(taking this to legal-talk)
Russ,
On 12/27/11 05:08, Russ Nelson wrote:
But this way is still marked as created by a nodecision user:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=3753605
Well, maybe it was created, but the sins of the father do not pass
onto the son. No part of what the nodecision
Hi,
On 12/27/11 14:53, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
* treat any tags contributed by a non-agreeing mapper as harmless if
these tags are not present any more in the current version
Did you manage to address your example of a user fixing a typo in the
tag name (individually or for a large number
On 24 December 2011 19:32, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I have prepared changes to the OSMI map that allow me to
* treat any tags contributed by a non-agreeing mapper as harmless if
these tags are not present any more in the current version
Are you sure that this is a good idea?
Robert,
when I wrote that I
* treat any tags contributed by a non-agreeing mapper as harmless if
these tags are not present any more in the current version
I did indeed mean that the edit is harmless if the *key* is not present
any more.
This will still result in some harmless edits
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Yes. I have no strong feelings either way; your argument is correct. However
the question must be asked in how far you can claim copyright for facts that
others have to extract from your prose. In my personal opinion, if
Hi,
On 12/27/2011 09:08 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
So if mapper adds nmae=Fred's Bistro, then decliner corrects to
name=Fred's Bistro, do your current rules consider that node tainted?
Yes, if a name tag is still present in the current version of the
object then it is assumed to be dervied
Tomorrow, I am planning to walk along streets which have been marked in red on
the OSM Inspector. Mainly for exercise, not only for legal reasons. These
streets exist for about 100 years and everybody who walks there needs to add
the same tags:
highway=residential
name=Parkallee
maxspeed=30
Simply add odbl=clean to the way, after verifying it and you'll be fine. A
few days later, or maybe even the next day it won't show up as problematic
anymore. OSM wants to be extra careful, regarding copyright laws, and we
always have been. So we'll also have to be when we want to change the
On 27 December 2011 15:31, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 12/27/11 14:53, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
* treat any tags contributed by a non-agreeing mapper as harmless if
these tags are not present any more in the current version
Did you manage to address your example of a user
On 28 December 2011 01:49, fk270...@fantasymail.de wrote:
Tomorrow, I am planning to walk along streets which have been marked in red
on the OSM Inspector. Mainly for exercise, not only for legal reasons. These
streets exist for about 100 years and everybody who walks there needs to add
10 matches
Mail list logo
