Kapier wrote:
I have question...
Why, in new version LFS, are We dynamically linking bintuitls and GCC in
Chapter 5, Pass 1??? In LFS 6.0 it was statically linked.
Thanx a lot
From the Changelog...
April 16, 2005 [matt]: Removed references to statically linking the pass
1 toolchain which
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi folks,
After starting up the FC3 host PC, continued building
LFS as follows;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# export LFS=/mnt/lfs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir -p $LFS/{proc,sys}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t proc proc $LFS/proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Chris,
- snip -
root:/sources/glibc-build# make check
.
make[2]: ***
[/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-cancel17.out]
Error
1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/sources/glibc-2.3.4-20040701/nptl'
make[1]: ***
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Chris,
- snip -
Actually, it's a different error (look carefully -
it's tst-cancelx17
- before it was tst-cancel17). That's the other
known frequent-failing
test, also fixed by the patch in the latest LFS.
That error can also be
ignored. Try make check again.
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi folks,
LFS 6.1
FC3 Host
Following problem was encountered on building LFS 6.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i
HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ '
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin
/tools/bin/bash --login +h
/tools/bin/env:
Stephen Liu wrote:
# ldd /tools/bin/bash
linux-gate.so.1 = (0x00d2)
libtermcap.so.2 = /lib/libtermcap.so.2
(0x00ac4000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x009d3000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00882000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00868000)
I assume
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Chris,
# ldd /tools/bin/bash
linux-gate.so.1 = (0x00d2)
libtermcap.so.2 = /lib/libtermcap.so.2
(0x00ac4000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x009d3000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(0x00882000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00868000)
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Tks for your advice.
/tools should be a symbolic link
pointing at /mnt/lfs/tools
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -al /tools
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Jun 28 17:06 /tools -
//mnt/lfs/tools
It is.
Is this accurate? It says /tools is pointing to //mnt/lfs/tools.
Seth Payne wrote:
Hello,
After a couple of years of being away I find myself needing to build
another LFS system. I am having trouble in chapter 6.3 when I try to
enter the chroot environment. After I issue the command listed in the
book, I get the following error:
chroot: cannot run
Seth Payne wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
It means that there's a library or file that /tools/bin/env needs that
it can't find. Most likely, it was compiled with something pointing to
/lib or /usr/lib. Run ldd /tools/bin/env - everything listed
should point to /tools.
I ran ldd /tools/bin
Seth Payne wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
Yup, it's pointing at /lib/ld-linux.so.2 which does not exist in the
chroot environment. You probably missed a step adjusting the
toolchain, maybe the specsfile change or the gcc specs patch. Try
checking your command history against the adjusting
David Ciecierski wrote:
Hello,
I am following LFS development flavour (2005.08.19) and ran across this
error while performing the dummy.c sanity check after re-adjusting the
toolchain. From what I know I followed the instructions exactly, except
that I misspelled binutils-build to
zhiqiang yu wrote:
gcc-g -DENABLE_CHECKING -DENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DIN_GCC -W -WALL
-Wwrite-string -Wstrict-protypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wold-style-definition -DHAVE_CONaFIG_H -I. -I. -I.../gcc-4.0.1/gcc
-I../../gcc-4.0.1/gcc/. -I../.../gcc-4.0.1/gcc/ .../include -I
../../gcc-4.0.1/gcc/
Allen J. Newton wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to build LFS 6.1 three times with no success. All three attempts
have failed at the same point, so I'm wondering what I'm missing?
I am using the 6.1 book and have tried to build it on to the following 3
setups:
A VMware 4.5 virtual machine running
---BeginMessage---
Ilja Honkonen wrote:
I was building LFS 6.1 and in chapter 6.21 ncurses gave this error
during make:
cd ../obj_s; /tools/bin/g++ -I../c++ -I../include -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I.
-I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -O2 -fPIC -c ../c++/demo.cc
/tools/bin/g++ -o demo
Ilja Honkonen wrote:
Lainaus Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't think that's a problem with the fact that you stopped and
restarted - if libstdc++ does not exist in /usr/lib then you forgot to
install the c++ compiler in chap. 6. Does /usr/bin/gcc exist?
No it did not, I noticed
Ilja Honkonen wrote:
Archaic wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:11:08PM +0300, Ilja Honkonen wrote:
No it did not, I noticed this when Groff wouldn't configure
complaining that
it couldn't compile c++ programs. There were no gcc or c++ or even cc in
/usr/bin. Very strange, but everyting
Basel Al-Mustafa wrote:
Hello,
Linux From Scratch - Version
7.0-cross-lfs-20050902-x86_64-Multilib
Host Distribution - Slackware 10.1 with kernel-2.6.13
Section - 5.9. Glibc-2.3.5 32 Bit
Processor - AMD64 3000+
I have stricktly followed the instructions in the book
but executing 'ldd' for the
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi ÕÅ ÓÂ˳,
i am install the lfs 6.1 in debian 3.1
with kernel 2.6.8.11-i386 gcc 3.4.3
and make this erren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs# chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i
\
HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
rick wrote:
The tarball was unpacked in the source directory before I
began.
I had already tried to apply the patch from the source
directory and received the following error message:
root:/source# patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.3.4-fix_test-1.patch
patch: Can't open patch file
Albert wrote:
I am just starting a 6.1 build on a GoboLinux 012 (kernel 2.6.11.9) box.
I am in 5.3.1 Installation of Binutils.
and make directory of binutils-build complains of bad permissions. Just
what directory am I supposed to be in at this point for the mkdir to work?
$LFS =
Ian Brown wrote:
Hello LFS List,
Can LFS stabel (6.1) be build with FC4 ?
FC4 comes with gcc version 4.0.1.
The kernel is 2.6.12-1.1398_FC4.
I am starting with the first package, according to the online bookl
This is binutils , in chap 5 (5.3.1. Installation of Binutils)
when running
Howard Wang wrote:
Hello,
I was tring to build binutils-2.15.91.0, after everything has been set up,
under
/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils_build
any idea how to fix this ?
thanks for the help.
/bin/sh ../../binutils-2.15.91.0.2/binutils/../ylwrap flex ../../binutils-2.15
.91.0.2/binutils/arlex.l
Howard Wang wrote:
thanks. Chris. after installed flex package, it still failed and gave me
more or less the same messages: see following:
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils_build make LDFLAGS=-all-static
make[3]: Entering directory
Howard Wang wrote:
Hi Chris,
I also installed bison, it still gave the same error message. I did a search, it seems that the ADDLIB is defined in
binutils/arparse.y. arlex.l can not find it. or should I compile the bison
first ? but the lfs 6.0 said that binutil is the first to be compiled.
Krishna Ganugapati wrote:
Figured it out. zlib's website lists zlib.1.2.3 not the zlib.1.2.2 as
required by LFS6.1 - as a result one of the soft links is libz.so -
libz.so.1.2.2 - but the built versions are libz.so.1.2.3
I now understand what FBBG means :-)
Krishna
I don't think that's
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Chris Staub wrote:
Krishna Ganugapati wrote:
Figured it out. zlib's website lists zlib.1.2.3 not the zlib.1.2.2 as
required by LFS6.1 - as a result one of the soft links is libz.so -
libz.so.1.2.2 - but the built versions are libz.so.1.2.3
I now
Howard Wang wrote:
Hi Chris,
I downloaded flex-devel-2.5.4a-1.i386.rpm from the web, and tried to install
it.
hwang66:/home/hwang # rpm -i flex-devel-2.5.4a-1.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
linux-gate.so.1 is needed by flex-devel-2.5.4a-1
when I issue:
hwang66:/home/hwang #
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Chris Staub wrote:
I suspect you have linked against the static library (and that Krishna
probably didn't build the static library).
http://developer.momonga-linux.org/viewcvs/trunk/tools/find-zlib
You probably want to use 2/dev/null when you run
Howard Wang wrote:
I followed your instructions, there is no flex-devel after flex, there is
only flac-devel which is not the right one. here is the list:
flac-devel
flac-xmms
flamethrower
flash-player
flex
FlghtGeaaar
film
I have successfully built lfs with SuSE, but that was with 9.1 and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I have some problem.
I use LFS 6.0 liveCD.
This is problem.
mkdir ../binutils-build
cd ../binutils-build
../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/configure --prefix=/tools --disable-nls
make (Hang) -- problem
Thanks
Does it give any output before it hangs, or is
umar wrote:
Hi,friends
This is umar from cdac.iam not getting
how to bundle the packages and make it to bootable CD
can any body help me out
Regards:
MOHD.UMAR
Project Engineer
CDAC
Sorry, can't really help without more information. Is there anything
specific you are having
Bryan Burke wrote:
System: i-386; Intel Pentium III; Dell Inspiron 2500 laptop
LFS version: 6.1
Topic: Chapter 5; Adjusting the Toolchain; sanity check
Host system: Berry Linux LiveCD 0.62 (LFS LiveCD does not boot on my
system)
The following is the issue that presents itself when I attempt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use 20 GB.
- filesystem 15 GB.
- and swap 5 GB.
Never mind, it looks like it ran out of space on your host system
partition
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have DDR 512 and cpu duron 1200.
thanks.
Are you unpacking sources onto your lfs partition?
This is my step of gcc.
1. mkdir ../gcc-build
2. cp /sources/gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2 /gcc-build
3. cd /gcc
Kendrick wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/install-lfs-from-livecd.txt
I have seen several people atempt to use this hint and are having some
problems with it. somthing goes wrong with the setenv.sh. I am
wondering if somthing needs to be ammended to this hint or if
Ian Armstrong wrote:
I had a look at the 'install-lfs-from-livecd.txt', and it looks quite useful. I haven't tried it yet, but I am in the middle of building version 6.1, and I will try it tomorrow.
I would suggest that it be kept.
Ian.
Check out my first reply to this topic - it can be
Howard Wang wrote:
Hi All,
while building gcc pass 2, it failed for the following:
/usr/include/asm/errno.h:4:31: asm-generic/errno.h: No such file or directory
I checked both LFS /usr/include/ and /tools/include dir, the entire dir
asm-generic is missing.
do we need this dir ? can I copy
Scott Loewen wrote:
I am working on LFS 6.1 and have completed it through section 6.8. I am
using the LFS LiveCD. I am also working through the more control and
package management stuff. When I tried to switch to the
linux-libc-headers user to install it, I received the following error:
Scott Loewen wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
You probably have su linked to host libraries. Try running ldd
/tools/bin/su and paste the result here.
Your comment tripped a memory. The more control and pkg mgmt calls for
copying su from the coreutils directory to /tools/bin. I didn't know
Micheal E Cooper wrote:
As an addition and in good faith, the only FAQ entry that looks like my
problem is:
ld: cannot find -lc
You get a message early in chapter 5 (LFS-4.1) or at the first pass of
gcc (LFS CVS) which ends like this:
-static -o gengenrtl \
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Micheal E Cooper wrote:
I have followed the book directions exactly, not customizing anything. I
am using LFS 6.1, the stable version. My host system is FC4 default
LFS-6.1 won't build on Fedora Core 4. Try a different host or try
Marcus wrote:
!!! The text was translated of google, sorry (German)!!!
Good day,
I have a problem to arrive into chroot the environment:
chroot: cannot run command '/tools/bin/env': no such file or directory/
/
I use the LFS Live CD 6.1 and had so far no me admitted errors.
where is my
Francesco Piccirillo wrote:
Thank you for your answer...
Ok, I understand, I must follow the book natively.
However I HAVE TO build a kernel with the stack protector option set
on, that is a must.
So, when do you suggest me to apply the right patches on the right
packages during the entire
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
If you have to then you're not following the book (regardless, you
don't need *any* patches in pass 1). Why do you need to ask where you
apply the patches? If you're applying patches not mentioned in the
book, you should know where they should go
Micheal E Cooper wrote:
This is my first time doing LFS, and I am just following the plain vanilla
default, no-modifications route. In 8.3, the book suggests:
Because of the complications with Hotplug, Udev, and modules, we strongly
recommend starting with a completely non-modular kernel
Alan Lord wrote:
Alan Lord wrote:
Hi,
I have just built (last night) a JHALFS build from SVN 271105. Is
there any [much] difference between that version and 6.1.1?
Thanks
Alan
Please ignore my previous post - I'm just plain stupid at 08:30am. Of
course they are different - GCC4 v GCC
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Hari,
Why don't you just use the LiveCD?
Oh, yes. I have LFS-LiveCD 6.1-3 here. I can't remember exactly
whether it is necessary to intall it on the HD. OR just run it on the
PC to install LFS on the empty HD, preformatted. I suppose I saw
this posting before,
Richard Westfield wrote:
No, the LiveCD cannot be installed to the hard drive - that's the point of the
LiveCD.
That's not true. I've got the LiveCD installed on a partition, and have been using that for my builds. LFS 6.1 is the only distro I've found, in my very quick research, that met
Mezlo wrote:
Is there a list of the minimum requirements for a host system to
successfully compile the packages from LFS? More specifically, what
packages (and minimum versions) need to be installed on the existing host?
The reason I'm asking is I'm attempting to do an LFS compile on my
Wim Godden wrote:
Is there no easy way to remove all those things, so you keep only the bare
system ?
Check the LFS hints. There should be 1 or 2 on stripping your system down.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Michael Weller wrote:
Hello everybody,
When I finished my LFS installation I chose not to install grub but
instead re-configure my existing grub installation. So I added entries
for my lfs system to the existing /boot/grub/menu.lst on my host system.
My question is: Might that be related to
Michael Weller wrote:
Hello,
Chris Staub wrote:
Hard to troubleshoot unless we know your exact configuration. Can you
paste the contents of /boot/grub and paste your menu.lst file?
$ls /boot/grub
device.map fat_stage1_5 menu.lst minix_stage1_5 stage1
xfs_stage1_5
e2fs_stage1_5
Aeliton Germano wrote:
hi,
I have a doubt: in the pages of lfs book(chap. 6) it shows
'Instalation depends on:'.
does it means that i have to put all dependencies in my lfs system or
i just have to put then in the toolchain?
ex: glibc instalation depends on: bash, binutils, coreutils,
diffutils,
Chandan M. C. wrote:
Hai ,
I did the command U told ... I got this output
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x006b2000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00695000)
What I shoud do now
Regards
Chandan
On Wed, Dec 7, 2005, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do su - lfs then run ldd /tools
Ross wrote:
Hello,
I hope this question doesn't turn out to be a stupid as my last one but
here goes anyway. I hav got to page 103 of the LFS book(6.1) and am
mounting the virtual kernel files on the new filesystem with
mount -t devpts -o gid=4,mode=620 none /dev/pts
I get a warning
can't
Chandan M. C. wrote:
Hai ,
On Compiling binutils for LFS ... Iam getting following error ..
cc not found ... Binutils cannot be compiled .
Wht should I do ... to proceed
Regards
Chandan
What part of the book are you at?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Amu wrote:
Hi all,
I got the error while running make command
in on binutils.
./binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/binutils/bucomm.c:425:
warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use
`mkstemp'
ar.o(.text+0x24): In function `mri_emul':
../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/binutils/ar.c:148:
Chandan M. C. wrote:
Hai ,
I installed bison ,flex,m4 and getetxt ... Even though I ma gettign same
error
Try also installing the bison-devel package.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005, Justin R. Knierim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Try searching the archives first. This exact question was asked and
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi folks,
lfs-6.1.1
host - lfs liveCD 6.1.1.2
chroot environment
Following error popup on installing sysklogd-1.4.1
root:/sources/sysklogd-1.4.1# make install
/usr/bin/install -o root -g root -m 644 sysklogd.8
/usr/share/man/man8/sysklogd.8
/usr/bin/install: invalid group
James Henry wrote:
I am running LFS SVN-20060506
my sytem configuration listed bellow, when booting /dev/hda2 kernel
panicks stating that cannot mount rootfs, set root= value, which i
have. am i correct about system still having a problem booting after a
certain block on the hd.
should i
Clemens HAUPT wrote:
Am Monday 09 January 2006 23:43 schrieben Sie:
This would work. You could also download the LFS live cd.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/livecd/
I did it. But what for? For making a bootable CD I need a host
using Kernel 2.6 at least. With a machine with older Kernel
boovarahan boovarahan wrote:
Hi !
I am a linux newbie and tried to construct my first LFS system using LFS 6.1 CD.
I got through successfully upto chater 5.
In chapter 6 , I chrooted and before installing the softwares, I
committed a blunder
of deleting the $LFS/sources directory completely.
Matt Darcy wrote:
Jeremy Monnet wrote:
Hi all,
First of all sorry for posting on 2 lists, but I'm not quite sure
which one is the best for this question. I would have thought lfs, but
I read a thread on blfs these days, so I'm just not quite sure
anymore. (furthermore, this would maybe be even
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Clemens Haupt wrote these words on 01/17/06 07:27 CST:
I think you have experience enough so I'll allways keep your advice
in mind! :-)
Or, you could actually just read the book, and do everything on your
own.
You expect someone to actually read the book and figure it
daniel wrote:
allo supprt team,
and net friend clement,
good day,
i'd reached ch 6 aftet executing the chroot command string in that page, got
result that chroot was not able to run the command /toos/bin/env.
The chroot command string was run as root.
please advise.
thanks
daniel lee
mrdaniel wrote:
hi chris,
as for your tips ldd/tools/bin/env, i had also run that, but its still no
such file or directory.
I did issue the command as follows :-
# env enter
it worked but only in chroot.
FYI I'd spent 10 days trying out the LFS, and had learnt quite a fair bit more
Michiel Faber wrote:
Chris Staub schreef:
mrdaniel wrote:
You don't need to mkdir /tools/include/asm. Just do as the book says.
If the instructions didn't work then you missed something.
I dont agree, i had to make the directory asm first too... It depends on
your host version of mkdir
mrdaniel wrote:
hi clemens,
excuse me for the typo entry, my apology.
thanks for directing me to use linux mail instead and get into the support
list.
currently i have reply from a chris and i hope that we can get towards the
goal asap. I hope to clearify the one line in tch5.5 whether it
mrdaniel wrote:
hi everybody,
this is my round 11 and took almost 6 solid hours. This time again no issue
along the way, but at the end of 5.7, no message output at the dummy test.
so far i follow exactly the book except at 5.7 the Adjusting of Toolchain, the
script file did not prepend
mrdaniel wrote:
hi everybody,
this is my round 11 and took almost 6 solid hours. This time again no issue
along the way, but at the end of 5.7, no message output at the dummy test.
so far i follow exactly the book except at 5.7 the Adjusting of Toolchain, the
script file did not prepend
mrdaniel wrote:
oh oh, i saw now that the pc clock is 01:14 but the date is 01/22/06
but may i ask has that got something to do with the dummy test ?
and if i reset the date/time now will it be ok or i have to start all over.
ciao
No, it doesn't have anything to do iwth the sanity check,
yu Qiang wrote:
i have find something maybe the reason for that error
i had read some papers and they said that the binuntils-2.15 can not
be compiled correctly with fedora 4,so i try
binutils-2.16.90.0.1.tar.bz2 as they mentioned,maybe it is He cause
the error!
today , i use the livecd to
Paul G Rogers wrote:
It's not in the sources directory! It does me no good being in the
booted system, I'm using my LFS-4.1 as host--it's much faster running
from a HD than a CD.
If you prefer to do it this way, then you can boot the CD, mount your HD
and copy the book to somewhere on your
Clemens Haupt wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 12:30, you wrote:
man bash
Danke!
When the lfs partition is mounted, all ln -s are here again
Where is that stored?
Kind regards
Clemens
I don't know what you mean. Where is what stored?
--
mrdaniel wrote:
i'd already came to this stage untaring the glibc once again as follows:
I have no name!://sources# tar -xvf glibc-2.3.4.tat.bz2
cd into the new glibc source directory and did the 3 patches, mkdir ../glibc-build.
cd ../glibc-build
then in ...glibc-build#
../configure with
then not possible because my PC under this LFS
project is a barebone and has no floppy drive.
ciao
--- Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mrdaniel wrote:
i'd already came to this stage untaring the glibc once again as
follows:
I have no name!://sources# tar -xvf glibc-2.3.4.tat.bz2
cd into the new
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/22/06 22:44 CST:
[snip many, many lines]
There's the problem. Your gcc is linked against the host's libraries.
You likely missed a step in the toolchain adjustment, or the gcc specs
patch. You need to start the whole build over
mrdaniel wrote:
hi chris,
to start all over i will, but may i be advised at which point to apply the
ldd and what to expect. That should be helpful to all as well i suppose.
thanks.
You simply make sure you follow all of the book's instructions,
especially the toolchain sanity checks.
--
mrdaniel wrote:
chris,
but it passed the sanity check. the message was diaplayed after the readelf ... command as:
[requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
thus it seemed that all was well up to that point.
your advise please.
thanks
It doesn't matter...gcc itself is
mrdaniel wrote:
may i enquire is that typo error,because ref back to the book the lib line was
make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib
ciao
Please stop adding yourself to the CC lists on messages you send - this
frequently causes replies that we send to be sent just to you and not
the list,
Clemens Haupt wrote:
To whom it may concern!
There might be a lot of scripts if one have to leave the building
process after he once came up as the chrooted root sucessfully.
So I have minimized the number of issues to necessarily have to be made
for an environment to go on building and
mrdaniel wrote:
allo support,
in ch6.13 afer running expect -c spawn ls got :-
the system has no more ptys. ...
so how do create more ptys before i can continue.
thanks
Check the LFS FAQs, and please start reading the book more before coming
here and asking a bunch of questions that are
Subhash Chandra wrote:
@mr.danial
I have an advise for you even if the rest of them decide I'm crazy! As
you seem to be hell bent over LFS, get the livecd and use jhalfs or
nalfs. You don't need much config there and default works fine. Once
you get the system up and running, go for blfs and
Richard Melville wrote:
Hi
This is my third attempt at building LFS 6.1 as I have not had enough
time to complete before.
Each time I have reached the PTY test after the installation of
*dejagnu*, and issued the command
*expect -c spawn ls* the shell just echoes *spawn ls*. Why is this?
Ungvari Gabor wrote:
Hi,
So, I have installed libgmp3 and then libmpfr and config for
binutils was clean. Then binutils has been succesfully built.
Then came the second package: gcc. Its config was ok but
'make bootstrap' has failed...
Here is the error message:
-8
Ungvari Gabor wrote:
Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] írta:
You are right Chris. I missed one letter from configure
command:)
I corrected it. Anyway I put it here since I still face some
problem.
So, config command:
/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build$ ../gcc-3.4.3/configure
--prefix=/tools --libexecdir
On Friday 17 February 2006 11:19, info (Giardina_Software) wrote:
Hello all,
does anyone here has complete the lfs/clfs book for ppc filesystem??
Suggestion or help is appeciated as to start..
Thanks at all..
Marco
If you read the CLFS book, you'll see that there is in fact a ppc book.
--
On Monday 20 February 2006 14:25, kshama shepal wrote:
Hi,
This is a 2nd letter of mine on this list. The
solutions I got for my previous problem were really
helpful. Rerunning Udevstart did solve the problem.
Thanks for the help.
Now, I m stuck in another error.
When booting of my
On Monday 20 February 2006 15:42, thorsten wrote:
Sounds like you created the LFS partition with a host e2fsprogs that uses
custom features. Check in section 2.3 of the book for more information
about this. Try booting with the host system and running debugfs -R
feature /dev/[lfspartition]
JK hcc wrote:
Hello,
I am a newbie and trying to install LFS on a PII 400MHz.
The first problem i encounter is that, when i type the line below i
get an error.
lfs:/tools/lib$ SPECFILE=`gcc --print-file specs`
sed 's@ /lib/ld-linux.so.2@ /tools/lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
$SPECFILE
Ellis Wilson wrote:
Hey all,
Finally finished my shiny new linux system, ran great, then went and
wanted to install Win2Kpro on the third partition on my harddisk (1st is
LFS, 2nd swap, 3rd Win2k). I put windows on and miraculously it treats
my system like its the only OS on it. No big deal I
Alberto Hernando wrote:
El Jueves, 2 de Marzo de 2006 11:00, Lord Igtenio escribió:
I even went so far as to add
/usr/include to the PATH and PKG_CONFIG
variables, thinking that'd help locate it, but it
didn't do any good.
Any other ideas on what could be
going on?
Hi.
Some days ago, I had
himanshu pahuja wrote:
hello everyone
i m installing glibc in chap6 (lfs ver 6.1.1 using live cd )
but i am getting an error msg when i try to configuer using
../glibc-2.3.4/configure.. command
../glibc-2.3.4/configure: line 250:sed :command not found
..
..
configure error
himanshu pahuja wrote:
hey chris thanx for rplying
but i have installed sed in chap5 and have verified it after
installing sed also i m getting this msg
what to do plz help
himanhsupahuja
c-dac noida
If it says sed: command not found then either you don't have it or the
system can't find
Diogo Franco wrote:
When building Texinfo for LFS 6.1.1, I get the following error message
right after the program makedoc, but the libncurses.so.5 library was
installed right before it and it is on ldconfig search path. LDD can't
find the library with the makeinfo program, but can find it for
himanshu pahuja wrote:
hi everyone
i am facing another problem while installing perl-5.8.7( i am using ver
6.1.1 and live cd)
after make
the last cmd on page 72 says to cp -Rv lib/* /toools/lib/perl5/5.8.7
it say sit cant create file /toools/lib/perl5/5.8.7 permission denied
plz help
what
Chris Staub wrote:
Diogo Franco wrote:
When building Texinfo for LFS 6.1.1, I get the following error message
right after the program makedoc, but the libncurses.so.5 library was
installed right before it and it is on ldconfig search path. LDD can't
find the library with the makeinfo program
Tom wrote:
I had a problem with coreutils so I reinstalled it now I get stty: command not
found after rebooting? Please help
Does /bin/stty exist?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
laurent wrote:
Justin R. Knierim wrote:
laurent waro wrote:
line whith mount, it says to me that /tools/bin/mount does not exist.
You can try rebuilding util-linux, but likely:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#any-no-such-file
Justin
Thanks Justin.
I followed the instructions
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
