(OpenSUSE Leap 15.3 to be precise)
So I've downloaded 2.23.7 and untarred into ~/Software/lilypond-2.23.7, created
a symbolic link from ~/Software/lilypond-2.23.7/bin/lilypond to ~/bin/lilypond,
and get the following...
> ~/bin/lilypond --version
GNU LilyPond 2.23.7 (running Guile 2.2)
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 5:04 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:01 PM Kevin Cole wrote:
>>
>> In my more-than-minimal example, the b16 from the first voice gets
>> merged with the b8. from the second voice. When I tried to create a
>> minimum (non-working) example, the two
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 4:09 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> > this is unrelated to ChordNames. Rather it just remaps chords
> > from \chordmode depending on Fretboards.
>
> I don't know how they interact exactly… Carl: Any comment on whether or
> not
Hi Valentin,
> this is unrelated to ChordNames. Rather it just remaps chords
> from \chordmode depending on Fretboards.
I don't know how they interact exactly… Carl: Any comment on whether or not
there's any intersection between Valentin's work and the GSoC work you
did/mentored?
Thanks,
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 21:39 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user
discussion wrote:
> I think I see where to fix this in Guile 2.2, let me try.
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1270 indeed fixes
it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Kevin,
Form what I see, the voices are interchanged.
What is in voiceOne should be voiceTwo and vice versa.
See:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/learning/i_0027m-hearing-voices
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:01 PM Kevin Cole wrote:
> In my more-than-minimal example, the b16 from the first voice gets
> merged with the b8. from the second voice. When I tried to create a
> minimum (non-working) example, the two didn't merge. But, what I want
> below is for the b8. from the
Hi Kieren,
I do not know what GSoC you are refering to (I’m not a Lilypond veteran like
yourself), but this is unrelated to ChordNames. Rather it just remaps chords
from \chordmode depending on Fretboards.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Sonntag, 27. März 2022, 22:14:35 CEST schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
>
Hi, Jogchum,
Please use Reply All to keep the messages on the user list.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 1:00 PM Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
> Op 27-03-2022 om 20:14 schreef Carl Sorensen:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 10:31 AM Jogchum Reitsma
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Brahms' Waldesnacht has an intro
Hi Valentin,
> Recently I’ve created a small function to invert chords to match Fretboard
> Diagrams, which I’d like to share with you all.
That's really cool!
Question: Does it take into account (or even need to?) the ChordNames GSoC work
that was done a few years ago?
Thanks for this!
In my more-than-minimal example, the b16 from the first voice gets
merged with the b8. from the second voice. When I tried to create a
minimum (non-working) example, the two didn't merge. But, what I want
below is for the b8. from the first voice to merge with the b8. from
the second voice.
In
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 17:04 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Ugh, ugh, ugh.
>
> \version "2.23.7"
>
> #(display (strftime "%c" (localtime -499092417)))
> #(newline)
> #(display (strftime "%c" (localtime (+ -499092417 (expt 2 31)
>
> =>
>
> Tue Mar 9 12:13:03 1954
>
> Sun Mar 27 16:27:11
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 19:47 +0200, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> Just tested with 2.23.6 and there it works!
>
> One thing that is different between 2.23.6 and 2.23.7 is that in 2.23.6
> there is a lilypond-windows.exe but not in 2.23.7
> I tried both lilypond-windows.exe and lilypond.exe and both
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 10:31 AM Jogchum Reitsma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brahms' Waldesnacht has an intro stanza number one, and after that a
> twice repeated melody, with stanza's 2 and three.
>
>
>
> How can I achieves those stanza's to begin at the repeat?
>
Jogchum,
It would normally be better to
Just tested with 2.23.6 and there it works!
One thing that is different between 2.23.6 and 2.23.7 is that in 2.23.6
there is a lilypond-windows.exe but not in 2.23.7
I tried both lilypond-windows.exe and lilypond.exe and both works for 2.23.6
Also there is an installation program in 2.23.6,
Hi,
Brahms' Waldesnacht has an intro stanza number one, and after that a
twice repeated melody, with stanza's 2 and three.
I tried to do that by making a new voice on the repeat, and associating
the second and third stanza's with that voice.
But stanza's 2 and three appear at the first
Hello Ponders!
Recently I’ve created a small function to invert chords to match Fretboard
Diagrams, which I’d like to share with you all.
Cheers,
Valentin#(define (normalize pitch)
(if (>= (ly:pitch-alteration pitch) 1)
(normalize (ly:pitch-transpose pitch (ly:make-pitch 0 1 -1)))
Le 27/03/2022 à 16:28, Michael Gerdau a écrit :
Can you compile this test file and report back?
\version "2.23.7"
#(debug-enable 'backtrace)
#(display (current-time))
#(newline)
#(display (localtime (current-time)))
#(newline)
#(display (strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 27/03/2022 à 16:23, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> It doesn't share the same music objects for different notes since $(...)
>> makes a ly:music-deep-copy anyway that will deduplicate the elements of
>> SequentialMusic while copying them. The intermediate expression is
>>
On 2022-03-27 16:28, Michael Gerdau wrote:
Can you compile this test file and report back?
\version "2.23.7"
#(debug-enable 'backtrace)
#(display (current-time))
#(newline)
#(display (localtime (current-time)))
#(newline)
#(display (strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time
Can you compile this test file and report back?
\version "2.23.7"
#(debug-enable 'backtrace)
#(display (current-time))
#(newline)
#(display (localtime (current-time)))
#(newline)
#(display (strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time
#(newline)
Yields:
Starte lilypond.exe 2.23.7 [Ohne
Le 27/03/2022 à 16:23, David Kastrup a écrit :
It doesn't share the same music objects for different notes since $(...)
makes a ly:music-deep-copy anyway that will deduplicate the elements of
SequentialMusic while copying them. The intermediate expression is
indeed not fit for every use, but the
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 26/03/2022 à 03:23, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
>> Hope that makes it clearer?
>
>
> Yes, I understand better, thanks. I'd just suggest changing your
> snippet to
>
> \version "2.23.7"
>
> $(let ((notes (ly:music-property #{ d'> #} 'elements)))
>
Hi Jean,
> Yes, I understand better, thanks.
I can give you uncountable examples of "sugar" being more powerful than just
about anything else that's visible in Lilypond. [We all know that sugar isn't
as powerful as the amazing code underneath… but for the purposes of
Lily-vangelizing, it's
Le 26/03/2022 à 03:23, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
Hope that makes it clearer?
Yes, I understand better, thanks. I'd just suggest changing your
snippet to
\version "2.23.7"
$(let ((notes (ly:music-property #{ d'> #} 'elements)))
(make-sequential-music
(map (lambda (x)
Le 27/03/2022 à 13:31, Michael Gerdau a écrit :
Hi List,
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.7. This is
termed > a development release, but these are usually reliable. If
you want
to> use the current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using
the> 2.22.2 version.>
%% start
\version "2.23.7"
date = #(strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
%% end
gives me:
3:9: Fehler: GUILE signalisierte einen Fehler für den hier beginnenden
Ausdruck
date = #
(strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
Invalid argument
Shouldn't this work or has
Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
writes:
> Am Sonntag, dem 27.03.2022 um 13:31 +0200 schrieb Michael Gerdau:
>> %% start
>> \version "2.23.7"
>>
>> date = #(strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
>> %% end
>>
>> gives me:
>> 3:9: Fehler: GUILE signalisierte einen Fehler für
Am Sonntag, dem 27.03.2022 um 13:31 +0200 schrieb Michael Gerdau:
> %% start
> \version "2.23.7"
>
> date = #(strftime "%d.%m.%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
> %% end
>
> gives me:
> 3:9: Fehler: GUILE signalisierte einen Fehler für den hier beginnenden
> Ausdruck
> date = #
>
Hi List,
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.7. This is termed > a development release, but these are usually reliable. If you want
to> use the current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the>
2.22.2 version.> [snip]
Please test this release and let us know
Hi Samanth,
(Please keep the list in your replies, so future readers can follow the
discussion.)
When I put in the \new Staff, it does indeed prevent the nullVoice
from producing a staff ... however the chords now appear in the wrong
line ... almost as if they are being put above where the
Hi Samanth(a),
I'm producing a bassline score, with chords, notes and lyrics.
As the bassline notes are ... sparse, I'm trying to use a NullVoice to
hold the rhythm and aligning the lyrics to that (I gather this is an
approach used by others)
Despite much googling/reading of
Hi all!
I'm producing a bassline score, with chords, notes and lyrics.
As the bassline notes are ... sparse, I'm trying to use a NullVoice to hold
the rhythm and aligning the lyrics to that (I gather this is an approach
used by others)
Despite much googling/reading of
Am Sonntag, dem 27.03.2022 um 09:02 +0200 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
> You can make a symlink in ~/bin/ if you want the command to be invoked
> as 'lilypond'.
Note that this depends on your distributions, not everyone has ~/bin/
in their PATH.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Le 27/03/2022 à 09:14, Rip _Mus a écrit :
Thanks for the reply!
It is just my curiosity.
I wonder what new features the new stable version might contain.
Of course I know this is a users mailing list, I asked why maybe
someone could know more than me
All of them are listed here:
Thanks for the reply!
It is just my curiosity.
I wonder what new features the new stable version might contain.
Of course I know this is a users mailing list, I asked why maybe someone
could know more than me
Il dom 27 mar 2022, 09:04 Jean Abou Samra ha scritto:
> Le 27/03/2022 à 08:43, Rip
Le 27/03/2022 à 08:43, Rip _Mus a écrit :
Hello everyone,
what are the forecasts for the release of a new stable version? Do you
know if it will be 2.24 directly or there will be some intermediate
updates of 2.22?
I don't know and don't think anybody knows, but if there are
updates of 2.22,
Le 27/03/2022 à 01:14, Paul Scott a écrit :
I just downloaded the Linux version from from Lily web site and got a tar.gz
version instead of the .sh version I expected. Is this a change or a mistake?
A change. These are static binaries. There is no installation needed.
Just unpack them
Hello everyone,
what are the forecasts for the release of a new stable version? Do you know
if it will be 2.24 directly or there will be some intermediate updates of
2.22?
Thank you
Rip_mus
39 matches
Mail list logo
