Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, On 7 Sep 2008, at 06:41, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: [ moving from libtool-patches ] Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST: Prepare for next stable release. * libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Bump

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:06:59AM CEST: On 7 Sep 2008, at 06:41, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST: Prepare for next stable release. * libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update. *

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! On 7 Sep 2008, at 15:15, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:06:59AM CEST: On 7 Sep 2008, at 06:41, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST: * configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Specify

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Why is Automake = 1.10.1 an issue though? It's been around for almost a year... But some distros still have two-year latencies for stable - stable releases. Yes, and some stable users may take another two-years to update to the latest stable

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Oh, sorry. I took the 'version management' rules a bit too literally :( 4. If any interfaces have been added, removed, or changed since the last update, increment CURRENT, and set REVISION to 0. Maybe we can set age to '2' in 2.2.8 to compensate? Ugh,

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 7 Sep 2008, at 23:17, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Oh, sorry. I took the 'version management' rules a bit too literally :( 4. If any interfaces have been added, removed, or changed since the last update, increment CURRENT, and set REVISION to 0. Maybe we

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 8 Sep 2008, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Adding 2 to age in 2.2.8 will not help, as it will change the soname again. Maybe we should pull the release, and put out 2.2.6.1? How does one pull a release? I don't think it is possible.

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: How does one pull a release? I don't think it is possible. Replace the tarball with a message that says. D'oh! Sorry, this release was stillborn, please get this other one instead The original tarball can be deleted from the official FSF

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: On 8 Sep 2008, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Adding 2 to age in 2.2.8 will not help, as it will change the soname again. Maybe we should pull the release, and put out 2.2.6.1? How does one pull a release? I don't think

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.4-45-gc2b8636

2008-09-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ moving from libtool-patches ] Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST: Prepare for next stable release. * libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Bump serial number to account for changes since 2.2.4