Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2019-07-25

On 25/07/2019 17:34, Jan Holesovsky wrote: * Bump LO 6.4 Java baseline from Java 6 to 8? (Stephan) + Only bumped from Java 5 to 6 for LO 6.3. + But Java 12 is becoming ever more popular, with min target 7 (e.g., "Bump Java source and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 15:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > + fuzzit https://fuzzit.dev/ available > + offering things to OSS projects – but looks like oss-fuzz > + seem to be pushing hard to encourage people to use it > + may look on return from vacation For the record, there

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 15:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > + fuzzit https://fuzzit.dev/ available > + offering things to OSS projects – but looks like oss-fuzz > + seem to be pushing hard to encourage people to use it > + may look on return from vacation For the record, there

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Den tors 27 juni 2019 kl 16:23 skrev Michael Meeks < michael.me...@collabora.com>: > * Present: > + Sophie, Kendy, Oliver, Christian, Stephan, Michael S, Michael W > Michael M, Caolan, Gabriel, Eike, Xisco, Thorsten, Heiko > > * Completed Action Items: > + send Arkadij a welcome

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Den tors 27 juni 2019 kl 16:23 skrev Michael Meeks < michael.me...@collabora.com>: > * Present: > + Sophie, Kendy, Oliver, Christian, Stephan, Michael S, Michael W > Michael M, Caolan, Gabriel, Eike, Xisco, Thorsten, Heiko > > * Completed Action Items: > + send Arkadij a welcome

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:44 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > + Crash testing: I meant to mention that I also refreshed the collection of files we test, so its now up to 113070 documents ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Michael, > + UI testing tool update ? > + Code is in > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/uitest/mass-testing > + Calc: Found some crashes related to the dynamic number of columns work > - E.g. >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Markus On 28/03/2019 17:53, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > This one was caused by a missing symbol extraction after symbol upload. > I could not find any reason in the log files that explains why the > upload of the symbols would succeed but the unziping of the uploaded > file would fail. As a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hey Michael, all, On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:44 AM Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On 28/03/2019 16:13, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > so in general the fastest way to get some feedback might be to ping me > > directly and give me some time to look into such issues. While I still > > have

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Markus, On 28/03/2019 16:13, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > so in general the fastest way to get some feedback might be to ping me > directly and give me some time to look into such issues. While I still > have quite bad internet and can't do any uploads of symbol information I > can still at least

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hey, * Crash Reporting (Xisco) > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/version/6.1.4.2 > + 837 (+46) > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/version/6.1.5.2 > + 875 634 (+241) > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/version/6.2.0.3 > + 1295 (+59) > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > * GSOC 2019 (Xisco) > AI: Submit proposal (Thorsten/Heiko/Xisco) > Done. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > * GSOC 2019 (Xisco) > AI: Submit proposal (Thorsten/Heiko/Xisco) > Done. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 06.12.18 17:51, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On 06/12/2018 16:46, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >>          + minor complaint wrt. single Chart save removal in calc >> (Heiko) >>             + how to know ? - checkout release notes >>   >> These people should feel free to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 06.12.18 17:51, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On 06/12/2018 16:46, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >>          + minor complaint wrt. single Chart save removal in calc >> (Heiko) >>             + how to know ? - checkout release notes >>   >> These people should feel free to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Markus, On 06/12/2018 16:46, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >          + minor complaint wrt. single Chart save removal in calc > (Heiko) >             + how to know ? - checkout release notes >   > These people should feel free to complain to me. However the removal was > necessary and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hey all, On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:31 PM Michael Meeks wrote: > + minor complaint wrt. single Chart save removal in calc (Heiko) > + how to know ? - checkout release notes > > These people should feel free to complain to me. However the removal was necessary and long

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > * Hackfests & Events (Thorsten) >+ next year hackfests coming up: >+ FOSDEM in February - 2 days before the conference expected. > Apologies, there's an off-by-one error: tentative FOSDEM schedule is as follows: Wednesday, January 30 * Hackfest at betacowork

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > * Hackfests & Events (Thorsten) >+ next year hackfests coming up: >+ FOSDEM in February - 2 days before the conference expected. > Apologies, there's an off-by-one error: tentative FOSDEM schedule is as follows: Wednesday, January 30 * Hackfest at betacowork

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 13/09/2018 16:35, Michael Meeks wrote: * IRC channel (cloph) + Spam wave seems over/in control by freenode – keep +r? + should we keep restriction to only registered nicks. + up to moderators – why not just lift it for dev channel (Thorsten) Had to enable it again now (after

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 13/09/2018 16:35, Michael Meeks wrote: * IRC channel (cloph) + Spam wave seems over/in control by freenode – keep +r? + should we keep restriction to only registered nicks. + up to moderators – why not just lift it for dev channel (Thorsten) Had to enable it again now (after

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Am 13.09.2018 um 18:09 schrieb V Stuart Foote: > >> * CTRL+ALT+E isn't opening the extension dialog but inserts a "é" >> + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119676 >>+ bug?, see also 118269 >> + why do we have a hot-key for that dialog ? (Michael) >>+ not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Michael Meeks Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:35 AM To: libreoffice-dev; libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org > * CTRL+ALT+E isn't opening the extension dialog but inserts a "é" > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

+ top 5 reviewers: Pootle bot made 2988 review comments in 1 month, and 2988 in 1 year But was it awarded a t-shirt or something? :-) -- Best regards, Mike Kaganski ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call

Stephan Bergmann wrote: > * Jean-Sebastien: > + Linagora branch for French ministry (mimo branch) > + Tell us name of desired branch, will be added (Thorsten) > + Sub-branches even? Probably not needed > Done - also added Jean-Sebastien as committer, otherwise the whole branch

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call

Stephan Bergmann wrote: > * Jean-Sebastien: > + Linagora branch for French ministry (mimo branch) > + Tell us name of desired branch, will be added (Thorsten) > + Sub-branches even? Probably not needed > Done - also added Jean-Sebastien as committer, otherwise the whole branch

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 4:50 PM Michael Meeks wrote: >+ Tools > Options > Asian/CTL always active >+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104318 The issue (at least the recent comment that revived it) argues that disabling CTL (and by extension CJK) by default makes it

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

e On 7 June 2018 at 16:46, Michael Meeks wrote: > + also looked at Windows build / CPU > + total time ~50mins > + 5 minutes at the begin – checkout/dep gen. > + 8 min in middle & end – just 1 CPU core. > + 20mins – with just 1 core. > + so

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2018-05-30

Enviado desde mi iPad > El 30 may 2018, a las 18:38, Jan Holesovsky escribió: > > * Present: >+ Thorsten, Kendy, Heiko, Noel, Olivier, Xisco, Bubli, Stephan, Sophie, > Michael W., Drew, Eike, Cloph + jani (I was the first, when you asked for names). Rgds Jan I. > > * Completed

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 26/04/18 16:36, Michael Meeks wrote: + create & circulate new ESC time poll & CC dev list (Heiko) => https://doodle.com/poll/567nszb5tfzfxue4 Even if the times in the poll are in UTC, I assume we are looking for a time that will float with the CET/CEST summer-time change again

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 26/04/18 16:36, Michael Meeks wrote: + create & circulate new ESC time poll & CC dev list (Heiko) => https://doodle.com/poll/567nszb5tfzfxue4 Even if the times in the poll are in UTC, I assume we are looking for a time that will float with the CET/CEST summer-time change again

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Khaled, On Saturday, 2018-04-14 04:44:02 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > There are two proposals for the project I want to mentor, but none of them > > > submitted any patches so far, so I'm not sure if we want any of these or > > > not. > > > > It's too late now because GSoC slot requests

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Khaled, > > On Thursday, 2018-04-05 16:22:26 +, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > There are two proposals for the project I want to mentor, but none of them > > submitted any patches so far, so I'm not sure if we want any of these or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Khaled, On Thursday, 2018-04-05 16:22:26 +, Khaled Hosny wrote: > There are two proposals for the project I want to mentor, but none of them > submitted any patches so far, so I'm not sure if we want any of these or > not. It's too late now because GSoC slot requests should had happened

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 06/04/18 16:43, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Unfortunately, appears that none of the Gerrit/Jenkins bots will actually check such changes (as none of them apparently uses --with-help=...).  Leads to broken master that needs fixing like

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 05/04/18 16:48, Michael Meeks wrote: * Documentation (Olivier) + Help pages updated /fixes (G. Kelemen. S. Horacek, buovjaga, D. Roscek, ohallot, atimar, A. Gelmini) + (on going) wiki page on direct inline help page editing in gerrit (thanks to D. Ostrovsky, M.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 05/04/18 16:48, Michael Meeks wrote: * Documentation (Olivier) + Help pages updated /fixes (G. Kelemen. S. Horacek, buovjaga, D. Roscek, ohallot, atimar, A. Gelmini) + (on going) wiki page on direct inline help page editing in gerrit (thanks to D. Ostrovsky, M.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 5:22 PM 'Markus Mohrhard' via Khaled Hosny < khaledho...@eglug.org> wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Michael Meeks > wrote: > >> >> >> * GSoC Application (Thorsten, Heiko) >>+ 42 final applications – deadline is over, please

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hey, On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > * GSoC Application (Thorsten, Heiko) >+ 42 final applications – deadline is over, please review! > + somewhat down on previous years; similar to other projects. >+ 16+ mentors >+ 10-15

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call 2018-02-01

On 1 February 2018 at 18:54, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > * Budgeting (Thorsten) > + collecting wish-lists: > + get some fast new Macs and host at Manitu > + gerrit updates > + other ideas for development topics ? > > SSDs for existing macs. SSD for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Markus Mohrhard < markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Michael Meeks < > michael.me...@collabora.com> wrote: > >> Hi Markus, >> >> On 18/09/17 16:26, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >> > * Crash Reporter (Xisco) >> > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On 18/09/17 16:26, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > * Crash Reporter (Xisco) > > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/?days=128 > ... > > I already spent more than a day looking into

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Markus, On 18/09/17 16:26, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > * Crash Reporter (Xisco) >     + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/?days=128 ... > I already spent more than a day looking into that issue. It is not a > problem in LibreOffice or our tooling. Merged libraries generarted with >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

> > > * Crash Reporter (Xisco) > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/?days=128 > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/version/5.3.4.2 > + 2121 (last 7 days) > + http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/version/5.3.5.2 > + 516 (last 7 days) > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 15:49 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Looked for related bugs in Bugzilla (Xisco) >+ didn’t look in too much detail > + http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Minutes-of-ESC-call-20 > 17-08-17-tt4220768.html#a4221038 > AI:+ dialog / cropping →

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call 2017-08-24

Hi, Le 24/08/2017 à 16:53, Miklos Vajna a écrit : [...] * Release Engineering update (Christian) + 5.3.6 RC1 is on the mirrors, to be announced early next week Some time ago, new RC builds were systematically announced on several ML (dev, QA, projects). Now, several RC were not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Friday, 2017-07-21 14:27:11 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > So my suggestion would be that we all try to write a few lines in a mail > when we have committed something that can/should be used by more developers. > > What do you think? I completely agree. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hey, On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > * Berlin German community meeting (Thorsten) > > + Hard to track changes going in for non fulltime devs (Björn) > + somebody to summarize the commits going in? > + would that actually

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hy all, Il 2017-06-15 15:09 Michael Meeks ha scritto: Hi guys, On 15/06/17 11:04, Heiko Tietze wrote: Would say the arguments are on the table. Cloph, what is the drawback of adding appimage to our repo ? Can we shelve this, and discuss it in-person at the next ESC call; I've added it to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hy all, Il 2017-06-15 15:09 Michael Meeks ha scritto: Hi guys, On 15/06/17 11:04, Heiko Tietze wrote: Would say the arguments are on the table. Cloph, what is the drawback of adding appimage to our repo ? Can we shelve this, and discuss it in-person at the next ESC call; I've added it to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi guys, On 15/06/17 11:04, Heiko Tietze wrote: > Would say the arguments are on the table. Cloph, what is the drawback > of adding appimage to our repo ? Can we shelve this, and discuss it in-person at the next ESC call; I've added it to the agenda already =) I'm hoping to see Antonio

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi guys, On 15/06/17 11:04, Heiko Tietze wrote: > Would say the arguments are on the table. Cloph, what is the drawback > of adding appimage to our repo ? Can we shelve this, and discuss it in-person at the next ESC call; I've added it to the agenda already =) I'm hoping to see Antonio

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Would say the arguments are on the table. Cloph, what is the drawback of adding appimage to our repo? Time, size, traffic? In your opinion it has only little benefit but when the costs are low that might be acceptable. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Would say the arguments are on the table. Cloph, what is the drawback of adding appimage to our repo? Time, size, traffic? In your opinion it has only little benefit but when the costs are low that might be acceptable. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

> Hi Jay, *, Hi Cloph, >> 1) not having to install it on your system to run it (aka portable) > No need to install for TDF builds either. You would have to extract, which isnt simple for a regular user. >> 2) copying it on a usb and run it on any linux distro (atleast the minimum >> system

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

> Hi Jay, *, Hi Cloph, >> 1) not having to install it on your system to run it (aka portable) > No need to install for TDF builds either. You would have to extract, which isnt simple for a regular user. >> 2) copying it on a usb and run it on any linux distro (atleast the minimum >> system

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Jay, *, On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Jay Philips wrote: > […] >> + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael) > > If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides > similar functionality as the portable

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Jay, *, On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Jay Philips wrote: > […] >> + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael) > > If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides > similar functionality as the portable

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Michael, Jay, all Il 09.06.2017 10:59 Michael Meeks ha scritto: Hi Jay, On 09/06/17 00:10, Jay Philips wrote: + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael) If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides similar functionality as the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi All, Sorry i wasnt able to attend today, so i guess i'll leave my comments by email. >  + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael) If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides similar functionality as the portable version found

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi All, Sorry i wasnt able to attend today, so i guess i'll leave my comments by email. >  + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael) If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides similar functionality as the portable version found

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Michael, >    The "just run the console and do chmod +x " that > I see on their front-page is (I suspect) rather a bit of a usability > nightmare ;-) at least initially vs. say an app-store. Some 'technical' > people I know are impressed by command-line use ;-) As you can set the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Michael, >    The "just run the console and do chmod +x " that > I see on their front-page is (I suspect) rather a bit of a usability > nightmare ;-) at least initially vs. say an app-store. Some 'technical' > people I know are impressed by command-line use ;-) As you can set the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Michael, Jay, all Il 09.06.2017 10:59 Michael Meeks ha scritto: Hi Jay, On 09/06/17 00:10, Jay Philips wrote: + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael) If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides similar functionality as the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Jay, On 09/06/17 00:10, Jay Philips wrote: >> + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage >> (Michael) > > If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it > provides similar functionality as the portable version found on > windows, like > > 1) not having to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Jay, On 09/06/17 00:10, Jay Philips wrote: >> + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage >> (Michael) > > If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it > provides similar functionality as the portable version found on > windows, like > > 1) not having to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thursday, 2017-05-11 15:44:56 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > + openhub statistics (2001-01-01), -1(-1) people did -1(-1) commits in 12 > month in -1(-1) lines of code > + Is that really so ? -1 lines is a lot ... Currently https://www.openhub.net/p/libreoffice says 30 Day

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: * Release Engineering update (Christian) + 5.2.7 RC2 + on the mirrors as a final version, but no official announce yet. + the last of the 5.2.x line planned. 5.2.7 RC1 changelog still missing here:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 20:08 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > + Google / ossfuzz: 27 fuzzers active now >   - unfortunately, addition of the doc one tipped us over some > upstream build infrastructure space limit so builds broken > upstream until that's sorted out >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:22:04AM +1000, Chris Sherlock wrote: > > On 31 Mar 2017, at 10:59 pm, David Tardon wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > >> * Crashtest update (Caolan) > >>+ Google / ossfuzz: 24 fuzzers active

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > * Crashtest update (Caolan) > + Google / ossfuzz: 24 fuzzers active now, unchanged > + not added any more tests – existing giving out enough noise > + lots of horsepower: they are also testing for local leaks &

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > $ cd online > $ git log libreoffice-5-3-branch-point..origin/libreoffice-5-3 --oneline > | nl -> 43 > Does not seem to match reality: $ git merge-base origin/master origin/libreoffice-5-3 0f2e5ef3fe8d52a2f58afc6d8ac19046df155202 $ git log

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > $ cd online > $ git log libreoffice-5-3-branch-point..origin/libreoffice-5-3 --oneline > | nl -> 43 > Does not seem to match reality: $ git merge-base origin/master origin/libreoffice-5-3 0f2e5ef3fe8d52a2f58afc6d8ac19046df155202 $ git log

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Thorsten, On 17/02/17 02:40, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > To expand a bit on that, very happy to say that Kopano > (https://kopano.com/) is sponsoring us to improve the stable TDF > branch of LibreOffice Online, which so far has not seen many > bugfixes. Curious; $ cd online $ git log

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Thorsten, On 17/02/17 02:40, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > To expand a bit on that, very happy to say that Kopano > (https://kopano.com/) is sponsoring us to improve the stable TDF > branch of LibreOffice Online, which so far has not seen many > bugfixes. Curious; $ cd online $ git log

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thursday, 2017-02-16 15:43:18 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > + Most Pressing Bugs: http://tdf.io/mostressingbugs > + Older: > + Crash in: `anonymous > namespace'::ScCaptionCreator::UpdateCaptionPos() > + >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > On 17/02/17 11:41, Pedro wrote: >> Is TDF hosting a free account version of LOO (not a nice acronym >> for British English people ;) ) at least for testing purposes? > > Heh - so - Collabora is already hosting that as a service for the > community - with integration into

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thursday, 2017-02-16 15:43:18 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > + Most Pressing Bugs: http://tdf.io/mostressingbugs > + New: > + Pivot crashes Calc > + > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105858 > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Pedro, On 17/02/17 11:41, Pedro wrote: >> + online/TDF/LDAP accounts etc. (Michael) >> + https://user.documentfoundation.org > > I assumed this would point to a test version but it seems to be a login > interface only... Am I missing something? Riight - so we're working on a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Thorsten, Michael, all Thorsten Behrens-6 wrote > Michael Meeks wrote: >> + online (Michael) >> + online branch maintenance (Thorsten) >> + wondering for 5.3 – what’s the policy ? >> + not using gerrit much. >> + customer wants to do stabilization &

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > + online (Michael) > + online branch maintenance (Thorsten) > + wondering for 5.3 – what’s the policy ? > + not using gerrit much. > + customer wants to do stabilization & bug-fixing > - plan for one review in gerrit

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > + online (Michael) > + online branch maintenance (Thorsten) > + wondering for 5.3 – what’s the policy ? > + not using gerrit much. > + customer wants to do stabilization & bug-fixing > - plan for one review in gerrit

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, > * TDF / Budgeting / Brainstorming (Thorsten) > + checkout spreadsheet: > https://demo.collaboracloudsuite.com/tdf/index.php/apps/richdocuments/index#719_%2FESC%20minutes > + currently ranked by highest score > + interesting ranking, thanks for rating. When will these

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:41:44PM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > So, dropping make 3.8.1 on Mac would clearly push people not to build > with the XCode system provided tools ? Well, it is still GNU make. But yes in general, its suggested to work on LibreOffice in a well defined

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:41:44PM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > So, dropping make 3.8.1 on Mac would clearly push people not to build > with the XCode system provided tools ? Well, it is still GNU make. But yes in general, its suggested to work on LibreOffice in a well defined

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Le 13/01/2017 à 15:03, Michael Meeks a écrit : > * make 3.81 (Michael S) > + Mac comes with 3.81 (Cloph) >+ but fine with dropping support for it. >+ if people build with lode – they get a current make anyway (Michael > S) > + recommended (JanI) So, dropping make

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi *, On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > […] > * Release Engineering update (Christian) > + 5.2.5 RC1 schedule acceleration ? > + fixes for both regressions in 5.2 > + Markus’ fix may help a lot with lots of shutdown crashes. >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > To relay some stories from real life - there's _so_ much integration > with especially OpenOffice out there, coming from legacy systems, tons > of macro-ized applications, sometimes bespoke development with the > company

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Björn, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > 1/ We unpublish all API > Ok so far - > 2/ We give UNO user an opportunity to ask for republishing specific parts of >the API, when they provide a reasonable use case and promise to be the >"client steward" for these. > This is where the plan breaks

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:24:33PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > - we (core devs) still retain the perogatibve to do the ultimate decisions > > on > > UNO API changes > > You know - I still really like having some area where people can work > without asking someone; I think having

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Bjoern, On 16/12/16 12:11, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Maybe we should change the meaning of "published" then? Currently, "published" > means a onesided promise to each and eevery person on this planet -- people > that we have > no relation with at all -- that we will never ever change this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

I have an even blunter suggestion: In a branch (branched off 5.2, for instance), we unpublish and rename all existing API. (For instance, s/com::sun::star/libreoffice/.) We make this very public, and make a test build available that contains it. And then we wait for reports what external software

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:42:43AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hmm ! ;-) My concern would be that removing the 'published' tag > everywhere would end up making it much harder to change all UNO APIs. > There is a spectrum of views on how conservative (or otherwise) we > should be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 16/12/16 09:28, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:02:03PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >> since the goal of the policy is "we can make incompatible changes >> whenever it doesn't affect any 3rd party extension or macro", the >> "published" tag is much less useful as

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 12/16/2016 10:28 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:02:03PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: since the goal of the policy is "we can make incompatible changes whenever it doesn't affect any 3rd party extension or macro", the "published" tag is much less useful as guidance

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:02:03PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > since the goal of the policy is "we can make incompatible changes > whenever it doesn't affect any 3rd party extension or macro", the > "published" tag is much less useful as guidance than it may appear at > first glance. So, uhmm,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 15-12-16 19:10: > Yes, but the rationale was the extraordinary number of MM regressions we had > during the cleanup of the old (really horrible) code. That major cleanup is > finishe for the most part now, activity in the area is back to normal, so no >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 15-12-16 19:10: > Yes, but the rationale was the extraordinary number of MM regressions we had > during the cleanup of the old (really horrible) code. That major cleanup is > finishe for the most part now, activity in the area is back to normal, so no >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:19:54PM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Michael Meeks wrote on 08-12-16 17:56: > > + Mail merge regressions: http://tdf.io/mmregressions > > + 4 open; 4 open last meeting (2 OSX, 1 Linux, 1 generic but hard > > repro) > > => drop from the QA

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:19:54PM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Michael Meeks wrote on 08-12-16 17:56: > > + Mail merge regressions: http://tdf.io/mmregressions > > + 4 open; 4 open last meeting (2 OSX, 1 Linux, 1 generic but hard > > repro) > > => drop from the QA

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >