On Sun, August 23, 2015 21:35, Steve Crosby wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
wrote:
MD5 support appears optional. I've only downloaded the tar.gz direct
from github (latest release), but setting CRYPT, NETTLE and GCRYPT to
no in the Makefile (as well
On 23 August 2015 at 20:40, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
William Harrington wrote:
Also IPV6 targets add ping6, but it also needs gcrypt or crypto
support for MD5. So either openssl, gcrypt or both need to be
installed before iputils for ping6.
That's a deal breaker. The
Richard Melville wrote:
On 22 August 2015 at 17:32, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 20:41, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 19:10, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:28:20 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm open to disabling ping/ping6 in inetutils and adding another package
to replace them, but I need to get someone to figure the procedure (I
can do the xml). The iputils package does not ship built man pages or
On 23 August 2015 at 19:51, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.org
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:28:20 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm open to disabling ping/ping6 in inetutils and adding another package
to replace them, but I need to get someone to figure the
William Harrington wrote:
Also IPV6 targets add ping6, but it also needs gcrypt or crypto
support for MD5. So either openssl, gcrypt or both need to be
installed before iputils for ping6.
That's a deal breaker. The inetutils ping6 works without those
packages. This whole thing is because
William Harrington wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:28:20 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm open to disabling ping/ping6 in inetutils and adding another package
to replace them, but I need to get someone to figure the procedure (I
can do the xml). The iputils package does not
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:13:59 +0100
Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23 August 2015 at 19:51, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.org
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:28:20 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm open to disabling ping/ping6 in
Richard Melville wrote:
On 23 August 2015 at 19:51, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.org
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:28:20 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm open to disabling ping/ping6 in inetutils and adding another package
to replace them, but I need to get someone
On 22 August 2015 at 17:32, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 20:41, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 19:10, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
William Harrington wrote:
Also IPV6 targets add ping6, but it also needs gcrypt or crypto
support for MD5. So either openssl, gcrypt or both need to be
installed before iputils for ping6.
That's a deal breaker. The
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:35:09 +1200
Steve Crosby steve.cro...@gmail.com wrote:
MD5 support appears optional. I've only downloaded the tar.gz direct
from github (latest release), but setting CRYPT, NETTLE and GCRYPT to
no in the Makefile (as well as CAP and IDN) compiles fine (barring a
On 21 August 2015 at 20:41, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 19:10, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
It was ftp and telnet that I was thinking of, along with rcp,
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 20:41, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 19:10, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
It was ftp and telnet that I was
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 19:10, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
It was ftp and telnet that I was thinking of, along with rcp, rexec,
rlogin, rsh and tftp. Surely, ifconfig has been marked as
On 21 August 2015 at 16:43, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
Is there any reason why we use ping from inetutils rather than the
version from iputils. I realise that we don't install iputils, but why?
Why not? There is no need to change.
Even though most
Richard Melville wrote:
It was ftp and telnet that I was thinking of, along with rcp, rexec,
rlogin, rsh and tftp. Surely, ifconfig has been marked as deprecated
for some time and replaced with iproute2.
I agree that the r* programs are obsolete, but the others are useful in
some
On 21 August 2015 at 19:10, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
It was ftp and telnet that I was thinking of, along with rcp, rexec,
rlogin, rsh and tftp. Surely, ifconfig has been marked as deprecated
for some time and replaced with iproute2.
I agree that
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 16:43, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
Is there any reason why we use ping from inetutils rather than the
version from iputils. I realise that we don't install
On 21 August 2015 at 18:35, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
On 21 August 2015 at 16:43, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Melville wrote:
Is there any reason why we use ping from inetutils rather than
20 matches
Mail list logo
