Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread David Tardon
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:02:18AM +, Wols Lists wrote: > On 26/11/10 09:05, David Tardon wrote: > > I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like > > WordprocessorML) use XSLT 2.0, which is not supported by libxslt (wasn't > > supported the last time I looked, at least). So ei

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 26/11/2010 20:50, Michael Meeks a écrit : > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: >> we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release. > :-) > >> Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not >> sure about bugs in localizations.

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-11-26 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Andrew, sorry, a few of those nasty odf-branded icons slipped past me, had to revert a bunch of your optimized icons in default_images - do we have a script / documentation somewhere, so this can be re-optimized? Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpX8CKqmowyF.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread Wols Lists
On 26/11/10 09:05, David Tardon wrote: > I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like > WordprocessorML) use XSLT 2.0, which is not supported by libxslt (wasn't > supported the last time I looked, at least). So either we throw > out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0 filters an

[Libreoffice] [Crazy Ideas] Discuss "Replace regexp parser with std library"

2010-11-26 Thread Joe Smith
Anyone interested in discussing this "crazy idea"? Replace home-grown regexp parser with some std library http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Replace_home-grown_regexp_parser_with_some_std_library I've been thinking about this since I found my first bug in OOo's oddball reg

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 9/9] binfilter sw3io warning fixes

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 18:10 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > > Err, you sort of changed the logic there. That doesn't look quite right. > I don't understand my error: I wanted to keep the logic with structure > changes ... having (at least I though) the same overall logic > but written slightl

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] final SAL_N_ELEMENTS

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kenneth, On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:42 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: > these patches will replace the last occurrences of > sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) with SAL_N_ELEMENTS(foo) Out of interest, do we think the very last ones of these have gone ? if so - good news of course :-) Any

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release. :-) > Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not > sure about bugs in localizations. So - I tend to think that time will tell

Re: [Libreoffice] Extensions code cleanup

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Robert, On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 21:27 +0200, Roth Robert wrote: > Some more dead code and bogus comments removed from extensions. The > license, as always is LGPLv3+ / MPL. Sounds good; did you forget to attach the patch though - or is it my mailer playing tricks with me :-) Th

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Remove duplicate 'placeholder' icons

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:01 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: > Here is another patch for the duplicate icons task. Great :-) > Where ImageList::GetImage is called > from, I don't know, we should audit that too. .. > g grep "vcl/image.hxx" | wc -l returns 179

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread Wols Lists
On 26/11/10 10:43, Michael Meeks wrote: >> Should I try and codify it as a copyright section on >> > http://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/ and in a HACKING file, or >> > would you rather I just went away and left this topic alone? (I don't >> > want to dive into something that is bound to be c

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove dead codes and confusing comments

2010-11-26 Thread David Tardon
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:56:33AM +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > More cleanup on base. > > Cheers, > -- Takeshi Abe Pushed, thanks! D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/l

Re: [Libreoffice] Auto-detection of toolbar icon size (well, kinda)

2010-11-26 Thread Peter Lairo
On Thu. 25.11.2010 12:47, Tor Lillqvist wrote: On 2010-11-25 at 12:47, wrote: 9. The *Bold* /Italics/ and _Underline_ icons should be the letters *B* /I/ and _U_ (and localized where possible). Using only "A"s is much less recognizable. Even users in non-localized countries will recognize the

Re: [Libreoffice] Auto-detection of toolbar icon size (well, kinda)

2010-11-26 Thread Peter Lairo
On Thu. 25.11.2010 12:29, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Peter, On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 11:47 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote: That's fine, but the large Icons are (about 50%) *too* large. I'm on Windows 7, have a 19" monitor, ratio: 4:5, resolution: 1280x1024 and I cannot fit the icons I want into the Toolbar

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) I suppose that logically this is something for the documentation team to get involved in... We're having a phone conference this weekend... Shall I add it to the agenda? If you need a docs person to liaise with about this, please feel free to include me in the loop. David Nelson On Fri,

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-11-26 Thread Arthur Machlas
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > Arthur Machlas píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 10:36 -0600: >> [N] "LibreOffice is used by many users every day. Any new release must >> not break their day job. Though, every software has bugs." >> [S] Remove "Though, every software has bugs." Partl

[Libreoffice] occured occurred

2010-11-26 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi, During the Easy Hacking, I have enjoyed ton of "occured" occurred and some occurrences of "occurance" in the code base. Why not come and join with `git grep -i occured` if you get tired of working hard in a miserable world ;) Well, seriously, it seems needed to find a systematic way to cope w

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 9/9] binfilter sw3io warning fixes

2010-11-26 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, First thanks for reviewing, catching my errors and correcting. I have learned a lot. Next time I do so many errors, please reject and I will correct it myself. Michael, I will wait making less errors in changes before requesting an account, if you don't mind. Just a question for: > Err, you s

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-11-26 Thread Petr Mladek
Arthur Machlas píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 10:36 -0600: > Not a member of this list, just passing through, but I thought I'd > throw some corrections / suggestions re: criteria > > > Now [N], Suggestion [S], Correction [C] > > [N] "LibreOffice is used by many users every day. Any new release must >

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-11-26 Thread Arthur Machlas
Not a member of this list, just passing through, but I thought I'd throw some corrections / suggestions re: criteria > Now [N], Suggestion [S], Correction [C] [N] "LibreOffice is used by many users every day. Any new release must not break their day job. Though, every software has bugs." [S] Remo

Re: [Libreoffice] Presenter Console

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andrew, On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 18:02 +, Andrew wrote: > On 19/11/10 20:02, Kevin Hunter wrote: > > At 1:19pm -0500 Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Andrew wrote: > >> Could you give me your opinion, as to which is best? So - I think it is best to have you involved in pouring your love & graphical

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 14:07 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:14 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > + crashes on exit > > + vile threading issue in destructors > > + a choice of memory corruption / crashes either way > > AA: + correct

Re: [Libreoffice] howto for getting non-trivial cppunit tests up and running

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:58 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 13:21 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > Hmm, sort of looks like the underlying cppu stuff, or something it uses, > > got pulled out from under it during the test. I don't think it could > > have gotten that far for th

[Libreoffice] Remove duplicate 'placeholder' icons

2010-11-26 Thread Joachim Trémouroux
Hi everybody, Here is another patch for the duplicate icons task. On 11/25/2010 02:18 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 22:04 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: > I have looked at the calling places. The ImplImageTree::loadImage > >> method is called here: >> vcl/source/gdi/bitmapex

[Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-11-26 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release. I have created proposal of the release criteria and definition of the blocker bugs at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not sure about bu

[Libreoffice] profiling & optimising ...

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 13:42 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > As rtl_alloc_cache is called 600k times on writer startup I looked at > it. Ok :-) so you just fell into the first hole of micro-optimisation. Unfortunately, vast numbers of people have dug in this hole at great l

Re: [Libreoffice] main.xdg 2 largest sections not needed on startup?

2010-11-26 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > The 2 biggest sections are: > "Labels" 14345 + 11 lines (defining label sizes for printing envelope labels) > "TableWizard" 8666 + 26 lines > > These make 1/3 of main.xdg, are both needed on startup or can those be > put into a different file that is only read when it is

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:14 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > + crashes on exit > + vile threading issue in destructors > + a choice of memory corruption / crashes either way > AA: + correct fixes coming [ Caolan working on it ] Done. Fixed this up a

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 9/9] binfilter sw3io warning fixes

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:58 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Err, you sort of changed the logic there. That doesn't look quite right. OutAttrSet went from getting called always to only getting called when pExportInfo is set. I've fixed this up now as well. C.

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi Sophie, Kendy, Christian, :-) Thanks for the answers and info... I'll talk about this with other docs people, and we'll probably have input about this in a couple of days... David Nelson ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 7/9] warnings removal in binfilter sw_sw3redln.cxx

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:57 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: Cut a little too deep in lcl_sw3io_getNodeOff. its only if( pDoc->GetNodes()[nIdx]->IsCntntNode() && nOffs > STRING_MAXLEN52 ) nOffs = STRING_MAXLEN52; that's always a false condition. The *pStrm << underneath nee

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 4/9] binfilter sc_interpr4.cxx further warnings removal

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:55 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Mostly good, though while the return value of GetStackType() is usused, looking closer at GetStackType() there is a potential route (the SetError one) where GetStackType() changes the state of the Document. So its safer to ju

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 3/9] warnings in binfilters sc_interpr4.cxx

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:54 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Looks good to me. Thanks for this, pushed now. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Christian, David, On 2010-11-26 at 14:04 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > So where would the "root" editing of the source text be done? > > In the actual sources, in git. > For help it would be > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/help/tree/helpcontent2/source > for other stuff like

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 2/9] remove warnings in binfilter - sc_interpr2.cxx

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:54 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Michael has pushed this, thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 1/9] suppress warning in binfilters sc_token

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:52 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > Hello, > here some patches in binfilter to remove warnings by compiling... Michael pushed this, looks good. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 6/9] waring cleaning in sw_sw3redln.cxx

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 14:12 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: > Pierre-André, > > Are you sure it is safe to remove the OpenFlagRec() call ? Indeed, good catch Joachim. The warning is that the ret value of OpenFlagRec is unused, looking closed at OpenFlagRec you'll see that it extracts a value fro

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all, On 26/11/2010 16:04, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi David, *, On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM, David Nelson wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 20:42, Christian Lohmaier wrote: No - english (en_US) is defined within the sources, so english is the "master language" and no translation. But t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 6/9] waring cleaning in sw_sw3redln.cxx

2010-11-26 Thread Joachim Trémouroux
Pierre-André, Are you sure it is safe to remove the OpenFlagRec() call ? diff --git a/binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/sw3io/sw_sw3redln.cxx b/binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/sw3io/sw_sw3redln.cxx index b0a286b..e2453f4 100644 --- a/binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/sw3io/sw_sw3redln.cxx +++ b/binfilter/bf_sw/s

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 21:04, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> (BTW, *where* is this Pootle web to be found?) > > It would help to write why the answer: > > http://pootle.documentfoundation.org/ (alias > http://translations.documentfoundation.org/ ) > > didn't make you happy... Sorry, I was

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi David, *, On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM, David Nelson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 20:42, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> No - english (en_US) is defined within the sources, so english is the >> "master language" and no translation. >> But there is en_UK (but for most of the string it of

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 20:42, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > No - english (en_US) is defined within the sources, so english is the > "master language" and no translation. > But there is en_UK (but for most of the string it of course just falls > back to en-US) So where would the "root" edi

Re: [Libreoffice] rtl_alloc_cache microopt question (& patch)

2010-11-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:29 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > -if (n >= SAL_MAX_SIZE - (RTL_MEMALIGN + RTL_MEMALIGN - 1)) > +if (n > SAL_MAX_SIZE - 2 * RTL_MEMALIGN DOH, as all those CAP-Macros are constants anyway, the compiler would probably evaluate that to a const value on compile time

[Libreoffice] rtl_alloc_cache microopt question (& patch)

2010-11-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
As rtl_alloc_cache is called 600k times on writer startup I looked at it. I made the function somewhat simpler to read by removing an indention level (unfortunately making the diff harder to read), and also tried to microoptimize a tiny bit. Would the compiler be smart enough to optimize this on

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jan, *; On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > On 2010-11-25 at 22:24 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > So first - what is WikiHelp?  It is going to be a help.libreoffice.org > site, where the LibreOffice help will be stored.  The intention is that > it will be a Wiki - be

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi David, Jonathan, *, On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29 AM, David Nelson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:22, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote: >> how do you guys carry out the conference calls are they carried out on >> skype? > > It's on Talkyoo, Jonathan. ...but you can call-in using skype All di

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] run-libreoffice-ciabot: avoid flood on merges

2010-11-26 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:15:46AM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Nice - please go ahead and push, and tell me when done; indeed, it is > not automatic ;-) I just pushed it. pgp1Cdpa8mHYM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list Lib

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi Kendy, :-) On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 17:19, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> I suppose that logically this is something for the documentation team >> to get involved in... We're having a phone conference this weekend... >> Shall I add it to the agenda? > > Indeed - that would be cool!  I am not sure if

Re: [Libreoffice] build failure in sdext/source/presenter

2010-11-26 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:53:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:48 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > The file contains two lines with '%' in it: > > ... > > > > ../../unxbsdx3.pro/misc/PresenterScreen/help$/en-US$/caption$/com.sun.PresenterScreen-netbsd_x86_64%

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:22:02 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > how do you guys carry out the conference calls are they carried out on > skype? Ho Jonathan, if you actually had a look at the link that was given, you would see how they are carried out. > > [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Doc

[Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Attending: Caolan, Kendy, Norbert, Thorsten, Rene, Petr, Chaosun, Michael Minutes: * 3.3 issues + meta-bug for blockers: + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 + nominate blockers by adding comments + decisions

[Libreoffice] [Pushed 9/9 patches]: suppress warning in binfilters sc_token

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Pierre, On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:52 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > here some patches in binfilter to remove warnings by compiling... This reads really well. > Since some changes could (will) look strange, I submit it in little > chunks, often with compiler warning in comment. Th

Re: [Libreoffice] build failure in sdext/source/presenter

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:48 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > The file contains two lines with '%' in it: > ... > > ../../unxbsdx3.pro/misc/PresenterScreen/help$/en-US$/caption$/com.sun.PresenterScreen-netbsd_x86_64%2Fpresenter.xhp > \ > ... > > ../../unxbsdx3.pro/misc/PresenterSc

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:32, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > hijacking the thread here, but it might come in hand if users who want to > join in so they can give their point of view. are end users also welcome to > join? You're welcome to listen in, but we have a lot of stuff on the agenda

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Wols, On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 00:23 +, Wols Lists wrote: > With no place for people who make MAJOR alterations to the file to add > their own copyright ... :-) Endless licensing discussions tend to be really poisonous, I would really appreciate concluding this one promptly. > That j

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hijacking the thread here, but it might come in hand if users who want to join in so they can give their point of view. are end users also welcome to join? On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29 AM, David Nelson wrote: > Hi, :-) > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:22, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote: > > how do you

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:22, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > how do you guys carry out the conference calls are they carried out on > skype? It's on Talkyoo, Jonathan. David Nelson ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org ht

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove dead codes and undesired comments with fixed typo

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Takeshi, On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 01:48 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > yet another cleanup on base. Great to see you fixing English spellings :-) > switch( nColId ) > { > // > -// NameCell > -case

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
how do you guys carry out the conference calls are they carried out on skype? On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, David Nelson wrote: > Hi Kendy, :-) > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 17:19, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On 2010-11-26 at 16:44 +0800, David Nelson wrote: > > > >> I suppose

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] unused variables in ./sal/osl/unx/util.c

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 23:06 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Here is a small patch for ./sal/osl/unx/util.c Did you compile this ? you removed a number of variables: -int i; -int so; that the code goes on to use (unless you're using Solaris): so = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_D

[Libreoffice] XSLT for flat XML ?

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:05 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > It would be simply wonderful to re-use the libxslt code (that we > > already ship) for the XSLT filter. I wonder if you might be interested .. > I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like > WordprocessorML) use XSLT

[Libreoffice] build failure in sdext/source/presenter

2010-11-26 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I've let libreoffice rest for a few weeks and now have tried another build from scratch. It fails for me with: Entering .../libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/sdext/source/presenter Making:PresenterScreen.dpz zipdep -- version: 1.12 Multi Platform Enabled Edition zipdep -- version:

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread David Nelson
Hi Kendy, :-) On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 17:19, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi David, > > On 2010-11-26 at 16:44 +0800, David Nelson wrote: > >> I suppose that logically this is something for the documentation team >> to get involved in... We're having a phone conference this weekend... >> Shall I add i

Re: [Libreoffice] C++0x and LibreOffice

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 04:14 +0100, René Kjellerup wrote: > (looks like a little of the C++0x is available as early as 4.3) Yes, but because c++0x is a moving target I don't know if the c++0x support in 4.3 is the same as that in 4.5.1, e.g. std::identity has bounced around a bit during the standar

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:05 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > So either we throw out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0 filters > and declare that we only support XSLT 1.0 or we're stuck with saxon > (and java). IIRC we also use a particular extension in saxon which only exists in some versions of s

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi David, On 2010-11-26 at 16:44 +0800, David Nelson wrote: > I suppose that logically this is something for the documentation team > to get involved in... We're having a phone conference this weekend... > Shall I add it to the agenda? Indeed - that would be cool! I am not sure if I can show up

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread David Tardon
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:52:49PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 09:47 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > > in bug #31633 I proposed a patch to one of the export filters. > > I've just committed it; sorry for delay. > > It's great to have you prodding at this pi

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Why not see if someone can try to port it to python or code something in another language that would be more beneficial instead of java? On 11/25/10 1:52 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 09:47 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: in bug #31633 I proposed a patch to one of the export fi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] run-libreoffice-ciabot: avoid flood on merges

2010-11-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Miklos, On 2010-11-26 at 01:33 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > I'm attaching a patch that updates the cia bot so that you don't need to > manually disable it on each merge. ;) > > OK to push? (More importantly, if I push it, it would be nice if you > could restart the bot, as I guess that's not

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Christian, On 2010-11-25 at 22:24 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > Hm... how will the help be exported? What's easiest for you? MediaWiki, any > > other interface? > > The question is whether you want people to just read the content > there, or whether you want people to update content. I

Re: [Libreoffice] Crash after Preference selection on Mac

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Chris i'm on a mac running 10.6.5 and cant replicate the issue. also i know a few weeks ago there was an update for java. do you have all updates installed for java? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskto