Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2008, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
Adding 2 to age in 2.2.8 will not help, as it will change the soname
again.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should pull the release, and put out 2.2.6.1?
>>
>> How does one pull a re
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
How does one pull a release? I don't think it is possible.
Replace the tarball with a message that says. D'oh! Sorry, this release was
stillborn, please get this other one instead
The original tarball can be deleted from the official FSF sit
On 8 Sep 2008, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Adding 2 to age in 2.2.8 will not help, as it will change the
soname again.
Maybe we should pull the release, and put out 2.2.6.1?
How does one pull a release? I don't think it is possible.
Replac
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Adding 2 to age in 2.2.8 will not help, as it will change the soname again.
Maybe we should pull the release, and put out 2.2.6.1?
How does one pull a release? I don't think it is possible.
Does FSF recommend 'a', 'b', 'c' notation for fixed relea
Hi Peter,
On 7 Sep 2008, at 23:17, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Oh, sorry. I took the 'version management' rules a bit too
literally :(
4. If any interfaces have been added, removed, or changed since the
last update, increment CURRENT, and set REVISION to 0.
Maybe we
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Oh, sorry. I took the 'version management' rules a bit too literally :(
>
> 4. If any interfaces have been added, removed, or changed since the
> last update, increment CURRENT, and set REVISION to 0.
>
> Maybe we can set age to '2' in 2.2.8 to compensate?
Ugh,
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why is Automake >= 1.10.1 an issue though? It's been around for
almost a year...
But some distros still have two-year latencies for stable -> stable
releases.
Yes, and some stable users may take another two-years to update to the
latest stable re
Hallo Ralf!
On 7 Sep 2008, at 15:15, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:06:59AM CEST:
On 7 Sep 2008, at 06:41, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST:
* configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Specify dist-lzma
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:06:59AM CEST:
> On 7 Sep 2008, at 06:41, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST:
>>>Prepare for next stable release.
>>>* libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update.
>>>* libltdl/
Hallo Ralf,
On 7 Sep 2008, at 06:41, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[ moving from libtool-patches ]
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST:
Prepare for next stable release.
* libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Bump ser
[ moving from libtool-patches ]
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST:
> Prepare for next stable release.
> * libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update.
> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Bump serial number to account for
> changes since 2.2.4 rel
11 matches
Mail list logo
