Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-25 Thread Christoph Kottke
Am 24.02.2013 01:43, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: In any case I concluded that firebird is above my head. I've spent an entire week trying to get a simple test case running, to no avail. I'm going to release libdbi-drivers without official firebird support unless someone steps up and

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-23 Thread markus . hoenicka
markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de writes: Christoph Kottke writes: Am 19.02.2013 00:16, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: Did you ever succeed in running the new test kit? Or the old one shipped with 0.8.3 fwiw? hi, i can't remeber on old kit passes and the new one

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-22 Thread markus . hoenicka
Christoph Kottke writes: Am 19.02.2013 00:16, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: Did you ever succeed in running the new test kit? Or the old one shipped with 0.8.3 fwiw? hi, i can't remeber on old kit passes and the new one has never pass. Hi, maybe you can shed some

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-21 Thread Markus Hoenicka
Christoph Kottke christoph.kot...@gmx.de was heard to say: Am 19.02.2013 00:16, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: Did you ever succeed in running the new test kit? Or the old one shipped with 0.8.3 fwiw? hi, i can't remeber on old kit passes and the new one has never pass. Hi, I've

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-19 Thread Christoph Kottke
Am 19.02.2013 00:16, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: Did you ever succeed in running the new test kit? Or the old one shipped with 0.8.3 fwiw? hi, i can't remeber on old kit passes and the new one has never pass. christoph

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-18 Thread Markus Hoenicka
Christoph Kottke christoph.kot...@gmx.de was heard to say: Hi, thanks for your investigating :) i've run an debian 6.0.6 on i386 and install the lastest firebird-1.5 from http://firebirdsql.org/ because libdbi-driver depends on old include files (gds.h, etc). but you can use the tarball

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-18 Thread Christoph Kottke
Am 18.02.2013 10:43, schrieb Christoph Kottke: Am 18.02.2013 10:27, schrieb Markus Hoenicka: Classic does not require this step, but it doesn't work either. I'm sure that I miss some critical step in the procedure. What about accounts: do you run your queries from a regular user account?

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-18 Thread markus . hoenicka
Christoph Kottke writes: some more hits, if you use xinet.d you must enabled by hand in /etc/xinet.d/firebird.conf and restart xinetd. and new created db can only access by SYSDBA before the are activated... Hi, one reboot later things have improved considerably. I tried to start

[libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-17 Thread markus . hoenicka
Christoph Kottke writes: hi, i've installed the latest cvs revisions for libdbi and libdbi-driver and when ever i try to fetch more than 3 row from an firebird table it's end in an segfault. but when i revert the bull patch in dbi_result.c it works like a charm. Hi, I'd be

[libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-14 Thread Christoph Kottke
hi, i've installed the latest cvs revisions for libdbi and libdbi-driver and when ever i try to fetch more than 3 row from an firebird table it's end in an segfault. but when i revert the bull patch in dbi_result.c it works like a charm. christoph

[libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault (c/o Christian???)

2013-02-14 Thread markus . hoenicka
Christoph Kottke writes: hi, i've installed the latest cvs revisions for libdbi and libdbi-driver and when ever i try to fetch more than 3 row from an firebird table it's end in an segfault. but when i revert the bull patch in dbi_result.c it works like a charm. Hi, thanks