Drew Ames wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2010 08:28 PM, robert wrote:
Someday of course I'll be able to add only known quantities after the
fresh build and thereby keep the whole thing smartly clean
something like a system-wide RSA number.
Robert,
If
No small sense of accomplishment attaches to having finished up this
project. Of course, this cannot be anywhere near as gratifying as
having actually put together this little project. Many people no doubt
involved. A warm gracias merci beaucoup danke to all of you.
As I believe I mentioned
robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 16:22 CST:
Any precautionary notes before I light out for the wilderness?
Why reinvent the wheel? An automated system to build LFS already exists!
Instead of simply doing boring work adding together the commands, why
not use your new Linux system to do
Randy McMurchy wrote:
robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 16:22 CST:
Any precautionary notes before I light out for the wilderness?
Why reinvent the wheel? An automated system to build LFS already exists!
Instead of simply doing boring work adding together the commands, why
not use your
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 04:22:45PM -0600, robert wrote:
I believe now, I'm going to concatenate all my commands (or at least as
many as should reasonably be concatenated) with and then try to get
it to build overnight.
Any precautionary notes before I light out for the wilderness?
Ken Moffat wrote:
Two thoughts (as someone who creates his own scripts to do this).
First, give some thought to catching error messages (e.g. by logging
stderr), whilst remembering that every script you create will bring
its own new bugs.
Second, and more importantly, the perfect is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2010 08:28 PM, robert wrote:
Someday of course I'll be able to add only known quantities after the
fresh build and thereby keep the whole thing smartly clean
something like a system-wide RSA number.
Robert,
If you're looking for a
