On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
On Friday, January 27, 2012, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
>>
>> ? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us.
>
> What are your experiences with the op
On Friday, January 27, 2012, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
>>
>> ? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us.
>
> What are your experiences with the optimizer code? Worth the extra
> code, hassle
> So my last question: if I put Warp's fparser in libMesh contrib, will
> that be too much of a hassle for you guys when it conflicts with your
> apps' local installation?
We'd either start using it directly, or configure it off if for some reason
we couldn't, so it shouldn't be an issue.
--
John
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us.
What are your experiences with the optimizer code? Worth the extra
code, hassle of testing for bison, etc?
---
Roy--
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
Any support there for vector-valued functions? It looks like it fixes
f: R^N -> R^N?
f: R^M -> R^N, but yeah.
I don't think I've used it that way, but maybe you could wrap your
own class around several scalar fparser objects...
In hindsight tha
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 27, 2012, David Knezevic
>> wrote:
>> > This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm
>> > all for it too!
>>
>> Have you ever tried
>>
>> http://w
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
On Friday, January 27, 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
> This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm
> all for it too!
Have you ever tried
http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
? I haven't tried mu, but the above works p
On 01/27/2012 01:59 PM, John Peterson wrote:
On Friday, January 27, 2012, David Knezevic
mailto:dkneze...@seas.harvard.edu>> wrote:
> This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm
> all for it too!
Have you ever tried
http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
? I ha
On Friday, January 27, 2012, David Knezevic
wrote:
> This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm
> all for it too!
Have you ever tried
http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us.
>
>
>
> On 01/27/2012 01:
This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm
all for it too!
On 01/27/2012 01:11 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> I'm adding support to an app for setting analytic initial and boundary
> conditions at runtime via math expression strings in config files,
> using the muParser
> If opinions are positive: does anyone want to get really crazy and put
> it in contrib/
I might go for that. In the meantime just add a configure option to point
it to an external installation, I'll see about modifying that to use our own
if/when it gets into ./contrib
-Ben
---
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>> Would anyone be interested in seeing some of the underlying
>> infrastructure (configure-time identification of muParser 2.0+, a
>> HAVE_MUPARSER dependent ParsedFunction subclass of FunctionBase) moved
>> into libMesh?
>
> Absolutely. W
YES. This would be great for boundary/initial conditions and simple
material properties.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> I'm adding support to an app for setting analytic initial and boundary
> conditions at runtime via math expression strings in config files,
> using the
> Would anyone be interested in seeing some of the underlying
> infrastructure (configure-time identification of muParser 2.0+, a
> HAVE_MUPARSER dependent ParsedFunction subclass of FunctionBase) moved
> into libMesh?
Absolutely. We'd really like to have user-defined bc functions in CATPISS
(er,
I'm adding support to an app for setting analytic initial and boundary
conditions at runtime via math expression strings in config files,
using the muParser library to turn the strings into bytecode and the
bytecode into vector-valued function evaluations.
Would anyone be interested in seeing som
15 matches
Mail list logo
