--- On Mon, 4/10/10, leeir...@cox.net leeir...@cox.net wrote:
Maybe I am misunderstanding what you are saying, but it
sounds like you think you have one Citation Detail (Source
Detail) per Event/Fact and that you think you are linking
more than one Source to the one Citation Detail (Source
The Geo is for modern locations. The mapping is the same. I don't use
the tool, for I want historical locations.
As you mentioned AniMap, that is in my opinion is the best tool for
historical locations. I own it and use it and it does the job well for
me. Keep in mind, the software is for USA
I have been a Legacy User for 10 years, but am just starting to using the Geo
Locator Database feature and the Mapping feature. I can't seem to figure out
how to find locations that are not modern. For example, if the town or city
was in a different county in the 19th century, the Geo Locator
Randy said: Where were/are the records kept Dover town or Dover Township? Or
are you trying to pinpoint a specific house, for example?
It is not the location of a repository that I am trying to record, but the
location of an event. I can't pinpoint the event to a city/town, but I do know
it
These are known limitations of the Geo Locator Database, which I rarely use
for that reason, and because it uses the so called 4 field convention which
is not applicable to the UK.
I happen to have a large selection of gazetteers which I use, but when I am
really stuck I Google the history of the
Tim:
If I am not mistaken, AniMap is for U.S. AND Canadian locations (per
Geoff's webinar).
Howland Davis
In a message dated 10/4/2010 10:07:05 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
spa...@xmission.com writes:
. . . . Keep in mind, the software is for USA locations.
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
--- On Sun, 3/10/10, RICHARD SCHULTHIES fourpa...@verizon.net wrote:
When that happened to me a few years
ago, I discovered, that by unknowingly sending backups to
the C: drive instead of my portable (it was plugged in) my
fifth backup (with multimedia) stepped on top of the
C:drive. What a
You had previously indicated that you were looking for information that used to
be in the Source Detail but is now missing or is replaced with some random
letter. I'm not sure how that would happen with the process you describe
below, because you create every Source Detail new and then paste
Paul said: When clicking into the Citation Details box to insert details for a
subsequent Citation, you can see the previous entries, and some are
missing/changed.
Maybe I am misunderstanding what you are saying, but it sounds like you think
you have one Citation Detail (Source Detail) per
Where were/are the records kept Dover town or Dover Township? Or are you
trying to pinpoint a specific house, for example?
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, leeir...@cox.net wrote:
I have been a Legacy User for 10 years, but am just starting to using the
Geo Locator Database feature and the
Emphasis:
In what way do they differ?
Using 9 X 12 size paper, the odd numbered pages all print with the
same margins. It looks pretty acceptable.
The margins EVEN numbered pages vary noticeably. I printed a report
that was ten pages, and got what looks like:
Page 2: margins appear to be set to:
On 03/10/2010 23:44, Robert E. Carneal wrote:
I tried that. I was thinking the same as you- extra white space.
However, the margins differ on the odd pages than they do on the even
pages in my case.
In what way do they differ? It is quite normal to print a book with
wider margins at the inner
Howland,
You are correct ! I should have mentioned it.
For anyone wanting to view the webinar:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/webinars.asp
I do believe that in the webinar, he mentions Centennia. I use that tool
also. Borders in Czechoslovakia change so many times over the years.
Sometime in
I THINK I had a similar problem some time ago - trouble is I don't remember how
I fixed it! Sorry. Have you checked the archives? I'm afraid I can't even
remember how I worded the problem to give you a clue for searching (blame chemo
brain I'm afraid!) My problem appeared when I was using
I just checked the Archives (after 21 Nov 2009) for my name and came across 15
pages of messages, including the ones containing my source clipboard problem
and the fact that it had started behaving itself.. for no apparent
reason! Sorry I can't help. I should perhaps say I do close
--- On Mon, 4/10/10, leeir...@cox.net leeir...@cox.net wrote:
You had previously indicated that you
were looking for information that used to be in the Source
Detail but is now missing or is replaced with some random
letter. I'm not sure how that would happen with the
process you describe
--- On Mon, 4/10/10, Jan Roberts poo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
I THINK I had a similar problem some
time ago
My problem appeared when I was using the source clipboard - the
source details were being replaced by random
characters in subsequent use of the source which I
gather is your problem
--- On Mon, 4/10/10, Jan Roberts poo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
I just checked the Archives (after 21
Nov 2009) for my name and came across 15 pages of messages,
including the ones containing my source clipboard problem
and the fact that it had started behaving itself..
for no apparent
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:21:23 -0700 (PDT), Paul Underwood
dan_c...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
--- On Sun, 3/10/10, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote:
How are you detecting the problem? By looking at a
generated report? Or
by viewing the Assigned Sources or Source Detail dialogs?
Paul said: No, the data appears correct when pasted, but then is changed
later. I only see it when putting in data for subsequent (separate) events.
What you are saying still does not sound like you are trying to do something
that is even possible. Could you explain in detail exactly what you
Send the screenshot to me. I can post it really quick on my web space
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
On 10/4/2010 10:10 AM, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:21:23 -0700 (PDT), Paul Underwood
--- On Sun, 3/10/10, Dennis M. Kowallekkowal...@iglou.com wrote:
Can you post a screenshot
I do not see any responses to your questions, so let me give them a shot; my
suggestions will be prefaced with CLS (my initials) and interspersed with your
original post, below.
Hope it helps!
Connie
--- On Sun, 9/26/10, E. Wolfe e20...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I've searched the archives after
Hi Paul
I experienced a similar problem (incorrect source text) a few days ago, but
have not been back to try and replicate it and to note exactly what
happened. I was using SourceWriter (I don't usually) and had entered detail
text (which was cut and paste from a word processor, not typed in),
23 matches
Mail list logo
