (another scam involving tax payers funding the
elite)
On 03/12/2010 21:23, John Sykes wrote:
If no one else, ITV, SKY or whatever was going to air with the story of
corruption, then why did BBC have to do it when they did.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2010/11/fifa_football_panorama.html
In terms of its timing, we only obtained the list
