On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
> https://glyph.twistedmatrix.com/2015/09/software-you-can-use.html
>
> "Python has a big problem. While it’s easy and fun to produce software
> in Python, it’s hard to produce software that people - especially
> laypeople
In the spirit of understanding things, I've long wished for a tool
for viewing the results of strace in a good way.
Linux only (I think, there might be a Windows equivalent), strace
logs what happens behind the scenes, up to verbosity which includes
the full text of files as they are read and
Understanding any program, or it's code to be more specific, is a real
need. Any significantly large project with significant amounts of code is
imposing to anyone trying to figure out how just a fraction of it works.
Here is perhaps not an impossible problem but a real one, and similar to
Hi,
On 15/09/15 09:30, Edward K. Ream wrote:
[...]
We would all like to mix and match the favorite features from two
different apps. Even with open software that can be a practically
impossible task. There are various workarounds, including support for
importing and importing data from
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> More interestingly Leo could use IPython's scheme of basing code
> completion of live objects, provided users are willing to execute the
> code in an outline. Yes, this could be dangerous, and people must be
This is an Engineering Notebook post. Feel free to ignore.
TL;DR: I'm looking for a problem that a) seems impossible and b) hasn't
been significantly studied. The problem I am thinking of involves
gathering data in new ways to help devs understand programs (their own or
other people's).
You may want to read up on Hindley-Milner type infererence. Here seems to
be a Python implementation:
http://smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2010/04/11/a-hindley-milner-type-inference-implementation-in-python/
Apparently MyPy has type inference as well.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:11 PM,
I'm also not impressed or depressed by the OP article. It appears as though
someone promised this guy the world in the form of Python and he's
disappointed that it's not perfect and that there is still work involved.
He mentions Javascript in the article and how easy it is to do this and
that
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:08 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor <
leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
> "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
>
> > More interestingly Leo could use IPython's scheme of basing code
> > completion of live objects,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
> > Rewriting an app in another language is unlikely ever
>
> to be a viable approach.
>
> urm, so why isn't Leo still in C++ ?
>
> :-]
>
Hehe. I actually don't remember why I switched to Python. It probably
was
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
off...@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> On 15/09/15 01:21, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
> Furthermore, the post overstates the problem. For example, IPython is
> wildly successful in the scientific world. IPython users are scientists,
> not
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
>>
>> https://glyph.twistedmatrix.com/2015/09/software-you-can-use.html
>>
>> "Python has a big problem. While it’s easy and fun to produce
Hi,
On 15/09/15 01:21, Edward K. Ream wrote:
Furthermore, the post overstates the problem. For example, IPython is
wildly successful in the scientific world. IPython users are
scientists, not "devs", and yet this doesn't cause great problems.
I used IPython for academic writing and
The following are various thoughts about IPython that I had soon after
returning from vacation. They seem relevant to the question about where
Leo is going.
TL:DR: IPython doesn't need Leo's features. Leo *could* use IPython's
typing completion.
- IPython is a super successful project.
14 matches
Mail list logo