On 06/14/2010 06:43 AM, Face wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:25 PM, littlebatdashing.m...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems you have missed something, I remember we should always use
non-root user (lfs) to compile LFS in chapter 5 at least.
See:
On 06/16/2010 05:34 AM, Parmenides wrote:
Hi,
When system starting, there are two settings, namely 'regional
settings' and 'edit settings',
at which the process of starting will pause and I have to press enter
key twice to finish them.
Is there any configurations by which I can skip them
On 06/16/2010 01:11 PM, Parmenides wrote:
2010/6/16 Chris Staubch...@beaker67.com:
On 06/16/2010 05:34 AM, Parmenides wrote:
Yes, this is the effect of a live CD indeed. But, I have clone the
live CD onto a partition of hard disk, and tried to altenate some
default settings of it.
Well,
On 07/07/2010 01:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
2.) the configuration file example given talks about Be careful not
to change the 'exec tail' line above. . But the example does not
contain a exec tail line. However, this line is important.
May be something is missing
On 12/05/2011 01:27 AM, str1chn1n3 wrote:
Hello All,
It's unclear whether the email list is restricted to just the stable
version-- if so, just say the word and I'll abandon DEV for STABLE. If
not, I could use a hand figuring out the cause of an install failure.
The details:
1) Building to a
Whenever I attempt to install as user lfs sans sudo, I get 'Permission
denied' for the target directory. That's why lfs is sudoed. Any thoughts
why this might be happening? (Btw, that's the reason for the indirect
toolchain adjustment.)
That means you've missed something earlier in the
On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote:
Guess I overlooked The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later.
So what liveCD should I use then?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Henk
Just download any fairly recent distro...Fedora, Ubuntu, etc...and if
needed install whatever additional
On 10/11/2012 03:42 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
I got this: ./bld: line 16: /usr/bin/mv: No such file or directory
when I ran my script for coreutils. I navigated to the /usr/bin
directory of the chroot enironment and there is no mv file or directory.
Any ideas? Also, if you want to see my
On 10/11/2012 09:14 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
I ran my script( http://pastebin.com/95jDZ7ds ) for chapter 6.33
Bash-4.2 and the prompt ended up just being bash and thus never seeing
my FLAG file or GOOD being echoed to the screen. Was my script still
successful? I'M thinking that it was and
On 10/22/2012 02:04 PM, Gaurav Goel wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the LFS-BOOK-7.2.
While building glibc in section 6.9 I'm getting following errors:
--
root:/sources#
On 10/31/2012 04:04 AM, gmspro wrote:
Is there any way to know how many packages are installed?
Is it possible to know if a package is installed or not?
Thanks.
See the page in the LFS book on Package Management -
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/pkgmgt.html
--
On 11/05/2012 09:10 PM, Harry Prevor wrote:
This is my second LFS build, but it's been a while. This time I'm
trying to build with Package Users as described in this hint:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/more_control_and_pkg_man.txt
For the sanity check at 6.17
On 11/06/2012 03:21 PM, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
Bruce wrote:
Why does one have to create a directory with that name before
executing the mount command?
The system has to know where to attach the data structures in the file
tree. You could create a script to do a 'mkdir -p mountpoint;
On 11/06/2012 08:13 PM, Harry Prevor wrote:
On 11/5/12, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com wrote:
I see numerous similar lines in your output - basically, it appears to
be looking in /bin and /lib for gcc files, rather than /usr/{bin,lib}.
To be honest, I'm not really sure why that is.
Does ls
On 11/06/2012 09:11 PM, Harry Prevor wrote:
On 11/6/12, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com wrote:
Installing GCC into /usr certainly shouldn't create any
directories or files in /bin or /lib. Do you have logs of your GCC
installation?
Only of the installation as root, as all the previous files
On 11/06/2012 09:19 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
On 11/06/2012 09:11 PM, Harry Prevor wrote:
Only of the installation as root, as all the previous files were
deleted. Here is my config.log:
http://sprunge.us/QUHB
I can provide any other files from the installation if requested.
configure
On 11/09/2012 12:30 PM, Prabhu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and
MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even
configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me
an error message says that
Please clarify
On 11/10/2012 01:49 AM, Prabhu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and
MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even
configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me
an error message says that
*checking for
On 11/10/2012 07:14 AM, Prabhu wrote:
(5.5.1 Installation of cross GCC)
I successfully compiled Binutilities, then I untared the GCC. In GCC
folder I done the following steps
*tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz
mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr
tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz
mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp
tar -zxf
On 11/10/2012 10:05 AM, yan wrote:
I also get a problem at this point
chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ '
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin/bash --login +h
/tools/bin/env: /tools/bin/bash: Permission denied
root@cpu:/home/yan/lfs# ll
On 11/10/2012 09:22 PM, yan wrote:
On Sat 10 Nov 2012 11:09:08 PM CST, Chris Staub wrote:
On 11/10/2012 10:05 AM, yan wrote:
I also get a problem at this point
chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ '
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin
On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, lei huang wrote:
Linux 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:01:37 EDT 2012 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
config.log
FATAL: kernel too old
help!!!
There's the problem - your host system doesn't have a recent enough
kernel. You will need to upgrade the kernel to at
On 11/14/2012 04:59 AM, Smith, Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
The package list specifies using linux kernel: Linux-3.5.2
Obviously the later releases would contain multiple fixes and security
improvements.
Any reason why using the latest 3.5.X release (Currently 3.5.7) would
cause any issues
On 11/16/2012 01:07 AM, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote:
Hi all,
Since I have completed building complete LFS system now I want to
configure it's network in order to access internet.
I have read through
robbat2 take new kernel, copy old config to .config
robbat2 make oldconfig
robbat2 answer
On 11/23/2012 07:33 PM, nettxzl wrote:
(Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have vanished.)
Hi,
I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
given there:
tar -Jxf
On 11/26/2012 12:19 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
王杰清 wrote:
hi,
when i install glibc following lfs.7.2 book, i meet with the error
configure: error : linker with -z support required
is my gcc wrong in my host? should i reinstall it ,or how can i fix it .
Any advice is pleasure;
Have you checked
On 11/27/2012 05:15 PM, Dave wrote:
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 11:09:33 Dave wrote:
I only have WiFi with WEP encryption here, can the WICD pkg and DHCP
alone handle this connect?
You will need some other packages, like wpa_supplicant, but the answer is
On 12/02/2012 01:02 AM, d...@fluidnetwork.com wrote:
Hello all,
Just built two systems, one of HLFS-development and one LFS-7.2.
Not sure what I did wrong, but neither system would successfully mount
/dev/pts or /dev/shm on bootup - both were complaining about
nonexistant mount points.
On 12/02/2012 11:22 AM, Francisco Jesús Navarro Cortés wrote:
Hello. i try build with make-3.82 and make-3.82-upstream_fixes-3.patch
the source webkitgtk-1.10.1 but get this error:
./.libs/libwebkit2gtk-3.0.so http://libwebkit2gtk-3.0.so: undefined
reference to `glCullFace'
On 12/08/2012 03:49 PM, Prabhu wrote:
Hi I'm getting permission error while make install the binutil
package, but I could successfully able to create folder in all the 3 dir
(source,tools,usr) with the user lfs. I rollback and reperformed the
chapter 4.1 to 4.4, but I'm still facing the issue.
On 12/15/2012 02:58 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote:
Hello all,
I am on section 5.15.1 (installing bash) on LFS version 7.2 and I am
receiving an error after running make:
$ make -j
yacc -d ./parse.y
make: execvp: yacc: Permission denied
make: *** [y.tab.c] Error 127
I have encountered this
On 12/15/2012 03:03 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote:
An additional piece of information that might be important:
The patch asked for in the book is bash-4.2-fixes-8.patch while the one
I have from the website and that one that I applied
is bash-4.2-fixes-10.patch
Could that be the cause of the
On 12/15/2012 03:11 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
ls -l /usr/bin/yacc gives:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41 Dec 13 19:13 /usr/bin/yacc
That explains it, that script is not executable. chmod a+x
/usr/bin/yacc and it should work.
--
On 12/16/2012 06:55 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
1) From
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
, binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
What is this patch for?
*patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch*
It tells you in the book. Try reading
On 12/17/2012 06:00 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all;
Sorry to bug all of you again.
I've successfully built
Binutils 2.23.1
GCC 4.7,2
Linux-kernel 3.6.10
Glib 2.16.0
However, is it a must for me to proceed to the pass 2 of binutils and gcc?
Whatever is in the book is there for a
On 12/18/2012 07:51 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Simon:
The reason why I'm doing that (use binutils-2.23.1 instead of
binutils-2.22) is I don't want to 100% strictly follow LFS book, so that
I might be able to understand how to build my own Linux deeper.
And, even now, I've got no idea why we
On 12/18/2012 08:25 AM, Prabhu wrote:
Hi,
Since its a check, I ignored it and I performed with the next step
that's *make install* even this fails and throw me an error as
*
*ERROR*:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
On 12/18/2012 09:23 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
Now, fail to build check-0.9.9 ...
The error message is:
//mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
note: 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO
/tools/lib/libpthread.so.0 so try adding it to the
On 12/18/2012 09:07 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
Thank you so much Bruce...
I proceed to expect 5.45 now
But, I got two test fails as follows. Is this normal?
If you had read the book like you're expected to, you would already know
the answer to this. If you can't be bothered to read it, quit
On 12/20/2012 06:33 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
However, I *failed to make install gcc 4.7.2*
The error message obtained is:
/* tar -cf - .; exit 0) | (cd
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/include; tar xpf - )
/bin/sh: line 1: tar: command not found
/bin/sh: line 1: tar: command not found
On 12/22/2012 06:30 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
I noticed on
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/glibc.html ,
I may meet some building errors while building glibc. I obtained the
following errors. I just wonder if as mentioned on the above page, can I
just ignore
On 12/22/2012 03:37 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Christ:
I recalled it now... This problem is probably caused by the SD
card automatic disconnection from the computer during *Installing Basic
System Software --- probably happened after make at page
On 12/26/2012 02:44 AM, Israel Silberg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm building LFS 7.2, and during the running of the configure section of
the kmod-9 I got the following:
checking for liblzma... no
configure: error: Package requirements (liblzma = 4.99) were not met:
No package 'liblzma' found
You should have liblzma.so in /tools/lib and lzma.h in /tools/include.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi Bruce,
Yes bith files
On 12/26/2012 05:25 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 12/26/2012 02:10 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
liblzma should be in /lib, not /usr/lib. Also, can you copy the contents
of config.log?
From 6.46. Xz-5.0.4
./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/lib --docdir=/usr/share/doc/xz-5.0.4
the prefix puts
On 01/03/2013 04:13 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
sorry for my naive question again.
I now noticed coreutils has been upgraded from 8.19 to 8.20 . I'd love
to upgrade it without rebuilding everything from scratch, but just this
single package.
I can always chroot into the environment
On 01/05/2013 07:35 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I have recurrently written about this, here.
My error with this page, even after having built one or two versions of
LFS, was that the last line:
gcc compilation OK
that made me ignore the other lines, when some of these lines were
On 01/06/2013 06:15 PM, Ahmed ELtayeb wrote:
just
cd binutils-2.22
and everything will be fine
Valentine Michael Smith siasl1952 at gmail.com writes:
I removed the outdated standards.info file, and then tried the sed
command:sed
-i.bak '/^INFO/s/standards.info //' etc/Makefile.inI
On 01/07/2013 07:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
I am trying to put LFS on a thumbdrive to use a rescue/fixit system.
When I boot it can not find the usb drive and filesystem. I have the
correct filesystem built into the kernel, not as a module
I am miising something in my kernel config.
This
On 11/02/2013 08:14 AM, Bernard Hurley wrote:
Hi there!
I have been trying to compile GCC-4.8.1 in section 5.5 of LFS 7.4. The
first problem was that the compiler didn't seem to understand (a
parameter to configure on p.37):
--disable-libstdc++-v3
In case anyone else has the problem,
On 11/02/2013 12:52 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
The second problem is a bit more intractible. Having made the apbove
adjustment to configure, when I run make it bombs out with:
snip ===
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
On 11/29/2013 01:56 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
Hello all --
Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as
far as section III in the online instructions: Building the LFS System.
I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to
sudo before
On 12/01/2013 06:27 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book,
or do I need to find a way to log in as the user root?
Thanks.
You stay root anyway as long as you're in the chroot.
I see the chroot is coming up in 6.4 but
On 01/11/14 03:35, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
Greetings:
Having rebuilt from scratch, and being certain all steps were followed
accurately - in the proper folder and environment; GCC 'make' is still
giving me the following error:
configure: error: C++ compiler missing or inoperational
On 01/11/14 14:25, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
Yes,
mount
/dev/sdb2 on /media/lfs type ext4
(rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered,uhelper=udisks)
The echo $LFS, is constantly slipping in and out of /mnt/lfs. I have to
keep doing the 'export'. Right now it returns
On 01/11/14 14:38, Frans de Boer wrote:
Dear reader,
I am having problems lately making the tool chain on my x86_64 machine.
I finally traced it back to chapter 5.7, where glibc aborts with the
next messages:
Makerules:755: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving
On 01/11/14 14:47, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
On 01/11/2014 02:33 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
On 01/11/14 14:25, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
Yes,
Your output says there is something mounted on /media/lfs, yet you keep
saying you are assigning LFS=/mnt/lfs.
I was trying to follow
On 01/16/14 13:00, parmenides wrote:
Hi,
I am build the LFS 7.4 following the book, and find two suspected bugs:
(2) In chapter 5, 5.7. Glibc-2.18
I got the following warning:
configure: WARNING:
*** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions: autoconf
*** some
On 01/16/14 18:07, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
On 01/16/2014 04:23 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 16/01/2014 22:15, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
You are correct - Pierre, I came to that same conclusion. So I very
carefully repeated the steps on page 36 to ensure those folders were
being
On 02/19/14 05:46, loki wrote:
Heya,
just wanted to ask what happened to CLFS?
On the address http://www.cross-lfs.org/ I'm getting a Domain for Sale.
Regards,
Daniel
Nothing happened to it, it's where it's always been, at trac.cross-lfs.org.
--
401 - 460 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
