What blocking we've seen with Lantern also corroborates Collin's
analysis in terms of blocking appearing to be IP enumeration and not
traffic classification. We've also seen increases in blocking on
weekends when perhaps they think we're not watching!
-Adam
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:00 PM,
Greetings LibTech!
Does anyone here know the details of Internet filtering in the
Ukraine? I've heard of keyword filtering, but are sites actually
blocked? If so, do you know which ones?
Many thanks.
-Adam
--
pgp A998 2B6E EF1C 373E 723F A813 045D A255 901A FD89
--
Liberationtech is public
I'm really interested in your in-country torrent deployments, Griffin.
I agree the threats are complicated. Is an infiltrating seeder in Iran
learning about someone serving the Tor binary dangerous for that
person serving it, for example? I would tend to say it's no more or
less dangerous than
I just wanted to quickly add my strong support for the notion that
having a variety of tools is essential to this fight. Lantern's up and
running in Iran and China right now, for example, but that could
change at any moment, and users need alternatives. China dropped the
hammer on us on Dec 12th I
,
Jillian
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Adam Fisk af...@bravenewsoftware.orgwrote:
Hi Everyone-
First off, apologies for the radio silence. My libtech reading has
decreased in direct proportion to the volume of traffic, which seems in
turn to have increased in direct proportion to my
Now that's what I call a productive, collaborative email. Awesome. Thanks
Roger. Responses inline.
Yep. I think using trust networks to solve the how do I learn about a
proxy to use question could work well for some (many) users. I haven't
looked at all the Lantern details lately, but if I had
All really well put, Shava, and I couldn't agree more. I actually met with
Jessica this morning after requesting they change the title (almost missed
my flight as a result!), and she spoke with her editor about it. They'd
apparently have to do it through issuing a correction, which sounds a
little
it to the fore. The right time for it seems to be rapidly approaching.
-Adam
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Adam Fisk af...@getlantern.org wrote:
... we really would love to hear any criticisms of Lantern people may
Congrats guys! I've had a small glimpse into the immense amount of work
that has gone into this and really looking forward to taking it for a spin.
Exciting!
On Thursday, March 21, 2013, Andrew Reynolds wrote:
Thanks James,
The Commotion team is excited about the new developer release of the
Congrats guys! I've had a small glimpse into the immense amount of work
that has gone into this and really looking forward to taking it for a spin.
Exciting!
On Thursday, March 21, 2013, Andrew Reynolds wrote:
Thanks James,
The Commotion team is excited about the new developer release of the
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Nadim Kobeissi na...@nadim.cc wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Adam Fisk af...@bravenewsoftware.org
wrote:
I'm certainly more confident in the overall security of silent circle in
its first release than I was in the overall security of cryptocat
I don't think anyone would claim that every piece of free software is
automatically more secure than every piece of proprietary software,
because as you say there are many other factors involved.
Nor would I!
But in your definition of security, you seem to be discounting the
user's
When I say million, I always mean billion...
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Adam Fisk a...@bravenewsoftware.org wrote:
At the risk of getting swept up in this by consciously saying something
unpopular, I want to put my shoulder against the wheel of the open source
process produces more
it will
be just as open source as Jitsi.
Passing that 10% through Google servers is definitely an issue though, and
that'll be 100% with 3 or more on a call. The alternative is to set up your
own TURN, STUN, and XMPP servers though.
-Adam
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
Adam
I sympathize with your frustration about Google and other companies'
unwillingness to talk about their interception capabilities. In the
particular case of Hangouts, it seems clear that the Hangout data is
encrypted only between the user and Google, and not end-to-end.
That doesn't appear
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Adam Fisk a...@littleshoot.org wrote:
I sympathize with your frustration about Google and other companies'
unwillingness to talk about their interception capabilities. In the
particular case of Hangouts, it seems clear that the Hangout data is
encrypted
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jerzy Łogiewa jerz...@interia.eu wrote:
Supports, but doesn't mean uses for default!
SRTP also supports NULL CIPHER...
Right -- ideally one of us would fire up Wireshark to check the defaults.
-Adam
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
--
Adam Fisk
http://www.littleshoot.org | http://adamfisk.wordpress.com |
http://twitter.com/adamfisk
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https
Thanks Martin. Do you know if Google Talk is still accessible (
talk.google.com)?
-Adam
On Friday, November 9, 2012, Martin Johnson wrote:
Today, Nov 9, 2012, http://www.google.com was blocked in China. It's the
first time since we started tracking online censorship in China in February
,
Marietta
On 14 August 2012 05:14, Philipp Winter identity.funct...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 09:14:48PM -0700, Adam Fisk wrote:
My understanding is that China just shows a blank page. Is that correct?
That depends on the type of filtering. The keyword filtering
infrastructure
Greetings all-
I'm wondering if anyone out there has screenshots handy of what
blocking looks like in different countries -- like what you see in
your browser when you attempt to go to a blocked page. If you happen
to have any image for any country at all, would you be so kind as to
send it my
21 matches
Mail list logo
