Well, If this goes the way I think it's going (SCO going down in flames),
their Lawyer that a certain august member of this list has been confused
with, is going to have the worlds largest resume stain.
|-+
| | Dean Kent|
| |
We are running in an LPAR in production. Actually soon to be TWO LPARS. You
are not alone. We have a few unique issues running in LPAR mode.
|-+
| | David Boyes |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | e.net
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 07:31:57AM -0500, James Melin wrote:
Well, If this goes the way I think it's going (SCO going down in flames),
their Lawyer that a certain august member of this list has been confused
with, is going to have the worlds largest resume stain.
Doubtful. He's had a bigger
The Midwest VM Regional User Group will be holding their fall meeting in
Cincinnati, Ohio on October 24. We've got a good slate of speakers and
topics lined up on Friday, and an opportunity for you to have a fun dinner
with your peers on Thursday night if you can make it.
Come join us for a
A few weeks ago there were some questions about the card format - and
I didn't want to reply from memory. But as a result of a successful
archeological expedition I now have before me a FORTRAN STATEMENT 80
column card (often called an IBM card although this specimen is from
EAC - I think that
Crossposted to IBM-MAIN, VSE-L, VMESA-L, LINUX-390
I'm writing an article on Running A Lean IT Organization, describing how
data centers work efficiently (using appropriate resources, eliminating
waste) and effectively (doing the right things).
This is for a newsletter on IT cost management
The card has columns 1-5 ruled off for Statement Number, with a C
above column 1 For Comment. Then col 6 is Continuation. Cols 7-72 are
for the statement, and 73-80 for Identification.
[sigh]
Oh for non-proportional fonts again.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44 7785
HUMOR MODE=SARCASM INTENSITY=TOOTHACHE
The zSeries+z/VM+Linux solution allows you to outsource 90% (or
more) of the SysAdmins to India (along with the programmers);
Only the ButtonMonkeys will need to be local.
/HUMOR
I really *REALLY* wish there was NO truth to the above.
Ron wrote:
Have you found any improvement ticking the clock in
LPAR,
and if there is a difference? Is that because of LPAR
or
because of other things (e.g. number of virtual CPUs
or whatever)?
I have seen the improvement under VM with the clocking
stopped. I don't anyone here who has looked at
Hello from Gregg C Levine
This issue has me some what confused. I know from my own experience
regarding Linux, and Intel based systems that the clock configuration
is one of the strangest, and can cause confusion, among staff members,
and even customers. How does Linux observe the behavior of the
Jim wrote:
We are running in an LPAR in production. Actually
soon to be TWO LPARS.
You
are not alone. We have a few unique issues running in
LPAR mode.
So I'm not going completely mad, after all! ;-)
=
Jim Sibley
Implementor of Linux on zSeries in the beautiful Silicon Valley
Computer are
Hi,
Has anyone on the list tried Levanta? If so, what do you think of it?
thanks
Gene
John wrote:
HUMOR MODE=SARCASM INTENSITY=TOOTHACHE
The zSeries+z/VM+Linux solution allows you to
outsource 90% (or
more) of the SysAdmins to India (along with
the programmers);
Only the ButtonMonkeys will need to be local.
/HUMOR
The very large blue company I work for is
I have created copies of my original system, and mounted them in approriate
relative positions under /mnt (/mnt/var /mnt/usr, etc).
This makes my 'new IPL device' address b213 - which is mounted as dasdg1
in /mnt/boot I have the original parm file. Yast, of course moved my swap
device to
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 12:43, Jim Sibley wrote:
I have seen the improvement under VM with the clocking
stopped. I don't anyone here who has looked at the
LPAR case with the clocking stopped; its always been
on and no-one has complained, even the performance
people who buts large loads on the
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:30, James Melin wrote:
I have created copies of my original system, and mounted them in approriate
relative positions under /mnt (/mnt/var /mnt/usr, etc).
This makes my 'new IPL device' address b213 - which is mounted as dasdg1
in /mnt/boot I have the original parm
So what do I do in a situation like this then? Sounds like a catch-22. The
dasd in question is not bootable as is. I need to make it bootable using
zipl, and I don't want to have to boot an installl/recovery disk to do
these things because I'm rather trying to keep the DR recovery of Linux out
of
Jim Sibley wrote:
2) Some of my users do want to boot under VM and in
LPAR to compare performance.
It's your party so you can do what you feel right. If
I were to do serious comparison between Linux in LPAR
and in a virtual machine, I would at least use the
things we have to exploit z/VM
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:50, James Melin wrote:
So what do I do in a situation like this then? Sounds like a catch-22. The
dasd in question is not bootable as is. I need to make it bootable using
zipl, and I don't want to have to boot an installl/recovery disk to do
these things because I'm
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:57, Little, Chris wrote:
assuming the entire directory structure is under /mnt (including /boot)
chroot /mnt
zipl
Or, yeah, that would be a lot easier.
Adam
We're using Levanta. Started with version 1 and are now using version 2.
Currently have a few production Version 1 instances. In 3 weeks we have
some mission-critical Linux instances going into production using Levanta.
Version 2 is based on VM-level minidisk sharing (instead of NFS as used in
We have had Levanta Rel. 1 in on a trial. It's pretty impressive, although it had a
few shortcomings, especially in the user interface. It would have been good for a few
dozen small servers, but I wouldn't have wanted to use it for hundreds of servers or
large Oracle databases.
We're getting
Hmm - I am working with a customer who is looking to create server
instances on the fly based on some off platform criteria. Is there a good
Programmable interface to this stuff? Would it be worth the money? Would
I be better off just using REXX execs and service machines?
Frank J. De Gilio
Much depends on the nature of your instances and how many you have. See
http://www.linuxcare.com
or give Brad Schwarz a call at 415-354-4535
God is a comedian playing to an audience afraid to laugh. - Voltaire
Gordon Wolfe, Ph. D. (425)865-5940
VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company
It would depend on how similar the individual instances were. At least with
version 1, you created templates for a class of systems, and then could
easily instantiate the template. If every server is different, or the
configurations can't be grouped into major classes with individual tweaks,
it
Hi,
I tried to put IBM JVM 1.4.1 for 390x with my application server (JBoss), but It is
showing an error with my SSL (HTTPS). When I use IBM JVM 1.3.1 for 390, SSL works well. I
discover that I need an ibmjsse.jar packet.
Where can I download ibmjsse.jar ?
thanks in advanced,
I tried to put IBM JVM 1.4.1 for 390x with my application server
(JBoss), but It is showing an error with my SSL (HTTPS). When I use
IBM JVM 1.3.1 for 390, SSL works well. I discover that I need an
ibmjsse.jar packet
Where can I download ibmjsse.jar ?
There is no formal support for IBM JDKs
We're trialing it. We've recommended to the powers that be here that we
purchase it. Now, Brad's just got get them to sign - the delays being
mostly the organizational transitions going between mainframe and
distributed groups than any thing else.
We started with the 1.0 trial - did that in
28 matches
Mail list logo
