Webmaster wrote:
Sometimes I don't have much time to wait it so I pressed Ctrl+C. Are
there any side effects if I stop it?
No. make check is always optional. However, you may miss an error
caused by an earlier mistake and have a latent error in your build.
That's a risk you have to decide
Timothy Powell wrote:
g++ -I. -I. -I/sources/groff-1.21/src/include
-I/sources/groff-1.21/src/include -I/src/libs/gnulib/lib -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g
-O2 -c font.cpp
If you run this again, do you get the same error in the same place?
font.cpp: In function 'int scale_round(int, int, int)':
Webmaster wrote:
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0xc SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: (spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x8 SAct=0xc
FIS=0050:0003)
ata1.00: cmd 61/08:10:0f:c1:4e/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 2 cdb 0x0 data 4096 out
ata1.00: cmd
William Immendorf wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Frederick Muriithi
fredmang...@gmail.com wrote:
../../gcc-4.5.2/gcc/c-common.c: In function 'c_common_nodes_and_builtins':
../../gcc-4.5.2/gcc/c-common.c:5106: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Please submit a full bug
robert wrote:
I'm out to sea here. Worked through 6.8 build without error (it would seem).
However, attempt to boot yields (in part):
scanned 0 and added 0 devices
autorun ...
... autorun DONE.
Root-NFS: no NFS server address
VFS: unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
VFS:
pete Spam-Avoider wrote:
The following line appeared on virtual console 1 during
testing of glic-2.13 in BK6.8_Ch6.9.1:
[ 5525.196801] Maximum lock depth 1024 reached task: ld-linux.so.2 (8378)
The line was also visible as the last line produced by 'dmesg'.
The line did
robert wrote:
vi. Prerequisites
link seems to be broken ...
#
The Linux Users' Guide http://www.linuxhq.com/guides/LUG/guide.html
This guide covers the usage of assorted Linux software. This reference is
also
fairly old, but still valid.
I can find a the guide in some compressed
Brian Dickens wrote:
Out of curiosity - I am building from the 6.3 LiveCD but following
the 6.8 book with the proper sources downloaded, etc.
That is fine.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
robert wrote:
6.36. Bzip2-1.0.6 works fine until I reach instruction:
rm -v /usr/bin/{bunzip2,bzcat,bzip2}
re-ran the sequence and stopped just before this command; checked /usr/bin
for
bunzip2, bzcat, and bzip2; these do not exist.
Is this a legacy instruction that is of no use, or
xinglp wrote:
2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com:
2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com:
Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system. But it
works well on 64bits.
May be my mistake, I'll check it later
It's like that I can't use entire the disk (/dev/sda, partitionless)
lanas wrote:
Hello all,
How would one achieve that ? I recently built a LFS system on a
64-bit host, and all binaries turned out to be 64-bit. I'd like to
build and run a 32-bit LFS system. Is there a way of doing that on a
64-bit host ?
On the other hand, the instructions in this
Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
many a manager say more or less the
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-mqueue5.out]
Nick Amor wrote:
Hi, I'm working on LFS 6.8 and I cannot download the Shadow package. When I
try to use wget it returns the message failed: connection refused. I tried
going to website to download directly and it said I didn't have access on the
download page. I have searched Google and
²ÜÓî wrote:
root:/sources/mpfr-3.0.0#make html
...
/sources/mpfr-3.0.0/missing: line 52: makeinfo: command not found
WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file
indirectly affecting
Send this type of message to lfs-support
Original Message
Subject: Re: lfs-support Digest, Vol 2302, Issue 2 (janu mam)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:57:37 +0530
From: janu mam janakiramulu.mt...@gmail.com
To: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
References: BANLkTi=v-FSv7De=mf67x
al...@verizon.net wrote:
That's a 360 (as they say) reversal of what I said in my previous
post.
Not sure if I got the attribution right.
LOL. I think you mean 180. :)
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Manuel Gonzalez Montoya wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Brett brettsca...@email.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to build LFS SVN-20110427 on an AMD64 system
I get a consistent failure when running the checks for Binutils in
chapter 6. This is the output where the error occurs:
For the
janu mam wrote:
hi all
in my system windows was there on -sda1,sda2-extended partition ,personal
data drive-sda5
i am doing lfs6.7(book)- on sda6,swap-sda7(i am using lfs-livecd)
---
see this is my grub.cfg file
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 13:17 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:25 +0800, xinglp wrote:
On my X86_64 lfs (SVN-20110427) system .
/dev/disk/by-label/xxx has not turnd up when mountfs started , so
I can't use LABEL= in fstab .
On 32bits system , this
bsquared wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
zgrep CONFIG_RTC /proc/config.gz
egrep ^CONFIG_RTC config-2.6.37
CONFIG_RTC_LIB=y
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y
CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE=rtc0
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y
thomas castleidne wrote:
Dear Linux From Scratch
I have just hit chapter three of the book and im having problems downloading
the packages. I cannot seem to get the required packages, i am connect to the
internet via ethernet cable.
when i try : wget
thomas castleidne wrote:
Dear Bruce since i emailed you i have played around a little more
with it. it seems that even when i try wget
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/wget-list i get
the same error message. I'm not entire sure where the problem is.
It appears that you
thomas castleidne wrote:
Well im emailing you throguht my Windows 7 laptop and im trying to
download the packages via the virtual terminal on the Linux From
scratch live cd, do i need to activate the internet connection
thoguht the terminal? im using an ethernet cable btw.
Don't top post.
Mike McCarty wrote:
I don't know whether there is a MD5SUM file for V 6.8 of the
book, but I've generated one, and verified that all the MD5
sums match the tarballs listed in the book. If one doesn't
already exist, I'd like to contribute it.
Well, if I ever get around to it, I'll upload the
Mike McCarty wrote:
Karthik Bhuvanagiri wrote:
Hi,
I'm following LFS-Book-6.7. I followed everything in the book successfully
until section 6.44.1-Installation of Grub. Compiling grub-1.98 fails after
issuing make command.
Please suggest me in resolving the issue.
*Output of ./configure
Mike McCarty wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
Did this ever get resolved? I see that the .o files got included
in the link more than once, but I didn't see a resolution.
In a fresh svn build yesterday, I get no errors at all. You've cut down
the output to where I can't see
Mike McCarty wrote:
I'm using a VM (qemu) to build LFS v 6.8. I'm using the LFS LiveCD
as my build system. I've partitioned and formatted my disc,
and successfully booted the LiveCD. I've downloaded jhalfs-2.3.2
(I understand the one on the LiveCD jhalfs-2.3.1 is broken) and
started setting
Mike McCarty wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
When you go into the VM, extract jhalfs to your /home directory (the
name doesn't matter). Run from there. jhalfs should create
/mnt/lfs/{jhalfs,sources}. I tell it not to mess with sources and then
What's the difference between that and running
On Apr 21, 2011 12:08 AM, Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
When you go into the VM, extract jhalfs to your /home directory (the
name doesn't matter). Run from there. jhalfs should create
/mnt/lfs/{jhalfs,sources}. I tell
bsquared wrote:
Hello;
I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for
two, but I am not finding any for this one.
LD drivers/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatch in
reference from the function parport_pc_probe_port() to the
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 04/14/2011 02:55 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
Yes, there's been a bit of discussion of this among the distributions of
late. Here's a couple of the links I've read on the subject...
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
me,apporc wrote:
Hi pioneer
I have finished to install lfs on my kvm virtual host.
But it has a problem now. Sometimes, i mean not always , it will fail to
boot. And i could not capture the error it reported , because next time i
succeed to boot it there is nothing about it in kern.log . I
Simon Geard wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:27 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Simon Geard wrote:
[...]
While not universal, there seems to be a growing feeling that having a
separate /usr partition serves no useful purpose these days. The third
of those links gives a pretty good summary of
Dave Hajoglou wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Dave Hajoglou dhajog...@gmail.com wrote:
To list,
I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some
slowness. I built an x86_64 kernel (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host
(5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon. It boots with no issues
Dave Hajoglou wrote:
I ran a jhalfs build last night and was wondering if anyone want's the
report. I seem to recall that a while back the developers wanted
these reports. The build took just over 4.5 hours.
Yes, please. Send it to me and I'll post it in
piper.guy1 wrote:
Respectfully I don't agree. I still maintain the instructions in this
section are confusing.
If you read the quote it definitely says to get out of the chrooted
environment, and then to re-enter it. There's nothing that says to perform
the subsequent reboot and grub
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:06:35 -0400
piper.guy1 piper.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm almost finished LFS-6.7. I verified that grub works in section
8.4.3 and LFS boots up without any hitches.
But now section 8.4.4 requires the change to the MBR with the
'grub-setup'
Julien BODIN wrote:
Actually I just want a reliable and fast system which can be
virtualized. I don't want to use CPU or RAM for other things that I
really use.
But this is not related to lfs, because I'm doing it just because I
want to know how a distribution work.
I was just curious
Ian T wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry if this has already been posted, I looked through the archives,
but I just joined this list.
I'm building a 6.8 LFS and am at 6.16 GCC. Because of an error return
in the tests, I went to check the build logs. However, the LFS site's
log page gives me an Access
Ian T wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian T wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry if this has already been posted, I looked through the archives,
but I just joined this list.
I'm building a 6.8 LFS and am at 6.16 GCC. Because of an error return
g...@mail.com wrote:
Good day.
I done 5.5. GCC-4.5.2 - Pass 1 After make install end of screen was:
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
After: ln -vs libgcc.a `$LFS_TGT-gcc
piper.guy1 wrote:
Hi,
I'm at the last stages of LFS-6.7, section 8.4.3 Testing The Configuration.
After rebooting, starting GRUB from the command line, and booted into
my LFS installation as indicated by 8.4.3, I had errors in several
boot scripts.
The cause was line 17 of
piper.guy1 wrote:
Is it me or is the first paragraph in section 8.4.3 in LFS-6.7 badly worded?
It sounds to me it's suggesting how to add the new LFS-6.7
installation to the existing GRUB simply by exiting the chroot
environment and then going back into the chroot environment.
To
g...@mail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 19:20 +0300, g...@mail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 10:28 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
g...@mail.com wrote:
Good day.
I done 5.5. GCC-4.5.2 - Pass 1 After make install end of screen was:
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/i686
fuf wrote:
Good day!
I had not might properly download the MPC (0.8.2), from LFS-6.8 book.
Archive Manager wrote; An error occurred while loading the archive.
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now.
The checking md5sum gave
Alex Bosworth wrote:
Here's the synopsis:
Been trying to compile LFS (from the latest svn version) on my laptop, I have
tried four times so far (please note I'm making use of JHLAFS). During all
the
four builds, gcc tests don't seem to be satisfactory as the number of
unexpected
Mark Maurer wrote:
All --
I was flowing along nicely with LFS 6.8, until I come to the second pass
of gcc 4.5.2 (after the binutils second pass). Where the book says to
patch
it (section 5.10.1) to revert to the old behavior with this command:
patch -Np1 -i
JAMC60 wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to install lfs-6.8 via ssh in a somehow old PC.
All seems to be ok but the last step: Using grub to set up the boot process
The output of device.map is:
(fd0)/dev/fd0
(hd0)/dev/hda
So, the next step is:
grub-install /dev/hda
No, the next step is
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
The MD5SUMs for lfs-bootscripts and udev-config as listed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter03/packages.html
are incorrect. The correct values are as follows:
lfs-bootscripts-20100627.tar.bz2:
8260bdb271caa3b538f8e95f65998864
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
The MD5SUMs for lfs-bootscripts and udev-config as listed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter03/packages.html
are incorrect. The correct values are as follows:
lfs-bootscripts-20100627.tar.bz2
I'm pleased to announce the release of LFS Version 6.8. This release
includes numerous changes to LFS-6.7 (including updates to
Linux-2.6.37, GCC-4.5.2, Glibc-2.13) and security fixes. It also
includes editorial work on the explanatory material throughout the book,
improving both the clarity and
frank@spx.com wrote:
Hi,
I was following LFS book source version 6.7. Completed steps before
step 5.10.
In 5.10, I need compile Gcc - pass 2. Got a fatal error ac_nonexistent.h
no such file or directory, details please see config.log below,
It sounds like you do not have autotools
frank@spx.com wrote:
Please do not top post.
It doesn't have the autotools requirement.
I am using lfslivecd have autoconf version 2.61 and automake 1.10.
You shouldn't need autotools for LFS. From my log:
checking libelf.h usability... no
checking libelf.h presence... no
checking for
frank@spx.com wrote:
It doesn't have the autotools requirement.
I am using lfslivecd have autoconf version 2.61 and automake 1.10.
You shouldn't need autotools for LFS.
In your first reply, you said It sounds like you do not have autotools
installed in your host. I thought it may be
al...@verizon.net wrote:
C. As nit-pickings (no urgency, we know how long it takes to change
will with must in the next (almost) daily revision of the book:)
C.1. 6.2.21 should say must instead of will
OK, we can do this. It's in section 6.2.1, not 6.2.21.
C.2. The whole Create some
janu mam wrote:
i am using lfs livex86-r2160 as host for building lfs book 6.7,
in lfs6.7 book the following msg was there
The LFS LiveCD might not work on newer hardware configurations,
failing to boot or failing to detect
some devices such as some SATA hard drives.
shall i use for
al...@verizon.net wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote,
When I rebooted, I got the following messages:
cannot open /dev/null
FATAL: Module platform: regulatory not set
FATAL: Module LNXSYTEM: not found
FATAL: Module doc not found
FATAL: pci:v... not found
This last was repeated about
al...@verizon.net wrote:
3.2. The PROBLEM (the actual object of the OP) has been
my worries started recently when _finally_ a [light] bulb went
[off] in my head on reading
# Create some devices and directories that Udev cannot handle
# due to them being required very early in
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Friday 25 February 2011 15:02:23 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
It looks like the process is:
1. Use null and console at the start.
2. Mount a tmpfs on /dev hiding the original null and console devices.
3. Create all new devices, including null, on the tmpfs via udev
al...@verizon.net wrote:
I do have a confusion underlying this thread.
I have claimed (possibly wrongly), the Udev philosophy assumes a /dev
absolutely empty. Are the initial (metal) null and console nodes
an LFS specific requirement (based on its particular boot/log sequence
I tested and
Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 22:11 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:24 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
What am I missing? My latest only has
$ ls /dev/disk
by-id by-path by-uuid
Odd - I see those, and by-label too. My main desktop is a little old
now (about ten
Simon Geard wrote:
As to the rest, it may be I've misunderstood your original post - the
confusion was over the claim that people are unaware they they have
those nodes on the metal /dev. Given these nodes are explicitly
created with a clear explanation as to why, it seemed to me that you
Simon Geard wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:38 -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
[rant] Digressing a little, I have a bone to pick with Kay Seivers and Greg
K-
H. Their attitude is that only symlinks should be used in /dev and created
from udev rules (for the most part), and those symlinks may only
Karthik Bhuvanagiri wrote:
Hi,
Where can I get md5sum of grub-1.98 tar ball?
All md5sums are in section 3.2. All Packages.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Karthik Bhuvanagiri wrote:
Hi,
I'm following LFS-Book-6.7. I followed everything in the book successfully
until section 6.44.1-Installation of Grub. Compiling grub-1.98 fails after
issuing make command.
Please suggest me in resolving the issue.
*Output of ./configure --prefix=/usr
Brian Winfrey wrote:
Is there any problem with deferring installation of shadow until
system is ready for deployment?
No, but why would you want to do that?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
Brian Winfrey wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian Winfrey wrote:
Is there any problem with deferring installation of shadow until
system is ready for deployment?
No, but why would you want to do that?
 -- Bruce
--
http
Brian Winfrey wrote:
update:
util_linux-ng need to change permissions on /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
Why? They look OK to me.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Stuart Stegall wrote:
It's not uncommon for Mice to be detected as Keyboards, Mice, and
Joysticks depending on the mouse's advertisements. I would imagine
your keyboard is the same way. It's still being detected as a
keyboard right? Send your complete X log and dmesg log. (Minus
anything
Melvin Poindexter wrote:
Greetings. I've decided to start yet another LFS SVN. I clicked the
link in the online book for the wget-list but it comes up Page not
found error. Has the link changed? One of the IRC channel ops said
that the server may not have generated one, and suggested that I
Melvin Poindexter wrote:
Thank you. Your link worked. I'm not sure where you got it. The link
located at Ch. 3.1 is pointing to
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/wget-list. Yours is
different. You got it from SVN-20110110 ?
I'm not sure where you are looking.
Simon Geard wrote:
I'm all for making sure the book is clear and unambiguous. But to use
your analogy of training wheels, I think they're a bad idea, giving
people an unjustified sense of competence because it looks easy. It's
*not* easy, and if people are in over their heads, they need to
karl tattersall wrote:
Brief explanation of the problem:
Configuration of gmp-5.0.0 produces an error.
• The version of the book being used (in this case 6.6)
Yes, the book version is 6.6.
• The host distribution and version being used to create LFS
I am creating this on Kubuntu –
Theodore Papamarkou wrote:
Device Boot Start End #cyls#blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 0+ 7649- 7649- 6144 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14020+ 14593-574- 46039055 Extended
/dev/sda3 7649+ 14019- 6371- 51174400 83 Linux
/dev/sda4 0
Theodore Papamarkou wrote:
The problem though is that I rebooted the system several times without
remounting it manually or automatically through /etc/fstab.
If that's one of the mistakes I made, then I will have to do go through all
the chapters of the book from the beginning, right...?
Not
Rosario Turco wrote:
Please ask on lfs-support.
I have seen with 'c' on prompt
No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9960
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs at
unknown-block(8,4)
This is a kernel message, so at this point grub's job is done.
Rosario Turco wrote:
I haven't got /dev/sda4, my /dev/sda has got only two (sda1 e sda2)
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 0 Jan 2 18:31 /dev/sda
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 1 Jan 2 18:31 /dev/sda1
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 2 Jan 2 18:31 /dev/sda2
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 16 Jan 2 18:31
Rosario Turco wrote:
Is it possible to see a log of the complete error? For example the output of
dmesg ...
Until you get it to boot, no. If it can't mount /, where would it write
to?
I don't think you understand. Make a grub.cfg file that is exactly 5
lines long:
insmod ext2
set
Thomas Pegg wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:18 AM, xinglp wrote:
It looks like the jhalfs use the below section instead of filename.
lfs/{chapter05,chapter06}/xz.xml line 9 ?dbhtml
filename=xz-utils.html?
Yes, right it does ignore my previous email. Bruce if you would like
I'll fix
xinglp wrote:
I patched the jhalfs. Maybe I should patch the lfs book instead.
BTW: Is there any tools for editing the lfs book in a easier way,
other than vim.
No, that's how we've always done it.
diff -Naur jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh jhalfs/LFS/master.sh
--- jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 13:30:58 +0530
Bavithra R bavithr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I am a newbie for creating distro from scratch.
Initially I started with LFS book.
Now I am in a need to use the Debian repository.
Then install Debian
Can any one please tell me
NeoAmsterdam wrote:
Here's what ``grep Error glibc-check-log`` had to say:
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-waitid.out] Error 1
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[1]: *** [posix/tests] Error 2
make[2]: ***
Rosario Turco wrote:
created a virtual machine with Fedora 14 guest host a filesystem with no
errors
everything is set up in LFS 6.7 Chapter 9. Kernel is ok.
When I mount the new virtual machine obtained LFS, I get errors because I did
not understand how to configure fstab and grub.cfg
Blake Morgan wrote:
The documentation says that the
CD includes SSH server and
client. I'm not sure if it is enabled
and I don't know how to enable
it. PuTTY says Network error:
Connection refused. The port
is 22, the connection type is
SSH, and the Host Name is the
IP Address.
Please
Blake Morgan wrote:
The reason I have been avoiding the differen didstro is because I'm
confused about the partitioning. Would I not partition durin the
install and do it in the shell? Would I follow the books instructions
during the install? I don't understand how to partition for LFS using
xinglp wrote:
It's a bug of sysklogd-1.5
ksym_mod.c line 184
if ( ksyms == NULL )
{
if ( errno == ENOENT )
Syslog(LOG_INFO, No module symbols loaded -
kernel modules not enabled.\n);
else
Nolan wrote:
Appears to be some show-stoppers here.
Any suggestions for debugging? || Do I need to rebuild, and at what
point should that start.
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
pieter blomme wrote:
Being pretty new to LFS, it's high chance I fucked up somewhere. But up
till now everything seemed to work.
When i try to apply the patch
patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.5.1-startfiles_fix-1.patch
while being in the gcc-directory, i get the following error:
patching file
Rosario Turco wrote:
I have Fedora 14 as host and I'm stuck in par. 6.7.1 of LFS 6.7 book.
I followed all the instructions, I'm sure you have typed everything like in
the
book (I did the chroot, mount, mkdir etc etc).
When I reinstall the package and try to do:
make mrproper
It
Fady Fawzy wrote:
Dear LFS-Deveolpers,
I detected that when we are build the /tools in CH5 , we used
$LFS_TGT to install the packages with modified target build name as
xxx-lfs-linux-gnu . When we are in CH6 we don't set the variable to
be used in real LFS build and so we don't use it
Fady Fawzy wrote:
Dear all ,
I'm going to build LFS system as a Virtual appliance and i put a
challenge for myself to build the appliance as small as possible . It
will handle some web app. ,JAVA ,and C++ programs .
I'm now in Ch6 in LFS 6.7 , So any suggestions about any un-needed
tools
Rosario Turco wrote:
Sorry, my editor has removed the hyphens and spaces made.
The exact command on Fedora 14 is (all lower case):
../glibc-2.12.1/configure --prefix=/tools \
--host = $ LFS_TGT --build =$(../ glibc-2.12.1/scripts/config.guess) \
--disable-profile --enable-add-ons \
Stuart Stegall wrote:
udev-test will run 142 tests:
FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
==
1 of 1 test failed
My system has error as expected for tests 1, 48, 81, 82, 139, 140, and
141 for udev-161.
0 errors occured
PASS: test/udev-test.pl
=
1
robert wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Stuart Stegall wrote:
udev-test will run 142 tests:
FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
==
1 of 1 test failed
My system has error as expected for tests 1, 48, 81, 82, 139, 140, and
141 for udev-161.
0 errors occured
Dax Mickelson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:05:24 -0700
Dax Mickelson d...@daxm.net wrote:
Attached is the output of 'make' failing. (If you need you can go to
www.daxm.net/LFS/6.7/Screenshot-6.32-make-errors.png to get it too.)
I don't even have a guess as to what to do. :-(
According
robert wrote:
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote:
unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2
cd udev-161
then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and
not jxvf???
'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar).
'tar xvfj' unpacks a
robert wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0600, robert wrote:
So, I don't follow then. Instructions at 6.59. Udev-161
say: tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2 ...
why not *J*xvf?
Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is
not 'j'.
Daryl Lee wrote:
I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-list
( has a broken link.
Broken:
Daryl Lee wrote:
On 12/06/2010 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Daryl Lee wrote:
I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-list
( has
901 - 1000 of 1449 matches
Mail list logo
