Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net writes:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
If the archives were public, it might deter people from speaking frankly.
I understand; however having public archives is also something
important for the project's
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
If the archives were public, it might deter people from speaking frankly.
I understand; however having public archives is also something
important for the project's history. The best compromise I could come
up with would be to
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
And before that, in October/November 2009 there were some mails about
how to handle someone, who back then didn't really show proper
behavior.
If you compare how I react to things then and now, you'll find I have
not changed one bit. Any
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:03:02AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
What leaves sort of a bad aftertaste here, I think, is that there is a
semi-official inner circle
Please read my email from two months ago
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg30917.html
and tell me what is
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
-- from my comment 3
Before discussing anything specific, I want to settle the abstract
question should an OSS project have any kind of private mailing
list?. You have two options:
1) Give an argument why they should not. In particular,
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:46:07PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
-- from my comment 3
Before discussing anything specific, I want to settle the abstract
question should an OSS project have any kind of private mailing
list?. You have
On 11/5/10 7:26 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I repeat: do you (not necessarily David, but anybody) agree
that an OSS project can, in theory, have some kind of private
mailing list?
I believe that private mailing lists for an OSS project are useful and that
LilyPond
On 11/5/10 7:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:36:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I don't think it's worth delaying 2.14 in order to debate either of these
questions. Can't we just note that the debate exists, perhaps add it to our
list of
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:36:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I don't think it's worth delaying 2.14 in order to debate either of these
questions. Can't we just note that the debate exists, perhaps add it to our
list of GLISS topics, and move on to getting 2.14 out?
It's not a GLISS (syntax)
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Great! Let's move on, OK? If Valentin wants to patch the documentation,
then he can propose a patch. The same applies to anyone else who wants to
propose a patch.
*I* certainly am in no place to propose a patch, since I
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 11/5/10 7:26 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I repeat: do you (not necessarily David, but anybody) agree
that an OSS project can, in theory, have some kind of private
mailing list?
I believe that private mailing lists for an
On 11/5/10 8:15 AM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Great! Let's move on, OK? If Valentin wants to patch the documentation,
then he can propose a patch. The same applies to anyone else who wants to
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
As far as I know, I'm not a member of -hackers. I get a not-found error
whenever I click on any of the links.
I don't have any emails from -hackers in my inbox or saved mails. I don't
have -hackers in my Contacts list.
On 11/5/10 9:37 AM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
As far as I know, I'm not a member of -hackers. I get a not-found error
whenever I click on any of the links.
I don't have any emails from
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
I'm certain that the reason I'm not on the list is because the list is in
total disarray.
It seems that we all agree on that.
I see several challenges associated with producing a more informative patch
at this time:
1)
On 11/5/10 11:40 AM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
2) Any description of the history may be irrelevant to the future
Is it for us to decide?
Nope. And it's impossible for anybody to decide until
Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net writes:
situation (and again: like David, I am not referring to the division
between people who are subscribed to -hackers and other people, but
between those who know about it and those who do not).
David seemingly is quite incapable of bringing his
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:29 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David seemingly is quite incapable of bringing his meaning across, so
instead of substituting your own, just quote him.
Indeed. As you may have guessed, I added your name to that sentence as
an afterthought, only to make it
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.netwrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:29 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David seemingly is quite incapable of bringing his meaning across, so
instead of substituting your own, just quote him.
Indeed. As you may have
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
What sort of signs would you find reassuring?
Greetings Joe,
Well, your answer is one, for starters :)
What I meant by reassuring signs is pretty much any reactions from
the development team acknowledging that there might be
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.netwrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
What sort of signs would you find reassuring?
Greetings Joe,
Well, your answer is one, for starters :)
What I meant by reassuring signs is
This email is a follow-up to comments in:
http://news.lilynet.net/The-LilyPond-Report-22
I spent 5 minutes trying to post my latest reply, but the forum
software continually complained that I had used wrong words, tags,
or symbols, and thus it rejected my comment as spam. I am posting
my reply
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I spent 5 minutes trying to post my latest reply, but the forum
software continually complained that I had used wrong words, tags,
or symbols, and thus it rejected my comment as spam. I am posting
my reply here
Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, um 21:56:24 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
2) Agree that an OSS project can, in theory, have a private
mailing list. And apologize.
*sigh* I do apologize if you felt offended (which you obviously do).
However, I can assure you that my goal is not to make you
24 matches
Mail list logo
