gner
<royst...@ices.utexas.edu<mailto:royst...@ices.utexas.edu>> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Rossi, Simone wrote:
The run times for 100 timesteps using AMR can be more than 10 times slower than
when using a fine uniform grid.
For example, with a 16 x 16 x 16 uniform grid, 100 iteration
|
-
On Apr 27, 2017, at 14:29, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc.edu<mailto:sro...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
Ok, I ran again the tests with different max_h_levels with the perflog enabled.
give you all the details as in the
example.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc.edu<mailto:sro...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
Dear Vikram,
as in the examples, I am using the libmesh::KellyErrorEstimator.
I’m compiling libmesh with the --ena
ationSystems
|
| build_solution_vector() 1 0.0001 0.560.0001
0.640.79 0.90 |
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc.edu<mailto:sro...@email.unc.edu
Dear Roy, dear Paul, dear all,
I am testing AMR in libmesh using simple linear elements.
My test case is a propagating front described by a reaction-diffusion equation
with a cubic bistable reaction term.
I followed the adaptivity examples to create this test case.
The run times for 100
Dear all,
I’m trying to implement a DG formulation for solid mechanics using linear
elements.
I’m currently using the following strategy:
I define my variables as MONOMIALS but in the assembly I pretend my FEType is
LAGRANGE.
This gives me the correct values of the shape functions on the edges.
I have the --disable-unique-ptr option in my configuration script since it is
required by another library I’m using on top of libMesh.
Thanks,
Simone
On Nov 7, 2016, at 11:49, John Peterson
<jwpeter...@gmail.com<mailto:jwpeter...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:
Dear all,
I’m upgrading to PETSc 3.7.4 and I am now compiling the git version of libMesh.
On my workstation (using gcc 5.4 and openmpi 2.0.0) I get a compilation error
/not_backed_up/srossi/TPL/libmesh/libmesh-git/src/reduced_basis/rb_eim_assembly.C:
In member function ‘virtual void
Hey John,
I’m using PETSc 3.7.2. I’ll install a another version to check if that’s the
problem.
Thanks,
Simone
On Nov 3, 2016, at 17:36, John Peterson
<jwpeter...@gmail.com<mailto:jwpeter...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc
elasticity problem, getting finally some instabilities in the pressure.
Thanks for the help,
Simone
On Oct 13, 2016, at 13:12, David Knezevic
<david.kneze...@akselos.com<mailto:david.kneze...@akselos.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc
Dear all,
I have been trying to run some of the time dependent examples.
Every time I use the -ksp_monitor command line option (with PETSc) to see the
output of the linear system,
after 4 iterations the simulation crashes saying that there are too many
kip_monitors.
The same thing happen when
e
On Oct 13, 2016, at 12:00, David Knezevic
<david.kneze...@akselos.com<mailto:david.kneze...@akselos.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc.edu<mailto:sro...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
Dear all,
I’m playing around with the elasticit
Dear all,
I’m playing around with the elasticity tests in the system of equations
examples (more specifically Ex4 and Ex5).
In particular I’m trying to set the poisson ratio to nu = 0.49995.
With this choice the solution I get using second order lagrangian elements does
not make any sense.
For
Thanks Paul,
so it is already implemented. It sounds awesome.
Thanks again,
Best
Simone
On Oct 7, 2016, at 13:34, Paul T. Bauman
<ptbau...@gmail.com<mailto:ptbau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Rossi, Simone
<sro...@email.unc.edu<mailto:sro...@ema
Dear all,
I’d like to extend my libmesh-based reaction-diffusion solver to a surface
solver,
taking the trace of the 3D shape functions on the surface mesh.
Before I start implementing a new element,
do you have any suggestion on how to approach it?
Thanks,
Simone
Hello,
I’m experiencing a runtime error when export the equation systems if I use more
than one EquationSystems with different variables in each system.
In particular, I created 2 EquationSystems: systems1 with one P1 variable and
systems2 with two P1 variables. After initializing, I write the
16 matches
Mail list logo