On 18 September 2017 at 14:59, Knute Snortum wrote:
> There is also a printer icon on the toolbar that does the same thing as
> File > Print Music. (Ctrl-P worked for me on Windows 10.)
>
The printer icon does absolutely nothing when clicked. On my frescobaldi
installation
Thank you Thomas!
On 18 September 2017 at 10:45, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2017-09-18 10:38 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
> > Great, thank you Thomas!!
> >
> > But why I should prefer "with" versio
version "2.19.65"
\score {
\new Staff {
\set Staff.midiInstrument = #"glockenspiel"
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \box \circle "1. "
a b c' d'
}
}
Thank you, g.
On 18 September 2017 at 10:24, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2017
How can I draw a box or a circle around the exercise number "1."
\version "2.19.65"
\score{
\new Staff {
\set Staff.instrumentName=#"1."
c' d' e' f'
}
}
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I forgot to mention I'm using Windows 10.
No, Ctrl-P or file/print music does not work and I don't get any error.
g.
On 14 September 2017 at 17:42, Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.09.2017 um 12:49 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>
>> Sorry to ask this
Harp scores sometimes specify a bracket below or above the notes to
indicate how to place your hand. In the attachment you can see an example.
I have found online this code that works pretty well:
[https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/48731/lilypond-
finger-placement-brackets]
\version
Sorry to ask this that probably is a very trivial question, but I have not
able to find a solution online.
Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly from
Frescobaldi?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
David Kastrup wrote:
> People tend to ignore warnings
> anyway.
I personally ignore warnings only when I don't see them. And I normally
don't see them when they are in a long list of other information (maybe
written in small character etc. etc :))
Ciao, g.
Thank you Malte and Phil!
It works well and your suggestion make sense. I normally didn't pay much
attention to this thing, now I will.
Gianmaria
On 14 September 2017 at 11:27, Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.09.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
&
This compiles well
\version "2.19.65"
\fixed c' {
c4 c c d
(c4) c c c
}
but when I add a \mark like this
\version "2.19.65"
\fixed c' {
c4 c c d
\mark "X" (c4) c c c
}
it doesn't. I know the problem is related to the slur and I can move the
mark before d but why I should not be able
On 3 September 2017 at 22:34, David Kastrup wrote:
> []
>
> > Well, you can cheat by going inside of chords like
> >
> > \version "2.19.60"
> >
> > nc = c_3
> > nd = d_2
> > ne = e_3
> > nf = f_4
> >
> > {
> > \fixed c' {<\nc>8 [ <\nd> <\ne> <\nf>]}
> > \fixed c' {<\nc>16
Salut Jacques!
I don’t have any experience with C# programming, but maybe the Flex and
> Bison specifications that are part of the LilyPond source code could be
> integrated within a C# application?
> This would provide a full and usable scanner and parser.
>
This would open interesting
On 31 August 2017 at 11:06, Gregrs wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:58:52PM +0100, Gregrs wrote:
>
> The below expression (minus the quotation marks) seems to work for notes
>> and chords without any articulation etc. attached. I've used Vim regex
>>
Does anybody knows where I can find any regex expression to match lilypond
notes and chords?
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 27 August 2017 at 08:57, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
> [...] if I explicitly set the beaming like this
> >
> > \version "2.19.60"
> >
> > note = {a8}
> >
> > {
> >
Need some help. This works:
\version "2.19.60"
note = {a8}
{
{\note b b b}
}
but if I explicitly set the beaming like this
\version "2.19.60"
note = {a8}
{
{\note [b b b]}
}
it doesn't compile. Why and how I can fix it?
Thank you, g.
___
Dear Peter,
I only spent one hour on it and I have not been able to make it working as
I need. It is not clear to me the value I have to set to set the instrument
range from c, to b,.
But I think that when I will have more time I should be able to modify your
code for that.
* * *
By the way
Thank you Peter and David for your help. I'll make some tests in the
followings hours.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The result of a transpose operation sometimes generate notes that are too
high (or too low) for my needs. In this case I would like to have these
notes one octave lower (or higher).
Is there any way to indicate a range where the notes should stay when
applying a transpose function?
Here it is an
897
>
> 2017-06-18 23:23 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 18 June 2017 at 19:47, Christopher R. Maden <cr...@maden.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/18/2017 12:26 PM, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there any au
On 18 June 2017 at 19:47, Christopher R. Maden <cr...@maden.org> wrote:
> On 06/18/2017 12:26 PM, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>> Is there any automatic way to color the notes of a simple piece in a
>> specified tonality according to their harmonic function?
>> []
&
Is there any automatic way to color the notes of a simple piece in a
specified tonality according to their harmonic function?
For example: the tonic in red colour, the dominant in green colour etc. etc
?
This is just a curiosity. I was thinking that this could be useful for
didactical reason.
g.
I already asked some question about \markup and \midi and get some usefull
answer. Here I attached the real code I'm working on.
I would like to generate the midi and I would appreciate some suggestion.
Kieren suggest to separate the layout and midi. Pro: clear and easy to do;
Cons: a bit
On 15 June 2017 at 12:05, David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> The German condition is "working perfectly, never mind how scary the
> outcome".
>
[...]
eheh :)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
with "The German condition" :)
On 15 June 2017 at 10:11, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Ciao Thomas,
> >
> > thank you for your code, I made some test and it works perfectly! But it
Ciao Thomas,
thank you for your code, I made some test and it works perfectly! But it
also scares me :)
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I wanted to try to avoid to split the midi in a different "block" but I
will go in this way.
Thank you Kieren and Guy!
g.
On 14 June 2017 at 19:02, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
>
> > Ok, something more real:
> >
> > \version "2.19.60"
> > \markup
>
> How about using \justify-line?
>
fantastic! This work perfectly! Thank you!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I'm playing with the \fill-line command:
Please have a look to the following example:
\version "2.19.60"
\markup \fill-line {Word Super_super_super_long_word
Another_super_super_super_long_word}
As you can see there are three words in the markup:
(1)Word (2)Super_super_super_long_word
<jimmyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> \version "2.19.60"
>> \markup {
>> \score {
>> {c' d'}
>> \midi{}
>> \layout{}
>
Why this code does not generate any midi file?
\version "2.19.60"
\markup {
\score {
{c' d'}
\midi{}
\layout{}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thank you David and Simon! (and Brian!)
On 13 June 2017 at 23:18, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes:
>
> > On 13.06.2017 18:51, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> >> What's \etc? Any link to this command?
> >
> >
It works perfectly thank you David.
What's \etc? Any link to this command?
Thank you!!!
g.
On 13 June 2017 at 18:43, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Perfect!!! Thank you David!
> >
> > Now, bec
Perfect!!! Thank you David!
Now, because they are a bit verbose, I would like to create a function with
parameter.
This is without parameter:
\version "2.19.60"
newFinger = \markup \underline \finger 3
{\clef bass e,_\newFinger }
How can I write somethingl ike:
\newFinger #3
?
On the accordion to indicate that a note is to be played in the counter
bass we put a small dash *under* the number of the finger (see attached
file capture.png). How can I do it?
* * *
Another convention for counter bass (that my teacher uses) is to put an x
in front of the number of the
Thanks David and Malte
they both work perfectly for me!
I'm sure they will be useful also to other.
g.
On 7 June 2017 at 09:15, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I would like to write short exercises of o
I would like to write short exercises of one measure consecutively on the
same line. Something similar to what I attached. How I can do it?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I can live without it :) It was more a curiosity than a necessity.
Thank you anyway!
g.
On 24 May 2017 at 10:57, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-05-24 9:01 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
> > Need again some help about footnote an
Need again some help about footnote and repeat. Have a look to this example:
\version "2.19.60"
{
\repeat percent 2 {c'8 d' e' f' \footnote #'(1 . 5) "This is a note on
percent" RepeatSlash }
\repeat percent 2 {c'4 d' e' f' \footnote #'(1 . 5) "This also"
PercentRepeat}
}
It works only for
Thank you Thomas (and Simon!), it works great.
Best regards, g.
On 21 May 2017 at 22:38, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2017-05-18 12:34 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>:
>
>> Am 18.05.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
oh!!! Thank you!
It looks a nice starting point.
Thanks, g.
On 18 May 2017 at 19:58, Jean-Charles Malahieude <lily...@orange.fr> wrote:
> Le 18/05/2017 à 10:20, Gianmaria Lari a écrit :
>
>> I want to write a score with some didactical annotation in different
>> lang
I know the part of the manual "different editions-from-one-source" but
that's pretty low level and I wonder how experienced users (that already
written score for different country) use that functionalities.
The link you Federico point out is what I was asking. I will wait :)
Thank you,
g.
I want to write a score with some didactical annotation in different
language (french and italian).
In case I decide to generate two separate score, one in italian and one in
french, what's the best way to manage the source?
Thank you, g.
___
Is there any way to put a footnote on a repeat percent-like symbols?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I'm writing some technical exercises like that one mentioned by Francesco
so your example is perfect.
[...]
> In didactical examples it is appropriate to give some instructions before
> the
> music pattern. However it’s not uncommon to see staff lines continuing a
> bit
> past the last bar,
Is there any musical equivalent symbol for the ellipsis points used to
indicates "and so forth"?
For example, suppose you have an exercise where there is a pattern to play
in different tonality. You write the first two or three measures and then I
would like to indicate "and so forth". What I
Try a more recent lilypond version. There have been some lilypond version
that had some problem with the fonts (others knows better the details of
the issue).
Version 2.19.59 works perfectly on windows and it's definitely fast :)
Ciao, g.
On 4 May 2017 at 14:08, Orm Finnendahl <
Cannot help Marc and Klaus but but I can say that on my windows pc I just
installed Frescobaldi 3.0 without problem and looks working normally as the
previous version.
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> > This also applies to slurs - `(c'4 d' e' f')` is a lot clearer to me
> > than `c'4( d' e' f)`.
Well, but slurs can start at the same note where another slur ends, and
> `c'4( d')( e')' is a lot clearer to me than `(c'4 (d') d')'
>
Just a curiosity David, have you ever considered this other
On 28 February 2017 at 18:31, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>> I have a fragment that needs to be repeated twice with alternate
ending
> > and
> >>> the second time one octave higher.
>> I have a fragment that needs to be repeated twice with alternate ending
and
>> the second time one octave higher. The following is an example that would
>> be ok...
[]
> Let's just cheat.
>
> \version "2.19.52"
>
> \score {
> {
> \mark "2nd time 8va"
> \repeat volta 2 {c' d' e'
I have a fragment that needs to be repeated twice with alternate ending and
the second time one octave higher. The following is an example that would
be ok...
\version "2.19.52"
\score {
{
\mark "2nd time 8va"
\repeat volta 2 {c' d' e' f'}
\alternative {{a a a a}{b b b b}}
}
Absolutely agree :) Consider my last code a scheme exercise...
On 28 January 2017 at 09:33, Helge Kruse <helge.kr...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 26.01.2017 um 10:51 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> > ... and this is one more way to do the change staff using a scheme
> function
> > tha
... and this is one more way to do the change staff using a scheme function
that toggle between the two staff.
\version "2.19.54"
#(define staffToggle #f)
cs= #(define-music-function (parser location) ;cs = Change Staff
()
(begin
(set! staffToggle (not
Thank you, Malte and Noeck, it works perfectly.
I post here another solution, that is interesting because it doesn't use
scheme and more easy to understand.
\version "2.19.54"
csl = { \change Staff = "left" }
csr = { \change Staff = "right" }
right = \fixed c' {
\clef treble
\time 2/4
- Is there a simpler way to write this source code avoiding all these
change staff?
- Is it correct writing the left hand using s2 etc. etc.?
Thank you, g.
\version "2.19.54"
right = \fixed c' {
\clef treble
\time 2/4
g8-4 \change Staff = "left" g_4 \change Staff = "right" e-3 \change
Oh! Sorry my mistake! I read "tempo" and not "time"!
On 25 January 2017 at 01:15, SoundsFromSound <soundsfromso...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari wrote
> > On 25 January 2017 at 00:31, Sam Frybyte
>
> > frybyte@
>
> > wrote:
> >
On 25 January 2017 at 00:31, Sam Frybyte wrote:
> I know it's possible but I need someone to direct me to the snippet or
> place in the manuals so I can invisiblize it for a cadenza piece, just the
> link.
>
Trevor wrote:
> I'll definitely turn on my financial contribution again.
>
what's the better way to give a financial contribution?
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
David Wright wrote:
> But your response here addresses a second point, the
> interpretation of \repeat unfold. Looking at my attached
> example, it seems to me that you want "\repeat unfold 2 { foo }"
> to behave like "foo foo" (B and C).
Yes, that's exact!
> But, if that's what you want,
>
I'm sorry, clearly there is a misunderstanding and it is probably from my
side, my apologies.
Let's me try to explain what I mean. Try to have a look to this code and
the related output (it is attached).
\version "2.19.54"
\include "addFingering.ly"
fragment = {c' d' e' f'}
\markup "Plain"
> \repeat { }
>
> generates a repeat expression. Whether that is "unfold" or not.
> And relativity works "linearly" across the expression even when
> alternatives are involved where having to write \relative each time
> would be a royal pita.
> --
> David Kastrup
Yes that's clear.
But
Thanks to all for the very quick and fantastic help.
g.
On 14 January 2017 at 11:36, Noeck wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Am 14.01.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> > 'Change staff' is perfectly fine in English.
>
> Thanks, Andrew. Reading the German translation for the two
> \repeat unfold is not evaluated at all. It stays a repeat expression
> until it gets interpreted. One reason it is implemented that way is in
> order to keep the repeats in
>
> \relative c' { \repeat unfold 4 { c e g } }
>
> in the same octave rather than get
>
> \relative c' { c e g c e g c e
Novice question. Attached it's a small music fragment from an harpe score.
How can I write it using lilypond?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thank you David Kastrup and Nalesnik and Gilles for you answer your help
and your explication!
I don't like the idea to use a custom repeat instead of the standard. But I
will make some test and see.
Thank you again!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
I probably figured out the reason of this behavior. The function
"addFingering" is evaluated before evaluating the repeat. So lilypond
evaluate this
\addFingering {\repeat unfold 2 {a b}} #"12"
as
\repeat unfold 2 {a-1 b-2}
instead of
\addFingering {a b a b} #"12"
But why? Is it
I have a problem with (the fantastic) addFingering snippet.
Here it is my simple code.
\version "2.19.54"
\include "addFingering.ly"
{
\addFingering {a b a b} #"12"
}
{
\addFingering {\repeat unfold 2 {a b}} #"12"
}
I expected that the two generated score would be exactly the same that
On 23 December 2016 at 10:39, ptoye wrote:
> [...] I really didn't mean to start a theological discussion about how one
> should
> type in music, but obviously some people feel much stronger about it than I
> do. There are three ways of telling LilyPond what the pitch of a
On 23 December 2016 at 09:59, Shevek wrote:
> I compose in \relative mode, and my practice is to use \resetRelativeOctave
> at the beginning of every new phrase. It is a lot of characters to type,
> but
> I've found that creating unnecessary aliases makes code harder
On 21 December 2016 at 23:22, Nathan Ho wrote:
> [...]
> I also stopped using \relative a few years ago (I think it was in
response to one of your posts here). No regrets here.
>
> It's alright for simple monophonic melodies, but it gets in the way when
engraving anything
On 21 December 2016 at 20:47, David Wright
wrote:
>
> I don't understand "annoying"/"unannoying" mistakes,
I'm not an expert user. I have used relative and absolute entry and with
relative I makes mistakes more frequently and spend much time fixing it. I
personally
Few months ago I switched from relative to absolute octave entry.
In the rare cases I need to write very high or very low octave notes and
consequently I need to write too much single quote ( ' ) or comma ( , ) I
use the "\fixed" function that I just discovered (before I was using
"\transpose")
Ciao Peter,
I know this is a totally different story but I suggest also to give a try
to avoid the "\relative" and to use absolute octave entry. It takes some
weeks to get used but in my opinion it is more easy to manage code in this
way. IMHO "\relative" is too much prone to annoying mistakes
Yes, it does. Thank you!
On 16 December 2016 at 00:48, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm editing a score where I would like to specify "8va".
> >
I'm editing a score where I would like to specify "8va".
If I write
\version "2.19.52"
{
\ottava #1
a b
}
lilypond creates a score with the text 8va but it also shifts the notes
one lower octave. So to avoid the shift I also had to specify a \transpose. I
have seen that the manual says
Thank you David, it works perfectly!
I started to read the "Defining new contexts" and it looks clear (even if
not trivial).
Ciao, g.
P.S. Any reason why you use attachment instead to directly copy and paste
your code? I was thinking that for snippet was better the latter because
the user can
Is there any way to specify the fingering in a specific context? I tried
this without success:
\version "2.19.49"
\score
{
<<
\new Staff {c' d' e' f'}
\new Dynamics {s4-1 s4-2 s4-3 s4-4}
>>
\layout { }
}
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user
If I write
\version "2.19.49"
\include "articulate.ly"
\score
{
\displayLilyMusic \articulate {c'4\trill}
\layout {}
\midi{}
}
the trill generated starts with d. Is there any way to make "articulate"
generating the trill from c?
Thank you, g.
> If you do this you can write to a file in the filesystem:
>
> {
> \displayLilyMusic #(open-output-file "display.txt") { c'4\f }
> }
>
Oh! Very useful, thank you Andrew!!
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
achh! I didn't notice it!
Thank you, g.
On 21 November 2016 at 23:36, Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 21.11.2016 um 23:28 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> > Is there any way to see the \displayLilyMusic output inside Frescobaldi?
>
> It is printed in t
Is there any way to see the \displayLilyMusic output inside Frescobaldi?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
That's very clear, I will not forget. Thank you David!
g.
On 18 November 2016 at 03:08, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Fri 18 Nov 2016 at 01:17:25 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > ahem I'm sorry I wrote tie but I meant slur... I always mix up these
&
but really, why my code is not acceptable?
Thank you, g.
On 17 November 2016 at 16:01, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> On 17 November 2016 at 15:07, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
>
I'm far from be sure but it is just what I found:) Anyway check the
attached image (taken from Mary Cohen, Technique takes off, "14 Romance").
And thank you for your code, it works perfectly.
Ciao, g.
On 17 November 2016 at 15:07, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
I need to tie the first 'a' with the second 'a' that is inside some grace
notes.
Here it is a fragment of the code:
\version "2.19.49"
{
b \afterGrace a {g16 b a} g4 g
}
Any suggestion?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
>
>
> it seems that the default RehearsalMarks use bold characters while the
> custom-made ones don't.
>
[]
> I get the same look if I override the property that's responsible for that:
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.font-series = #'bold
> \mark "A"
>
Great thank you!
g.
I need to write a rehearsal mark followed by an apostrophe, so something
like: A'.
If I try to do
\mark "A'"
the resulting character looks different compared to the other default
rehearsal mark. Should I use some markup?
Thank you, g.
___
David Kaustrup wrote:
> Well, standard bass is severely underrepresented in what I am
> occasionally working with: I don't need it for accordion orchestra, and
> I am not a particularly skilled arranger so I tend to just use the free
> bass when playing stuff written for other instruments.
>
>
Wow! That's great! We have to use carefully but with kids can be very
interesting!!! Thank you!
g.
On 15 November 2016 at 17:49, Klaus Blum wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
>
> I use highlighting a lot, and I prefer coloring things.
> If you search the LSR for the term "colored",
>
> My own inclination would be to use it as an educational tool, and try
> to mark the score in a way that a musician might, eg a hand-drawn
> circle.
>
> (Personally I prefer my *own* markings to convey some more useful
> information, rather than just putting circles everywhere. I have
> my own
>
> > c4 \chordmode {f, f,}
> > e \chordmode {e, e,}
> > \partial 2 b \chordmode {e,}
>
> [graphics]
>
> If that input corresponds to the printed output you gave, I want to see
> the code producing the output.
>
>
No, it doesn't correspond. Have a look to this code and to attached images:
>
> > c4 \chordmode {f, f,}
> > e \chordmode {e, e,}
> > \partial 2 b \chordmode {e,}
>
[...]
> At any rate, in current versions you can write
>
> \chordmode {
> 4 f f
>e:7 e:7
>e:7 e:7
> }
>
> Doesn't mix with \relative though. Not a problem for accordion I guess.
>
I don't use
gt; wrote:
> Am 15.11.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need an advice. Suppose you have two very similar fragments of musica,
> > maybe very few notes change or maybe just the fingering changes.
> >
> > How do you highlight the differences
Hello,
I need an advice. Suppose you have two very similar fragments of musica,
maybe very few notes change or maybe just the fingering changes.
How do you highlight the differences to avoid the player makes mistakes
playing it? Does exist a standard way to do it?
Thank you, g.
On 14 November 2016 at 12:03, Bernhard Kleine <bernhard.kle...@gmx.net>
wrote:
> Am 14.11.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>
> I have something like this:
>
> frag = { \repeat volta 2 {c'^\markup {p (2nd time: f)} d' e' f'}}
>
> \score {\frag \layout{}}
>
> \
I have something like this:
frag = { \repeat volta 2 {c'^\markup {p (2nd time: f)} d' e' f'}}
\score {\frag \layout{}}
\score {\unfoldRepeats \frag \midi{}}
As you can see I mentioned in the markup that the first time the score
should be played piano and the second forte. Is there any way to
>
> the ly file you provide had not been created by midi2ly.py (lilypond's
> MIDI to
> ly converter)
> However Karl's Perl script is working specifically with files created by
> midi2ly.py, not with ly files in general.
>
ahhh My apologies, you're totally right, I completely forgot it!
Here it is the midi and the violin part I extracted.
I would like to better format the violin part (that I already extracted)
and also to extract the piano part.
Let me know what you're able to do :) and thank you anyway for your
help and interest.
Ciao, Gianmaria
On 10 November 2016 at
I have some lilypond code imported by a midi file that is not well
formatted.
Is there any way using Frescobaldi or any other tool to format the code so
that each musical measure stays on a different line?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
401 - 500 of 590 matches
Mail list logo