Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:58:15 -0800 (PST)
From: John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LIB] Can someone explain the following?!
Sorry I misread. Your FAT16 (d:) drive needs to follow
the rules of dos installation, has to be located
within the first 2 gigbytes. That is how I've always
partitioned
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:31:17 +0100
From: Avi Cohen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LIB] Can someone explain the following?!
OK. That I can try! Didn't know that about FAT16...
Thanks.
Avi.
-Original Message-
From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 11 November
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:29:19 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Can someone explain the following?!
Hi Avi:
As far as I understand your questions:
Avi Cohen Stuart wrote:
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:18:17 +0100
From: Avi Cohen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:58:37 +0100
From: Avi Cohen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LIB] Can someone explain the following?!
Hi Philip,
Ok. I can live with it that DOS cannot handle it.
My partition scheme was not particualary smart, I agree.
In the end it didn't matter as I still get
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:36:47 -0800 (PST)
From: John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Can someone explain the following?!
hi Avi,
win98 does not read ntfs.
john
--- Avi Cohen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:18:17 +0100
From: Avi Cohen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:44:36 +0100
From: Avi Cohen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LIB] Can someone explain the following?!
Hi John,
partition 1 FAT32 c:
partition 2 FAT d:
partition 3 102 MB empt y
partition 4 logical with nfts
I'm talking about the d: which cannot be accessed
