Re: Custom keypad for streamlining LilyPond input - thoughts?

On 4/7/2022 7:34 PM, Nikolai Hedler wrote: Has something like this been done before for LilyPond? I am reminded of Denemo. " Denemo allows you to use the numeric keypad as a kind of rhythm instrument – you play in a phrase or two of the music using the number keys to

Re: Custom keypad for streamlining LilyPond input - thoughts?

You might check out Companion , which is an open source alternative to the stream deck software. It can run on a Stream Deck or any touch interface that can access the web UI over a network (like a smartphone). You can make graphic icons for the buttons. For what

Re: Custom keypad for streamlining LilyPond input - thoughts?

After some research, I found some discussion of a software tool Nicolas built that had a similar intention; from what I can tell, his strategy was to use this software to interpret input from a standard keyboard as LilyPond functions, rather than using separate hardware. The obvious advantage of

Re: Custom keypad for streamlining LilyPond input - thoughts?

Le 08/04/2022 à 02:34, Nikolai Hedler a écrit : 3. Has something like this been done before for LilyPond? You might be interested in discussing this with Nicolas Sceaux, who did something similar if I recall correctly. https://editions-nicolas-sceaux.fr/ Best, Jean

Custom keypad for streamlining LilyPond input - thoughts?

Hello! First things first: I'm not planning any commercial ventures. This is a personal project, and I'm happy to share any details with others interested in something similar. In brief, I wanted to see if I could simplify and speed up the process of transcribing music into LilyPond, and it

RE: print-page-number = yes - made the page number go away? And other thoughts.

@gnu.org Subject: print-page-number = yes - made the page number go away? And other thoughts. So I have been looking for this page number thing having seen nothing. But toying around and working on the automated diagram Flute script of notes I noticed after having 2 pages that it was putting

print-page-number = yes - made the page number go away? And other thoughts.

So I have been looking for this page number thing having seen nothing. But toying around and working on the automated diagram Flute script of notes I noticed after having 2 pages that it was putting it on, and fixed for another page having 3 in total, and pages 2 and 3 does put numbers on it.

Some thoughts on narrowing, was Re: How to compile Lilypond files using Emacs?

On Mon 27 Jul 2020 at 17:02:15 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote: > The issue is not WIndows specific. You need to add a line similar to > this in your emacs init file to get the compile to work: > > ;; lilypond > (setq LilyPond-lilypond-command "lilypond -I ~/lib/lilypond >

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

Urs, > I think you're missing something: the double backslash construct that David > uses already creates the voices as \voiceOne \voiceTwo etc. implicitly. So if > that isn't good enough engraving-wise then setting it manually should not > make any difference Thanks for that. I had become

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

> I'm not sure about using << ... // ... >> to make it "infinitely expandable"... wouldn't the output become illegible past 4 voices? If you're mechanically generating these parts, I'd say keep it to 2 voices per staff, which is least problematic. In theory, it should be easy for the program to

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

Am 26. Oktober 2016 16:56:16 GMT-07:00, schrieb "H. S. Teoh" : >On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:52:18PM -0700, David Bellows wrote: >> > Do you use the \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree commands in the >> > generated parts? Sometimes those can help, by rendering rests for >>

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:52:18PM -0700, David Bellows wrote: > > Do you use the \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree commands in the > > generated parts? Sometimes those can help, by rendering rests for > > each voice separately. Not sure if this is the solution you're > > looking for, though. >

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

> Do you use the \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree commands in the generated parts? Sometimes those can help, by rendering rests for each voice separately. Not sure if this is the solution you're looking for, though. I had been but keeping it all straight and making the process infinitely

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:10:49PM -0700, David Bellows wrote: > I have a large computer music generating program that I'm creating. > One of the things it does is generate sheet music for the generated > music using Lilypond. It works really well. > > When dealing with one or two voices

Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

So sorry everyone, I forgot to use reply all. Here's my latest message: Ok, this all might be confusing so I've attached two example pngs showing the collisions. The use_rest.png file uses rests like c'4/rest while no_rest just uses regular rests like r4. I know I could manipulate these manually

Re: Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

Hi David, > When dealing with one or two voices everything's fine. But I just > added a musical style that uses three voices and collisions with rests > are occurring. [more stuff on avoiding rest collisions snipped] You may wish to look at http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=336 That should

Any thoughts on how to automatically avoid rest collisions in polyphonic music?

I have a large computer music generating program that I'm creating. One of the things it does is generate sheet music for the generated music using Lilypond. It works really well. When dealing with one or two voices everything's fine. But I just added a musical style that uses three voices and

Re: Thoughts on Frescobaldi...

Edward Ardzinski writes: > As for snippets - so far I've added a generic variable, generic drum > high/low variable, the code to set a midi instrument, a drum staff, and a > comment break (just a percent sign followed by a bunch of asterisks). As I > have been

Thoughts on Frescobaldi...

in all, I'm very pleased with both the new version of Lilypond and Frescobaldi. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-on-Frescobaldi-tp182350.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Blöchl Bernhard writes: > Am 05.10.2015 02:29, schrieb Ivan Kuznetsov: >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings >> wrote: > >>> >>> How would somebody like me gain access to vi (and other Unix-like >>> tools)? >> > > Recommended:

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Am 05.10.2015 08:32, schrieb David Kastrup: ... LilyPond somewhere offers a lilydev VM that can be started under Windows. ... http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilydev There is a chapter Installing LilyDev in VirtualBox May be that is what David mentioned? (I

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Am 05.10.2015 02:29, schrieb Ivan Kuznetsov: On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings wrote: How would somebody like me gain access to vi (and other Unix-like tools)? Recommended: Trash Windows, free yourself and use Linux and Frescobaldi Second best:

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Quarto Nonas Novembres MMXV scripsit Ivan Kuznetsov : > > How would somebody like me gain access to vi (and other Unix-like tools)? > > By using Lilypond under Linux. For the specific case of vi(m), there is a perfectly fine version of gvim for Windows (this is usually the very first program I

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/10/15 03:40, Colin Campbell wrote: > On 15-10-04 06:29 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings >> wrote: >>> I'm a former Bell Labs engineer, where I used Unix (vi, awk, >>> shell,

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On 10/4/15 8:40 PM, "Colin Campbell" wrote: >On 15-10-04 06:29 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings >>wrote: >>> I'm a former Bell Labs engineer, where I used Unix (vi, awk, shell, >>>etc.) everyday. >>> I got so used

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On 15-10-04 06:29 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings wrote: I'm a former Bell Labs engineer, where I used Unix (vi, awk, shell, etc.) everyday. I got so used to using those tools, and I find I miss their power... I'm really

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:51:49AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Paul Scott writes: > > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote: > >> Hear, hear! > >> > >> Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: > >> >Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi > > > > Or Emacs! > > At the

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Paul Scott wrote: Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi Or Emacs! Oh no .. not a Vi(m) vs Emacs discussion again! Do I see a connection with the average age thread that was here recently? (many 50+ people here) BTW: I use Vim. Not because it's better or worse but

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Paul Scott writes: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:51:49AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> Paul Scott writes: >> >> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote: >> >> Hear, hear! >> >> >> >> Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: >> >> >Do yourself a

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far.

mber a day without it. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-18-2-Thoughts-so-far-tp181962p181977.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ___ > lilypond

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/15 09:08, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Paul Scott wrote: > Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi >> >> Or Emacs! > > Oh no .. not a Vi(m) vs Emacs discussion again! Do I see a > connection with the average age

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far.

I donwloaded and installed Frescobaldi. I'm giving it a test run now, finishing up a piece I'm working on. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-18-2-Thoughts-so-far-tp181962p181991.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far.

I think I'm going to like Frescobaldi - especially building up the snippets I need... Now to see how long I stay on this version. LOL Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-18-2-Thoughts-so-far-tp181962p181992.html Sent from the User mailing list

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far.

On 2015-10-04 22:00, Edward Ardzinski wrote: I think I'm going to like Frescobaldi - especially building up the snippets I need... Now to see how long I stay on this version. LOL One (of many) advantages with using Frescobaldi is that you can configure it for multiple versions of Lilypond.

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings wrote: > > I'm a former Bell Labs engineer, where I used Unix (vi, awk, shell, etc.) > everyday. > I got so used to using those tools, and I find I miss their power... > > I'm really struggling to learn how to use the "tools"

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Edward Ardzinski writes: > 1) I was apparently following some good practices in 2.6.5, since what I've > done in 2.18.2 has been essentially seamless. But... > > a) I miss my old editor, as I had a lot of code shortcuts built in it. > Still, I had not

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

o revise, even using the same version. I have some re-learnin's to do. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-18-2-Thoughts-so-far-tp181962p181967.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypo

2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

. These are after all demos.. 4) One final thought, as my snippets/code are in purgatory - what's the code switch at the beginning of the input file to turn off the point-n-click in the PDF output? Thx!!! -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-18-2-Thoughts-so-far

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Edward Ardzinski wrote: 4) One final thought, as my snippets/code are in purgatory - what's the code switch at the beginning of the input file to turn off the point-n-click in the PDF output? Thx!!! In the source use: \pointAndClickOff Or on the commandline:

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi Edward Ardzinski wrote: > > with Notepad [...] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Hear, hear! Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far.

n5.nabble.com/2-18-2-Thoughts-so-far-tp181962p181977.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

Paul Scott writes: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote: >> Hear, hear! >> >> Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: >> >Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi > > Or Emacs! At the current point of time, I find LilyPond-mode not a convincing case for using Emacs. I

Re: 2.18.2 - Thoughts so far

On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote: > Hear, hear! > > Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: > >Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi Or Emacs! Paul ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-tp172123.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-hackathon-challenge-to-popularise-Lilypond-anyone-tp172123p172132.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

. I hope that answer you question. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-hackathon-challenge-to-popularise-Lilypond-anyone-tp172123p172132.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

know. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-hackathon-challenge-to-popularise-Lilypond-anyone-tp172123p172137.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-hackathon-challenge-to-popularise-Lilypond-anyone-tp172123p172133.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https

Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Jacques Menu imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote: To be sure I get you right : you’d like the users of your site to able to adapt and complement an existing score according to their taste, is that it? IMSLP supports uploading arrangements.

Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-tp172123.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Current Stack Exchange activity (was: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?)

On 11/02/2013 10:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next time! Yes, please do so. But I hope we agree that it, as Ryan wrote, would be helpful for the community if we found

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

On 2013-11-02 11:54, David Kastrup wrote: Hm, I like this idea of turning a mailing list into an entirely optional social networking medium by adding more of a feedback/scoring criterion than Report Spam. So the mailing-list continues to function as-is, with a separate system for maintaining

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Exchange. However, to those who are--What are your thoughts about creating a LilyPond Stack Exchange page? I personally love the concept of Stack Exchange, and I believe that it would be great for the LilyPond community. - Ryan McClure Luna Music Engraving -- View this message in context: http

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

I am also totally up for this idea as well. What's wrong with this list? Everybody wants to take his LilyPond business to the web interface of his choice that takes a lot of additional work over just reading and typing text and further dilutes the LilyPond knowledge. I second that. We

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

I agree with Urs that a Stack Exchange page shouldn't be instead of this list, if that was the suggestion. But as Gilberto pointed out there is already LilyPond questions asked on different Stack Exchange forums (I answered one myself earlier this week). And it seems to be some confusion

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Engraving -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153232.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: I agree with Urs that a Stack Exchange page shouldn't be instead of this list, if that was the suggestion. But as Gilberto pointed out there is already LilyPond questions asked on different Stack Exchange forums (I answered one myself earlier this

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Allow me to clarify that in no way did I intend for the Stack Exchange page to replace this list. It would have been purely an addition of resources. Well, you might answer all lilypond questions by simply pointing questioners to the list :) For me, the purpose of the Stack Exchange page

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

ryanmichaelmcclure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com writes: Allow me to clarify that in no way did I intend for the Stack Exchange page to replace this list. It would have been purely an addition of resources. For me, the purpose of the Stack Exchange page is about accessibility to those who

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

On 11/02/2013 08:28 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Well, they are on-topic in this mailing list. If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next time! But I hope we agree that it, as Ryan wrote, would be helpful

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next time! Yes, please do so. But I hope we agree that it, as Ryan wrote, would be helpful for the community if we found ways to deal with questions posted outside

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

On 11/02/2013 10:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next time! Yes, please do so. No problem! Then I suppose I should also post that answer to the meta question I linked

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next time! Yes, please do so. But I hope we agree that it, as Ryan wrote, would be helpful for the community if we found ways

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Then I suppose I should also post that answer to the meta question I linked to previously!? I think this would be good, yes. So, is this the link to give? https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user It depends. For casual users, the gmane interface is perhaps better suited, thus

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

On 11/02/2013 11:16 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: It depends. For casual users, the gmane interface is perhaps better suited, thus the link should rather be http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general Maybe it is even better to send them directly to the posting!?

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/02/2013 11:16 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: It depends. For casual users, the gmane interface is perhaps better suited, thus the link should rather be http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general Maybe it is even better to send them

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Maybe it is even better to send them directly to the posting!? http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general Probably. I don't use gmane at all, so I can't give a recommendation. However, as with StackExchange, people should *search* first before post something whether

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Hi, my 3 eurocents: 1) StackExchange is great. It's QA style of sharing knowledge is very efficient and pleasure to work with. 2) LilyPond is too small to have its own StackExcange site. If you look at http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/10733/leaving-beta-requirements you'll

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: when all you have is a hammer, every problem starts looking like a nail. Mailing lists are an all-purpose communication tool. Many things can be done using a mailing list, but some things may be done more efficiently using other tools - for

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153253.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

On 2013-11-02 05:52, David Kastrup wrote: Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com writes: I am also totally up for this idea as well. What's wrong with this list? Everybody wants to take his LilyPond business to the web interface of his choice that takes a lot of additional work

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

with this mailing-list :) Regards to all, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153253.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Hilary Snaden h...@newearth.demon.co.uk writes: On 2013-11-02 05:52, David Kastrup wrote: Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com writes: I am also totally up for this idea as well. What's wrong with this list? Everybody wants to take his LilyPond business to the web interface of

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

for the record as another option, not to suggest that it should be used or not (I don't know that much about it in any case). Best to all, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153269.html Sent from

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes: janek.lilypond wrote QA sites like StackExchange are better for sharing QA knowledge than mailing lists because they allow to edit information, update it, remove duplicates, and make order. I think this is a good point. The mailing list is

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153273.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

I'm not sure if many of you are familiar with Stack Exchange. However, to those who are--What are your thoughts about creating a LilyPond Stack Exchange page? I personally love the concept of Stack Exchange, and I believe that it would be great for the LilyPond community. - Ryan McClure

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Hello Ryan: On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 16:30 -0700, ryanmichaelmcclure wrote: What are your thoughts about creating a LilyPond Stack Exchange page? I have found the LaTex Stack Exchange very useful. I think that LilyPond would definitely benefit from a Stack Exchange-type website. I don't mean

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153218.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

I am very much in favour of it, see this post from *exactly* one year ago: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-11/msg00018.html Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

to. - Ryan McClure Luna Music Engraving -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153220.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Performance, but I think it is extremely uninteresting and vulgar (IMO, it consists mainly of questions about guitar tabs or which guitar to buy or which guitar did [insert famous guitar player name here] use). -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about

Re: Thoughts about creating Stack Exchange page?

Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com writes: I am also totally up for this idea as well. What's wrong with this list? Everybody wants to take his LilyPond business to the web interface of his choice that takes a lot of additional work over just reading and typing text and further

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

On 7 Feb 2013, at 23:33 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: The regular one doesn't, the full-Boehm instrument does. See e.g. this example: http://www.clarinetsdirect.biz/RC-F279670.html But that also has the low-ees, because it still is a soprano it sounds higher then the low-ees in the

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

On 02/08/2013 10:11 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: But that also has the low-ees, because it still is a soprano it sounds higher then the low-ees in the bass-clarinet. The key lay-out is similar as the basset-clarinet (which is in A, not B flat). Confusing all this is ... Not really ... ?

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl writes: On 7 Feb 2013, at 23:33 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: That is not that easy, it is not ly-code, but Scheme code and tougher (more and more stacked upon another) as I expected. The basic files involved are together already 3200 lines (some are

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

But it also looks like we should look into autoload here. There is no point loading this sort of baggage into every LilyPond run. Does guile support autoload out of the box? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

And hopefully loads once then :-) Regards, Wim. On 8 Feb 2013, at 10:49 , Werner LEMBERG wrote: But it also looks like we should look into autoload here. There is no point loading this sort of baggage into every LilyPond run. Does guile support autoload out of the box? Werner

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: But it also looks like we should look into autoload here. There is no point loading this sort of baggage into every LilyPond run. Does guile support autoload out of the box? Seemingly in connection with modules. -- David Kastrup

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

Does guile support autoload out of the box? Seemingly in connection with modules. IIRC, there are attempts to have lilypond modules as soon as we migrate to guile2, so this would be a nice benefit... Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: Does guile support autoload out of the box? Seemingly in connection with modules. IIRC, there are attempts to have lilypond modules as soon as we migrate to guile2, so this would be a nice benefit... Reality check: the current codebase already uses

Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

Hi Joseph, Mike, I've looked into different brand/models (as far as my friends and knowledge reaches) and had my thoughts on it (so it is may be not exhausting enough!). Meanwhile I also studied the underlying code (which is both daunting and haunting) and I see the following model(s

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

On 02/07/2013 02:26 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: clarinet-family -- clarinet (what we have now, but without the hole) hole ? I guess you mean the extra touchpiece on the LH 1st finger? Ideally you'd like to have some backwards compatibility, so I suggest keeping clarinet for the base

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

On 7 Feb 2013, at 18:46 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 02/07/2013 02:26 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: clarinet-family -- clarinet (what we have now, but without the hole) hole ? I guess you mean the extra touchpiece on the LH 1st finger? Internally it is coded as hole, h :-)

Re: Streamlining my thoughts on the clarinet woodwind-diagrams

On 02/07/2013 09:22 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: Mmmh, that (lh . (gis)) is already taken for the upper key, using the same, not completly describing name will again confuse others. OK, fair enough, clarinet-lh-low-gis is better, then. I'd use clarinet-full-boehm as the name for the clarinet

Re: Thoughts on Midge (was: Re: [midi] Re: Articulate midi script)

On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:15:21 +1000 Peter Chubb lily.u...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote: Grammostola == Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: Grammostola David Raleigh Arnold wrote: Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The syntax is completely

Thoughts on Midge (was: Re: [midi] Re: Articulate midi script)

Grammostola == Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: Grammostola David Raleigh Arnold wrote: Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU. It is dedicated to midi, not notation. Why not find

Thoughts on Midge (was: Re: [midi] Re: Articulate midi script)

Grammostola == Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: Grammostola David Raleigh Arnold wrote: Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU. It is dedicated to midi, not notation. Why not find

Re: Numbers in variable names Re: thoughts

For example, you can define your own music function that has a single numerical argument (for example to modify some spacing parameters). The syntax for such a function would be exacty of the form \myvar 1. /Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would expect that \myvar1 refers to the variable

  1   2   >