On 8/14/2019 6:04 PM, Rachel Knight via lilypond-user wrote:
Hi,
In a piece I am working on, the markups are colliding with crescendo
and decrescendo markings. I finished a different piece that had both
hairpins and markups where the markups were perfectly placed below the
crescendo. Any idea
Hi,In a piece I am working on, the markups are colliding with crescendo and decrescendo markings. I finished a different piece that had both hairpins and markups where the markups were perfectly placed below the crescendo. Any idea what is wrong with this score?Best,Rachel\version
el 2019-08-14 a las 18:34 Robin Bannister escribió:
> You can override the positions property.
> Try
>
> \new DrumStaff \with {
>\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
>\override Arpeggio.thickness = #2.0
>\override Arpeggio.positions = #(lambda(grob)
> (interval-widen
edes wrote:
I'm very close to what I want, but is there a way to tweak the length of
the brackets?
You can override the positions property.
Try
\new DrumStaff \with {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override Arpeggio.thickness = #2.0
\override Arpeggio.positions =
el 2019-08-13 a las 22:36 Aaron Hill escribió:
> Try:
>
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> \new DrumStaff
> \with { \consists "Arpeggio_engraver" }
Excellent, thank you! Almost there... ;-)
I'm very close to what I want, but is there a way to tweak the length of
the brackets?
What I'm
> Ok, I noticed I am only having the issue when I am using Lilypond on
> Linux. Why would that be?
Please always include the list in your response so that others might
benefit in the future.
I don't seem to have problems on my Linux based lilypond. However I
notice the version statement in your
14. August 2019 12:21, "David Kastrup" schrieb:
> "Urs Liska" writes:
>
>> 14. August 2019 11:55, "David Kastrup" schrieb:
>>
>>> "Urs Liska" writes:
>>>
>> ...
> People write music theory texts with other typesetters than LaTeX.
> People even write music with other typesetters than
"Urs Liska" writes:
> 14. August 2019 11:55, "David Kastrup" schrieb:
>
>> "Urs Liska" writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm currently rewriting my lilyglyphs package
>>> ...
>>
>> Wouldn't it be a lot more generally useful (and likely more efficient
>> since the mechanism is made for that) to
14. August 2019 11:55, "David Kastrup" schrieb:
> "Urs Liska" writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently rewriting my lilyglyphs package
>> ...
>
> Wouldn't it be a lot more generally useful (and likely more efficient
> since the mechanism is made for that) to just add those kerning pairs to
>
"Urs Liska" writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently rewriting my lilyglyphs package
> (http://ctan.org/pkg/lilyglyphs,
> https://github.com/uliska/lualilyglyphs) to make better use of
> advanced Lua functionality, which I hope will be great for future
> extensibility. And right now I've come across
Hi all,
I'm currently rewriting my lilyglyphs package (http://ctan.org/pkg/lilyglyphs,
https://github.com/uliska/lualilyglyphs) to make better use of advanced Lua
functionality, which I hope will be great for future extensibility. And right
now I've come across a great opportunity for someone
Hello Anzick,
you are not providing any source files whatsoever. As a consequence I don't
think there are many people able to help. You may also wish to read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/web-big-page#tiny-examples and
follow the advice given as that greatly increases the
12 matches
Mail list logo
