On 2020-02-23 16:21 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 2/23/20 10:46 AM, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 5:20 PM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > We don't consider XPASS a failure. There are many XPASS in LFS packages
> > > (>20 in
> > > total, I
On 2/23/20 8:22 PM, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
Can anything think of a reason why, when I render the Book sources
locally, some entities don't render ?
I've recently noticed this with the ssh-askpass section in the BLFS book
but have seen similar with the LFS sources too, when adding to
Can anything think of a reason why, when I render the Book sources
locally, some entities don't render ?
I've recently noticed this with the ssh-askpass section in the BLFS book
but have seen similar with the LFS sources too, when adding to them.
In the source the title fo the section is
On 2/23/20 10:46 AM, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 5:20 PM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
wrote:
We don't consider XPASS a failure. There are many XPASS in LFS packages (>20 in
total, I think) and it does not make sense to document them one by one.
I'd never seen a XPASS
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 5:20 PM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
wrote:
> We don't consider XPASS a failure. There are many XPASS in LFS packages (>20
> in
> total, I think) and it does not make sense to document them one by one.
>
> I'd never seen a XPASS which is a "bad thing". Once a grep maintainer
On 2020-02-23 15:39 +0100, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Quoting
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/glibc.html
>
> You may see some test failures. The Glibc test suite is somewhat
> dependent on the host system. This is a list of the most common
Le 23/02/2020 à 15:49, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev a écrit :
>
> I am glad to help. But, really, test what you fly, and fly what you
> test. In other words, don't do an SVN build to write the book's text
> (note that GCC has just moved from SVN to git this new year). Thank
> you.
I only did
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 3:26 PM Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
> Le 23/02/2020 à 15:06, Tadeus Prastowo a écrit :
> > No. I have only one machine with one distro that I have been wanting
> > to ditch. In this surveillance age, liberty indeed means hard work,
>
> like writing "free" in hex ;)
Yes,
Hello,
Quoting
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/glibc.html
You may see some test failures. The Glibc test suite is somewhat
dependent on the host system. This is a list of the most common issues
seen for some versions of LFS:
End quote.
To that list, I would like
Le 23/02/2020 à 15:06, Tadeus Prastowo a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 9:48 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> wrote:
>>
>> Le 23/02/2020 à 09:20, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev a écrit :
>>> In other words, the description of the option given in the LFS book
>>> about some C library or libgcc not
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 9:48 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> Le 23/02/2020 à 09:20, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev a écrit :
> > In other words, the description of the option given in the LFS book
> > about some C library or libgcc not being compiled with a thread
> > support is just
Le 22/02/2020 à 23:04, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev a écrit :
> Le 21/02/2020 à 21:50, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev a écrit :
>> Le 21/02/2020 à 18:15, Tadeus Prastowo a écrit :
>>> Some corrections below, keeping in mind that the binutils build is a
>>> native build, not a cross build.
>>>
>>> On
Le 23/02/2020 à 09:20, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 7:58 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> wrote:
>>
>> Le 23/02/2020 à 07:21, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev a écrit :
>>> Le 23/02/2020 à 00:33, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 7:58 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> Le 23/02/2020 à 07:21, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev a écrit :
> > Le 23/02/2020 à 00:33, Tadeus Prastowo via lfs-dev a écrit :
> >> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:10 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Le
14 matches
Mail list logo
