What do you want to do regarding the " -mat_new_nonzero_allocation_err
false" issue in reduced_basis_ex5 and reduced_basis_ex6?
On my local version I've hard-coded DofMap::block_size() to return 1, as
you suggested.
On 07/12/2013 04:03 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
OK, I lost lock
From: David Knezevic [[email protected]]
> hehe I'm in Australia at the moment, it's a comfortable time in the
> afternoon down here. The real question is: Do you sleep!?
Enjoy Australia!
I was able to make it to Ostrava after all the drama, so I
On 06/18/2013 03:53 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break
> anything since the DG-subclass-specific features aren't used anywhere in
> the library yet.
>
> P.S. Do you want to include that new example I added, misc_ex9?
>
> I'd lo
From: David Knezevic [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-devel] 0.9.2 status
I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break
anythi
I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break
anything since the DG-subclass-specific features aren't used anywhere in
the library yet.
P.S. Do you want to include that new example I added, misc_ex9?
On 06/18/2013 03:38 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> OK, I've got
Read as far as I'm concerned, but I don't have time to tag it until I'm done
with the course stuff. If someone beats me im ok with that...
-Ben
On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:37 PM, "Cody Permann" wrote:
> Any update as to where 0.9.2 is at?
>
> Cody
>
Any update as to where 0.9.2 is at?
Cody
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___
Libmesh-devel mailing li
Hi Paul,
I'm at a conference so I don't have time to switch the RB examples now,
so if you go ahead that'd be great.
David
On 06/05/2013 11:22 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
Mind waiting 24 hours? I wanted to finish off the work I'd started a
long time ago on "privatizing" FEMSystem stuff for t
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> anyone have heartache if I package up 0.9.2-rc1, complete with PETSc
> 3.4 support and preliminary blocked matrix support?
If we're going to continue having much more frequent releases then we
ought to script up the whole tag/branch/upload
On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:22 AM, "Paul T. Bauman" wrote:
> Mind waiting 24 hours?
Not at all. I'm actually overwhelmed with stuff ATM so you won't be holding me
up.
--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departmen
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> anyone have heartache if I package up 0.9.2-rc1, complete with PETSc
> 3.4 support and preliminary blocked matrix support?
We should be set to go for -rc1 whenever Paul's ready. There's a
couple bugfixes for non-uint index types that I wan
Mind waiting 24 hours? I wanted to finish off the work I'd started a long
time ago on "privatizing" FEMSystem stuff for this release (which will
break backward compatibility). A couple of hours work tonight should be
able to finish it off and I can put in a pull request.
David Knezivic, I'll try a
12 matches
Mail list logo
