If there's no rational reason to use Lift, then perhaps you could find
another community to spend your time in.
I didn't say that there was no rational reason to use Lift BUT THAT YOU ARE
FAILING TO COMMUNICATE WHAT THAT REASON MIGHT BE TO POTENTIAL USERS! You
can't expect potential users to
Warren Henning wrote:
tl;dr
Want a cookie for your efforts?
If you don't like Lift, don't use it. Problem solved. Hooray, turkey
for everyone!
There are few things sillier than investing time - serious time from lots of
people - in a framework aimed at programmers and then
Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu writes:
Sorry Jeppe, but I disagree.
On which part :-) Maybe the not really into the visual
aesthetics. What I meant was not that we don't care, but more that we
will rather spend time on coding.
The issue to date
As this is likely to be very controversial, I'll recap one more time while my
gf finishes dying her hair -
- Don't ignore people like Mark. His feedback was detailed, thoughtful, and
invaluable if want non-committers to use Lift
- Do decide how you are going to position Lift. Position being
Timothy Perrett wrote:
By all means, come here with questions and you will find this group to be
very responsive and helpful, but do not come here and automatically assume
that you can illuminate to us the errors in our project marketing or
experience.
What's automatic about Mark's
Re. branding == What can you do for me, just compare the sites from Grails
and Lift.
Grails:
Have your next Web 2.0 project done in weeks instead of months. Grails
delivers a new age of Java web application productivity.
- Ok, this is (claimed to be) a high productivity Web 2.0 framework.
You mistake different with harder. People who are used to one way to do
things will find different harder than the same.
No, I don't. Different *is* harder. When there is a convention it should be
followed unless there is a good reason not to do so. This is one of the half
dozen or so key
