Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-12 Thread Jed Brown
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:57:13 -0700, Derek Gaston wrote: > > Speaking of higher order elements and available visualization, do any > > of these viz programs actually support *high* order elements? > > Quadratics don't count. I remember one of the problems I had with p > > refinement in libMesh wa

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-12 Thread Jed Brown
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:33:24 -0600 (CST), Roy Stogner wrote: > The one current limitation that VisIt seems to have compared to > Paraview is ubiquity. When I wanted to play with the latter, I found > it in the Fedora repos for home and it was in Ubuntu for them to > install at work. There's a l

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Derek Gaston
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > Speaking of higher order elements and available visualization, do any > of these viz programs actually support *high* order elements? > Quadratics don't count. I remember one of the problems I had with p > refinement in libMesh was just get

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Boyce Griffith
I'd love to see VisIt become the libMesh viewer of choice! However, right now, it seems like most of the output formats supported by libMesh do not play well with VisIt. I spent the better part of an afternoon several months back trying to get VisIt to read the VTK files generated by libMesh

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Roy Stogner
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Boyce Griffith wrote: > I'd love to see VisIt become the libMesh viewer of choice! However, right > now, it seems like most of the output formats supported by libMesh do not > play well with VisIt. I spent the better part of an afternoon several months > back trying to g

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Cody Permann
Well that would probably be the logical thing to do but no, it has not been implemented that way yet That would be important for restarts but at the time the "hack" was implemented it was a quick workable solution to view the generated meshes. On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:47 PM, John Peterson w

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Geordie McBain
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Jed Brown wrote: > There is also VisIt which I usually prefer it to Paraview. Another free VTK viewer is Mayavi2 ; it's quite widely available, e.g. it's packaged for Ubuntu. -

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread John Peterson
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Cody Permann wrote: > Yes, The Exodus writer maps zero blocks and sidesets to max(type) instead.   > This isn't heavily tested but seems to be a good work around. Great! Does the reader also map such values back to zero when they get read back in? -- John

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Cody Permann
Yes, The Exodus writer maps zero blocks and sidesets to max(type) instead. This isn't heavily tested but seems to be a good work around. On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:38 PM, John Peterson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Derek Gaston wrote: >> On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: >

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Jed Brown
There is also VisIt which I usually prefer it to Paraview. Jed -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parall

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Paul T. Bauman
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:38 PM, John Peterson < [email protected]> wrote: > > I've never really liked paraview the few times I've tried it, probably > just takes some getting used to. > It's got to be better than Tecplot...

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread John Peterson
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Derek Gaston wrote: > On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > Roy, John, Ben... what do you guys usually use? GMV... I guess I'd be OK switching our examples to Exodus, as long as we can iron out a good long term solution for the "no zero sidesets" re

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
t: Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: You and Ben have the most experience with all the various file formats, I believe, so if you both agree on something then let's switch to it. If you disagree, I su

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Derek Gaston
On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > You and Ben have the most experience with all the various file > formats, I believe, so if you both agree on something then let's > switch to it. If you disagree, I suggest some sort of steel cage > match to break the tie. I do believe I would lo

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Roy Stogner
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Derek Gaston wrote: >> Maybe we should switch our examples to VTK, and recommend Paraview? > > We noticed this a few days ago ourselves. > > Is there any chance that we could switch the examples to writing Exodus and > recommend Paraview? You and Ben have the most experienc

Re: [Libmesh-devel] [Libmesh-users] dump the tecplot-accepted ASCII data file

2010-03-11 Thread Derek Gaston
On Mar 11, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > http://www-xdiv.lanl.gov/XCM/gmv/GMVHome.html > "GMV is now exclusively licensed to CPFD Software, LLC" > > That's quite disappointing. I'm a big GMV fan, but I was always a > little wary about recommending a non-open-source utility to all our >