Thanks for responding. Here is what I get:
linuxd01:/etc/sysconfig/network # lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
qdio 37040 0
8021q 15256 0 (unused)
nfsd 80392 4 (autoclean)
ipv6 329288 -1 (autoc
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 5:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dynamic I/O Configuration and removing eth1
> I assume this is cause by eth1 still being defined
We are running SuSE Linux SLES8 SP03 on a native LPAR. I shutdown network
interface eth1 which was an OSA configured in TCP/IP passthru. I did an I/O
configuration under HCD and redefined the OSA as QDIO. I have the following
questions.
I dynamically activated the new I/O configuration under z/OS
I'm having some minor issues with VDISK Swap space on Redhat AS 3
(Taroon Update 2) and the dasd_diag_mod driver. It's 31bit mode, so that
should work (from what I understand). I'm using SWAPGEN (V5) for format
the VDISK swap space prior to Linux IPL, that's working fine. However
when RHAS detects
Tom Shilson wrote:
Is there a trick to getting tcpdump to work on zLinux? I can't make it do
what I want. Tcpdump on MP-RAS (NCR's *nix) is much better behaved. I am
using RedHat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.21. I also tried installing the latest
libpcap and tcpdump but no change.
Yep, SuSE had some patc
What kind of network interface do you have? Some (like QETH) do not have
a raw or promiscuous mode, and thus can't do much to capture things that
aren't addressed to them.
> Is there a trick to getting tcpdump to work on zLinux? I
> can't make it do
> what I want. Tcpdump on MP-RAS (NCR's *nix)
Is there a trick to getting tcpdump to work on zLinux? I can't make it do
what I want. Tcpdump on MP-RAS (NCR's *nix) is much better behaved. I am
using RedHat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.21. I also tried installing the latest
libpcap and tcpdump but no change.
Thanks,
_/) Tom Shils
> Guessing (WAG mode): Could this memory growth be caused by maintaining
> symlink context?
>
> It strikes me that if there are a lot of symlinks that there'd need to
be
> kept a list of where they're pointing so that it could ensure
resolution.
>
> Since I've *NO* knowledge of the internals of T
> > But, that said, no, that's not unusual. The TSM client is a pig for
> > resources.
It'd sure be nice if Tivoli would open-source the TSM client API
libraries...
-- db
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access in
Guessing (WAG mode): Could this memory growth be caused by maintaining
symlink context?
It strikes me that if there are a lot of symlinks that there'd need to be
kept a list of where they're pointing so that it could ensure resolution.
Since I've *NO* knowledge of the internals of TSM (I have eno
> I've seen that behavior on a system with a lot of open files (it keeps
a
> context entry to go back and check later in the run to see if the file
> is closed and available), but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
Is
> this the first backup of that filesystem on this server? Sometimes the
> fi
> For those that are using the Tivoli client for file-level backups on
> linux s/390, can anyone comment on their own experiences with Tivoli
> client resource requirements? We've recently started backing up a new
> file-server. As it was hitting its 430,000th file processed, top was
> reporting
For those that are using the Tivoli client for file-level backups on
linux s/390, can anyone comment on their own experiences with Tivoli
client resource requirements? We've recently started backing up a new
file-server. As it was hitting its 430,000th file processed, top was
reporting memory usa
First, any salesman with a rule of thumb like 10:1 scares the
everything out of me Your 1GB of storage will at most support
an 800MB virtual machine. YOU CAN NOT OVERCOMMIT STORAGE if you
only run one virtual machine. You can ONLY make the virtual
machine small enough so that it fits in the VM
What do I need to add/change in the gdm config file to enable this?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/19/04 08:53AM >>>
On Iau, 2004-08-19 at 13:49, Richard Pinion wrote:
> I login as root and type in gdm and the same for xdm. gdm comes up but I can't get
> a session using Labtam's Xserver Windows softwa
On Iau, 2004-08-19 at 13:49, Richard Pinion wrote:
> I login as root and type in gdm and the same for xdm. gdm comes up but I can't get
> a session using Labtam's Xserver Windows software.
gdm defaults to local access only. Either gdmconfig or fiddling with the
config file by hand can be used to
Hi Doug,
you should consider using ficon attached storage on the z800 for database
workload. In addition, consider using LVM striping over multiple volumes
or
alternatively LVM multipath on parallel access volumes to get your IO
thoughput up to a reasonable level.
With regard to memory size, you d
Hi list,
problem solved:
--
/etc/inittab - Just uncomment definition for s1:
# Local serial lines:
s1:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -L ttyS0 9600 vt100
#s2:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -L ttyS1 9600 vt100
--
/e
I login as root and type in gdm and the same for xdm. gdm comes up but I can't get a
session using Labtam's Xserver Windows software.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/19/04 08:45AM >>>
Richard,
How is gdm being started? And what userid is starting it?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Li
Richard,
How is gdm being started? And what userid is starting it?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Pinion
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slack/390
I can get gdm to come up bu
Tobias,
As Daniel has already told you, /etc/inittab controls this. I ship an
inittab that has a bash shell running on the VM console. I would recommend
that you look at bootshell in the /extra directory. This is a simple tool
written by Mike Kershaw of Marist College that "sits" on the console
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/19 1:53 >>>
>Thanks for all the great info. and suggestions. I have another
question
>regarding memory and vm. One of the sales reps was saying that
memory
>on the z/Series under z/vm had a 10 to 1 ratio over memory on intel,
>meaning if we had a intel box using 10 gig
Thanks for all the great info. and suggestions. I have another question
regarding memory and vm. One of the sales reps was saying that memory
on the z/Series under z/vm had a 10 to 1 ratio over memory on intel,
meaning if we had a intel box using 10 gig of ram that we would only
require 1 gig of
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web pag
24 matches
Mail list logo