-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2013 03:08 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> micah:
>> Eugen Leitl writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 03:07:35PM +0200, ilf wrote:
>>>
I can't believe this bullshit thread recommending *only*
commercial services.
>>>
This is a c
micah:
> Eugen Leitl writes:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 03:07:35PM +0200, ilf wrote:
>>
>>> I can't believe this bullshit thread recommending *only*
>>> commercial services.
>>
>> Look, free is distinctly unaffordable. If you need a dedicated box
>> somebody has got to pay for the hosting an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/18/2013 04:45 PM, Hisham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Activists whose sites come under attack struggle to find cheap
> solutions to keep their websites safely guarded. Many of them are
> looking for secure, inexpensive hosting. I've come across many suc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Either I missed it, or it wasn't posted: dod.net is a wonderful 501(c)3
which has a great distributed network of servers and is super big on
privacy protection and their clients data.
It's free to host with them, but they ask for donations.
Also Bu
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:26:05PM -0400, micah wrote:
> Can't rely on them to be there for what exactly?
Just being there and responsive for the entire duration
you need them.
> Where is the liberatory technological element to recommending commercial
The liberatory technological element is
Ehhh, it can block some stuff, but it's not bulletproof against DDoS
attacks and certainly not any sort of injection attack. And I certainly
wouldn't call it an anonymizer by any means whatsoever, considering that a
lot of people leave their direct A record in place (direct.example.com ->
IP behind
I have the ability to host such hostile sites. E-mail me with your budget
and I'll let you know what I can do.
Our servers are highly optimized for performance and security of Wordpress
CMS.
Respectfully,
Brad Beckett
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:26 PM, micah wrote:
> Eugen Leitl writes:
>
> >
Eugen Leitl writes:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 03:07:35PM +0200, ilf wrote:
>
>> I can't believe this bullshit thread recommending *only* commercial
>> services.
>
> Look, free is distinctly unaffordable. If you need a dedicated
> box somebody has got to pay for the hosting and remote hands.
> A
yeah, and there's only one "Swedish Pirate Party" in the world:
http://organic.typepad.com/threeminds/2013/02/swedish-pirate-party.html
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L. Pacheco Sanfuentes
+1 (817) 271-9619
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 03:07:35PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> I can't believe this bullshit thread recommending *only* commercial
> services.
Look, free is distinctly unaffordable. If you need a dedicated
box somebody has got to pay for the hosting and remote hands.
Activists donating own resources ar
Hisham:
Activists whose sites come under attack struggle to find cheap solutions to
keep their websites safely guarded. Many of them are looking for
secure, inexpensive hosting.
I can't believe this bullshit thread recommending *only* commercial
services.
How about checking out this list?
h
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Hisham wrote:
> Activists whose sites come under attack struggle to find cheap solutions
> to keep their websites safely guarded. Many of them are looking for
> secure, inexpensive hosting. I've come across many such cases, from
> Senegal, to Zambia to Egypt to M
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:50:22PM +, Andreas Bader wrote:
> Hetzner Germany is pretty good.
> We use it since years and never had problems with it.
Hetzner is good and cheap (though no longer that
cheap) but they'll drop you like a hot potato
in case of ever the slightest problems.
I would
Hi
On Fri 19-Apr-2013 at 10:19:03PM +0100, Bill Best wrote:
>
> This company has hosting in Iceland:
>
> http://ecodissident.net
Thanks for the plug!
We can also provide shared hosting in Iceland based on the prices here:
https://webarch.net/shared-hosting
All the best
Chris
--
Webarchite
On 18 April 2013 21:45, Hisham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Activists whose sites come under attack struggle to find cheap solutions to
> keep their websites safely guarded. Many of them are looking for secure,
> inexpensive hosting. I've come across many such cases, from Senegal, to
> Zambia to Egypt to
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 03:13:06 -0400
Shava Nerad wrote:
> Doesn't cloudflare block Tor? I've seen complaints from wordpress
> installations using their plugin...
Just so it's said, since most people won't read the tor-talk links
posted later in this thread:
No, cloudflare doesn't block tor expli
Doesn't cloudflare block Tor? I've seen complaints from wordpress
installations using their plugin...
Shava Nerad
shav...@gmail.com
On Apr 18, 2013 4:49 PM, "Nadim Kobeissi" wrote:
> While not technically a hosting solution, CloudFlare can definitely help
> secure websites against many co
Will be writing off list to those of you who offered help. Thanks for your
input and generosity.
Cheers,
H
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Edouard Poitras wrote:
> We offer such hosting for people in this exact scenario. Nothing as
> robust as CloudFlare in terms of DDoS resistance, but certa
We offer such hosting for people in this exact scenario. Nothing as
robust as CloudFlare in terms of DDoS resistance, but certainly secure
(and free). We also offer to host the DNS.
Typically a site will just want to be back up as soon as possible with
web-ftp access, but we can also put in the
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, xek3149 wrote:
>
>> The problem with Cloudflare is that it is difficult to connect to sites
>>> using Tor. Either they (Cloudflare) are blocking Tor outright or they are
>>> restricting the number of connections per IP address.
>>>
>>
Here's the discussion o
Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, xek3149 wrote:
>
>> The problem with Cloudflare is that it is difficult to connect to sites
>> using Tor. Either they (Cloudflare) are blocking Tor outright or they are
>> restricting the number of connections per IP address.
>>
> Are ther
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, xek3149 wrote:
> The problem with Cloudflare is that it is difficult to connect to sites
> using Tor. Either they (Cloudflare) are blocking Tor outright or they are
> restricting the number of connections per IP address.
>
Are there any references regarding this?
The problem with Cloudflare is that it is difficult to connect to sites
using Tor. Either they (Cloudflare) are blocking Tor outright or they are
restricting the number of connections per IP address.
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attach
Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
> While not technically a hosting solution, CloudFlare can definitely help
> secure websites against many common attacks. It's free and works with
> almost any hosting provider.
>
> https://www.cloudflare.com/
>
Seconded. It also helps hide one's hosting provider. One p
Hisham:
> Hi all,
>
> Activists whose sites come under attack struggle to find cheap solutions to
> keep their websites safely guarded. Many of them are looking for
> secure, inexpensive hosting. I've come across many such cases, from
> Senegal, to Zambia to Egypt to Morocco. Some of them ask for
While not technically a hosting solution, CloudFlare can definitely help
secure websites against many common attacks. It's free and works with
almost any hosting provider.
https://www.cloudflare.com/
NK
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Hisham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Activists whose sites come u
Hi all,
Activists whose sites come under attack struggle to find cheap solutions to
keep their websites safely guarded. Many of them are looking for
secure, inexpensive hosting. I've come across many such cases, from
Senegal, to Zambia to Egypt to Morocco. Some of them ask for temporary hosting
to
27 matches
Mail list logo
