Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

2010-10-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 1:11am -0400 Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: 3. Misinterpretation of __PRETTY_FUNCTION__? What is __PRETTY_FUNCTION__? It changed in GCC 3.4, I believe. Now, contrary to the implicit understanding from its all caps nature

Re: [Libreoffice] damaged file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:51am -0400 Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 02:32 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: [what's the bug?] Checking:../unxlngx6.pro/ Error: ../unxlngx6.pro/misc/sysui/dummy/localize.sdf 0 Bytes! Error: 1 damaged files encountered dmake: Error code 1, while making

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

2010-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 8:17am -0400 Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Thomas Klausner wrote: I don't imagine we're much interested in gcc2 nowadays Tangentially, does this imply that there should be a check, preprocessor or otherwise, that says, You're using a compiler older that X.Y.Z. LiberOffice needs at least A.B.C or

Re: [Libreoffice] damaged file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 8:02am -0400 Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: I wanted to *reduce* what it was compiling because it was taking so long, so I thought the --with-lang=en-US would make it forgo the l10n/i18n. I'll hesitate before saying You are correct, sir! until I regen/compile and get another error

Re: [Libreoffice] damaged file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:56pm -0400 Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: $ make # and wait for 4 hours. - Yes, I'm aware I can change the CPU count, among other things, but this was my noob starting point. Wow, this *really* makes a difference. I would have thought it might have halved the time, to about

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

2010-10-22 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 8:08am -0400 Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Thomas Klausner wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:16:32PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: I'll switch diagnose.h (locally) to give for OSL_THIS_FUNC, as it currently seems to do for everyone else. To close this thread: I've pushed this change. Have you

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:03am -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 02:08 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: Oh, forever more, unless I explicitly say otherwise, it is safe to assume that my patches are all LGPLv3. (That's v3, not v3+.) But I'll try to remember to say it as well

Re: [Libreoffice] damaged file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:48am -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: I -imagine- that most of the speedup came from ccache :-) And that gives a huge, but somewhat unpredictable speedup - depending which headers change - clearly with ccache you only do the pre-processing. Does distclean not remove the

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:12pm -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: The short answer is no, I'm not scared of all future versions, but on principal, I will not blindly trust a document that I (no one!) have yet to see. Fair enough :-) We're still

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:15am -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, John Lee Castle wrote: any suggestions on a better code editor than gedit? Careful! Lest you start a flame war! (But we're all friends here. :-) I believe almost any *text* editor will suit you, provided you take the time to learn it's strengths and

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:12am -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:44 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: For a project as large as LibreOffice, you may also more appreciate the use of an IDE (Integrated Development Environment). Eclipse is often touted to me, as is Geany, and KDevelop

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build tool options are interspread the feature/code switches, extension-switches are

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: sigh/ I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list... Oh brother, I hear you. I personally prefer that a list gets all traffic, end of discussion. However, it was pointed out to me about 6 months ago that I'm the

Re: [Libreoffice] Tar / Zip wobbly

2010-10-27 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:47pm -0400 Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Wols Lists wrote: On 27/10/10 18:10, Kevin Hunter wrote: The file format was created circa 1990 (Phil Katz, maybe?), and, because of lawsuits against his company, intentionally released into the public domain. I've forgotten the exact story details

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-27 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:39am -0400 Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Wols Lists wrote: I just click on reply list :-) Thunderbird has that option if you want to use that ... So it does! Apparently since the 3.0. I've been using my keyboard friends: Ctrl+R (respond directly to author) Ctrl+Shift+R (respond to everyone)

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD patch #1

2010-10-28 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:09am -0400 Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: Ultimately if people want to incrementally fix bash-isms as they creep in I see no reason why they should not commit fixes to make it use generic-shell; hopefully with the gnumake based build we'll have less shell lying around. An on going

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

2010-11-04 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo LO Git committers, Patches against calc/.../miscdlgs/ to remove non-compiled code and other minor refactors. Patches created with: $ git format-patch --patience -19 -o ~/tmp/easy_hack_non_compiled $ cd ~/tmp/ # tar -cjf easy_hack_non_compiled{.tbz,} $ sha1sum easy_hack_non_compiled.tbz

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

2010-11-04 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:47am -0400 Thu, 04 Nov 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: I'm sorry if [the request not to make any formatting changes] was not too obvious from the EasyHacks page - do you think adding something like this to the preamble would make it more clear: please avoid larger reformatting of the code

Re: [Libreoffice] Changing mailing list behavior

2010-11-04 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:01pm -0400 Thu, 04 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:58 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: If you're subscribed, and you don't want extra copies, just set a Reply-To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org header. Most mailers (and people) adhere to that. Also, many email

[Libreoffice] Some more rtl easy hack goodness

2010-11-07 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Some accessibility tabbar RTL_CONST conversion goodness. Kevin 0001-EasyHack-createFromAscii-RTL_CONST.-macro.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] comment removal, rtl easy hack

2010-11-07 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo Committers, A patch set against directory: accessibility/source/helper Cheers, Kevin comment_removal_2.tgz Description: application/compressed-tar 0001-EasyHack-convert-createFromAscii-to-RTL.-macro.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

[Libreoffice] large swathes of commented/#if 0 code removed

2010-11-07 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo Committers, Subject says it all. Patch against three files under automation/source/ Builds successfully here. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] large swathes of commented/#if 0 code removed

2010-11-07 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 2:17am -0500 Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: Subject says it all. Patch against three files under automation/source/ Doh! Helps to actually /attach/ the file. Kevin large_swathes_gone.tbz Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar

[Libreoffice] easy hacks, commented code removal

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hello List, Here's another set of patches. Caolán, I think I've done a little better on the comments this time, but probably not yet perfect. accessibility/ Cheers, Kevin comment_removals.tbz Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar ___

[Libreoffice] accessibility easy hack, RTL

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Another RTL_CONST patch, also against accessibility/ . Cheers, Kevin 0001-EasyHack-createAsciiFrom-RTL_CONST.patch.bz2 Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] easyhack: remove blocks of commented code

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hi List, A patch to remove large blocks of already commented code. basic/ Cheers, Kevin basic_commented_removed.tgz Description: application/compressed-tar ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: large swathes of commented/#if 0 code removed

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:23pm -0500 Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Caolán McNamara wrote: Pushed the substantial hacking out of the commented-out code in automation. Thanks. I'm holding back on the end of line whitespace stuff because all of our files have it, at least in line 4 :-). Maybe we can resolve all of those in one

[Libreoffice] More easy hack RTL goodness

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo again, Some more easy hack RTL code. bridges/ Kevin bridges_rtl_easy_hack.tbz Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] RTL patches for canvas and chart2

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hello again list, My last contribution of the day, with two RTL patches for canvas/ and chart2/ . Cheers, Kevin canvas_rtl_easy_hack.tbz Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar chart2_rtl_easy_hack.tbz Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] easy hacks, commented code removal

2010-11-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:03am -0500 Tue, 09 Nov 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: Please make sure to not remove the newlines after the last vi modeline. There were a few of that that I had to fix. Ah, of course. That's my editor doing an automatic job. I'll update the settings for this project. Thanks, mate.

Re: [Libreoffice] 4 patches of rtl goodness

2010-11-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:44pm -0500 Tue, 09 Nov 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: Here are four more patch conversions from createFromAscii to RTL_CONST... applied against: basebmp/ binfilter/ bridges/ connectivity/ I apologize, I temporarily forgot about the automatic whitespace handling and flat committed those

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Renaming extension options consistently

2010-11-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 2:05am -0500 Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: +1 for quiet down the icecream advertisment a bit, we should rather put instructions for that in our wiki. If someone configured to use distcc, we should not output icecream related stuff at all. So who comes up with a patch :-)? My

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 8:21pm -0500 Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Patrick Bakker wrote: SEMI-COLON INSTEAD OF COMMA AS FUNCTION ARGUMENT SEPARATOR Current Calc behaviour: =subtotal(9;a1:a5) Desired behaviour: =subtotal(9,a1:a5) I believe OpenOffice has supported both semicolon and comma since at least 3.0. Take a look at

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:32am -0500 Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 23:30 -0800, Patrick Bakker wrote: SEMI-COLON INSTEAD OF COMMA AS FUNCTION ARGUMENT SEPARATOR Kohei (or was it Jody) fixed this many moons ago; I believe the default is set to improve usability here in LibreOffice; I

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:32am -0500 Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 23:30 -0800, Patrick Bakker wrote: DELETE CELL HELPER The delete cell helper dialog box pops up anytime I try to delete a cell or cell selection. It gives me options to delete some And this is deadly annoying too -

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:32am -0500 Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: Might be a good easy-hack; how we tell the user in an unobtrusive way that this has happened, I don't know - some good UI ideas there appreciated; the 'status bar' is not such a great plan I suspect for this. alpha transparent, hovering

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-13 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:57am -0500 Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 5:32am -0500 Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: I wonder if switching the polarity of the check-box - so it is checked might help people 'see' it, and thus un-check it to get rid of it (some Mozilla dialogs do that I guess

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-15 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:47am -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:21 -0800, Patrick Bakker wrote: COPY PASTE TO A CELL WITH AN EXISTING VALUE The first time I copy and pasted a cell formula into another cell which already had something in it a dialog came up asking something

[Libreoffice] setting ulimit before running soffice

2010-11-17 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, What's the story with the ulimit set in 'ooenv' right before running a freshly built LO: $ cd install/program/ $ ./soffice ulimit: 5: error setting limit (Operation not permitted) [LO running] $ Am I the only one seeing this error? If yes, then does this imply that others

Re: [Libreoffice] setting ulimit before running soffice

2010-11-17 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:07am -0500 Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Caolán McNamara wrote: Am I the only one seeing this error? If yes, then does this imply that others are running as root? Nah, I don't run as root ulimit -c unlimited works fine. I'd guess that there some hard limits set that ordinary users aren't allowed to

Re: [Libreoffice] Questions about Timers

2010-11-17 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:13pm -0500 Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Julien Nabet wrote: PS : in the easy hack, for RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM macro, wouldn't it be better to change the grep in fgrep in order to make the searching faster ? That might have marginally been an issue once upon a time, but now, they're likely to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 02/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components cui options

2010-11-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
As I assume you're using a regex, you might consider catching this by doing the search and replace in series. Here's an example: 1. Catch the 'OUString +?= ...createFromAscii...' case and replace with 'OUString var( RTL...)' search: OUString\s*\w+\s*\+?=\s*\S*createFromAscii\(\s*([^]*)\s*\)

[Libreoffice] binfilter RTL easy hack

2010-11-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, This rather large commit should take care of all non-commented versions of the RTL_CONST macro easy hack in binfilter/ . Cheers, Kevin 0001-EasyHack-RTL-macro-from-createFromAscii.patch.bz Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] setting ulimit before running soffice

2010-11-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:49am -0500 Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Kevin Hunterhunt...@earlham.edu wrote: I suppose it's an Ubuntu thing then. I've used ulimit files minimally in my career thus far. I suppose I'll get some practice this go round ... mmh, works fine

[Libreoffice] EasyHack: svtools/ RTL macro conversion

2010-11-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, An easy hack for RTL conversion strings, against svtools/ . Cheers, Kevin 0001-EasyHack-RTL_CONST-macro-from-createFromAscii.patch.bz Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] newish to git: howto recover from bad merge?

2010-11-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, It must be something simple, but I'm having a devil of a time recovering from a bad merge. Given my transcript below, how do I recover? It usually happens after I've committed a change to my local repository, that I then sent in as a patch. That patch got applied with a slight

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: EasyHack: svtools/ RTL macro conversion

2010-11-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:59am -0500 Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Caolán Mcnamara wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 18:50 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: An easy hack for RTL conversion strings, against svtools/ . Excellent, looks good. Pushed this. I simplified the syntax of a few of the constructor here and there on the way. Och

Re: [Libreoffice] setting ulimit before running soffice

2010-11-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:59am -0500 Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:57 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: What's the story with the ulimit set in 'ooenv' right before running a freshly built LO: As Caolan says - without this, your app will simply not dump core. Of course, mostly people

[Libreoffice] RTL easy hack against bridges/

2010-11-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, A simple one against but test cases, but, as I said in the commit message, they were in my (grep) road! Kevin 0001-EasyHack-RTL_CONST-macro-from-createFromAscii.patch.xz Description: application/xz ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] Presenter Console

2010-11-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 1:19pm -0500 Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Andrew wrote: Could you give me your opinion, as to which is best? 1st - As it currently is 2nd - Smaller font, no use of bold, 'filled' icons 3rd - Smaller font, no use of bold, 'line drawing' icons I like the icons from 1, and the lighter colors. However,

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] binfilter/ : remove dead code

2010-11-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Removing some dead/non-compiled code in binfilter. Did some drive by comment translation, and minor tab removals. Cheers, Kevin 0001-EasyHacks-kill-dead-code-translate-formatting.patch.bz Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL goodness against filters/

2010-11-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 2:22am -0500 Sat, 20 Nov 2010, David Tardon wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:04:52PM -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: Some more RTL goodness against filters/. I corrected two obviously wrong changes: Thank you for checking those. I caught three of those, but missed those two

Re: [Libreoffice] newish to git: howto recover from bad merge?

2010-11-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:16am -0500 Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Wols Lists wrote: Firstly, I'm slightly surprised no-one suggested merely reverting your patch. But I'm guessing all you want to do is get rid of your patch and replace it with the official one - so just dropping your version should do what you want? This

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] binfilter/ : #if 0 removals

2010-11-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Some #if 0 removals in binfilter. Cheers, Kevin if0_removals.txz Description: application/xz-compressed-tar ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 02/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components cui options

2010-11-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:58pm -0500 Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Wols Lists wrote: On 18/11/10 13:36, Kevin Hunter wrote: As I assume you're using a regex, you might consider catching this by doing the search and replace in series. Here's an example: 1. Catch the 'OUString +?= ...createFromAscii...' case and replace

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

2010-11-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 1:16am -0500 Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: PROBLEM 2: Will have to let someone else respond to problem 1, but I believe problem 2 to be fairly simple to solve: The problem I had on the previous build: I had a good build and did an install, but the I could not run the program

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] i18npool/ : minor memory leak

2010-11-22 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Minor memory leak (but a leak nonetheless), found thanks to cppcheck and Jesse's appreciated webpage. Kevin 0001-Fix-a-memory-leak.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

2010-11-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:54am -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there, and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell whether or not the document is currently modified. A lot of people were using the save icon status for

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] minor updates to bootstrap/g

2010-12-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 10:37am -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: Updated expressions in bootstrap/g so that it uses Bash internal expressions, rather than farming out to the '[' or 'test' external command. Updated deprecated backtick subshell calls to $( I've just learned of/realized the not-Bash

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:33am -0500 Thu, 02 Dec 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering: would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:20am -0500 Wed, 08 Dec 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:04 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: In countries where power supplies are intermittent, or irregular, it matters a great deal. If your phone or electricity lines crap out part way through the download, and you were

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:04am -0500 Wed, 08 Dec 2010, Plino wrote: I'm willing to report the bugs I find when a proper bug tracker is set up. Do you mean something other than what is currently available through bugs.freedesktop.org?

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused variables

2010-12-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Simple patch to remove unused variables in: vcl/win/source/gdi/winlayout.cxx Cheers, Kevin 0001-Remove-unused-variables.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] make experts: progress information?

2011-10-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hi LO Make experts, Is it possible to get subproject build progress information dynamically from Make? Among other things, moving all projects to tail_build currently reduces the usefulness of the Zenity SVG clock build progress meter. I'm looking at snippets like

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc - a better design ...

2011-10-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
, 2011-07-27 at 06:56 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 6:07am -0400 Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: but IMHO -the- fundamental design problem with calc, is something quite banal - the concept that a spreadsheet is built from cells: without breaking that basic misconception I don't think we can

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

2011-10-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:52pm -0400 Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/LibreOffice4 + getting stuck into Windows / mingw build etc. From the wiki page, one of the concerns is binary incompatibility. I assume this is in reference to

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

2011-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:39am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: [one /could/ work toward interprocess extensions ... ] But of course, I personally think there is much lower hanging fruit in the calc core ;-) Noted and agreed! I'm just sticking my nose in all things LO, probably stepping on toes as I

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

2011-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:11am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 10/21/2011 02:06 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote: 5. That API definition will be a *lot* of work, but hopefully somewhat thought out already through only a mild reengineering of the current binary API. The UNO API is already there. Or what

Re: [Libreoffice] make experts: progress information?

2011-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 5:16am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 14:20 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: That said, I anecdotally note on my limited-in-hardware machine, that a consecutive run of make is almost instantaneous. Would a make -pn really be that expensive? Try running a no-op

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: writerperfect/source

2011-10-24 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:24pm -0400 Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Fridrich Štrba wrote: New commits: commit 38cf494f90d19d1673773437cd52e8f0cfbf4eb5 Author: Fridrich Štrba fridrich.st...@bluewin.ch Date: Tue Oct 25 01:11:49 2011 +0200 White-space change to fix messy mix of different coding styles [...] diff --git

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: writerperfect/source

2011-10-24 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:48pm -0400 Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 7:24pm -0400 Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Fridrich Štrba wrote: for (std::mapWPXString, FontStyle *, ltstr::const_iterator iter = mHash.begin(); - iter != mHash.end(); ++iter) + iter != mHash.end(); iter++) Err, in terms of coding style, is a pre

[Libreoffice] semantics of ScBaseCell* lclCloneCell

2011-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo Calc Devs, I'm nosing around ScBaseCell in sc/source/core/data/cell.cxx, and I'm curious about the semantics of the function lclCloneCell. Specifically, when would that function ever return a NULL pointer? Does Calc not know about all its cell types? Perhaps extensions are able to

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/gtk3 merged ...

2011-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
On 10/25/2011 04:32 PM, Noel Grandin wrote: Getting there :) almost have a complete build on my machine :) After a long build, I'm there. As I'm not mired in that part of LibO internals, for what visible changes should I be looking? Heh, or put differently, what Ctrl+F should I use on

Re: [Libreoffice] semantics of ScBaseCell* lclCloneCell

2011-10-27 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 2:49am -0400 Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 10/27/2011 07:10 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote: I'm nosing around ScBaseCell in sc/source/core/data/cell.cxx, and I'm curious about the semantics of the function lclCloneCell. Specifically, when would that function ever return a NULL pointer

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestions for improving the look 'n' feel of LibreOffice

2011-10-29 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:57pm -0400 Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Alexander Wilms wrote: There's a short summary with a few examples in this document: http://ubuntuone.com/7m7AXgeh7OIwGBiCOHAjGh 1) It would be useful if the user could define alternating colors for table rows/columns and maybe even export Styles for

Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing

2011-10-29 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 1:12am -0400 Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Jean-baptiste Faure wrote: I already noticed these cpu problems in my own build since 2 or 3 days, but I can't be more precise. Does somebody has a clue about the cause (which commit?) of this CPU consumption? I don't specifically, but my hunch is that it's

[Libreoffice] how to 'make' a single target?

2011-10-29 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, I'm currently working in the sc/ module, and I'm in the make small change, re-compile, make small change, re-compile stage. This is proving very cumbersome, however, as I'm unable to re-make just the affected files. For instance, note my attached output, showing the output of

Re: [Libreoffice] how to 'make' a single target?

2011-10-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:29pm -0400 Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 06:17:09PM -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: This is proving very cumbersome, however, as I'm unable to re-make just the affected files. For instance $ make -j1 | head; sleep; make -j1 | head The attached output

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestions for improving the look 'n' feel of LibreOffice

2011-10-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:40pm -0400 Sat, 29 Oct 2011, alexander.wi...@zoho.com wrote: I've just created this small mock-up, of what I think could be a good solution: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Toxicbits That seems a good start. But let's see if some other devs have any thoughts, or if ... is it

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:15pm -0500 Wed, 09 Nov 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:40 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: Summary : Isn't Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into the merged cell? better ? I like the following better: Do you want to merge the contents of the

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: basic/inc basic/source

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:19am -0500 Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Fridrich Štrba wrote: New commits: commit 1f2d0c83d07b2c877722069c0075ba35860a0400 Author: Fridrich Štrba Date: Tue Nov 15 13:19:24 2011 +0100 Put back a method needed by Windows and reformat a bit diff --git a/basic/inc/basic/sbxvar.hxx

[Libreoffice] uno discoverability

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, I'm working on a school project that involves UNO with Python (talking to LO from an external invocation of Python). One of the things that I find extremely frustrating is the lack of discoverability from within the Python context. The interactive shell (IPython package and

Re: [Libreoffice] uno discoverability

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:00pm -0500 Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: there are some real issues here, inasmuch that it can't be known until run-time what interfaces are supported, and lots of type information disappears down the toilet around queryInterfaces and 'any's. Unfortunately, this makes the API

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: sc/inc sc/source

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:21pm -0500 Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: sc/inc/cell.hxx |4 ++-- sc/source/core/data/cell2.cxx | 10 ++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 87be97a31d8686e3e6e976bb5585b32c096ca19d Author: Kohei

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: sc/inc sc/source

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:28am -0500 Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote: From the curious cat: why? Because that made it easier to debug whatever I was debugging. Plus, I don't believe in those implicitly inline methods, especially in headers

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Word count dialog modeless

2011-11-16 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:51pm -0500 Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Astron wrote: On 15 November 2011 19:15, Michael Meeks wrote: :-) sounds reasonable. My only concern would be to make it discoverable and of course performance: would we take a per-keystroke hit there ? so perhaps having it easy-to-enable but disabled by

[Libreoffice] unable to pass tests ...

2011-11-17 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hiya LO List, I've finally gotten a new build completed, but I'm unable to pass a couple of tests. Unfortunately, I think the tests aren't even able to run, but I don't currently know how to step into this. Can anyone give me a pointer, given the attached test output? Many thanks, Kevin

Re: [Libreoffice] unable to pass tests ...

2011-11-17 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:22am -0500 Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 11/17/2011 05:16 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: - file://[...]/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/ComponentTarget/uno xml/source/rdf/unordf.component: component has empty uri attribute Looks like you fell victim to the component file mess

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

2011-11-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:53am -0500 Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: It would be good if such impossible to proceed situations would lead to uncaught exceptions [...] or clear error messages from within LO (this functionality is unavailable (detailed error message: ...)), instead of LO silently doing

[Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-11-23 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hello List, I'm trying to get hold of an ScDocument from scratch. I have naively attempted to replicate another section of code, but for the life of me can't figure out what I'm missing. My code crashes with a SIGSEGV on this line: aDocShell = new ScDocShell(); I think I've boiled it

Re: [Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-11-23 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:56pm -0500 Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Can you explain in a bit more detail what you want to do. You can't just create a new ScDocShell, you always need to do some initialisation before. Depending on what you want to do you should not need to create the ScDocShell yourself.

Re: [Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-11-23 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 8:45pm -0500 Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 20:33 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 7:56pm -0500 Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Can you explain in a bit more detail what you want to do. You can't just create a new ScDocShell, you always need to do some

Re: [Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-12-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:25am -0500 Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 01:05 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: I wanted to create an ScDocument to work with in a new test file. I was thinking in terms of test driven development and having some tests such that I could execute only them

Re: [Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:47pm -0500 Thu, 08 Dec 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 13:05 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: More specifically, I wish there were a way to run exactly and only one test (i.e. a single ::testFunction()). Fine, sounds like a worthy goal. I suggest you hack cppunit to add some

Re: [Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:03am -0500 Fri, 09 Dec 2011, Noel Grandin wrote: I don't have any unit tests in my tree yet, so feel free to go ahead. Ah, what I'm going to be working on is the implementation of Cppunit for us such that we can have some niceties that would have helped me tremendously while getting up

Re: [Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference from scratch

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 8:05am -0500 Fri, 09 Dec 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 12/09/2011 12:55 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: Oh! I didn't realize cppunit was open for hacking from our end. Not really. Keep in mind that LO's configure has --with-system-cppunit, which people do make use of. The existing patches fix

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-12 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:34pm -0500 Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Petr Mladek wrote: Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use (3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved for release candidates. ./g fetch --tags ./g checkout -b

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-12 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 1:24pm -0500 Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Petr Mladek wrote: Looks good. Please, also make sure that the other repositories are on this branch. I do the following ./g branch | grep \* :-) They are; no worries/ But good eye for git vs ./g! Kevin ___

[Libreoffice] consistent SCCOL use?

2011-12-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo SC Devs, A quick question to any more-knowledgeable-than-me person on whether there's a reason these spots in the calc code base are hard-coded to sal_Int16, rather than using SCCOL? Thanks, Kevin diff --git a/sc/inc/pivot.hxx b/sc/inc/pivot.hxx index 705f794..b6bded9 100644 ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Serious bug on LO Windows installer

2011-01-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:22am -0500 Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Plino wrote: I did receive the email by Tor at the time. But I checked the Nabble site and my message was listed as pending until 1 AM, i.e 12 hours later... (and I have subscribed to this mailing list) No, your message came through the list to me just over 30

  1   2   >