Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be
played for example with 2 or 3?
I agree with David and Ralph: put them on top of each other or at
oppisite
On Sat, May 5, 2018, 7:35 AM Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
>
> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be
> played for example with 2 or 3? I normally writ
Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
>
> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be
> played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write
>
> \finger "2(3)"
>
This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be
played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write
\finger "2(3)"
or
\finger "2/3"
but I'm not sure this is co
proach is that it creates TextScript objects,
so in case a score (as in my real project) is using some padding for
TextScript objects then the custom fingering will be placed away from
the note.
[ . . . ]
However I wonder if a better fallback could be provided when using a
letter with \finger.
As Feta number
for
TextScript objects then the custom fingering will be placed away from
the note.
[ . . . ]
However I wonder if a better fallback could be provided when using a
letter with \finger.
As Feta numbers look as bold serif fonts, shouldn't the t in `\finger
"3t"` fall back to serif inste
\finger 4 \fontsize #-2.5 \raise #0.03
\bold t }
The downside of this approach is that it creates TextScript objects, so
in case a score (as in my real project) is using some padding for
TextScript objects then the custom fingering will be placed away from
the note.
Even if I was able to c
Il giorno gio 3 mag 2018 alle 9:47, Torsten =?iso-8859-1?q?H=E4mmerle?=
<"torsten.haemmerle"@web.de> ha scritto:
Hi all,
And the remaining problem of \finger in this case is that \finger
(just as
\number) uses the Feta numbers from the Emmentaler notation font.
As this font does not
I have short music exercises (for accordion) that I would like to engrave
with alternate fingering like in the following example:
\version "2.19.81"
\fixed c' {c-2 d-3 e-2 f-3 g-2 a-3 b-4 c'-5}
\fixed c' {c-1 d-2 e-3 f-4 g-2 a-3 b-4 c'-5}
\fixed c' {c-1 d-2 e-3 f-4 g-2 a\
Federico Bruni writes:
> Il giorno mer 2 mag 2018 alle 8:49, Gianmaria Lari
> ha scritto:
>>
>> Not sure that this is what you want, but what about
>>
>>> \version "2.19.81"
>>> { a\finger "3t"}
>>
>> ?
>
> Well, this produces the same output of
t2 e2
>> }
>>
>>
>
> This is perfect, thanks.
> I think this should be added to the LSR.
>
> However lilypond is using a sans serif font for the t. How can I set
> it to serif?
> Also, the t seems bigger than the number. See attached image.
#(format "~dt
Il giorno mer 2 mag 2018 alle 8:49, Gianmaria Lari
ha scritto:
On 2 May 2018 at 08:46, Federico Bruni wrote:
Hi all
How can I create custom fingerings which are made of a number and a
letter?
I want to display 3t, 2t, etc.
I found this
Il giorno mer 2 mag 2018 alle 8:56, David Kastrup ha
scritto:
Federico Bruni writes:
Hi all
How can I create custom fingerings which are made of a number and a
letter?
I want to display 3t, 2t, etc.
I found this snippet in the LSR:
;> >> {
>> >> c\t1 d\t2 e2
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >
>> > interesting! As you know David, to indicate a finger on the 4th row of
>> the
>> > accordion right keyboard, we circle the finger number. This same notation
>> >
now David, to indicate a finger on the 4th row of
> the
> > accordion right keyboard, we circle the finger number. This same notation
> > is used on violin/guitar etc. to indicate a chord number.
> > For example if I need to indicate a "c" pitch to play on the 4th ro
guitar etc. to indicate a chord number.
> For example if I need to indicate a "c" pitch to play on the 4th row I
> write "c\4".
>
> Wouldn't be better to define a custom fingering function for that so that
> it is treated as a fingering?
Uh, the above is a custom fing
d on violin/guitar etc. to indicate a chord number.
For example if I need to indicate a "c" pitch to play on the 4th row I
write "c\4".
Wouldn't be better to define a custom fingering function for that so that
it is treated as a fingering?
Thank you, g.
P.S. Sorry Federico for my misinterpretation
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Federico Bruni writes:
> Hi all
>
> How can I create custom fingerings which are made of a number and a
> letter?
> I want to display 3t, 2t, etc.
>
> I found this snippet in the LSR:
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=83
>
> but it allows to use only one character.
>
>
Hi all
How can I create custom fingerings which are made of a number and a
letter?
I want to display 3t, 2t, etc.
I found this snippet in the LSR:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=83
but it allows to use only one character.
Thanks in advance
Federico
k whether a stencil is present before trying to
> change it. At least it calms down my paranoia ...
>
> adjustFC =
> \override Staff.FingeringColumn.before-line-breaking =
> #(lambda (grob)
>"Sets @code{snap-radius} of @code{FingeringCol
"Sets @code{snap-radius} of @code{FingeringColumn} to @code{3} and
applies @code{centered-stencil} to every fingering-stencil"
(let* ((fingerings (ly:grob-object grob 'fingerings))
(fingering-ls
(if (ly:grob-array? fingerings)
2018-02-22 10:58 GMT+01:00 Gianmaria Lari :
> Dear Harm,
>
> thank you for your really nice help. Your fix worked well and now your
> example is perfect!
>
> I hope others will take advantage of it.
>
> I copy here the final working code with a screenshot.
Glad you like
adius} of @code{FingeringColumn} to @code{3} and
applies @code{centered-stencil} to every fingering-stencil"
(let* ((fingerings (ly:grob-object grob 'fingerings))
(fingering-ls
(if (ly:grob-array? fingerings)
(ly:grob-ar
gt;> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You can splay it out using Y-offset:
>> >> >> <d'-\tweak Y-offset 0.7 \4 b \3 g-\tweak Y-offset -0.9 -2 >1
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Do you kno
eone else knows if it’s possible to control the vertical
> >> >>> spacing within the staff;
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> You can splay it out using Y-offset:
> >> >> <d'-\tweak Y-offset 0.7 \4 b \3 g-\twea
t;
>> >> You can splay it out using Y-offset:
>> >> <d'-\tweak Y-offset 0.7 \4 b \3 g-\tweak Y-offset -0.9 -2 >1
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you know Robin, if there is any way to avoid the "\tweak ..." and
>> > make
>> >
2 >1
> >
> >
> > Do you know Robin, if there is any way to avoid the "\tweak ..." and make
> > Lilypond automatically spacing the fingering/stringNumber elements?
> >
> > Thank you, g.
>
>
>
> How about:
>
> \version "2.19.81&qu
ing within the staff;
>>
>>
>> You can splay it out using Y-offset:
>> <d'-\tweak Y-offset 0.7 \4 b \3 g-\tweak Y-offset -0.9 -2 >1
>
>
> Do you know Robin, if there is any way to avoid the "\tweak ..." and make
> Lilypond automa
4 b \3 g-\tweak Y-offset -0.9 -2 >1
>
Do you know Robin, if there is any way to avoid the "\tweak ..." and make
Lilypond automatically spacing the fingering/stringNumber elements?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
Thank you Robin and DJF for your kind help!
I made some experiments that I post here so that other can take advantages
of them or improve them. Attached the output result.
%overlapping fingering
\version "2.19.81"
\fixed c' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left) \set stringNumberOr
DJF wrote:
perhaps someone else knows if it’s possible to control the vertical spacing within the staff;
You can splay it out using Y-offset:
1
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But now the number inside the circle are too small. How could I keep the size
> like in the first example and keep the fingering more separated?
> My english didn't help me :) I would like to keep the different
ke to keep the different fingering
elements in a vertical line but introduce some space between them.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
How could I keep the
> size like in the first example and keep the fingering more separated?
>
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I would like to write some fingering information on the left of the notes
like this:
[image: Inline images 2]
As you can see I need that some numbers are specified inside circles (on
the button accordion this means that the finger has to be played on the
additional rows). This is the code I used
are using a dots system instead of letters
for
right-hand fingerings to avoid any confusion.
But your proposition of capital letters instead, is very interesting in
that
context.
Capital letters for right hand fingering are standard in Banjo TABS. I
never have seen it different.
Thomas
gt; 4
< c-\RH #2 e g > 4
}
<<
\new Voice \mus
\new TabVoice \mus
Am 29.01.2018 00:58, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
2018-01-28 19:52 GMT+01:00 Blöchl Bernhard
<b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net>:
I experimente with this fingering notation:
\version "2.19.80"
\
Éric writes:
> Thomas Morley-2 wrote
>> Though, you're right in so far as TabStaff is usually regarded as a
>> notation where already is shown what to _do_.
>> Thus, fingerings, stroke-finger, string-numbers are superfluous.
>
> I think a tablature is a notation showing
Hi,
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> Though, you're right in so far as TabStaff is usually regarded as a
> notation where already is shown what to _do_.
> Thus, fingerings, stroke-finger, string-numbers are superfluous.
I think a tablature is a notation showing where_to_go but not how_to_do_it.
So
Hi,
2018-01-28 19:52 GMT+01:00 Blöchl Bernhard <b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net>:
> I experimente with this fingering notation:
>
> \version "2.19.80"
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \TabStaff
This should go into TabVoice not TabStaff, imho
> \o
thanks for details and correcting my beginner mistakes.
This code compile (in Frescobaldi 3.0) but with error message for me, for
both fingerings :
side-axis not set for grob StrokeFinger
while there is no message error when I compile it using LilyBin on line :
\version "2.19.60"
#(define RH
I experimente with this fingering notation:
\version "2.19.80"
\layout {
\context {
\TabStaff
\override StrokeFinger.digit-names = ##("P" "I" "M" "A" "X")
\consists New_fingering_engraver
strokeFingerOrientations
Éric <eric.bell...@yahoo.fr> writes:
> Hello
> expending the thread "TAB with right hand fingering?", it's a pity it is
> not usable in chords with more than 1 fingering?
> Even with only 1 fingering in a chord, it works only when attached to the
> 1rst note
Hello
expending the thread "TAB with right hand fingering?", it's a pity it is
not usable in chords with more than 1 fingering?
Even with only 1 fingering in a chord, it works only when attached to the
1rst note like this :
#(define RH rightHandFinger)
\score {
\new TabStaff \
8 GMT+01:00 Blöchl Bernhard <b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net>:
How to get capital letters for right hand fingering? I add an example code.
#(define RH rightHandFinger)
\new Staff \relative c' {
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'( down)
c-\RH #1 e-\RH #2 g-\RH #3 c-\RH #4
}
#
Hi Bernhard,
Here's a snippet that shows how to customize the RH fingering :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=409
HTH, Cheers,
Pierre
2018-01-28 11:58 GMT+01:00 Blöchl Bernhard <b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net>
:
> How to get capital letters for right hand fingering? I add an exa
How to get capital letters for right hand fingering? I add an example
code.
#(define RH rightHandFinger)
\new Staff \relative c' {
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'( down)
c-\RH #1 e-\RH #2 g-\RH #3 c-\RH #4
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
>>
> >> The following code is pretty the same except I added the fingering
> >> to the notes...
> >>
> >> \version "2.19.65"
> >> \score {
> >> \articulate
> >> \fixed c'' { d^.-1 c^.-1 d^.-1 c^.-1} %wit
Ben <soundsfromso...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 10/2/2017 6:17 AM, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>> This code works as expected...
>>
>> The following code is pretty the same except I added the fingering
>> to the notes...
>>
>> \version "2.19.65"
On 10/2/2017 6:17 AM, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
This code works as expected...
The following code is pretty the same except I added the fingering to
the notes...
\version "2.19.65"
\score {
\articulate
\fixed c'' { d^.-1 c^.-1 d^.-1 c^.-1} %with fingering
This code works as expected...
\version "2.19.65"
\include "articulate.ly"
\score {
\articulate
\fixed c' {d^. c^. d^. c^.} %without fingering
\layout {}
\midi { }
}
the generated midi file is 'staccato' and because of \articulate the
generated music score
Very welcome Marco,
Look at this
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(down right up)
4
The 1 shall be below the c
The 3 to the right of the e
The 5 above the chord
The individual directions in the #'( ) determine where each fingering is
placed.
Good?
Mark
-Original Message-
From
helpful from FingeringColumn, but I didn't
found any useful pointers apart from the ones grob-interface delivers.
Is it really not possible to get Fingering from FingeringColumn directly ??
(one could catch the PaperColumn and then filter for Fingerings, but
this sounds clumsy...)
Also, fingering
Marco,
Have a look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#fingering-instructions
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Marco Bianchi
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 1:39 AM
To: lilypond
gt; Is it really not possible to get Fingering from FingeringColumn directly ??
>> (one could catch the PaperColumn and then filter for Fingerings, but
>> this sounds clumsy...)
>>
>> Also, fingeringOrientations set left, not only prints Fingering at the
>> left, but also le
Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> I tried to get something helpful from FingeringColumn, but I didn't
> found any useful pointers apart from the ones grob-interface delivers.
> Is it really not possible to get Fingering from FingeringColumn directly ??
>
2017-09-19 21:51 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
> Marco Bianchi <mr.whi...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to have all the fingerings aligned to the left as in the picture.
>> Is there a way to move independently every single fingering ins
David this is great!
Thank you
On 19/09/2017 21:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Marco Bianchi <mr.whi...@gmail.com> writes:
Hi,
I'm trying to have all the fingerings aligned to the left as in the picture.
Is there a way to move independently every single fingering inside the chord?
My work
Marco Bianchi <mr.whi...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to have all the fingerings aligned to the left as in the picture.
> Is there a way to move independently every single fingering inside the chord?
> My workaround (see the code) it's not perfect and uses an hidden n
09/2017 20:09, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Marco,
Have a look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#fingering-instructions
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Marco Bianchi
Sen
Hi,
I'm trying to have all the fingerings aligned to the left as in the picture.
Is there a way to move independently every single fingering inside the
chord?
My workaround (see the code) it's not perfect and uses an hidden note in
a second voice.
Thank you very much,
have a nice day.
Marco
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:45 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
> >> > move it to a layout block:
> >> >
> >> > \layout { \omit Fi
Hi
Am 25.06.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Ivanov Dmitry:
> Would it be better to move:
>
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
>
> to the layout block as well? Or keep it as is?
Fist, \omit is always equivalent to setting the stencil to false
Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
>> > move it to a layout block:
>> >
>> > \layout { \omit Fingering }
>>
>> Great. Would it be better to move:
>>
>> \onc
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
> > move it to a layout block:
> >
> > \layout { \omit Fingering }
>
> Great. Would it be better to move:
>
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
> move it to a layout block:
>
> \layout { \omit Fingering }
Great. Would it be better to move:
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
to the layout block as well? Or keep it as is?
On 6/25/17, Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plu
Signature #'stencil = ##f
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
> \omit Fingering
> \relative g'' { <<
> \new Voice \relative c''{
> \voiceOne
> c2_2_[]
> }
> \new Voice \relative g''{
>
I have a problem with several voices:
\version "2.18.2"
\language "english"
\paper {
indent = 0
}
\new Staff \relative f''{
\time 2/4
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
\omit Fingering
\relative g'' {
t;
> >> > You have the right idea already ;-)
> >> > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
> >> >
> >> > Try
> >> >
> >> > \override Fingering.stencil = ##f
> >> >
> >> > (I hope this syntax works with 2.18)
&
Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Manuela Gößnitzer <pressephotogra...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > You have the right idea already ;-)
>> > The Fingering stenc
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Manuela Gößnitzer <pressephotogra...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > You have the right idea already ;-)
> > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
> >
> > Try
> >
> > \override Fin
Manuela Gößnitzer <pressephotogra...@gmail.com> writes:
> Try
>
> \override Fingering.stencil = ##f
David Kastrup<d...@gnu.org> writes:
> As does
>
>\omit Fingering
Thanks a lot. Both variants work.
___
lilypond-u
Manuela Gößnitzer <pressephotogra...@gmail.com> writes:
> You have the right idea already ;-)
> The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
>
> Try
>
> \override Fingering.stencil = ##f
>
> (I hope this syntax works with 2.18)
As does
\omi
You have the right idea already ;-)
The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
Try
\override Fingering.stencil = ##f
(I hope this syntax works with 2.18)
2017-06-25 2:52 GMT+02:00 Ivanov Dmitry <usr...@gmail.com>:
> This code will output "c" note with number &quo
This code will output "c" note with number "3" above it. I learned,
how to hide the cleff and the time signature. How can I hide the
fingering as well without removing "-3" from "c8-3". I need to
generate a pdf without fingers sometimes and don't wa
On 04.12.2016 23:45, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
Any reason why you use attachment instead to directly copy and paste
your code? I was thinking that for snippet was better the latter
because the user can read the code without having to open the file
Good causes can be made for both. Using
Hi, I am a new user of Lilypond.
Since on the topic of finger: As Frescobaldi has a tool of Quick remove
fingering, is there is a way a snippet to automatically add fingering of
numeric tonic name).
I understand this may be under keybord data-entry issue not a engraver
issue?
ching
Thank you David, it works perfectly!
I started to read the "Defining new contexts" and it looks clear (even if
not trivial).
Ciao, g.
P.S. Any reason why you use attachment instead to directly copy and paste
your code? I was thinking that for snippet was better the latter because
the user can
Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there any way to specify the fingering in a specific context? I tried
> this without success:
>
> \version "2.19.49"
>
> \score
> {
> <<
> \new Staff {c' d' e' f'}
> \n
Is there any way to specify the fingering in a specific context? I tried
this without success:
\version "2.19.49"
\score
{
<<
\new Staff {c' d' e' f'}
\new Dynamics {s4-1 s4-2 s4-3 s4-4}
>>
\layout { }
}
Thank you, g.
___
Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>> > c4 \chordmode {f, f,}
>> > e \chordmode {e, e,}
>> > \partial 2 b \chordmode {e,}
>>
>> [graphics]
>>
>> If that input corresponds to the printed output you gave, I want to see
>> the code producing the output.
>>
>>
> No, it doesn't
the term "colored", you'll find lots of useful
> things for that purpose:
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=colored=0=10
>
> Cheers,
> Klaus
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.
> nabble.com/highlight-music-fingering-t
one highlighting some music aspect (fingering,
dynamics, composer suggestion etc.). But with paper we have to choose a
good compromise. In the specific case my target are young child, so I
prefer to be a bit more explicit and verbose.
Ciao, g.
___
lilypond
>
> > c4 \chordmode {f, f,}
> > e \chordmode {e, e,}
> > \partial 2 b \chordmode {e,}
>
> [graphics]
>
> If that input corresponds to the printed output you gave, I want to see
> the code producing the output.
>
>
No, it doesn't correspond. Have a look to this code and to attached images:
>
> > c4 \chordmode {f, f,}
> > e \chordmode {e, e,}
> > \partial 2 b \chordmode {e,}
>
[...]
> At any rate, in current versions you can write
>
> \chordmode {
> 4 f f
>e:7 e:7
>e:7 e:7
> }
>
> Doesn't mix with \relative though. Not a problem for accordion I guess.
>
I don't use
lly I think colours are ideal because they provide something
like an independent dimension, but of course that requires colour
printing as well.
Urs
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/highlight-music-fingering-tp196636p196661.html
1069038.n5.nabble.com/highlight-music-fingering-tp196636p196661.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Tue 15 Nov 2016 at 10:13:24 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> Ciao Urs,
>
> sorry not beeing able to be more clear! yes, second time it's different.
> Anyway, attached you can find the complete pdf.
>
> I was hoping there was a standard procedure :) Boxing looks a bit too
> "intrusive", bold
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> In the score there are both versions. The score "audience" are children; I
> would like that they pay attention to the fact the music is similar but not
> identical.
>
> Have a look to the attached files (fragments from Greensleves for
>
<u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
>
>> Am 15.11.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I need an advice. Suppose you have two very similar fragments of
>musica,
>> > maybe very few notes change or maybe just the fingering ch
gt; wrote:
> Am 15.11.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need an advice. Suppose you have two very similar fragments of musica,
> > maybe very few notes change or maybe just the fingering changes.
> >
> > How do you highlight the differences
Am 15.11.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> Hello,
>
> I need an advice. Suppose you have two very similar fragments of musica,
> maybe very few notes change or maybe just the fingering changes.
>
> How do you highlight the differences to avoid the player makes mistakes
Hello,
I need an advice. Suppose you have two very similar fragments of musica,
maybe very few notes change or maybe just the fingering changes.
How do you highlight the differences to avoid the player makes mistakes
playing it? Does exist a standard way to do it?
Thank you, g
2016-09-02 21:36 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>:
> Warrants a ticket I'd say.
It's now:
Issue 4964 fingeringOrientations don't deal properly with omitted
Fingering-stencils
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/is
2016-09-02 18:27 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> 2016-09-02 16:44 GMT+02:00 Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson <hinrik@gmail.com>:
>>> If I want to omit the fingering instructions for some part of a scor
Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2016-09-02 16:44 GMT+02:00 Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson <hinrik@gmail.com>:
>> If I want to omit the fingering instructions for some part of a score or the
>> entire thing, I put "\omit Fingering" in the app
2016-09-02 16:44 GMT+02:00 Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson <hinrik@gmail.com>:
> If I want to omit the fingering instructions for some part of a score or the
> entire thing, I put "\omit Fingering" in the appopriate place. However, it
> results in warnings ("prog
If I want to omit the fingering instructions for some part of a score or
the entire thing, I put "\omit Fingering" in the appopriate place. However,
it results in warnings ("programming error: Infinity or NaN encountered")
if "\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)&
Thanks, that's perfect.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-default-fingering-location-for-lower-staff-in-a-grand-staff-tp191855p191861.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Michael,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Michael Rivers [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n191855...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Is there a way to set the default location for fingering in the lower
> staff of a grand staff to be below the staff rather than above? I realize
> that I
201 - 300 of 1060 matches
Mail list logo