Now for me as a longtime Director developer this sounds worrisome
Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel support
include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic, Fireworks and
Contribute.
Is it just me, or is there something missing? Getting real nervous...
Bart
Am 02.06.2006 um 11:48 schrieb Bart Pietercil:
Now for me as a longtime Director developer this sounds worrisome
Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel
support include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic,
Fireworks and Contribute.
Is it just me, or is there
I stand corrected :-)
http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/31/adobe/index.php?lsrc=mwrss
It's always a good practice to include a link to the source of a
citation.
we don't know, wher ethe statement comes from and in which context
it is to be put.
I don't think seeing the context will
Am 02.06.2006 um 13:12 schrieb Bart Pietercil:
I stand corrected :-)
http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/31/adobe/index.php?lsrc=mwrss
which reveals, that this is news from Feb. 1.
http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/02/01/adobeplans/index.php
anyway, the absence of any official adobe
At 11:48 AM +0200 6/2/06, Bart Pietercil wrote:
Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel support
include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic, Fireworks and
Contribute.
Is it just me, or is there something missing? Getting real nervous...
I highly recommend
On 02 Jun 2006, at 15:36, Cole Tierney wrote:
At 11:48 AM +0200 6/2/06, Bart Pietercil wrote:
Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel
support include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic,
Fireworks and Contribute.
Is it just me, or is there something missing?
Am 02.06.2006 um 17:28 schrieb Bart Pietercil:
I'm off, back to improving my java skills
looks like being the best thing to do right now
---
|||
a¿ex
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi
