Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-25 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Aug 20, 11:05 am, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are currently 2 alternative linux installation routes, both of which are simpler than what is done in the install script: 1) Install leo as library (currently only used by %lleo in ILeo, but other uses may surface in the

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-25 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that 2) is the simplest thing that could possibly work. Both the 'install' script and the 'setup.py' script seem to cause confusion. For b4 I'm going to remove 'install', 'uninstall' and 'setup.py'

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-25 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please don't remove setup.py. My recent change should prevent the confusion. Ok. I'll put it back in and redo the distribution. Edward --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-25 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make sure to add the version in trunk - it has my warning fix. Oops. The updated setup.py didn't make it into the b4 distribution. I've updated the leo-4-5-final branch, so it will appear in all further releases.

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-24 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM, rogererens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for explaining. One more thing: how do you define 'correctly installed'? Putting the directory into /site-packages? site-packages is a typical place for extensions, but anywhere else will do as well. I don't put

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-21 Thread rogererens
On 20 aug, 18:05, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have gone around and around with the linux install script. I'd rather not change it at all unless absolutely required. I don't see a need for that

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-21 Thread rogererens
I'd rather not add .pth files by default. In the new bzr world I'm often working on several different branches at once. Adding .pth files could create some unintended results. Maybe that could be prevented by using a .pth-file for each branch like leo-4-3-b1.pth, leo-4-3-1-b2.pth, etc.

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-21 Thread rogererens
On 20 aug, 18:30, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 20, 11:05 am, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have gone around and around with the linux install script. I'd rather not change it at

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-21 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM, rogererens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Just run launchLeo.py from the root directory where you extracted the tarball. If a /usr/bin/leo or /usr/local/bin/leo executable script is created that contains python root of extracted leo-directory/launchLeo.py $@

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-20 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:46 PM, rogererens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any hints? I got this .pth-stuff without the soft link working (AFAICT) on Ubuntu 8.04 like so: I'd rather not add .pth files by default. In the new bzr world I'm often working on several different branches at once.

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-20 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have gone around and around with the linux install script. I'd rather not change it at all unless absolutely required. I don't see a need for that install script at all, really. There are currently 2 alternative

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-20 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Aug 20, 11:05 am, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have gone around and around with the linux install script.  I'd rather not change it at all unless absolutely required. I don't see a need for that

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-19 Thread rogererens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't tested this, but for me, building a symbolic link into the python directory: sudo ln -s /usr/local/lib/leo/ /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ made the message Traceback (most recent call last):  File /usr/local/lib/leo/core/runLeo.py, line

Re: problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-08-19 Thread rogererens
Any hints? I got this .pth-stuff without the soft link working (AFAICT) on Ubuntu 8.04 like so: 1) add a leo.pth file to /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages that contains the line /usr/local/lib/leo 2) substitute all 'import leo.core.whatever as whatever' with 'import core.whatever as whatever'

problems using leo-4-5-b1 install script on linux

2008-07-18 Thread rogererens
Hi, I think there are some issues with the install script for linux. I'm using Ubuntu8.04. After unpacking the zip file, I cd'ed into the leo-4-5-b1 directory and made the install file executable. 1) I don't understand why the core and config directory are being copied, removed, and copied