The vim approach
http://www.fredkschott.com/post/50510962864/introducing-covim-collaborative-editing-for-vim
looks hard to grok without using it, but there are tabs for each participant
(the blue one looks a lot like terry_brown)
Terry's work could offer a shared view of document structure,
Q. Why are crows?
A. caws
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the tip/reminder. Any particular reason why this is not False by
default?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:33
Trying to see the future, I think I'm less interested in
'what tags are on this node?'
than
'what nodes have this tag?'
So I would expect to use the list returned by g.tags(['leo tip', 'command'])
to build a tree of cloned nodes.
As such, I wouldn't be interested in adding tag data to the tree
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com
wrote:
So, some more specific thoughts, better / other ideas welcome, not sure
when any coding might occur.
p.v.u['str_tags'] = ['one', 'two
http://bit.ly/14qThQL
Looks cool.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
- Kent's and Terry's suggestions are always worth consideration :-)
Unless they want the print-xxx commands renamed to something sensible.
ducks
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does leo need tags for nodes?
Yes.
My view of Leo as a data manager means I want tags.
I've been thinking I'd address them in the context of the
db of nodes, all the better if they were native.
Interface wise I see
I thought of other prefixes, 'printing-' imposes a keystroke penalty,
I would be ok with 'prn-' but I think that went away with dos
'lp' is another reference to a printer, but that goes way way back ...
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:28 PM, gatesphere gatesph...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/15/2013 9:35 PM,
It just works! Nice.
Being able to preview is great, less paper wasted.
I rely entirely on command completion as a memory aid, too
bad the info listing commands also start with 'print'. I would
think that 'list-attribute' would have nicely disambiguated the
situation now we have print.
Too late?
I'm going to push a little here.
command completion is one of Leo's best features, making
it manageable to work with hundreds of commands. It's
usefulness depends on the quality of command names.
The current situation is both non-intuitive for folks looking
for information ('print-xxx is not
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on a python command line script and am spening a lot of time
swtiching back and forth between a console window and Leo. Is there a way
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net
wrote:
Hi Folks,
A big Leo fan pointed me at Leo, and this group - indicated that sharing
Leo documents has been talked about over the years,
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for not responding sooner. That was really unfortunate. In
my
experience, the best way to ruin good ideas is to ignore them
?
And maybe the posts of blog should be labeled with level of difficulties?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
All it needs is someone to create it.
I'd expect it should be Edward, unless in the spirit of
delegation someone steps up
ktenney / kten...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I pushed some updated content to the blog, and created a repository to host
the sources from which the blog is generated here:
https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-blog
Browsing the source
Adopt Terry's *todo* workflow, by and for the overwhelmed.
:-]
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm being overwhelmed by Leo-related items. I suppose this is a sign of
progress :-) In particular, I am finding it hard even to generate minimal
+1
All it needs is someone to create it.
I'd expect it should be Edward, unless in the spirit of
delegation someone steps up to be the 'Keeper of the LeoBlog'
Then, either issue permissions, or agree that submissions
go through the Keeper.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matt Wilkie
my mouth is watering ...
I just hope the install / setup is as idiot-proof as possible,
This happens to me too often:
- I get the occasional hour to do some coding
- I decide to try the latest-greatest Leo feature
- I spend the hour futzing with settings
Next time I get an hour to code, I use
Might this work:
a new top level menu: 'Extensions'
Entries in this menu would refer to scripts which did all
the behind the scene work required to enable a feature,
with a small tutorial to boot.
It might even find myLeoSettings.leo, insert the required nodes
and prompt for restarting the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Jacob Peck gatesph...@gmail.com wrote:
May I humbly suggest Ctrl-+ and Ctrl--, like so many other editors and web
browsers? Unless those already have default keybindings
I can't find the thread, but I thought we once discussed reducing the number
of bindings
I don't have any visual indication of the existence of @rclick nodes,
it would be nice.
Something I've found useful is adding a @click node like:
@rclick -
that separates my entries from the ever present
'Remove Button' and 'Goto Script' entries
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:50 PM,
at 8:13 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone depending on
alt-ctrl-a = toggle-find-wrap-around-option ?
Absolutely. I use the Alt-Ctrl bindings in the Find Tab all the time. I
don't often use Alt-Ctrl-A, but I wouldn't want to eliminate it.
Edward
--
You received
all you Sherlocks out there, which is which in the photos?
Have we provided clues in posts, or are they in the photos
which would allow matching names?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
Goofy pictures attached :) Edward / Kent / Terry left to right.
Things got a little fast and loose with core, some data would
have been lost if not for
BUTTERFIELD BACKUP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LQkH-xGypw
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
Goofy pictures attached :) Edward / Kent / Terry left to right.
My
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the summary and pics, the time stamp stuff sounds very
intriguing.
As it stands, enabling the timestamp.py plugin does the following:
- sets 3 event hooks
- event 'new': when a Leo file is created
- event
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
As the sprint approaches, I would like to argue (feebly ;-) that Leo has
been the beneficiary of all the foreign work on static type checking.
And I will try to argue (vehemently :-]) that there is method behind
the
Since Leo files are so flexible, they can be considered as many
things, I towards seeing them as collections of data.
A node is a key:value pair, headline and body.
A subtree is a graph of key value pairs, a Leo file is
a graph of graphs, usually on a topic.
key: value examples:
Classname: code
as: show me the last 10 nodes I've made changes to ...
In this file, for starters, but eventually, across all my Leo files.
Thanks,
Kent
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Since Leo files are so flexible, they can be considered as many
things, I towards seeing
Great point, hand waving is fun, but tested code is more useful.
An attainable goal for the sprint could could provide structure
within which to compare workmethods.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 6:59:08 AM UTC-5, Edward
What do people imagine a 'Leo in the cloud' session would look like?
I open a file which changes as I edit it, but also changes as others edit it?
That sounds unsettling and not useful.
I can see a Leo file as the moral equivalent of a git working tree.
I push my Leo file to a repository, others
So, a and b are siblings above and below, pos is 0 for first child ... ?
nice
In this scheme all nodes are relatively located,
What would you think of adding 'address':
the list of positions which define absolute node location in a file?
Thanks,
Kent
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Ville M.
Cool, the actual pyOraGeek on the Leo list!
I've enjoyed your videos greatly, made several false starts on learning
HTSQL, have every intention of folding cmd2 into my workflow ...
http://pyvideo.org/speaker/294/catherine-devlin/rss
What a rich skill set you bring. It would be fabulous to
FYI
This hasn't been working for me, so I looked at the code
a bit instead of just complaining.
I make the following change in active_path.py, cmd_LoadRecursive
-sync_node_to_folder(c,s,path,updateOnly=True,recurse=True)
+sync_node_to_folder(c,s,path,updateOnly=False,recurse=True)
with
Here comes IPython
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/2012-December/010799.html
We are proud to announce that we've received funding from the
Alfred P. Sloan foundation (http://sloan.org) that will support
IPython development for the next two years.
Thanks to this $1.15M grant...
wow
That flow would sure make a great webcast!
(ie: I don't get it, but I can tell it's cool)
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've found that having edits on a node in one outline simultaneously
reflected in another node in another outline works
Hosting at Github offers lots of advantages.
Being on Github raises visibility and cred of a project, feature
rich, well documented and well funded.
+1
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
What about access to vim-open-file for @auto nodes?
What about it?
I seem to recall having the option of Leo opening a node
in a vim session
Just a heads up, dclick on the @path node creates file nodes,
dclick on file nodes loads the file, so this is just about convenience.
focus on @path node
selecting from Plugins - active-path - Set Node To Absolute Path Recursive
traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Joon Ro joonp...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply. alt-x vim-open-node DOES work, but other things do
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Joon Ro joonp...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply. alt-x vim-open-node DOES work, but other things do
not.
vim,py is turned on in @enabled-plugins. Leo goes to heading editing mode
when I double click on the node icons.
I wonder if there is any linux
The 'nav' plugin is the only search tool I use, very intuitive.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:02 PM, F.S. speech.f...@gmail.com wrote:
1. The find panel does not work.
Correct. This is by design, although it's confusing
I'm not sure if this is related, seems maybe.
I've longed for specialized Leos: a config file which defines
- menus
- commands
- templates
- ...
which encapsulate the learning curve for an application.
Most apps consist of a set of files:
- source
- configuration
- data
- logs
- doc
I need to
No need to do anything, I was just curious about the state of affairs.
I'll continue to use @auto and strip the leading @language ...
line before sending the body to work.
Thanks,
Kent
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:29 PM,
I want to do vanilla editing of a file, I try
@asis myfile
@nosent myfile
I rclick the headline and and select 'Refresh from disk'
both give
no @file nodes in the selected tree
@auto myfile
loads the file, putting '@language unknown_language'
at top of body.
- should @asis and/or @nosent work?
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:29:04 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to do vanilla editing of a file
I usually use @edit for that.
Ok, that works, sticks a @nocolor line in ...
- is the @nocolor
Update:
All is well, focus stays put.
Thanks,
Kent
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:35:52 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I want
This is seriously cool stuff.
Now, how to use it ...
My first take is: I've created a file warehouse.leo which has
nodes for various projects.
I've been using this idiom:
When I'm about to make major changes to a method, I copy the
node and edit the copy. Python doesn't care, the new version
I guess the complete list of possible post action foci would be
- Node that you operated on (or next node if it was a move)
- Node after the node you operated on (the current *intended* behavior)
- Destination node, the newly created one, possibly in another outline.
But perhaps with the
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:35:52 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I want something like
c.quickMove.to_other(unl, cut=False, follow=False) # copy
If you want it via a call to c.quickMove.to_other
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:13:58 -0500
Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
Note particularly that a wrapper is the face that is presented to
Leo's core. Here is the line from createEditor::
wrapper =
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a video demo of light table + python at
http://www.chris-granger.com/2012/05/21/the-future-is-specific/
(3rd example)
I don't see any video.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ibdknox/light-table
They hit 300k, Python will be in the initial release!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
I've been using jinja2 lately, because it's favored by Salt.
http://saltstack.org
There is so much wisdom behind the Salt team that I look to them
for best practice recommendations.
I've been wanting to slip in a plug for Salt, there you go. Of course there
are many very good template systems
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
About a year ago at the Ashland sprint Kent (iirc) made the following
suggestion: solid, simple implementation of one of the standard
template engines providing intuitive template nodes, variable
definitions, and
Cool!
Looks like it needs a first time tweak:
Thanks,
Kent
[ ktenney@lappy: ~/work ]$ leo toc.leo
/usr/bin/python /usr/fetching/leo-editor/launchLeo.py --gui=qttabs
--maximize --ipython --session-save --session-restore toc.leo
** isPython3: False
Leo 4.10 final, build 5325, 2012-05-21 08:53:59
I'd also like to send a node as an email, this looks good for that:
https://crate.io/packages/inbox/
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to send the emails in my inbox to an outline.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are
the hook
On May 2, 2012 11:41 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Running 5295:
edit .. edit .. new node ...
g.es(g.contentModifiedSet)
g.es(g.childrenModifiedSet)
g.es(p.v.contentModified())
shows they are there and empty, am I jumping the gun,
or need I do something else to populate
Ah, cool. That takes care of mtime for the body.
Is a new focusChanged hook of interest?
(which would provide atime)
Thanks,
Kent
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 08:09:51 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't get
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Kent Tenney
Sent: 5/1/2012 11:37 PM
To: leo-editor@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Request for discussion: a Leo JSON format
If the current xml became JSON, the data in a Leo file would be
readable and writable by almost any app.
= good
The node/edge schema
.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Ville Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure reading json is more commonly supported than reading XML,
so the benefits are not obvious.
Sure, but since I've never learned to use
Running 5295:
edit .. edit .. new node ...
g.es(g.contentModifiedSet)
g.es(g.childrenModifiedSet)
g.es(p.v.contentModified())
shows they are there and empty, am I jumping the gun,
or need I do something else to populate them?
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com
I hope this thread is leading to improvement in 'node changed' hooking,
which seems crucial for enabling extending Leo capability in all sorts of
ways.
I think it would also be great if Leo used this to add some timestamp
metadata to nodes: ctime, mtime, atime - created, modified, accessed
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
How about changes to the tree structure, I.e. on-children-changed?
Nice, similar to mtime of a directory.
I think the cost of timestamps would
pay off well.
On May 1, 2012 5:27 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
If the current xml became JSON, the data in a Leo file would be
readable and writable by almost any app.
= good
The node/edge schema offers lots of interesting potential, but isn't it
a separate topic from the file format?
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
you could go with another connotation of the word:
- a generous supply
standing under a stream of documentation
be showered with information
:-]
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:25:55 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote
Interesting ...
Am I correct: this is POC, edits in your serialized pane don't reflect
in the Leo file?
This is a hint of something I've long wanted, what I have called
'slurped' vs 'chunked'
Something I miss with Leo is the capability get an overview of a file,
I find myself
needing to 'open
- I need a brief howto, put in node, ctl-b ... next?
wonder why I called it DocShower instead of DocViewer.
I'm afraid I've been unable to read the 'shower' component as
'thing which shows', it's always 'standing under a stream of water'
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Terry Brown
better said as
rhymes with 'flower', instead of 'blower'
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
- I need a brief howto, put in node, ctl-b ... next?
wonder why I called it DocShower instead of DocViewer.
I'm afraid I've been unable to read the 'shower' component
When installing I most always use the following
$ sudo apt-get install aptitude
(I prefer using aptitude to apt-get)
$ try to do something
Error, missing not installed
$ aptitude search missing
...
or, if too many results:
$ aptitude search missing | less
I can now browse the packages looking
starting at $15
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ibdknox/light-table
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
v 5277
When I rclick on a divider, no menu and console says:
splitter_menu splitter not enabled
do I need a @setting?
Thanks,
Kent
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:51:49 -0500
Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
2012 11:45:35 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
When I rclick on a divider, no menu and console says:
splitter_menu splitter not enabled
do I need a @setting?
I wonder if having free_layout.py anywhere in an @enabled-plugins node
is breaking things now. Now that it's moved to core
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:50:29 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I've been seeing updates to plugins/free_layout.py when I bzr pull,
so I thought it should be enabled ...
Yes, it's still in the folder
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:23:36 -0500
Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
leo.plugins.dtest myLeoSettings.leo
leo.plugins.valuespace myLeoSettings.leo
leo.plugins.vim myLeoSettings.leo
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
But viewrendered panes seem to be behaving.
Well, I'll fix that ;-)
Please take a look at 5267. Does it work for you?
No:
/usr/bin/python
Update.
No problem opening a Leo file which doesn't contain a persisted free_layout pane
Thanks,
Kent
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Terry Brown
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:55:11 -0500
Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem opening a Leo file which doesn't contain a persisted
free_layout pane
Terry, I'm completely lost. There is persisted
fixed; in vim, added another '@' to @free-layout-layout
v t=ktenney.20120119115138.1865vh@@data free-layout-layout/vh/v
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:25:09 -0500
Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012
The editor envy resulting from the Light Table demo has me revisiting
a feature that's been percolating.
Sending output to the log pane is very useful, it's how Leo talks back.
Executing from the command line means one space for input and output.
Executing in a Leo node and writing to the log
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:37:22 +0300
Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
How about taking this idea further and locking the body editors in a
grid, or column?
When the body editor is a well behaved widget it
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Could...any node...be designated as a destination for output?
Certainly. Just assign to v.b in the appropriate place.
Right. Leo can
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 18, 10:53 am, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
When the body editor is a well behaved widget it should be straight
forward to place them where ever you want in using the free-layout
mechanism.
Yes.
The ipython integration is great, any chance of connecting the the web notebook?
# ipython notebook
then, from the ipython dashboard in browser, click to open a notebook
the console reports:
[IPKernelApp] To connect another client to this kernel, use:
[IPKernelApp] --existing
Cool.
that's a lot of commands!
Thanks,
Kent
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
The title pretty much says it all. To see the sorted list of all
available minibuffer commands, just use tab completion immediately
upon entering the minibuffer.
Edward
Zope provides a coding framework which has evolved into a set of
tools and a very disciplined methodology. Folks who understand the
complexity and use the idioms correctly seem to build apps which don't
end up hitting walls due to scale or extensibility. This seems to come
at the price of a
revno 5200
with 2 editors, each scrolled to last line:
cycle-editor-focus returns cursor to beginning of first line.
Maybe it's because I use a tabbed QT gui and Unity desktop?
Regardless, 12 hours of work is already too much for a complaint
that no one else seems to have, I can deal with it.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 12:27 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
alt-x add-editor is a requirement for my workmethod, seeing
the code and the test
Howdy,
alt-x add-editor is a requirement for my workmethod, seeing
the code and the test I'm writing side by side ...
It's currently unusable due to unwanted scrolling when moving
between editors. I can't describe how to duplicate, not entirely
predictable, it involves switching focus to the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote:
There is such a format. It's a modification of the MORE format. Use
the flatten-outline command to write the file; use the import-file
command to read the file.
I think the key to Matt's idea is that it work through the
This is a 3 hour workshop on new ipython, pretty impressive.
http://pyvideo.org/video/605/ipython-in-depth-high-productivity-interactive-a
BTW pyvideo.org seems to have high quality vids of the entire pycon 2012
and much more.
Thanks,
Kent
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Matt Wilkie
I tend to rclick to discover what can be done ...
How about a function which added a rclick menu item pointing to your plugin?
It might be cool to make it as accessible as @button and @command
@rclick My custom node handler
# node body contains code which does something with this node
Leo would
vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Not happening for me. The link is blue underlined, clicking it doesn't
change focus.
Missing a plugin?
Can you paste what you see on terminal where you launched leo, when
clicking on the links
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd vote for @command-xxx definition for _all_ commands.
Why would we want that?
A common prefix extends the power of tab completion.
I would use
Should clicking on a result take me to the file?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I have now pushed full text search support (operational already, not
as nice as it will be later on ;-).
Screenshot here:
is not already open, it doesn't work in current
implementation. So you have to open the file manually, then click on
the link.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Should clicking on a result take me to the file?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai
So Cool.
Not only for Leo, but I look forward to learning more about Whoosh,
after looking at several full-text search solutions, Whoosh seems like the
sweet spot: pure Python, powerful but not too heavy, capable but
not too complex ...
Thanks,
Kent
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Ville M.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:27 AM, HansBKK hans...@gmail.com wrote:
This got me quite excited
Imo, if people aren't excited by this Aha, then they don't get it ;-)
I don't get it. :-]
I have trouble following the
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Edward K. Ream
Imo, if people aren't excited by this Aha, then they don't get it ;-)
I don't get
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not interested in multiple 'users' changing my Leo files,
I'm interested in multiple 'applications' using my Leo data.
The client doesn't
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
Good, then it will act the same as when the current file contains
the command definition. That's what I was expecting.
No wonder you are confused
401 - 500 of 1251 matches
Mail list logo
