Good points, Aaron, thank you.
-Ahanu
On Sat, May 1, 2021, 22:35 Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2021-05-01 5:56 pm, Ahanu Banerjee wrote:
> > Here you go:
> >
> > \version "2.20.0"
> > { \defineBarLine "xyz" #'("|." ".|:" "")
> > \repeat unfold 7 c'
> > c'-\tweak X-offset #5 _\markup \bold \italic
On 2021-05-01 5:56 pm, Ahanu Banerjee wrote:
Here you go:
\version "2.20.0"
{ \defineBarLine "xyz" #'("|." ".|:" "")
\repeat unfold 7 c'
c'-\tweak X-offset #5 _\markup \bold \italic "Fine"
\bar "xyz" \break
\repeat unfold 7 c' c'_\markup \bold \italic "D.C. al Fine"
\bar ":|." }
To
quot;Fine" would occur at the line break, thus requiring "|." at the end
>> >> of the first line and ".|:" at the beginning of the next line.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Ahanu
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, May 1, 2021, 20:26 Mark Ste
May 1, 2021, 20:26 Mark Stephen Mrotek
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ahanu,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Where is the “Fine”?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>>>
>>> From: lilypond-user
>>> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Ahanu Banerjee
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2021 3:29 PM
>>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>>> Subject: repeat barline aft
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=
>> ca.rr....@gnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Ahanu Banerjee
>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 1, 2021 3:29 PM
>> *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> *Subject:* repeat barline after fine double-barline
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As
”?
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> *From:* lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=
> ca.rr@gnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Ahanu Banerjee
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 1, 2021 3:29 PM
> *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Subject:* repeat barline after fine double-barline
>
Ahanu,
Where is the “Fine”?
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Ahanu Banerjee
Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2021 3:29 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: repeat barline after fine double-barline
Hi,
As per the subject
Hi,
As per the subject line, I am trying to get a "repeat" (".|:") barline
after a "Fine", which has a bold double-barline ("|.") at the end of a line.
The closest I have found in documentation is ".|:-||", which yields "||",
not &qu
Hi Harm,
Le lun. 29 juin 2020 à 09:59, Thomas Morley a
écrit :
> Hi Pierre,
>
> I've now approved it as
> lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1116
> with some slight changes.
>
> I deleted another instance of \hideNotes and changed
> \once\override Staff.Clef.space-alist =
>
Am So., 28. Juni 2020 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider
:
>
> Hi Harm,
>
> Le sam. 27 juin 2020 à 10:39, Thomas Morley a
> écrit :
> ...
>>
>> Some Remarks:
>> (a) Your override
>> \once\override Staff.TimeSignature.space-alist =
>> #'((first-note . (fixed-space . 0)))
>> will
Hi Harm,
Le sam. 27 juin 2020 à 10:39, Thomas Morley a
écrit :
...
> Some Remarks:
> (a) Your override
> \once\override Staff.TimeSignature.space-alist =
> #'((first-note . (fixed-space . 0)))
> will replace the default space-alist with your setting, i.e. the other
> default settings
Am Fr., 26. Juni 2020 um 12:06 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider
:
>
> Hi Harm,
> Thank you for your suggestion. Definitly better.
> Ultimately, I've created a new snippet:
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1116
> If you're ok with it, I'll delete snippet #1110
> Cheers,
> Pierre
Hi Pierre,
Hi Harm,
Thank you for your suggestion. Definitly better.
Ultimately, I've created a new snippet:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1116
If you're ok with it, I'll delete snippet #1110
Cheers,
Pierre
Le jeu. 25 juin 2020 à 22:21, Thomas Morley a
écrit :
> Am Do., 25. Juni 2020 um 10:55 Uhr
Am Do., 25. Juni 2020 um 10:55 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider
:
>
> Hi Harm,
>
> Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 23:26, Thomas Morley a
> écrit :
>>
>> To the author of said snippet.
>> lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1110
>>
>> I will not approve it in it's current state.
>
>
> Ok.
>
>> This sounds
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 23:26, Thomas Morley a
écrit :
...
> Please check whether there's an issue about it already, if not report
> it on the bug-list.
>
Done:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Clef-change-and-repeat-sign-td234226.html
Cheers,
Pierre
Hi Harm,
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 23:26, Thomas Morley a
écrit :
> To the author of said snippet.
> lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1110
>
> I will not approve it in it's current state.
>
Ok.
This sounds like default LilyPond being wrong in this regard. If so,
> it's a bug, needed to be reported,
clef changes after a repeat barline!"
This sounds like default LilyPond being wrong in this regard. If so,
it's a bug, needed to be reported, probably discussed and finally
fixed.
Please check whether there's an issue about it already, if not report
it on the bug-list.
Tbh, I don't thin
Thank you both. Silly me, didn't read the fine print.
Sorry to bother you!
Brent.
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020, 8:20 pm Noeck, wrote:
> This is a longstanding issue. You need to add invisible grace notes in
> the other staves:
>
>
>
This is a longstanding issue. You need to add invisible grace notes in
the other staves:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns.html#Known-issues-and-warnings-58
Joram
lta 2 {" ) the doubled repeat bars will
disappear.
> 7 apr. 2020 kl. 12:03 skrev Brent Annable :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm typesetting a multi-staff score, and whenever one part begins with grace
> notes immediately following a repeat barline, an extra barline is placed
> afte
Hi all,
I'm typesetting a multi-staff score, and whenever one part begins with
grace notes immediately following a repeat barline, an extra barline is
placed after the grace notes, between them and the note to which they are
attached. It doesn't matter whether I use volta repeats or just insert
> single barline instead. You can see that in the two attached images.
>
> If I manually use \bar "||" before the time signature the repeat barline is
> removed, so that is obviously not a viable approach. I think I'd rather have
> to override some properties of the barline but don
Hi Harm and Jan-Peter
happy new year from me as well.
Am 02.01.2018 um 11:27 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Happy new year Harm!
That is reasonable and descriptive and RTFM shall be be a New Year's
resolution ;-)
Of course that's embarrassing.
Actually I *did* look at that page, but only at the
2018-01-02 11:27 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt :
> Happy new year Harm!
> That is reasonable and descriptive and RTFM shall be be a New Year's
> resolution ;-)
:)
Happy New Year!
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Happy new year Harm!
That is reasonable and descriptive and RTFM shall be be a New Year's
resolution ;-)
Best
Jan-Peter
Am 02.01.2018 um 11:21 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2018-01-02 11:07 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt :
... you don't need to define this one. Just use the predefined:
2018-01-02 11:07 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt :
> ... you don't need to define this one. Just use the predefined:
> \bar ".|:-||"
Sometimes the docs are not that bad...
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/bars
>
> The order is "-" ... that is sometimes
> puzzeling
t
line, but LilyPond prints a single barline instead. You can see that
in the two attached images.
If I manually use \bar "||" before the time signature the repeat
barline is removed, so that is obviously not a viable approach. I
think I'd rather have to override some properties
ture at the end of the first
line, but LilyPond prints a single barline instead. You can see that in
the two attached images.
If I manually use \bar "||" before the time signature the repeat barline
is removed, so that is obviously not a viable approach. I think I'd
rather have to overr
and consistent with what Gould says I want to print a
double barline before the new time signature at the end of the first
line, but LilyPond prints a single barline instead. You can see that in
the two attached images.
If I manually use \bar "||" before the time signature the repe
2017-09-03 21:20 GMT+02:00 Caagr98 :
> For the record, how exactly does that space-alist override work?
>
> On 09/03/17 21:08, Thomas Morley wrote:
>>\once \override Staff.KeySignature.space-alist.first-note =
>> #'(fixed-space . 0)
Well, the property
?
On 09/03/17 21:08, Thomas Morley wrote:
2017-09-03 20:48 GMT+02:00 <caag...@gmail.com>:
Most obvious approaches would result in the key change being inside the
repeat barline, which doesn't feel right. See attached pic if you don't know
what I'm talking about.
Cheating:
{
2017-09-03 20:48 GMT+02:00 <caag...@gmail.com>:
> Most obvious approaches would result in the key change being inside the
> repeat barline, which doesn't feel right. See attached pic if you don't know
> what I'm talking about.
Cheating:
{
r2. g4->
Hi Malte,
Brilliant. Thanks. Useful to know where the dots actually come from.
Andrew
On 26 March 2017 at 18:19, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
> These dots come from the music font, so try
>
> \override Staff.Barline.font-size = 6
>
> (negative values for smaller than
Am 26.03.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> When using a smaller staff size than the default, how do you make the
> double dots in a repeat barline smaller also?
These dots come from the music font, so try
\override Staff.Barline.font-size = 6
(negative values for smalle
When using a smaller staff size than the default, how do you make the
double dots in a repeat barline smaller also?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2014-03-01 0:49 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
HTH,
Harm my friend this is just perfect !
Cheers,
~Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 01.03.2014 10:45, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
2014-03-01 0:49 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
HTH,
Harm my friend this is just perfect !
Hi Harm,
would you mind to share your solution with us? ;-)
Marc
Cheers,
~Pierre
2014-03-01 11:13 GMT+01:00 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de:
Hi Harm,
would you mind to share your solution with us? ;-)
Marc
Hi Marc,
I could verify that I've sent my reply to Pierre, Shane _and_ the list!
Though, I can't find it in any archive.
Strange!
Anyway, here again. Hope it works now.
Am 01.03.2014 14:01, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2014-03-01 11:13 GMT+01:00 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de:
Hi Harm,
would you mind to share your solution with us? ;-)
Marc
Hi Marc,
I could verify that I've sent my reply to Pierre, Shane _and_ the list!
Though, I can't find it in any archive.
this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Ancient-tablature-repeat-barline-tp159966.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
.nabble.com/file/n159966/GaillardeMorlaye.png
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Ancient-tablature-repeat-barline-tp159966.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing
2014-02-28 21:34 GMT+01:00 Shane Brandes sh...@grayskies.net:
Pierre,
Why are you trying to reproduce the bad copy of the facsimile? The
facsimile shows a completely different construction that looks more
like this :|.|: where the middle dot is in the center staff space.
Humm... answer is:
2014-02-28 21:34 GMT+01:00 Shane Brandes sh...@grayskies.net:
The facsimile shows a completely different construction that looks more
like this :|.|: where the middle dot is in the center staff space.
To Shane :
\version 2.18.0
gittern = \stringTuning d g b e'
\defineBarLine :||: #'( | :)
Hello all,
I have a problem with a repeat barline in a StaffGroup and a PianoStaff.
It looks more or less like this:
|:
|:
|:
So there is this double dot also between the staves.
It only happens two times in my score but I have no idea why.
In the attachment I extracted the horns
Quoting Tao Cumplido [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all,
I have a problem with a repeat barline in a StaffGroup and a PianoStaff.
It looks more or less like this:
|:
|:
|:
So there is this double dot also between the staves.
It only happens two times in my score but I have no idea why
This feature is documented in the section on Bar lines in the manual.
I just added the following information at the end of the section on
Repeat syntax:
If you want to start a repeat at the beginning of a line and have a
double bar at the end of
hello,
in the following code the first repeat bar line of the second last repeat block
is missing.
I don't think I made a mistake, but I thought I'd ask here first before I
report it to the bug-list.
If one of you is sure that it is a bug, could he/she please forward it to the
bug-list for me
in the following code the first repeat bar line of the second last repeat
block is missing.
I don't think I made a mistake, but I thought I'd ask here first before I
report it to the bug-list.
If one of you is sure that it is a bug, could he/she please forward it to the
bug-list for me
PROTECTED]
CC: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: missing repeat barline
in the following code the first repeat bar line of the second last
repeat block is missing.
I don't think I made a mistake, but I thought I'd ask here first before
I report it to the bug-list.
If one of you is sure
Tao Cumplido wrote:
yes, I tried that but the double-barline needs to be there and when I remove it
the second ending bracket is closed which shouldn't be.
Replace || with ||:
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hello list, hello Edward,
You wrote:
On Wednesday April 14 2004 12:21, Roland Goretzki wrote:
The problem remains. :-(
Sounds like the bar line between the piano staves doesn't draw in measures
starting with a bar line that starts a measure unless it is drawing the
barline as the end
Hi,
lilypond-version is 2.2.0.
If there are two areas of repeats in a piano-piece directly one after
another, lilypond creates automatically a correct double-repeat-barline
(:|:).
Unfortunately, in one piece this double-repeat-barline appears at page
break, and what happens, is the following
Hello list,
I wrote:
Unfortunately, in one piece this double-repeat-barline appears at page
break, and what happens, is the following:
Excuse me, it's not the page break, which causes the broken barline, but
the line break. (Tested with interscoreline = -5.0 \mm in the paper
block
Hi,
I was wondering, when copying old music, I found out that
it was a bit untasteful and complicated to convert all the
repeats to modern system. Composers didn't bother with
alternate endings, they just used to cut measures where it
suited them best.
I haven't figured out a way
55 matches
Mail list logo