Hello,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:53:54 +
Karl P wrote:
[]
> mbed is going to be supporting freescale, LPC and ST boards, and
> they've got corporate backing. It's also a lot more appealing now
> that they properly support using it offline. If you want to see a
> common api, mbed is probably
Hello,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:28:14 -0800
Chuck McManis wrote:
> Trevor,
>
> So Paul's take on the issue of programming these things is the
> Peripheral Template Library, its on github at
> https://github.com/pfalcon/PeripheralTemplateLibrary. So understand
> he has a horse in this particular r
Hello,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:25:22 -0500
Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your input. You obviously have a great deal of experience
> with ST.
Not really. I specifically taking care to watch wider MCU space, not
sticking with a single vendor. And then after watching them for s
Trevor,
So Paul's take on the issue of programming these things is the Peripheral
Template Library, its on github at
https://github.com/pfalcon/PeripheralTemplateLibrary. So understand he has
a horse in this particular race.
Trevor wrote:
> My original email was merely pointing out how ironic it
On 02/18/2014 05:49 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure by now everyone has seen the recent ST announcement for their
> "nucleo" boards?[1][2][3] How ironic that, just the other day on IRC, we
> were talking about higher-layer hardware abstractions and it was
> mentioned that, if anythin
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your input. You obviously have a great deal of experience
with ST. Since I don't have this same amount of experience, it isn't
obvious to me how ST will have this project unfold.
On 02/18/14 13:42, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:49:38 -0500
> Trevor Woerner w
Hello,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:49:38 -0500
Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure by now everyone has seen the recent ST announcement for their
> "nucleo" boards?[1][2][3] How ironic that, just the other day on IRC,
> we were talking about higher-layer hardware abstractions and it was
> mentio
> "Trevor" == Trevor Woerner writes:
Trevor> Hi, I'm sure by now everyone has seen the recent ST announcement
Trevor> for their "nucleo" boards?[1][2][3] How ironic that, just the
Trevor> other day on IRC, we were talking about higher-layer hardware
Trevor> abstractions and it
Hi,
I'm sure by now everyone has seen the recent ST announcement for their
"nucleo" boards?[1][2][3] How ironic that, just the other day on IRC, we
were talking about higher-layer hardware abstractions and it was
mentioned that, if anything, it would be a good idea to consider a new
fake machine (
