Wendy, thank you for your reply.
In my case there are no half marriages or broken ;line in the descent from
ym g grandmother to me and in the case of my cousin, I am fairly positive
there are none in her line but I will cjeck again.
I have run Check and Repair with no improvement so my next
On 2012/02/15 04:19, R G Strong-genes wrote:
Actually all you have to do in Family view is right click on the person and
then pick the menu item Addbrother or sister
Brother and Sister as options aren't enabled unless there is at least one
parent. You can't move him down into the children's
On 15/02/2012 08:05, Colin Liddell wrote:
In my case there are no half marriages or broken ;line in the descent from
ym g grandmother to me and in the case of my cousin, I am fairly positive
there are none in her line but I will cjeck again.
I have run Check and Repair with no improvement so
I want to conduct a Social Security Death Index search blitz and try to
locate entries for all the eligible people in my database who don't already
have an existing source citation for the SSDI. So...
I'd like to produce a search list of all the people in my database with 2
conditions:
1.
Carol,
Your comment that Source Writer is only suitable for American Sources is
incorrect. There are specific templates for BMDs and censuses for the
constituent countries of the British Isles.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: cr brassfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:48
Jean,
If you tag all those with an SSDI with, say, tag1 then search for all those
where tag1 is equal to untagged, you will have those you are looking for.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Jean Suplick
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:53 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
On 2012/02/15 18:04, Ron Ferguson wrote:
If you tag all those with an SSDI with, say, tag1 then search for all those
where tag1 is equal to untagged, you will have those you are looking for.
And, you also have to eliminate everyone who died before SSDI was introduced in
the 20thc :-)
--
Legacy’s Add-On Gen-Smarts will do that for you. As a matter of fact, it is on
sale right now. Gen-Smarts will also tell you which records need articles from
Genealogybank.com and many others. It allows you to isolate what type of
record.
Morris Sonnier
From: Jean Suplick
Here is my way of finding those who may be included in the SSDI and have not
been found or entered into Legacy.
Detailed Search
Part 1
Look for whom? Individual
Where to look? Birth Date
How to look? After
What to look for? 1873
second condition (and)
Look for whom? Individual
If you're planning to join today's webinar, sign in at least 15-20 minutes
early, or even earlier. Nearly 2,000 have registered but only the first
1,000 to join will be able to join. See you there!
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
ge...@legacyfamilytree.com
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
Admittedly, I do not use the webpage-generation feature, but if they're unknown,
what's the point of including them as specific individuals? I guess you must
have one piece of information on each individual that made you decide to add
them...? Otherwise, there's not any value in having the
Good point, Mike. I had a picture of missing spouse in mind as I was reading
these posts. Thanks.
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale
Ron
I stand corrected although having just taken a look at the templates I think I
prefer the system I have set up. That though is probably just a personal
preference for a system I have got used to using.
Carol
From: ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject:
Bobby
Part 1 first section
Why have you put 1873?
I can understand 1935 in 2nd section as SS only started in a limited way then
but I don't understand after 1873 for birth date.
My husband's grandfather was born in 1870 and died in 1965 and is shown in
SSDI. It's not a mistype as I have a
It had been my understanding that subsequent citations only apply to
SourceWriter sources. A quick look at the previews of some of my sources
initially appeared to confirm this. However, I now see that text entered on
the Text/Comments tab of a Basic source detail, with the checkbox checked to
Carol,
You can find people in the SSDI with birthdates as early as 1874. Although
they are few of them, it just might be that they are there. You may not find
many that died before 1940 or even 1961 but there are a few. The death index
was not computerized until the early 1960’s Entries
Thx, Laird. Indexed censuses, I hope. Heritage Quest has 1830-50 as
browse-only.
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale
Thx, Paul. I like your program. Additional names on females is great!
Although I think I have very few if any mysteries left to solve in the 1940
time-frame.
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton
Can just anyone volunteer?
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle
Jones Klein Koyle
Leonard, If I am reading you correctly, I don't go so far as to indicate in the
census detail citation which piece(s) of information are supported. I mean, I
attach the detail citation to the pieces / fields that are supported, but I am
not trying to print that out. I have the little source
Aha... I use the census source writer templates. Explains a bit of our
disconnect. But maybe part of the reason your endnotes consume so many pages is
your desire to have a citation print for every field sourced on an individual?
Well, again it does boil down to personal preference, and I think
v7.5.0.147 - New General Release Builds - 15 February 2012
Check your Legacy Home Tab
--
Tim Rosenlof
Always Source Your Work
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Here's my thinking on it, Paula, trying to explain as briefly as
possible. Quite often when you go to a genealogy website, the first
thing you do is pull up the master person list to check for your
possible ancestors. On many websites (if not most), you will see the
very top of the list will
Sweet! Now why didn't I think of that? Thanks, Ron!
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
Jean,
If you tag all those with an SSDI with, say, tag1 then search for all
those where tag1 is equal to untagged, you will have those you are looking
I have been following both these threads and have come to the
conclusion that SourceWriter is not all it's cracked up to be. I
stopped using SW several months ago and have been contemplating
returning to Basic Sources. After following this discussion, I have
decided to do that. I know most
Hi Colin,
In my case there are no half marriages or broken ;line in the descent from
ym g grandmother to me and in the case of my cousin, I am fairly positive
there are none in her line but I will cjeck again.
I have run Check and Repair with no improvement so my next step is to check
with
I just finished my portfolio for the Board for the Certification of
Genealogists (BCG). During that process I found that my SW sources did not
match the Evidence Explained formats exactly and instead of being able to copy
and paste, I had to hand type them correctly. I am seriously thinking
Can you share with us which source writer templates produced unsatisfactory
citations? Surely, not all of them?
And being these two threads are mainly about the subsequent citations - was
that where the problems were?
Thanks.
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley
Marian Pierre-Louis did a fantastic job today in our webinar. View the
recording (free until Monday, February 27) at
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/webinars.asp. The recording is also available on
her CD (includes 4 pages of handouts) at
I just finished my portfolio for the Board for the Certification of
Genealogists (BCG). During that process I found that my SW sources did not
match the Evidence Explained formats exactly and instead of being able to copy
and paste, I had to hand type them correctly. I am seriously thinking
I have 129 Records which have junk from a FTM import. Through a detailed
search, I have been able to isolate these files and then designate them in Name
List using tag # 9. I can edit general notes, medical notes, research notes,
but I do not see a way to edit the marriage notes. When I
Search Find Detailed Search
Search for Individuals with Tag 9 Equal to tagged.
With the search list displayed select the Family tab on the right.
If the person is married you will see a button to edit the marriage
You can edit the marriage notes from the marriage edit screen.
Brian
Customer
It was little things on several different types of sources. I can’t remember
exactly. I would look it up in the book and then look at how it was in Legacy
and it wouldn’t match exactly. It wasn’t something glaring but small things.
However, I wanted my sources to be 100% consistent and
Hi Brian,
Works great.
Thanks
Morris Sonnier
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:58 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Marriage List
Search Find Detailed Search
Search for
I forgot to copy the chat notes from todays Ten Brick Wall Tips for Beginners
webinar. They were so good! Can anyone share those with me?
Thanks,
Monique
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
I'm with you Tim. Actually I would like to go back one release. 7.5.0.112
really screwed up my database. I now have sources assigned to people who
have nothing to do with that source. Problem is finding all of these
incorrect assignments. I have backups before converting to 7.5.0.112, but
A child always has a mother and a father. That's the way the world works.
Full stop, as they say.
The father may not be a husband of the mother, lawfully wed and all. Would
you agree?
In the Legacy database, every child is entitled to two parents, which
reflects nature. So far so good. What
Chick
I started converting my SW sources back to Basic about 6 months ago, mainly
because I saw how mangled they are in transferring via GEDCOM to other
programs. I've found it best to do it one source at a time. It's possible with
Basic sources to figure out a way to match EE sources, but it
38 matches
Mail list logo
