Hi, Chris:
Unfortunately, I spent another 4 hours to rebuild everything from scratch,
with glibc patched this time. Still, the same. I still obtained the
following error message:
*/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
Problem solved.
It seems I need to do
*reconfigration *after setting CFLAGS=-L/tools/lib -lpthread, and then
proceed to *make* .
It's all about the ./configure.
Better add one command *$ CFLAGS=-L/tools/lib -lpthread* before *./configure
--prefix=/tools*
in the user manual.
cheers
Pei
On Wed,
JIA Pei wrote:
Problem solved.
It seems I need to do
*reconfigration *after setting CFLAGS=-L/tools/lib -lpthread, and then
proceed to *make* .
It's all about the ./configure.
Better add one command *$ CFLAGS=-L/tools/lib -lpthread* before
*./configure
--prefix=/tools*
in the user
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 17:01 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Unfortunately, the reason why I'm using the latest version of Binutils
is deu to the current wget-list:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/wget-list
However, on the book, it's still using binutils-2.22
Restart building all of your tools, pay attention to the cp command,
it requires admin privileges.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 17:01 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Unfortunately, the reason why I'm using the latest version of Binutils
is
Hi, Simon:
The reason why I'm doing that (use binutils-2.23.1 instead of
binutils-2.22) is I don't want to 100% strictly follow LFS book, so that I
might be able to understand how to build my own Linux deeper.
And, even now, I've got no idea why we need to patch binutils ??
Because without
On 12/18/2012 07:51 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Simon:
The reason why I'm doing that (use binutils-2.23.1 instead of
binutils-2.22) is I don't want to 100% strictly follow LFS book, so that
I might be able to understand how to build my own Linux deeper.
And, even now, I've got no idea why we
Hi, Thank you Chris.
Thanks for your reply. I now understand a bit more about why we need
Binutils Pass 1 and Pass 2.
However, I still prefer using Binutils 2.23.1, does that mean I'll have to
create my own patch for Binutils-2.23.1??
Are you planning to afford the patches to all newest needed
JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Thank you Chris.
Thanks for your reply. I now understand a bit more about why we need
Binutils Pass 1 and Pass 2.
However, I still prefer using Binutils 2.23.1, does that mean I'll have to
create my own patch for Binutils-2.23.1??
Are you planning to afford the patches to
Thank you so much Bruce...
I proceed to expect 5.45 now
But, I got two test fails as follows. Is this normal?
* expect-1.8b default remove null behavior FAILED*
* Contents of test case:*
*
*
*spawn cat $filename*
*expect ab*
*set rc [regexp $expect_out(buffer) ab]*
*
JIA Pei wrote:
Thank you so much Bruce...
I proceed to expect 5.45 now
But, I got two test fails as follows. Is this normal?
We do not recommend running tests in Chapter 5. They often depend on
the host system and we don't know what the arbitrary user has as a host.
You are on your own
Now, fail to build check-0.9.9 ...
The error message is:
*/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
note: 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO
/tools/lib/libpthread.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line*
On 12/18/2012 09:23 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
Now, fail to build check-0.9.9 ...
The error message is:
//mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
note: 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO
/tools/lib/libpthread.so.0 so try adding it to the
On 12/18/2012 09:07 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
Thank you so much Bruce...
I proceed to expect 5.45 now
But, I got two test fails as follows. Is this normal?
If you had read the book like you're expected to, you would already know
the answer to this. If you can't be bothered to read it, quit
Hi, all;
Sorry to bug all of you again.
I've successfully built
Binutils 2.23.1
GCC 4.7,2
Linux-kernel 3.6.10
Glib 2.16.0
However, is it a must for me to proceed to the pass 2 of binutils and gcc?
I'm now following Pass 2 of Binutils
On 12/17/2012 06:00 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all;
Sorry to bug all of you again.
I've successfully built
Binutils 2.23.1
GCC 4.7,2
Linux-kernel 3.6.10
Glib 2.16.0
However, is it a must for me to proceed to the pass 2 of binutils and gcc?
Whatever is in the book is there for a
Hi, Thanks Chris:
Thank you for your prompt reply.
Unfortunately, the reason why I'm using the latest version of Binutils is
deu to the current wget-list:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/wget-list
On this list, binutils-2.23.1 is used
17 matches
Mail list logo
