Hi,
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept both
Stem as well as Staff.TimeSignature as a function argument.
At the current point of
On 2012-09-12 10:38, David Kastrup wrote:
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept both
Stem as well as Staff.TimeSignature as a function
2012/9/12 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Hi,
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept both
Stem as well as Staff.TimeSignature as a
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.17.2. This
release contains the usual number of bugfixes. It is strongly
recommended that normal users do not use this release, and instead
use the stable 2.16 version.
--
Phil Holmes
___
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at writes:
On 2012-09-12 10:38, David Kastrup wrote:
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept
Hi,
a recent discussion at the german LilyPond-Forum showed a problem with
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/snippets/text#text-center-text-below-hairpin-dynamics
If the NoteColumn, where the Hairpin starts, has a 'DynamicText
attached, LilyPond returns weird output.
I wrote a fix for
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc
File lily/chord-name-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc#newcode149
lily/chord-name-engraver.cc:149: ly_is_equal (chord_as_scm,
last_chord_))
On 2012/09/06
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:56 AM
Subject: Fix for poblematic snippet in /Documentation/snippets and
LSR -policy?
Hi,
a recent discussion at the german
On 12 sept. 2012, at 14:05, d...@gnu.org wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc
File lily/chord-name-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc#newcode149
lily/chord-name-engraver.cc:149:
Yes, I did not check you actually addressed the points of the review
before the countdown ended. But I see my role as a reviewer, not as a
surveillance team.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc
File lily/chord-name-engraver.cc (right):
2012/9/12 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:56 AM
Subject: Fix for poblematic snippet in /Documentation/snippets and LSR
-policy?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc#newcode87
lily/chord-name-engraver.cc:87: {
On 2012/09/06 08:50:40, dak wrote:
What kind of contorted logic and guessing game is that?
if (make_markup)
{
[old code ending in setting text]
}
Please don't
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
Basically, if a music function wants to provide a shorthand for an
override, not being able to specify an optional context is a nuisance.
I currently have just the same problem writing a \hide function that is
supposed
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
Basically, if a music function wants to provide a shorthand for an
override, not being able to specify an optional context is a nuisance.
I currently have just the same
Hi,
please have a look at the fix for
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/snippets/text#text-center-text-below-hairpin-dynamics
imported from LSR:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=233
making possible to add DynamicText to the NoteColumn where the Hairpin starts.
Additionally I added
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I
want xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz).
Go!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Werner LEMBERG writes:
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I
want xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz).
Go!
isn't using symbols
'(xxx yyy zzz)
more scheme-like, schemonic, schemesque?
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond
Am 11.09.2012 21:54, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 11 sept. 2012, at 22:29, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Are you certain that every vertical axis group will always contain the same
number of bar lines? If not, it's possible that the matrix you're talking
about may not have complete
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Werner LEMBERG writes:
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I
want xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz).
Go!
isn't using symbols
'(xxx yyy zzz)
more scheme-like, schemonic, schemesque?
Well, this is
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept both
Stem as well as
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to have music
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string.
On 2012/09/12 11:48:45, mike7 wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc#newcode87
lily/chord-name-engraver.cc:87: {
On 2012/09/06 08:50:40, dak wrote:
What kind of contorted logic and guessing game is that?
if (make_markup)
{
[old code ending in
On 2012/09/12 16:11:05, dak wrote:
when it should rather have the form
if (rest_event_)
{
- SCM no_chord_markup = get_property (noChordSymbol);
- if (!Text_interface::is_markup (no_chord_markup))
...
+ if (make_markup)
+ {
+ SCM no_chord_markup =
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
These changes are expected and explained in tracker issues
2493
2611
2783
2493
728
2727
2493
1290
2493
On 12 sept. 2012, at 19:16, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/09/12 16:11:05, dak wrote:
when it should rather have the form
if (rest_event_)
{
- SCM no_chord_markup = get_property (noChordSymbol);
- if (!Text_interface::is_markup (no_chord_markup))
...
+ if
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.2 regtests
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of
consideration:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:22:38AM +0300, Yannis Rammos wrote:
Thanks for forwarding the issue
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-09/msg00452.html).to
the dev list.
No one answered but in the meantime I found a solution: the header file
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:43:15PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:22:38AM +0300, Yannis Rammos wrote:
No one answered but in the meantime I found a solution: the header file
/usr/include/FlexLexer.h
is updated in 10.8, which is why LilyPond would not
2012/9/12 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at writes:
On 2012-09-12 10:38, David Kastrup wrote:
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings (xxx yyy zzz). The main
incentive is to be able to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:28:36PM +0100, James wrote:
Mark,
On 10 September 2012 14:15, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Is there a way to rename the patch description that shows up in the
issue tracker? I think I have seen something like this in a patch
from Mike, so it should be
I'd like to float two ideas about events.
The first is to define a null event which functions like the
empty chord . Although mathematicians and programmers are quite
comfortable with contains with 0 items inside them, this is not a
particularly intuitive concept (just look at the concept of
I'm really not happy with \hide vs. \hidden depending on whether it's
override or tweak. How do we expect novice users (or moderate users) to
know which they need to use?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6443087/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:04:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Basically every construct that we would be tempted to use or s1*0 for
occasionally is one that is not really attached to a note, but rather to
a moment in time.
I certainly agree that it would be good to be clear about stuff
which
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:44:40PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Short story: some files in the lilypond source are missing
copyright/licensing headers, but for the most part this doesn't seem
like a big deal. As they get edited or otherwise patched, it would be
helpful to add them.
Yes. In
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I'd like to float two ideas about events.
The first is to define a null event which functions like the
empty chord . Although mathematicians and programmers are quite
comfortable with contains with 0 items inside them, this is not a
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2012/09/12 23:20:46, Graham Percival wrote:
I'm really not happy with \hide vs. \hidden depending on whether it's
override
or tweak. How do we expect novice users (or moderate users) to know
which they
need to use?
How do we expect them to know
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:04:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Basically every construct that we would be tempted to use or s1*0 for
occasionally is one that is not really attached to a note, but rather to
a moment in time.
I certainly agree
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/9/12 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at writes:
On 2012-09-12 10:38, David Kastrup wrote:
if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:06:12AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
How do we expect them to know whether to use \override or \tweak?
I actually don't know. However, there's nothing in the word
hide that brings to mind tweak to me. I suppose that we could
argue that \hide goes with \tweak because
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:59:25 -0700, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
These changes are expected and explained in tracker issues
2493
Not convinced. Would we not expect the new time sig to be shown at the end
of the previous line? It's gone.
The first is to define a null event which functions like the empty
chord .
While this is perhaps a nice syntax sugar idea...
\new Voice { c'1 y4\ y y\ y\! }
... I think that this is a nightmare both on the user and the
parser/lexer side. Your proposed `y' essentially means to go
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:56:35AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
A vaguely-related idea is to allow easy positioning of musical
events within a note. Instead of having a non-timed null event
which begins *after* the previous note, we have a
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Here's a few imaginary ways of writing the same music:
\at 4 \ \at 1 \! c'1
c'1 y4 y\ y z\!
c'1- y4 y\ y z\!
c'1-{ s4 s\ s2 z\! }
Out of these, I'm most comfortable with the last one.
c-d-.
Which one gets the accent?
--
David
On 12 sept. 2012, at 15:54, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I think of music as being a series of
pitches+rhythms+modifications. I mean, when I skim music, my eyes
notice the staff position, notehead, and beam before really taking
in dynamic signs, articulations, etc.
You'll be really popular with
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 12 sept. 2012, at 15:54, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
--
Phil Holmes
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:18:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Here's a few imaginary ways of writing the same music:
\at 4 \ \at 1 \! c'1
c'1 y4 y\ y z\!
c'1- y4 y\ y z\!
c'1-{ s4 s\ s2 z\! }
Out of these, I'm most
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:29:35AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
With that view (which is evidently not universal), it seems natural to
me to write the pitch and duration first, and then all the other
special bits that occur on or around that
51 matches
Mail list logo
