Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for testing. Shutdown problems in Windows

m.a.riosv wrote > there are not daily windows's builds since at least a couple of weeks, > for 5.2 and 5.3 No, Thorsten's TB42 has been rolling master each night. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@42/ Just Kendy's TB39 and Cloph's TB62 have been missing. -- View this mes

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 5.2.6 RC2 test builds available

Jean-Baptiste Faure-3 wrote > Is it on purpose that RC are not made available on the Development > versions webpage: https://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ ? Actually the link to Access the Pre-releases server and pick the version of your choice there.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

@Regina, * Regina Henschel wrote > ... > does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes > invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way? Strangely, no META that I could find--but probably needed. Otherwise some inconsistent use of Whiteboard "odf" and/o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

Michael Stahl-2 wrote > ... together with an ODF meta-bug that was created in 2015 and that i've > never heard of? I searched but somehow missed Jay's meta -- BZ link is tdf#95487 alias as *ODF-spec*. Added the Keyword and Whiteboard

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] proposed keyword filter:docbook

Terrence Enger wrote > Would it be a good idea to have this keyword?  If so, who can make it > happen? Easily done, but looking at the volume for "docbook" or ".dbk" (24 over project duration), probably not necessary. When we triage we try to toss any filter issues into the "filters and storage" c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Incomplete text in menus and dialogs in 5.4.0.1

@Pedro, You seem to have set a system font other than Segoe UI or Tahoma (looking at the x-height and crossbar positioning). Do you have a LibreOffice replacment table in use? If so clear that and retest, otherwise reset you system font to something with better/correct font metrics. Stuart -

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Incomplete text in menus and dialogs in 5.4.0.1

@Pedro, I looked closer and the "1" and "y", are from Tahoma. Just the x-height and crossbar position had looked stretched vertically to me--compared Segoe and Tahoma side by side the clip shows Tahoma. Sorry for that noise. As to the funky x-scale--unable to reproduce. Tried various Windows co

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla spam

Another round of spam clobbering BZ all last week and continuing. Anything that can be done? Perhaps the AntiSpam extension for our BZ instance? =-ref-= https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1306750 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Bugzilla-spam-tp

[Libreoffice-qa] New BZ spam vector

Xisco, * This morning saw a new twist to the BZ spam issues. See existing valid bug tdf#104252 [1], where a BZ user changes elements, linkages and drops in URL links in the URL and Whiteboard fields. The link is to a valid URL containing malware payload (a malformed script in this case). How to

[Libreoffice-qa] DirectWrite deficienies holding open BZ issues

@Xisco, * Notice we'd reverted a number of closings for BZ issues that are cleared by Khaled's tweak for tdf#112486 "...optionally not using GDI when not using OpenGL (previously we always used GDI when OpenGL was used). I think it w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Saying Goodbye

Jay -- Thank you! Stuart -- Sent from: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/QA-f3613148.html ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Confusion about most recent builds

It depends on what you need--there are 3 active build branches 5.4 Stable (5.4.7 upcomming release); 6.0 Fresh (6.0.3 upcomming release) and master/6.1. Master has the most recent & ongoing development work--new features and initial patches of bugs will occur normally occur on master builds and th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Confusion about most recent builds

Yes that is correct, in the timed-based release development of LibreOffice there are always two "release" branches in active developement/support, with a third master branch in active development. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan If you have been asked to check a current build, tha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Michael Meeks Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:35 AM To: libreoffice-dev; libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > * CTRL+ALT+E isn't opening the extension dialog but inserts a "é" > + https://bugs.documentfounda

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-documentation] Buttons/Icons missing from the form Formatting Toolbar.

Believe display of the LTR and RTL toolbar buttons are dependent on the Language settings. Support for CTL (language can be none) must be checked enabled (Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages). Then restart Calc. Works like that for me on Windows 10 with 6.2.2 and current master/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

Xisco, Here is one for you: tdf#34355 Stuart p.s. could you add me to the admin or set permissions so I can do QA 'close', and set 'deletion request' -- Sent from: http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/QA-f

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

Xisco Fauli wrote > What do you mean? you are already in the contributor group. you > shouldn't have any limitation or am I missing something? Though QA active before the cut over from the FreeDesktop BZ instance, don't think I've ever had ability to 'close' a bug, nor to mark obvious spam for 'de

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

V Stuart Foote wrote >> contributors limits who can change priority, severity, qa field, and >> assigned So, yes I am in the BZ contributors group--but not sure members the "contributors" group actually have the capability to 'close' or 'request del

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

@Xisco, * Xisco Fauli wrote > 'Close' is just another status, so if you can change any bug to NEW or > NEEDINFO you can change them to CLOSED as well. However, it depends on > the bug's workflow. Only RESOLVED or VERIFIED bugs can be set to CLOSED > afterwards. /me --*facepalm*-- Never made th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Impress meta bugs

At the moment there are 1428 open issues against the Impress module. With 39 defined META issues collecting various reports into trackable groups. Current Impress BZ issues

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2023-04-13

> -> + Shortcuts for "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" > > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45705 > ... > + Word has no zoom in/out, unclear what to do > ... Actually, the Word 2019 desktop canvas responds to "pinch" zoom on trackpad and on touch screens. And similar to LO Zoom

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice-QA] Minutes for 2013-05-03

An aside from the discussions, I do like the new QA meeting minutes format, very easy to see what was covered from the agenda and what actions and "best practices" are put forth in discussion. A reader is now able to follow the agenda items that were not covered (time constraint, or missing part

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 tag created

@Pedro, @Norbert I think you are both missing the point. This announce simply demarks a point of the 4.1.0.0alpha0 QA work from the TinderBox buildbot (or self compiled) builds to an "official" LibreOffice 4.1.0.0alpha1 snapshot build. The Windows build for example, available at http://dev-builds

[Libreoffice-qa] FDO cgit services for current 4.1.0.0alpha1 builds

So here is an interesting puzzler: with announce of the libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 and availability of an official pre-release build, a pull and install of the LibreOfficeDev_4.1.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86.msi build displays a Build ID: 67ce08e2c64a6615abc90d3a3c442f90d86fa69 Wanted to see what made the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning up QA Nabble and Archive folders from Spam?

Pedro, >From: libreoffice-qa-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org on behalf of Pedro >[pedl...@gmail.com] >Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 4:48 PM >To: libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning up QA Nabble and Archive folders from > Spam? > >Hi again Sophie > > >sophi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Excel Function Meta Bug?

Philipp, Myself and Aurimas did a little clean-up today of Joel's original Wiki restatement of fdo#46918 . Cleaned up the "voting" and the list of non-supported functions. Also added the Excel 2010 and 2013 "new feature" listings - someone m

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

reisi007 wrote >>> Pedro-- ... and the install size is huge (because all files are >>> unpacked) >>BTW: Is there really a that big difference in size? I don't see it, size on Windows OSs for current 4.1.0 builds whether /A administrative install or full install with registry is coming in about ~3

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

reisi007 wrote >>Thanks for that info, but I meant difference between parallel install >>and portable... Sorry, misunderstood... So latest PortableApps.com build of LibreOffice (4.0.3.3 - 0eaa50a932c8f2199a615e1eb30f7ac74279539) is ~330 MB for an English install, but that can be cut to ~221MB

[Libreoffice-qa] what to do with AOO - Sidebar - experimental feature in libreoffice-4-1 master and the 4.1.0 branch

OK, so with a bit of git magic, looks like the Apache OpenOffice work on their Sidebar implementation of the Symphony contribution has been merged into LibreOffice master. And, unless I am really misreading the git logs, has been included in the libreoffice-4-1 branch (at commit a2c9d4f8bbde97f

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO cgit services for current 4.1.0.0alpha1 builds

Petr Mladek wrote > Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:01 AMPetr Mladek [pmla...@suse.cz] > Hi, > > better late than never. Thank you none the less... > V Stuart Foote píše v Pá 10. 05. 2013 v 09:16 -0700: >> So here is an interesting puzzler: >> >> with announce of t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

Not sure I'd exactly consider Rob's musings as unbiased. Kind of an apples and oranges comparison, truth be told the public persona of Apache Open Office is still based on a 12 month old release (r1351645). Relatively bug free, but remains feature poor compared to the AOO development builds.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Fixed in 4.2 branch, broken in 4.1 daily, status thoughts?

jmadero wrote > This is a general problem that I think we shoudl just talk a bit about. If > we confirm a bug on 4.1 but it's fixed in 4.2 master - what status is > appropriate? Joel, As the support tail continues to stretch us thin, performing QA bug triage and commenting Works for Me (noting

[Libreoffice-qa] cgit query help - syntax for entering a range of commits

Need some help with our cgit repository! Feeling really dumb, I am trying to use the cgit commit logs-- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/ -- and pull a range of commits against master to track a bug: 20130607 67278daaf3cb664f8a89900382f0d7b19956b18 20130611 c36348f20c4fcb6ae1acb

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] cgit query help - syntax for entering a range of commits

Michael Stahl-2 wrote > On 28/06/13 18:06, V Stuart Foote wrote: >> Need some help with our cgit repository! > > go to the log page: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/ > > in the top right there is a box with "search" button next to it, ch

[Libreoffice-qa] Microsoft Installer Error 1937 with TB 39 Windows builds of master for failing assembly signature(s) -- fdo 69601

Trying to work with TB builds of Master for Windows, but have an open but unconfirmed Bugzilla issue fdo 69601 . For recent TB 39 builds of master, I have been receiving MSI Error 1937 on a Windows 7 Ultimate, sp1 64-bit system. Can use the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Microsoft Installer Error 1937 with TB 39 Windows builds of master for failing assembly signature(s) -- fdo 69601

V Stuart Foote wrote > Has happened with the TB 39 builds for 16, 19, 20, 21 and now 22 > September. Last that had actually installed for me on this system was > from 9 September. Checking builds for the 10th, 11th and 15th at the > moment. TB 39 builds of master for 10th and 11th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Pleaqse test SI-GUI 4.1.1.6

Florian, I used the 4.1.16 build to do an Administrative install of todays TB 39 build of Master, and also for the release build of LibreOffice 4.1.2.2. Both installs match my manual process--although I adjust the bootstrap.ini to the "$ORIGIN/../Data/settings" of the current Wiki--the "Edit b

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Doubled "Help" and "Close" in "Find & Replace" window

Under Windows 7 sp1 64-bit, with current LODev Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 164b6ce7b27c0a9ec19019e7b078b9f8f382007d TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2013-09-28_16:39:42 Full panel looks like this:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Doubled "Help" and "Close" in "Find & Replace" window

Similar fully formed GUI elements with LO 4.1.2.2 on Fedora 19 64-bit. So not sure what might be up with the WM in Debian. Version: 4.1.2.2 Build ID: 4.1.2.2-1.fc19 @Thoma

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Doubled "Help" and "Close" in "Find & Replace" window

@Thomas, Glad it has been sorted at the 4.1.2.3 RC. But what was wonky with the Debian for 4.1.1.2 and 4.1.2.2? Any chance of firing up a different WM to see if it was unique to your primary WM? Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Dou

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Doubled "Help" and "Close" in "Find & Replace" window

@Thomas, Also had clean formation of button widgets on the LO 4.1.1.2 +H panel with KDE-Plasma WM on Fedora 19. So does not appear to be a WM/DE issue. Stuart -- Vi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

@Pedro, I could not confirm issue. Have marked it Resolved WFM. Please revisit your test case, and provide better details on producing the data loss if you feel the issue is valid. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOff

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

@Pedro, The Find & Replace --> Replace All of your fdo#70029 appears to be working correctly for both Windows XP and Windows 7. Not dismissing your issues as personal whim, just not seeing the behavior. So again, you need to provide additi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Microsoft Installer Error 1937 with TB 39 Windows builds of master for failing assembly signature(s) -- fdo 69601

No further Error 1937 installer issues from TB 39 builds, fdo#69601 was closed WFM -- but don't know if Michael S. has additional work to do yet on the cli_cppuhelper.dll and other signature mechanism. But for @ape and @pedro, 32-bit Windows XP sp3 installed and ran today's 2013-10-04_08.16.05

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.6 RC2 test builds available

The working project archive is located here: http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ Note that the 4.0.6.2 build is posted there as expected since it has been uploaded to mirror sites as final release. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] The garbage into the dev-builds.libreoffice.org

Pedro wrote > One other request: your Tinderbox is not creating the txt files with the > build info. Unfortunately this is the only element that allows QA to know > from which TB each binary came from (before installing, obviously) so it > is quite important that it is generated with the binary...

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to report double used and/or not "working as expected" mnemonics?

sophi wrote > If you grep, just be aware that now there is two kinds of mnemonics: > [~] for the previous dialogs, [_] for the ported to .ui dialogs. > AFAIK, only the main menus are scripted, the others are placed by the > dialog creator or the translators. Yes that is correct. Unfortunately the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox green but no daily/master build

Robinson Tryon wrote: > Indeed -- it looks like something happened on the 7th such that builds > were no longer produced (or no longer uploaded). > So the Windows TB47 at least spit out a usable build this morning: Build Info tinderbox: administrator: lohmaier+tinder...@gmail.com tinderbox: buil

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345

Vote: > Here's the list (in alphabetical order): > * blo -- NO > * lbz -- YES, but only as alternative to tdf > * libo -- NO > * lo -- NO > * lob -- NO > * lobz -- NO > * tdf -- YES, of course LibreOffice is not The Document Foundation, but TDF > is LibreOffice's home and the F

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345

> -Original Message- > From: Robinson Tryon [mailto:bishop.robin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:02 PM > > If we go that route, we should use the url bugs.documentfoundation.org > > Thoughts?? Well it would have the advantage of neutral Bugzilla support for any other

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds

Pedro, Text file is not "needed"! It is just convenient ;-) It is trivial to view the details of the TB builds of Master -- http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html just match the time-stamp of the build to the "buld time" collumn and side across to the collumn for the TB your r

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds

Thorsten, Thorsten Behrens wrote >> 2) TB #39 and #42 are building Master builds for the upcoming 4.3 branch >> (as >> expected) but there are no 4.2 branch daily builds >> > Good point, let me add that. We look to now have a viable LODev 4.2.0.0beta1+ build running on TB-42. Thanks! http://dev-

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345

Robinson Tryon Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 12:31 PM >Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P > >Voting Rules: >* Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) >* Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use >* If there's no clear winner, we can ha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds

@Pedro, I suspect that was the fdo#72451 issue (clobbered builds from the 7th - 10th) already corrected on master and also should be fixed on the 4.2 branch. But with TB-42 hung, can't tell at the moment. Gave Thorsten a nudge last night. H

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds

I just downloaded and did a /A administrative install of the same 4.2.0beta2+ build onto Windows XP sp3 (as a VMWare guest OS on WIndows 7 sp1, 64-bit). Version: 4.2.0.0.beta2+ Build ID: 02180aed7dc0b8c5f9cc23b319adc2386a9aab69 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:libreoffice-4-2, Time: 2013-12-08_08:48

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] old Windows x86 libreoffice master builds

Roopesh, It would be up to the individual TinderBox maintainer to archive the builds, I don't believe any do as it is possible to configure git to build at a particular historical commit point. The actual release RC band final builds are archived here: http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks-5 wrote > + decide on whether to remove legacy Java Access Bridge from 4.2 > (Michael S) > [ decided not to for now, historically good to have old RTF + new > RTF > filters, so it's easy to try out if new bugs are causd by new > code ] > While probably sound

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] old Windows x86 libreoffice master builds

Roopesh, Have zipped up the following: Grab it here (simple anonymous ftp) October 2013 LibreOffice TB builds of master Size for the Zip'd archi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 test builds available

@Cloph, Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > Also new: Starting with 4.2.0rc1, developers (and people doing some > "low-level" QA) on windows can make use of the symbol server to get > pdb files for debugging the release builds. The symbol server's URL is > > http://dev-downloads.libreoffice.org/symstore

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 test builds available

Christian, (aka.@cloph). Thanks, the new symbols do work fine even if we can't review them in a browser. Not much of a programmer so don't load Visual Studio, personally in my day-to-day sysadmin work on Windows I prefer running the SysInternals ProcessMonitor (v3.0.5) to fully log ALL system

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC2 test builds available

Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > Grab the builds from here here: > > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ The Windows builds show as built and posted today, but they are named as LibreOffice_4.2.0.1.0_Win_x86.msi So, mislabeled? Or not yet built/posted for 4.2.0.2 RC2? -- View thi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC2 test builds available

Christian, Something has gone very wrong with the Windows build. Activating the IAccessible2 UAA bridge results in no ability to edit a document as an key press will crash the edit session and close LO. TB 42 builds seem unaffected. Opened BZ bug 73464

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Pre-Testing Mailing List

Joel, Not a frequent Google Docs user. But when I log in, am I supposed to be able to open the spread sheet and edit the listing to add my name and email? Not sure how... seems to be read only. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Pre-

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Daily builds of LibreOffice 4.2 for Linux

Afraid you'll need to roll your own... Currently only OSX on TB @21 and Windows on TB @42 for the 4.2.1.0.0+ builds: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-2/ Linux builds for master only, Tinderbox @45 or @46 here for master: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ S

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version field options way too fine grained

@Kohei, Not so sure, because it goes the other way as well. When attempting to triage a bug, having the correct release --or better the commit information to exactly reproduce the issue as reported, and work backward to point of origin-- the granular field remains very helpful. So perhaps i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.3 RC2 test builds available

Chrisitan, *, Great! The release cycles roll on... But please also fix the web site. The 'Development versions' page is still listing LibreOffice 4.2.3 RC1, and LibreOffice 4.1.5 RC2--STILL!. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.3 RC2 test builds available

Christian, *, >The release so far is only on pre-releases server, not on the mirror network. OK, guess that is correct. Logic being the 'Development versions' web page should not display it until it hits the public mirrors. Though we do link to the TDF pre-release server directly from the page

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 Upgrade unusable!

Hi Derek, Sorry you are so challenged by what have been incremental improvements to the LibreOffice user interface and function. Fortunately, you are welcome to roll back to earlier releases more in line with your comfort level. Historical builds are vailable for direct download here: http://dow

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No thinderbox build for Windows master after 30-04-14

Markus, Yes, that got it--Kendy's TB-39 has pushed out two builds now. I saw the mass "mis-spelling" corrections that Pedro G. had done during the time frame for the break. What a weird error. Is "Execution" parameter a protected keyword or such in the MSI template? Stuart -- View this messa

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

@Pedro, That is a bit under whelming as an issue report. Perhaps you can fill in details we'd need to be able to verify. It could be a resurgence of fdo#69517 , but it looks like Kendy at least on the TB-39 builds has the "--with-windows-sdk

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Just installed to a Windows XP sp3 VM running on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: f76026a43acc65465882924796d93e635c35fd90 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-05-04_06:34:33 Fully functional all components, no issues. -- View this message in context: http:/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Hmm, may have something going on Same Windows XP sp3 VM on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit With TDF alpha1 release Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID: 46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781 This build is launches, writer and calc crash with any text entry. Impress and Draw crash at initial launch when the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Here is a stack trace for a crashing writer session on XP sp3... soffice.bin =-=-= ntdll.dll!KiFastSystemCallRet kernel32.dll!WaitForMultipleObjects+0x18 kernel32.dll!GetSystemDirectoryW+0x35 kernel32.dll!UnhandledExceptionFilter+0x55c MSVCR110.dll!_crtUnhandledException+0x14 MSVCR110.dll!_invalid

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Joel, 4.3.0 Alpha1 on the Pre-release page http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86.msi -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Running-LO-4-3-alpha-i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

@Miguel Ángel, I don't think the issue on Windows XP is related. But confirming your report with todays resumption of TB builds on Windows. Possibly something is still off with the mass-spelling corrections that had broken the MSI packaging on Windows. Stuart -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No thinderbox build for Windows master after 30-04-14

Markus, While the TB's are back on line. Look to have a lingering issue with the builds where now toolbar action (Tools -> Options for example) has lost its resulting actions and the UI simply hangs with a partial GUI dialog opening. Reported in BZ as fdo#78266

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

Tested on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: d09d75167d77adcc8538c5cc5d8fe6bac6091ca1 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2014-05-05_23:04:20 All seems to be corrected now. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Somethi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Pedro, *, Pre-release Windows build of Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID: 46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781 Was definitely broken as in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 , not sure of the exact reason, but it is NOT isolated to Windows XP. Also, prior an

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo#77479

Kohei, So confirmed at least as far back as 3.5.x, but probably some of the work you and Markus did Nov 2011 in lead up to 3.4.0 Issue is confirmed--and have set the bug to NEW. The issue is that when the AutoFilter buttons are cleared during a Sort--if there were any filters applied those det

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

So looking at today's TB51 build for Windows, getting crash on text entry in impress, writer and calc. Have reopened https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 Similar stack traces as below on crash of writer, calc, impress--also immediate crash attempting to launch any Tools -> Options ->

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Have adjusted title of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 -- Other: LibreOffice crashes as soon as one enters text in a module, this on TDF release configured TB51. QA needs to determine if this affects only TB51 configuration, or also TB39 and TB42 as well--if someone has a mom

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 Bug Hunting Weekend!

A reminder for folks that with the 4.3.0beta they will need to install the Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 C++ run-time if not already present. Available here: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679# -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 Bug Hunting Weekend!

@Christian, Traveling this week, but did an install of the windows build of LODev4.3.0beta1 on a borrowed Windows 7 sp1, 32-bit system. Beta1 install goes fine. But on initial launch get a pop-up error: Download and installation o

[Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

Help... I was working on FDO 79489 (a dup of 73806) -- Expert Configuration - default window frame of configuration table is too large, unable to resize-- and I was attempting to install a current Linux build from RPM packaging. Working on a Fedora 20, 64-bit VM, and I am getting this dependenc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

Christian, *, Ran through attempts to install RPM packaging using YUM and have attached a full log of both the 4.3.0beta1 and the TB46 4.4.0alpah0+ 20140531 build. Interesting stuff is in the Error stanzas at the end of the logs--are the <= testing logic correct where failing? LODev430beta1_YUM_

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

Christian, *, Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > It is yum performing the version check differently than rpm itself does > it. > > Anyway - changing the debian-specific change to an overall linux > packaging change should please yum as well... > In any case no problem for the RCs, only master/the alpha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

V Stuart Foote wrote > So the repackaging done for beta2 now does pass the YUM dependency and > verification steps of Fedora 20. Looking at the YUM install log, I do see this error--seems trivial, and the desktop launchers otherwise have icons and have a launch action associated. Oth

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3.0 new features and communication

Sophie, *, So don't have but a moment to comment (sorry for not digging out the fdo bugzilla IDs) but several fit-n-finish issues that could use some attention or release note comment prior to release. 1. Globally assigned accelerators from VCL v.s UI based GUI's are a mess (e.g. Main Menu vs. S

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3.0 new features and communication

Sophi, *, Back with a bit more meat to those issues, also scratch the general issues with UI scroll bar, with the 4.3.0.2 rc2 build they seem to have resolved. Stuart > 1. Globally assigned accelerators from VCL vs. UI based GUI's are a mess > (e.g. Main Menu vs. StartCenter) fdo#80477

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Toolbar Proposal Completed

Jay forgot to add it, but his work up on this is an active BZ issue-- fdo#81475 . More on the proposal is detailed there. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Toolbar-Proposal-Complete

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Suggestion for the use of pre-written responses

Jay, *, Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the best interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi. It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over their life span. Otherwise, duri

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Missing "Tools - Options - Internet - MediaWiki" options in LO 4.4.0.0

@Thomas, Sorry, can't check. No MediaWiki option on the TB39 builds for Windows Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fd81523328891c69ee7cb28bf22308225da42744 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-09-03_08:48:37 From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Scrollbar missing at "Tools - Options - LibreOfficeDev - Appearance" in LO 4.4.0.0alpha under Debian Testing i686

@Thomas, On Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fd81523328891c69ee7cb28bf22308225da42744 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-09-03_08:48:37 Not having this issue, the scroll bar appears in the Tools --> Options --> Appearance panel for this build. __

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Scrollbar missing at "Tools - Options - LibreOfficeDev - Appearance" in LO 4.4.0.0alpha under Debian Testing i686

See fdo#81920 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81920 ) , had been closed WFM, but reopening for you... From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Jay Philips Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:14 PM To: Thomas Hackert; libreoffice-qa@lists.freede

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Update to wiki Development/Java page

@Owen, *, Great, but I think the numbers are even better in 4.3 and current builds of master. Between 4.2.x and 4.3.x we dumped most of the Java based accessibility bridge. See this commit by David Ostrovsky -- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=130833f80e89774269108cf30b2d1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Scrollbar missing at "Tools - Options - LibreOfficeDev - Appearance" in LO 4.4.0.0alpha under Debian Testing i686

Thomas, Jay, *, Guess then it must have been Jay's message from Sep 4th finally clearing moderation. So Jay, are you good now with the scroll bar on the Appearance panel on the 32-bit TB45 builds? Can we set the fdo#81920 back to Resolved WFM? Stuart -- View this message in context: http

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.5

Joel, Kind of looks like they did... https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/admin.cgi Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/fdo-Bugzilla-upgraded-to-4-4-5-tp4124643p4124714.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.7 RC1 test builds available

Dan, *, Lionel would need to comment, but with just the final bug-fix release pending, IMHO it is not going to make it into 4.2 Suspect this is one of those issues that really can not, and should not be back ported--as simply too much of the infrastructure in base changed between 4.2 and 4.3

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bugzilla search

@Terry, Not just you, I ran your query multiple times same result, and then realized what it was. It is subtle, as it looks the same--but the Description of an attachment is actually not tagged as a "Comment" for use in query. It has its own field "Attachment description" that can only be used fr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Release Notes Whiteboard Keyword

Top posting reply to Joel's note... Actually, it makes a lot of sense in that release notes really need a more descriptive narrative for substantive enhancements and bug fixes. As is we often simply list the fixes against prior releases. Envision this whiteboard tagging would support two aspec

  1   2   >