Hello, Jan.
The article you pointed out earlier, by J-P Coulon, was more useful than
anything I could find.
The handbook from the Music Publishers Association of the United States, by
contrast, has some mistakes -- such as putting the key cancellation /after/ the
new key signature; we in
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
The version that Chappell
- Original Message -
From: Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com
To: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
Cc: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
...@gmail.com
To: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
Cc: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one
: Saturday, December 18, 2010 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks Phil, I'm curious about the vocal part. Why is the stemming different
than the piano reduction? As written, it indicates SAA division on the first
chord and SSS (no Alto!) on the second. This may seem trivial and skilled
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:46:24 -0500 James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#Known-issues-and-warnings-30
PS To anyone else who knows, if this known issue does apply in this case,
thenit might be a good idea to not use the
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
From: Marco Correia marco.v.correia at gmail.com
\include english.ly
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
{ fs'4 }
\\
{ f'4 }
This was one of the first issues I raised, in June this year. I think it
was my first bug report:
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
From: Marco Correia marco.v.correia at gmail.com
\include english.ly
{
\clef treble
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
Nice.
It does break the usual rules about horizontal placement, and about when to
cancel accidentals in another voice. But, with the beaming to clarify the
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
Nice.
It does break the usual rules about horizontal
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Michael Ellis
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 21:50
To: Keith OHara
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Odd output
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara k
Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Michael Ellis
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 21:50
To: Keith OHara
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Odd output
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one simplistic example of C
seems erroneous. Isn't the idea of the notes printed at the same moment to
show that they need to be sung at the same moment if you see what I
Hi all,
2010/12/10 Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com:
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve
as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly - it
- Original Message -
From: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com
To: marco.v.corr...@gmail.com
Cc: Lilypond Bugreports bug-lilyp...@gnu.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 8:19 AM
Subject: issue classification was: Odd output
Hi all,
2010/12/10 Marco
FWIW, Finale 2010 *does* support this if you put the notes in separate
layers (voices), add a courtesy accidental to the natural note, and fiddle
with the Accidental Mover and Note Position gui tools. It doesn't do the
right thing by default, though. Image attached.
So if pride in LilyPond's
FWIW, Finale 2010 *does* support this if you put the notes in
separate layers (voices), add a courtesy accidental to the natural
note, and fiddle with the Accidental Mover and Note Position gui
tools. It doesn't do the right thing by default, though. Image
attached.
Well, *manually* you
- Original Message -
From: Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:35 AM
Subject: Odd output
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making some
mistake.
When compiling this example:
\include
Isn't there a missing to pair with the ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
You get 2 stems because you created 2 voices with the signs and \\
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices.html
What are you trying to compose?
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Marco Correia wrote:
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very
think this problem deserves more
consideration.
Thank you!
Marco
On Friday 10 December 2010, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:35 AM
Subject: Odd output
Hi,
I just
m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to
serve
as a printer for computer generated music
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to
serve
as a printer for computer
: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
You get 2 stems because you created 2 voices with the signs and \\
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices.html
What are you trying to compose?
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:35 PM
, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Why not set one of the notes to a different enharmonic pitch? It's certainly
much kinder to the musician who's trying to play the composition.
\include english.ly
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
{ fs'4 }
\\
{ es'4 }
}
Cheers
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve
as a printer for computer
his final comment - could use a Gb but shouldn't.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
*From:* Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com
*To:* LilyPond User Group lilypond-user@gnu.org
*Sent:* Friday, December 10, 2010 5:18 PM
*Subject:* Re: Odd output
Why not set one of the notes
: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to
serve
as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly
marco.v.corr...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which
Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com writes:
Yes! Spelling does count because poorly spelled music is much harder
to read. I'm somewhat less convinced regarding sonic differences on
untempered instruments because the matter is more complicated than
that, e.g G# as the leading tone to A is
, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to
serve
as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly
On 12/10/10 8:27 PM, Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I didn't want to sound rude or anything. I just want to make a point that I do
not consider this as a minor improvement since:
1. The output is not aestetically wrong, it is definitely readable differently
from
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making some
mistake.
When compiling this example:
\include english.ly
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
{ fs'4 }
\\
{ f'4 }
}
I see two notes on fs (occupying the same position but with stems up and
down). There is no
Hello
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Marco
Correia
Sent: Fri 12/10/2010 0:35
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Odd output
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making some
mistake.
When
34 matches
Mail list logo
