Tim,
Extracted function is now in master. I renamed it as 'decompose' since
it decomposes case class into JSON AST.
Thanks again, Joni
On Sep 21, 6:52 pm, Tim Nelson tnell...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all thanks for a great library. I'm finding lift-json quite useful
in my current project.
Hi,
There is now improved XML support in lift master. See a short section
in README:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/master/lift-json/
and some executable examples:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/blob/master/lift-json/src/test/scala/net/liftweb/json/XmlExamples.scala
Cheers Joni
On Sep 2,
Marcin Mielżyński l...@gazeta.pl writes:
I'm playing around with CRUDify and to some extent it is flexible.
However, requirements for more flexibility made me extend the CRUDify,
but finally I ended up having all the impl on my own.
I think I'm in the same boat :-) The only part I've
Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com writes:
Moved over to main Lift list. Folks, for better handle on the context,
please have a quick run through of the original message before coming to
David's comments and my responses.
Thanks, Indrajit
Looks like a bunch of work, but I really
Guys,
IE8 brings with it a whole new lot of joy and:
input type=image /
Does not act as a submit button. According to the interweb, this will
fix it:
button type=submitimg src=whatever.jpg //button
As I need to exectute the submit function in my lift snippet - how can
i get around this with
Actually scrap that - any solution to make image submit buttons work
in IE and lift would be good :-)
Cheers, Tim
On Sep 24, 9:19 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Guys,
IE8 brings with it a whole new lot of joy and:
input type=image /
Does not act as a submit button.
Nice stuff Joni!
Cheers, Tim
On 24 Sep 2009, at 08:24, Joni Freeman wrote:
Hi,
There is now improved XML support in lift master. See a short section
in README:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/master/lift-json/
and some executable examples:
One comment re the scala versions: I don't know about maven, but for
other build systems, I don't think this completely solves the problem.
Indrajit was talking about Maven and how to improve the POMs (project
description files which amongst many other information contain versioned
dependency
Hi,
removing scala from the direct dependency of project using lift will
ease maintenance for user, I agree.
But, IMHO :
* It's not a good practice because it's like saying that you don't use
scala-library directly, it's a transitive/indirect dependency.
* project should list every direct
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:44 AM, David Bernard
david.bernard...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
removing scala from the direct dependency of project using lift will
ease maintenance for user, I agree.
But, IMHO :
* It's not a good practice because it's like saying that you don't use
scala-library
Hi all,
I've got a following problem. When I create a form form automaticly..
similar to the User login/register example I encontered a problem I'm
not posible to cope with.
Firstly I have 'written' a function (using CopyPaste method) which
creates a form fields list based on my class
Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com writes:
One comment re the scala versions: I don't know about maven, but for
other build systems, I don't think this completely solves the problem.
Indrajit was talking about Maven and how to improve the POMs (project
description files which
Excellent. Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Joni Freeman freeman.j...@gmail.comwrote:
Tim,
Extracted function is now in master. I renamed it as 'decompose' since
it decomposes case class into JSON AST.
Thanks again, Joni
On Sep 21, 6:52 pm, Tim Nelson tnell...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeppe,
If you are not using Maven, you certainly have to provide any
information your build system needs. But why would you want to bother
about the POMs then? They are Maven-specific and of no interest for
other build systems. Or am I missing something?
Heiko
On Thursday, September 24, 2009,
Hi all,
The company I work for, Paycorp, is based in Sydney Australia and has a job
with a significant Lift / Scala component. The job description is posted on
http://www.scalacareers.com/
cheers
Oliver
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
My son was born a week ago, with a heart defect that has just been operated
on - I've been biting my nails for months and haven't felt like
communicating or working. Things are starting to look good for him so maybe
Im back.
cheers
Oliver
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Charles F. Munat
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Oliver Lambert olambo...@gmail.com wrote:
My son was born a week ago, with a heart defect that has just been operated
on - I've been biting my nails for months and haven't felt like
communicating or working. Things are starting to look good for him so maybe
Im
Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com writes:
Jeppe,
If you are not using Maven, you certainly have to provide any
information your build system needs. But why would you want to bother
about the POMs then? They are Maven-specific and of no interest for
other build systems. Or am I
It sounds like you probably want p{ SHtml.submit(Title of submit
button, () = actionToTakeWhenButtonIsUsedToSubmitForm) }/p
By the way, what you have there doesn't seem to be following the usual
lift pattern of binding snippets, is there a reason that you prefer
this to:
template:
As long as the changes you're proposing do not require changes to non-maven
projects, I say go for it.
Thanks for taking the time to answer the community's questions and for
having such a well thought out proposal!
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Oliver Lambert olambo...@gmail.com wrote:
My son was born a week ago, with a heart defect that has just been operated
on - I've been biting my nails for months and haven't felt like
communicating or working. Things are starting to look good for him so maybe
Im
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Nice stuff Joni!
+1
Cheers, Tim
On 24 Sep 2009, at 08:24, Joni Freeman wrote:
Hi,
There is now improved XML support in lift master. See a short section
in README:
It appears that placing a hidden field at the end of the form with the
right function binding solves the issue.
Its far from ideal, but ironically appears to be what Microsoft do
with .NET to work around IE issues.
The joys of IE!
Cheers, Tim
On Sep 24, 9:41 am, Timothy Perrett
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Neil.Lv anim...@gmail.com wrote:
It works now that i add /test/hello into the SiteMap.
Menu(Loc(Test, List(test, hello), Test))
But i have something questions about the SiteMap.
If i have more and more these links in my application whether i must
add
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
What do you mean by as a normal snippet?
The parallel snippet processing is implemented deep inside LiftSession.
It's not a snippet. All the lift:xxx/ tags, even those with defaults
built into Lift, are
My 2 cents,
I'm not sure I'm a fan of do: namespace, though I agree it would be
nice to have a common one. Maybe snippet:parallel, snippet:eager_eval?
-Ross
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:46 PM, David Pollak wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jeppe,
Many other build systems (Ivy, Gradle, SBT, buildr) etc. can use a Maven
repository to resolve dependencies and hence use the POMs from the repo.
Ah, now I see your point ;-)
I'm not using maven so don't know how the POM in the repo gets
generated, but somehow thought the proposal
This refactoring *must* be done in a branch... we don't want to
inadvertently break a whole bunch of peoples projects.
From the responses here its obvious there is a fair amount of
hesitation around this proposal - thus, lets put it up in a branch and
test it to death before even
If you like the idea of having them all as attributes but don't like the idea
of using a single attribute ('xx:eager_eval=true xx:parallel=true' rather
than 'xx:eval=eager parallel' as I suggested, where xx is the prefix to be
chosen) then maybe the prefix should be 'eval'.
As far as ajax
Let's hope that things are fine from here on out!
Chas.
David Pollak wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Oliver Lambert olambo...@gmail.com
mailto:olambo...@gmail.com wrote:
My son was born a week ago, with a heart defect that has just been
operated on - I've been biting
Cheesus mate,
the horrors of war...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
It appears that placing a hidden field at the end of the form with the
right function binding solves the issue.
Its far from ideal, but ironically appears to be what Microsoft
Dear Oliver,
As a father of five, i know the feeling. Sending good will and good wishes
to you and yours,
--greg
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Oliver Lambert olambo...@gmail.com wrote:
My son was born a week ago, with a heart defect that has just been operated
on - I've been biting my
How do you want the database to store it?
-
benb...@primrose.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
So I have an object which gets persisted via the normal way .. ie :
class Person extends LongKeyedMapper[Person] with IdPK {
object name extends MappedPoliteString(this,
But I cannot for the life of me work out of to store a list of objects
What do you expect the underlying type in the database table to be?
Normally this would be done with a separate table with a foreign key
(MappedLongForeignKey) back to the users table.
-harryh
On 24/09/09 2:59 PM, Heiko Seeberger wrote:
One comment re the scala versions: I don't know about maven, but for
other build systems, I don't think this completely solves the problem.
Indrajit was talking about Maven and how to improve the POMs (project
description files which
This is really really great. Will totally help me out a lot. Thanks!
-harryh
On Sep 24, 3:24 am, Joni Freeman freeman.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There is now improved XML support in lift master. See a short section
in README:http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/master/lift-json/
and some
On Sep 24, 11:45 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
This refactoring *must* be done in a branch... we don't want to
inadvertently break a whole bunch of peoples projects.
Actually, this
If I was in Java/Hibernate mode, I guess I'd tag it as one-to-many and
have a Skill object, which maps back to the Person object via a
key ... just not sure how to do that with Lift's OR mapper. I keep
having mental blocks when it comes to lift scala :(
I guess if I was doing it in Java, I
I'd suggest a one to many relationship with a foreign key. For
something off the top of my head (no guarantees this'll actually
work):
class Person extends LongKeyedMapper[Person] with IdPK {
def getSingleton = Person
object skills extends MappedOneToMany(Skills, Skills.person) with
Thanks for the reply, will have a go at that.
Cheers,
Ben
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
ben b...@primrose.org.uk writes:
If I was in Java/Hibernate mode, I guess I'd tag it as one-to-many and
have a Skill object, which maps back to the Person object via a
key ... just not sure how to do that with Lift's OR mapper. I keep
having mental blocks when it comes to lift scala :(
harryh har...@gmail.com writes:
But I cannot for the life of me work out of to store a list of objects
What do you expect the underlying type in the database table to be?
Normally this would be done with a separate table with a foreign key
(MappedLongForeignKey) back to the users table.
I
Hello lifters,
I have the following form and bind:
SHtml.ajaxForm(
bind(ajax, xhtml,
view - doView _,
save - SHtml.ajaxButton(
Save,
{() =
Log.info(Got a 'save' AJAX call)
this.redirectTo(/redirect1)
On 24/09/09 2:34 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
Nice stuff Joni!
Indeed. That this module gets lots of love shows.
Everything nice and tidy in a neat little package.
Did I mention that it's test cases serve as docs too?
/Indrajit
Cheers, Tim
On 24 Sep 2009, at 08:24, Joni Freeman wrote:
Jeppe : Yes, thats what I was after. It seems like a lot of work to
map a list of objects (compared to other ORMs), but I'm willing to
give it a go.
Shame really, as I've got used to writing less code lately with
Scala !
Problem is, LongMappedForeignMapper seems to be only from Lift 1.1 ...
but
You can do this with Mapper using a ManyToMany relationship. To make
sure we're talking about the same thing, let me try and explain.
With ManyToMany, you can do both Person.find(By(Person.name,
name)).map(_.skills) as well as Skills.find(By(Skill.description,
description)).map(_.people) and get
That is exactly what I designed OneToMany / MappedOneToMany for -- to be a view
on a one-to-many relationship as a collection. I'm sure it could be optimized
better but it works (at least for me :) ). If the wiki article isn't clear
enough let me know.
MappedOneTwoMany does not extend
ben b...@primrose.org.uk writes:
Jeppe : Yes, thats what I was after. It seems like a lot of work to
map a list of objects (compared to other ORMs), but I'm willing to
give it a go.
Shame really, as I've got used to writing less code lately with
Scala !
Problem is, LongMappedForeignMapper
This may be obvious but I am having trouble setting this up.
I need to map a database view which isn't a problem because I just set
it up as I would any other table. Can I specify in the code that the
class and object mapping the view is read only and cannot be modified?
It doesn't seem like I
You can ..
override def writePermission_? = false
(On a per-field basis)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:52 PM, andythedestroyer
andythedestro...@gmail.com wrote:
This may be obvious but I am having trouble setting this up.
I need to map a database view which isn't a problem because I just
In the interest of sharing ideas with the larger Lift community, I
found myself creating many different mapper classes to model a
hierarchy of entities best viewed in a tree, such as roles, tags and
navigation links. To reduce code duplication, and to try to better
understand Mapper classes, I
There's no read-only support for tables in mapper at this time. Sorry.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:52 PM, andythedestroyer
andythedestro...@gmail.com wrote:
This may be obvious but I am having trouble setting this up.
I need to map a database view which isn't a problem because I just set
it
Please use the JsCommands.RedirectTo(...) method. This will send a
JavaScript command to the browser that will cause it to redirect.
the S.redirectTo method is only for redirecting as part of a full page
render.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:49 PM, David david.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
David, just to make sure that I know what I'm talking about, if you
set writePermission_? to false for each field, you could emulate the
behavior?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:41 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no read-only support for tables in mapper at this time.
54 matches
Mail list logo
