Hello,
is it possible to have a text with height set in staff-space units?
For example, I would like that the height of " \markup { foo } " is X * (1
staff-space)
where X can be integer of decimal.
Thanks,
P
Sorry for the redundant question. I forgot that I already obtained an
answer for the same question (and I did not delete in my "how-to" list,
meanwhile)
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Outside-staff-priority-and-vertical-order-of-grobs-td226058.html
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:3
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:07 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Paolo Prete writes:
>
>
> >>
> >> Possibly
> >>
> >> \once \override TupletBracket.Y-offset = #(lambda (grob)
> >>(* -20
> >>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:32 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Paolo Prete writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > as you can test with the following snippet, TupletBracket doesn't take
> into
> > account its direction when setting Y-offset (tested both on stable and
> >
Hello,
what's wrong in the following code? (tested on both 2.18 and 2,19)
I would like that the Script grob appear below the other grobs, then I set
the lowest value for its outside-staff-priority, but it appears above the
TupletBracket.
How can I fix this?
Thanks,
P
%
{
\once
Hello Aaron,
as you can see in the following code, your (great and useful) function,
which visualizes the staff-padding of a grob, fails if I set an
outside-staff-priority for a TupletBracket.
Is there a fix for this?
Thank you very much
Best,
Paolo
%%
#(define line-thickness 0.2)
Hello,
as you can test with the following snippet, TupletBracket doesn't take into
account its direction when setting Y-offset (tested both on stable and
2.19.83 versions)
{
\once \override TupletBracket.direction = #UP
\once \override TupletBracket.Y-offset = -20
\tuplet 3/2 { c'''4 c'' c''}
}
Hello,
please consider this snippet:
%%%
{
\override Staff.TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text = \markup { \small
\bold "Rit." }
\once \override Slur.outside-staff-priority = 100
\once \override DynamicText.outside-staff-priority = 200
\once \override TupletBracket.outside-staff-priority =
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:46 AM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > is it possible to draw one or more horizontal lines, above/below the
> staff, that are completely ignored for collisions with the score's grobs?
>
> Absolutely: just use
Hello,
is it possible to draw one or more horizontal lines, above/below the staff,
that are completely ignored for collisions with the score's grobs?
Also: is it possible to draw a *grid* as a background for the score?
Thanks,
P
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 3:05 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-01-24 9:12 am, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > I'm trying to implement the work-around you suggested.
> > TupletNumber doesn't cause the discussed weird space.
> >
> nstead, simply replace the normal stencil proced
On Saturday, January 25, 2020, Knute Snortum wrote:
> You didn't say what version you were using, but it looks like 2.18.2
> and 2.19.83 do the same thing.
>
>
I tried it with both 2.18.2 and 2.19.83
Hello,
>From what I see, Y-offset gives weird results on a TupletBracket
fakeRulerUp = { \once \hide NoteHead \once \hide Stem c'}
{
%doesn't do anything
\override TupletBracket.Y-offset = 5
\tuplet 3/2 { c' c' c' } \fakeRulerUp
% not only the middle line of the staff is ignored; it
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:56 PM Aaron Hill
wrote:
> On 2020-01-22 7:26 am, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > The problem is associated with:
> >
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-01/msg00467.html
> >
> > Sorry if I insist again with thi
Y
>
> All of my helper functions for overlaying stencils are really just
> hacks; they might work for some grobs and fail for others. And when
> things stop working, you just have to look for another hack. For
> instance, if messing with the stencil for TupletBracket is not working,
> perhaps
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:47 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Rutger,
>
> > Cannot you fake it using a TupletBracket (\tuplet 1/1) and override the
> TupletNumber.text?
>
> Absolutely — that’s a great solution.
>
>
Hi Kieren and Rutger,
Unfortunately I can't use
Hello,
is it possible to obtain a stencil, for a HorizontalBracket, similar to the
TupletBracket one?
Something like:
some-text
| |
I see that there is a .bracket-flare property for the grob, but it's not
enough for achieving this result.
To Aaron (and any other helpful contributor):
As you can see in the below snippet, the visualize-padding function you so
kindly provided, doesn't work in some cases with TupletBracket. Here is a
snippet where the bug occurs.
The problem is associated with:
Hello,
please consider the following snippet. The procedure called at
after-line-breaking doesn't do *anything*, but a weird space is added
between staves.
If you remove the \override line OR the \tuplet, this doesn't happen
Why?? Is there a fix for this?
The error happens for both 2.18 and 2.19
Hello,
Is there a way to draw a line on the reference point of the "padding"
property?
Aaron already wrote a snippet for obtaining that for the X-offset property
(where the x-ref-point is on the x-parent):
\version "2.19.83"
{
\once \override DynamicText.after-line-breaking = #(lambda
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:30 AM Aaron Hill
wrote:
> On 2020-01-19 7:15 am, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > I'm looking at your code and I don't understand what is it intended to
> > do.
> > You write: "% Test with bracket that is positioned by Y-offset."
>
:37 Uhr schrieb Paolo Prete <
> paolopr...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > is it possible to make a music expression from strings? It would be
> useful for building expressions with combination of string chunks.
> Something like:
> >
> >
&g
Hello,
is it possible to make a music expression from strings? It would be useful
for building expressions with combination of string chunks. Something like:
\version "2.19.45"
strToMusicExpr = #(define-music-function (parser location token1 token2
token3 mus) (string? string? string?
>
>
> In 2.18, the NoteHead is considered the X parent of the DynamicText.
> However, in 2.19, the NoteColumn is the parent. NoteColumn does not
> have an existing stencil to overlay, so the \stencil markup command
> fails. Here's a version that supplies a dummy stencil:
>
>
> \version
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 9:52 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
>
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> {
>\once \override DynamicText.after-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob)
> (let* ((x-parent (ly:grob-parent grob X))
> (orig-sten (ly:grob-property x-parent 'stencil)))
>
Hello. IIUC, the reference point for the X-offset property (or any other
x-shifting property that preserves the avoid-collisions algo) is on the X-
parent grob of the grob I want to modify.
Is there a way to draw a line on this grob, so that I can visually well see
the distance that I'm going to
Hello Aaron,
sorry for the (a bit) late reply.
I'm looking at your code and I don't understand what is it intended to do.
You write: "% Test with bracket that is positioned by Y-offset."
but from what I see, the bracket is positioned by both
outside-staff-padding and y-offset inside
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:08 PM Aaron Hill
wrote:
> On 2020-01-17 4:34 am, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > I said (and I confirm) that *\offset Y-offset is broken*. This command
> > should be blacklisted, given that it leads to random results.
> > That's all.
>
> I believe I
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:33 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-01-16 4:01 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > This gives a clearer overview, thanks, but I would not use it, even if
> > it
> > produces the wanted result.
>
> Sorry if I implied otherwise, but I thought
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:31 AM Aaron Hill
wrote:
>
> This time, you omitted the overrides to prevent padding and
> staff-padding from influencing the test:
>
> \version "2.19.45"
> notes = \fixed c''' { \ottava 1 f4 4 4 \ottava 0 f, }
>
> {
>% Make sure these properties do not
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:35 PM Aaron Hill
wrote:
>
>
> You forgot to \revert outside-staff-padding *before* applying
> extra-offset.
>
>
Right, But even with \revert, the issue remains, because in any case the
value of 0.56 for outside-staff-padding doesn't produce a shift. See:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:09 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> %
>
> 0.56 s exactly the quantity corresponding to extra-offset to 0.1. But if
> you produce a SVG file, and open it with a text editor, you will see three
> pairs of coordinates:
>
> (fir
Hi Robin,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:05 PM Robin Bannister wrote:
> Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> > And I really thank you. Offsetting brackets is a *very*, *very* important
> > feature in professional music engraving.
>
> You're welcome.
I'm sorry to say that I made additi
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:01 PM Robin Bannister wrote:
> Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> So this 0.46 is just for outside-staff-padding.
>
And I really thank you. Offsetting brackets is a *very*, *very* important
feature in professional music engraving.
Best,
Paolo
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:22 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
> My testing found that \offset didn’t work with outside-staff-padding for
> OttavaBracket grobs.
>
That's great, because with this method the user is not forced to use a
ruler. Then, the best one. I just tested it and now we can say that,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:33 PM Robin Bannister wrote:
> OR
>
> 3) make outside-staff-padding 0.46 more than needed vertical shift
> e.g. 2.46
>
> Cheers,
Robin
>
This is *precious* info. Please, can you tell/confirm if
1) you are referring to \offset command ?
2) is it applicable as a
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:43 PM Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> it seems like you have some very specific setup of lilypond files and
> framework and need a solution that works within that, but you’re trying
> to avoid explaining the whole setup either because it’s too much effort
> or for
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:49 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> However, why jump through such Scheme hoops when LilyPond syntax is more
> direct?
>
>
Thank you Aaron. I used a misleading topic, sorry. I wanted a set of layout
properties which is shared by all the scores I edit. So I can simply import
it
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:45 AM Michael Gerdau wrote:
>
>
> FWIW: Prior to reading this thread I wasn't even aware, that \offset
> might not do what I want in all situations. I use it occasionally and
> like it - works for me.
>
> Claiming it is completely broken seems way over the top to me.
>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 3:15 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-01-15 5:15 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > is it possible to override a property of StaffSymbol outside a
> > \new Staff \with { ... }
> > context?
> >
&g
Hello,
is it possible to override a property of StaffSymbol outside a
\new Staff \with { ... }
context?
I would like to obtain something like:
%%%
#scheme-code-for-overriding-staffsymbol-for-all-the-staves-in-the-score
{
c' c' c' c'
}
%%%
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:16 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-01-15 3:59 pm, Paolo Prete wrote
>
> If you are pushing things by small amounts akin to font kerning, then
> collisions are unlikely and extra-offset is often the right tool for the
> job.
>
"If you are pushing
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:31 AM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> It may be desirable, but it’s not **necessary** to add a warning. At
> this point, I don’t think we have the infrastructure to add the warning.
>
I did not know that. I thought that such a modification was a one-line
change.
Yes, but, it's necessary too to add a *warning* on the Lilypond output.
This is much more clear for the user than the documentation.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:12 AM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM
> *To:
Aaron Hill
wrote:
> On 2020-01-15 1:57 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > I quote Carl's words:
> >
> > "So offset applies to the *estimated* position, and then the spacing
> > engine
> > works on the offset+estimated postion and ends up putting things where
> >
not see that as bad criticism. I'm telling that because it could
save time to other people.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:22 AM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 4:16 PM
> *To: *Carl Sorensen
> *Cc: *Lilypond-User
the offset with a ruler (in a very
uncomfortable way, though, given that you have to offset the ruler as well
with the ref point of the grob).
Thanks,
Paolo
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:55 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Wednesday, January 1
py to find
a way to use this properties. They are essential for the automatic
avoid-collision algos.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:57 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> I quote Carl's words:
>
> "So offset applies to the *estimated* position, and then the spacing
> engine works on the offset
to offset an estimated position. How could you do that if
you don't know this estimated position?
Best,
P
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:46 PM Aaron Hill
wrote:
> On 2020-01-15 1:21 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Without a proper behavior of the "\offset" command you cannot d
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 8:10 PM
> *To: *Aaron Hill
> *Cc: *Lilypond-User Mailing List
> *Subject: *Re: Distance of a grob from its reference point
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I really can'
set" command you cannot do nor the
automatic 2) placement, nor a fine tuning.
Best,
Paolo
It seems
(I apologize if that
is coming across sarcastically, but I am afraid I lack better
wordsmithing.)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:50 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-01-14 7:10 pm,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:10 PM kieren_macmillan kieren_macmillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo (et al.),
>
> > Why do I need to move a grob?
> > For the simple fact that any score, in order to have a * professional *
> > appearance, needs HUNDREDS of these adjustments.
> >
Sorry, broken link
Here's the correct one:
https://filebin.net/sy6z7b39fcounb5j
>
> I am a convinced open source developer and already 10 years ago I used
> Lilypond to create my scores, because I wanted to avoid Finale, Sibelius
> and other proprietary software (which I used before). In the
to the
other grobs. So I dedicated myself to the LilyJSSVG editor.
Here is what came out:
https://github.com/paolo-prete/LilyJSSVG/blob/master/LilyJSSVG.gif
Try making these micro- (or big) adjustments with just the text editor. You
will go crazy.
Note one * very important * thing. This Editor adds
Hello.
Is there a way to obtain, for a given grob
1) its *calculated* distance from its reference point? (from what I see,
the reference Y of an OttavaBracket is the middle line of the associated
staff...)
I tried ly:grob-staff-position (see the snippet below), but it doesn't seem
to give this
Sorry for the typo
WRONG:
1) At this point, given that Y-offset can't be used for properly offsetting
(\offset) the OttavaBracket (unless you use a ruler and place its reference
point of the bracket, which is very tedious), is there any any other
property that can be used?
CORRECT
1) At this
) Is there a way to pull out the actual finished position (or the distance
from its reference point), so that I can compare it with the wanted
position?
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:46 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Monday, January 13, 2020 at 1:33 PM
>
Does it mean that similar issues can happen with the same property applied
to other grobs, like DynamicLineSpanner ?
Thanks,
Best
P
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:20 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 1/13/20, 12:25 PM, "Kieren MacMillan"
> wrote:
>
> Hi Paolo (et al.),
>
> > Well, I
\)\ottava #0
r4
\once \offset Y-offset 1 Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava #1 c8\( 8\)\ottava #0
r4
}
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:07 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Monday, January 13, 2020 at 12:21 PM
> *To: *David Nalesnik
>
You are right. I made the same test one minute ago :-)
Well, definitely a bug.
Is there a workaround for this at least in 2.19 ?
Otherwise the OttavaBracket interface is almost unusable (except for the
extra-offset property)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:25 PM Kieren MacMillan <
Well, I investigated as well. I think that the only way to solve this is to
use the combination
Y-offset + \offset + 2.19
As you can see, this seems to work in 2.19
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/12
And it doesn't work in 2.18.
Correct me if I'm wrong: this is currently the *only* proper way to
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:36 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > But it doesn't work in many cases. For example, in my snippet I'm forced
> to use a ruler If I want to shift the bracket exactly +2 staff-spaces more.
> Then I have to put the starting point
est,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:22 PM Robin Bannister wrote:
> Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> > (A) + (B)
> > make me suspect that the whole OttavaBracket interface is buggy.
>
>
> It may not be exactly what you want, but I have the feeling that you
> haven't tried outside-
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:35 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> >
>
> Not in my example: I know its reference point is exactly 10 spaces from
> the reference point of the staff. ;)
>
>
This happens because you have chosen a value that you know at a glance
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:37 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > from what I read in the documentation
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/moving-objects
> > ... there are two ways to place items like the OctaveBracket.
> >
> > 1) The
iences.
HTH,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:16 AM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paolo Prete
> *Date: *Sunday, January 12, 2020 at 7:31 PM
> *To: *Aaron Hill
> *Cc: *lilypond-user
> *Subject: *Re: Shift up OttavaBracket
>
>
>
> As said in the first post
Hi Kieren,
look at my last post. Repositioning the OttavaBracket requires an unknown
offset.
best,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:26 AM kieren_macmillan kieren_macmillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all
>
>
>
> outside-staff-padding does the job only if reset; see:
>
> http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/4
>
>
> Wrong link. Look at:
>>
>
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/5
-offset concerning the starting offset.
Best,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:31 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-01-12 5:17 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all the
> > other
> > objects are not moved
Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all the other
objects are not moved automatically (smart repositioning)
Does my example show a bug/missing feature for OttavaBracket?
Thanks,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:56 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> If you want to move the bracket
olo,
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:27 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> >
> > Try this with both stable and unstable
> >
> > http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/1
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:20 AM David Nalesnik <
> david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
Try this with both stable and unstable
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/1
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:20 AM David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:13 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> >
> > Thanks very much David.
> > Just tested and it works with 2.19 (not with 2.18, though)
Thanks very much David.
Just tested and it works with 2.19 (not with 2.18, though)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:06 AM David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:54 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Please consider this example:
> >
>
Hello.
Please consider this example:
{{ \ottava #1 c c c c \ottava #0 }}
How can I shift up the ottava bracket exactly TWO staff spaces above its
calculated position?
Both:
\override Staff.OttavaBracket.Y-offset = ... and \override
Staff.OttavaBracket.staff-padding = ...
%%
\version "2.19.83"
upper = {
s1
}
lower = {
c'8[\sustainOn \change Staff = "upper" d'' e'' f'']\sustainOff r2
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \upper
\new Staff = "lower" \lower
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
Hello.
What about the status of this?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Sustain-pedal-problems-with-voices-staffs-td157131.html
It's a very annoying missing feature/bug . Is there a fix or
workaround/alternative for avoiding that, other than using an additional
Dynamics layer?
Best,
P
Hello Michael and Andrew,
please look at this (2.19.83):
{
\once \override DynamicText.extra-offset = #'(-2 . -3)
a'\p\< a' a' a'\ff
}
Obviously, the hairpin is not automatically moved so to be aligned with the
moved DynamicText.
I wonder if is there a way to achieve this.
Best,
P
On
Hello,
given:
{{
a'\p\< a' a' a'\ff
}}
... how can I move the hairpin so that its start and end dynamics (p and
ff, in this case) are automatically repositioned?
(otherwise: how can I move the dynamics so that the hairpin is
automatically repositioned?)
Thanks.
Best,
P
Hello all,
I was a little bit reluctant to publish this (the Scheme code has to be
cleaned, better indented etc.) but given that it seems to me that it works
well and avoids many limitations of the cross-staff interface, I am happy
to share it.
http://lilybin.com/eoxzn9/2
Is there any volunteer
Hi Simon
you have to download it and play with a common player, as explained in the
homepage of the project.
There's not an embedded viewer in Github, sorry.
best,
Paolo.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:01 PM Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On 05.01.20 23:32, Paolo Prete wrote:
Hello all,
I am very happy to announce the first version of the LilyJSSVG editor,
after the various tests made in the previous days (I have not yet committed
the release, but everything is ready).
https://github.com/paolo-prete/LilyJSSVG
As you can see, this version brings VERY IMPORTANT
Hello.
1) How can I associate a stencil to a NoteColumn grob?
I would like to show a vertical line in correspondence of it, but it seems
that
\override NoteColumn.stencil ... has no effect.
2) is it possible to associate an output-attributes list to the NoteColumn
grob, as well (so that it
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Martin Tarenskeen
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/paolo-prete/LilyJSSVG
>
> > Unlike the previous script, there is no need for copy and paste: the
> editor offers a textarea that is a
for the tuning of curves through the mouse
https://github.com/paolo-prete/LilyJSSVG
At the moment, in addition to the tuning of curves and beams, it is
possible to position texts, dynamics and articulations. The code is
designed to be easily extended, in order to add other objects to be
positioned
Hello all,
In these days, I worked at my Javascript script which allows to place
Lilypond's grobs with the mouse. I think I'm ready to share a test version
on Github.
>From what I see, the only license that I can use for it is GPLv3.
Can you confirm that?
I just saw this article about the bad
Hi Melt: I just solved in this way ( I looked at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21816306/guile-scheme-redefine-another-modules-internal-function
for
understanding how a redefinition of a module's function works):
Lot of dependencies to fix as a consequence, but it works:
attributes?
>
> El dom., 22 dic. 2019 a las 14:04, Paolo Prete ()
> escribió:
>
>> Thank you again Stefano. This helps again and you will see how good it
>> will fit in the library I'm coding.
>> However, I can't make it work for a TextScript (either before the
>
Hello,
is it possible, in some way (without an external script) to override the
extension for the output file?
I need that output.svg is renamed as output.html
Thanks
utes outprop)))
> \tweak Beam.output-attributes.id #id #mus #} )
> (else #{ \tweak output-attributes.id #id #mus #}
>mexp)))
>
> \relative { c'4 d8-\token [ e ] \token f g c,4 }
> %
>
> The code cou
Hello all.
the following function (thanks to Stefano!) inserts the beam-thickness
property of a Beam in the list of output-attributes of the corresponding
SVG item. It does its job if I place the function soon before a beam symbol
"[". But it doesn't work (no errors, but the output-attributes
tes outprop)))
> #mexp #} )
> (else mexp
>mexp)))
>
> \relative { c'4 d8 -\token [ e ] f -\token [ g ] c,4 }
>
>
> I wrote the token function in a way that I think will be easy for you to
> expand, testing for differe
ay, with and without your modification.
>
>
>
> In your lilypond file put:
>
> \displayMusic oldmusic
>
> \displayMusic newmusic
>
>
>
> And what you can see wht you have to write by observing the differences
>
>
>
> Jaap
>
>
>
> *From:* lilyp
Var current-value-of-beam-thickness )
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:14 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 6:01 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > And thanks again to the Scheme-master Aaron.
>
> I appreciate the kind words, though I doubt my experience rises to the
> level of "mas
, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:07 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 4:21 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > unfortunately, it doesn't increment the counter globally, and the two
> > ids
> > in the SVG file are identical
>
> You will need to define a music
Hi Kieren,
yes, of course! please let me know how to use it
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:32 AM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > The ids must be: foobar_1, foobar_2 etc.
>
> Can they be foobar.1, foobar.2, etc. instead?
> Lilypond has a nice built-in
ing (serial) \etc
>
> \relative { c'4 d8 -\token [ e ] f -\token [ g ] c,4 }
>
> I will test your snippet for modifying beams later! Thank you for the work
> you are doing.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Stéfano
>
> El mar., 17 dic. 2019 a las 19:23, Paolo Prete ()
>
gt;
> token = -\tweak output-attributes #'((id . "foobar")) \etc
>
> \relative { c'4 d8 -\token [ e ] f2 }
>
> That achieves half of what you want. Now, how to make "foobar"
> automatically increment I don't know, perhaps someone else can help with
> that.
>
&
That achieves half of what you want. Now, how to make "foobar"
> automatically increment I don't know, perhaps someone else can help with
> that.
>
> Hope that helps!
> Stéfano
>
> El mar., 17 dic. 2019 a las 19:06, Paolo Prete ()
> escribió:
>
>> Hello all,
>
Hello all,
In order to automate the reverse process of the lilypond+javascript
snippets (write the GUI modifications of the grobs to the .ly file) I need
to make the following code work:
%
token = \tweak output-attributes #'((id . "foobar"))
\score
{
{
a8
at 2:17 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Mon 16 Dec 2019 at 23:55:52 (+0100), Paolo Prete wrote:
> > P.S) I don't know why the browser's viewer messes up the indentation of
> > these attachments.
> > If so, I ask if are there volunteers to fix that and re-post the snippet
> (I
>
301 - 400 of 520 matches
Mail list logo
