On 06/12/2015 01:07 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 11 Jun 2015, at 12:00, Simon Walter wrote:
>
>> Looking at projects that use APR, many seem to include the entire thing
>> in their code base. I'm guessing that one of the drawbacks is that APR
>> comes with a lot of baggage so to speak.
>
> You
At 2015-06-11 09:12, Simon Walter was heard to say:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to using libdbi and C in general. I am wondering why libdbi has
> no support for prepared statements.
>
> Is it that because the way libdbi is written, a prepared statement
> would
> not provide any benefit? Or is it just
On 11 Jun 2015, at 12:00, Simon Walter wrote:
> Looking at projects that use APR, many seem to include the entire thing
> in their code base. I'm guessing that one of the drawbacks is that APR
> comes with a lot of baggage so to speak.
You can dynamically link to an APR library.
> Have you use
On 06/11/2015 06:07 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 11 Jun 2015, at 08:12, Simon Walter wrote:
>
>> If the application I'm writing can benefit from prepared statements, I
>> would like to eventually either add that feature to libdbi or I may have
>> to use something else in the future.
>
> Not muc
On 11 Jun 2015, at 08:12, Simon Walter wrote:
> If the application I'm writing can benefit from prepared statements, I
> would like to eventually either add that feature to libdbi or I may have
> to use something else in the future.
Not much use I know, but I can confirm it doesn't support prep
Hi all,
I'm new to using libdbi and C in general. I am wondering why libdbi has
no support for prepared statements.
Is it that because the way libdbi is written, a prepared statement would
not provide any benefit? Or is it just lacking that feature? If it's
just lacking the feature, are there pla
