: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
If I am reading this thread correctly the comments you refer to are
comments on a source or source detail. Those will only appear, if they
are set to be included in reports, with the source citation which can be
included:
As a footnote on the page
If I am reading this thread correctly the comments you refer to are
comments on a source or source detail. Those will only appear, if they
are set to be included in reports, with the source citation which can be
included:
As a footnote on the page
As a citation at the end of a Generation (if the
] Relationships surety level
Hi Kirsten
I have just tested a Gedcom basic format and the comments I made in the
source citation were included in the export. Did you ensure that this
item was ticked for attachment to the citation or ticked to include at
the prompt during the export?
Cheers, Brett
B McL
McDonald Misner
Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan Williams
From: Luis Salreta luisalr...@clix.pt
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sun, June 26, 2011 12:25:45 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Sorry but i'm
] Relationships surety level
Hi Luis
I use the Comments about this Citation (in the Source Detail) to explain why
things may not be as they seem - usually relating to the reliability or
accuracy of the citation. The Comment is specific to the detail of the
citation, so you can comment about the source
Thank you all for the various solutions proposed.
I still believe that this needs a real program solution.
All the solutions are, as we say in Portugal, "desenrascanços" (see in google) or "MacGyverism" (we use what we have at hand to resolve the problem)
Thanks
L.Salreta
Legacy User Group
I missed the original post because it was not plain text. But this topic
interests me as an analyst/programmer so I thought I would add my
$0.02...
***
The OP makes a good point. If you look at the GENTECH Genealogical Data
Model (GDM)...
OK let’s see if I can make myself clear
Let's use a very simple military example:
I have several source of intelligence that gives me some information.
I collect the information about related subjects and build one conclusion.
This conclusion is weighted based on the credibility of the sources
Hi
I am Legacy
user, since version 4 (standard) and version 5 (deluxe edition) and belong to
the team that is translating Legacy to European Portuguese.
Of course I
like the program, but there is one thing that is missing and I would like to
know what you do in similar situations.
If we
it.
Michele
From: Luis Salreta
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 8:31 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Hi
I am Legacy user, since version 4 (standard) and version 5 (deluxe edition) and
belong to the team that is translating Legacy to European
: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Luis,
Your English is very good! When I am sure of a parent-child relationship but I
just can’t prove it, I go ahead and link them in legacy and then in the notes I
explain all of my circumstantial evidence [evidências circunstanciais]
explaining why I think I am
PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Luis,
I have added a child status of Challenged. I use the Research Notes of the
child to present my arguements. The child status can be set to show on the
Family view by going to the View tab in Options
On 2011/06/26 14:31, Luis Salreta wrote:
For instance I have a Jake son of John Salreta and Maryann. Later on I have
the
marriage of Jake (son of John Salreta and Marylu). I believe in the documents
and the information within but are those 2 Jakes the same? If I could I would
put only 3
...@yahoo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2011 4:04 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Luis,
I have added a child status of Challenged. I use the Research Notes of
the child to present my arguements. The child status can be set to show
I put Maybe Not in the name field, it stands out like a bright light
G But then I use a lot of ??? and then in my events I might say
this looks right or this may be he. I like things I can spot from
afar.
I also have a tree that includes all the people I find in Cleveland
Ohio from the Malmesbury
Sorry but i'm not receiving the mails so I can´t answer directly
Thanks for ll the opinions.
I use notes but they are all mixed in the same place.
The example I gave is the simplest (and is an example not a real case).
I have lots of cases where the missing "link" is to the grandparents that
work on?
Sandy K Keas
From: luisalr...@clix.pt
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:25:45 +0100
Sorry but i'm not receiving the mails so I can´t answer directly
Thanks for ll the opinions.
I use notes but they are all
I don't believe in assigning numeric surety levels to anything! What I think
is a 2 you may think is a 3, and what I think today is a 2, next month I may
think is a 1. It's all too subjective.
I discuss conflicting evidence, indirect evidence, etc. in Notes so it is clear
to me, and
Hi Luis
I use the Comments about this Citation (in the Source Detail) to explain
why things may not be as they seem - usually relating to the reliability
or accuracy of the citation. The Comment is specific to the detail of
the citation, so you can comment about the source being used in support
, 2011 12:01:29 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Terri,
Is that not the wrong description? I would suggest that in the case quoted it
should be “Not Proven” rather than “Challenged”, the l,latter meaning that
somebody has questioned the relationship.
Ron Ferguson
http
I'd mention it.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: Brett McL Robinson [mailto:b...@vodafone.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 7:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: Luis Salreta
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Hi Luis
I use the Comments about this Citation
21 matches
Mail list logo
